Printable View
[QUOTE=JomBoy123;7316767]Any feedback on Murderdeath or Nianskye? I'm pretty sure the first has been around but a different name. Feel free to PM and I can trade info on other cuddlers.[/QUOTE]I sent a note. Really nice and really platonic to Murder. She responded really well and I thought we were moving to the next level of communication. Come back the next day and find out she blocked me. Sad I really wanted to lie down with her and get some good cuddles in.
[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;7326980]I sent a note. Really nice and really platonic to Murder. She responded really well and I thought we were moving to the next level of communication. Come back the next day and find out she blocked me. Sad I really wanted to lie down with her and get some good cuddles in.[/QUOTE]That sucks, but I guess it may have saved some money for you. Would you mind sharing what you said? I'm just curious at what level of inquiry would they decide to block someone. Also, did you send her your photo (or do you have one on your profile)? I wonder if that makes any difference.
Looking at this page: [URL]https://profiles.skyprivate.com/models/2jdvg-mira.html[/URL]
And her twitter: [URL]https://x.com/MissMurderDeath[/URL]
It seems like she's a cam-girl and not an actual in-person provider. It's hard to figure some of these people out, though.
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7327516]That sucks, but I guess it may have saved some money for you. Would you mind sharing what you said? I'm just curious at what level of inquiry would they decide to block someone. Also, did you send her your photo (or do you have one on your profile)? I wonder if that makes any difference.
Looking at this page: [URL]https://profiles.skyprivate.com/models/2jdvg-mira.html[/URL]
And her twitter: [URL]https://x.com/MissMurderDeath[/URL]
It seems like she's a cam-girl and not an actual in-person provider. It's hard to figure some of these people out, though.[/QUOTE]That is an spot-on assessment. After researching her I got the same vibe. I. e. A very erotic girl who really does not want in-person interaction unless it is platonic or unless you spend a LOT of platonic time on her before she feels comfortable enough to go further. My note to her was incredibly platonic. She responded in the positive telling me to give her times that work. I got busy and did not respond for about 2 days. When I went back in she had blocked me. So she either got a feeling about me wanting more. Or more likely she felt I was not showing her enough interest. Either way I have a life and cannot jump every time a girl asks me to. Haha. I would have loved to cream her pie hole though.
[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;7328472]That is an spot-on assessment. After researching her I got the same vibe. I. e. A very erotic girl who really does not want in-person interaction unless it is platonic or unless you spend a LOT of platonic time on her before she feels comfortable enough to go further. My note to her was incredibly platonic. She responded in the positive telling me to give her times that work. I got busy and did not respond for about 2 days. When I went back in she had blocked me. So she either got a feeling about me wanting more. Or more likely she felt I was not showing her enough interest. Either way I have a life and cannot jump every time a girl asks me to. Haha. I would have loved to cream her pie hole though.[/QUOTE]I found her profile on Fet (MistressMiraDom: [URL]https://fetlife.com/MistressMiraDom[/URL]) which has a link to her Tryst site. She charges EXORBITANT rates for not much in return:
[URL]https://tryst.link/bdsm/mistress-mira#rates[/URL]
For example:
- Sensual Cuddling $250 Hourly Rate. Includes clothed, non-sexual touch, intimate glances and flirtatious conversation.
- Nude Cuddling $300 Hourly Rate. No touching genitals.
- Nude Cuddling+ $400 Hourly Rate. External touching only.
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7343805]I found her profile on Fet (MistressMiraDom: [URL]https://fetlife.com/MistressMiraDom[/URL]) which has a link to her Tryst site. She charges EXORBITANT rates for not much in return:
[URL]https://tryst.link/bdsm/mistress-mira#rates[/URL]
For example:
- Sensual Cuddling $250 Hourly Rate. Includes clothed, non-sexual touch, intimate glances and flirtatious conversation.
- Nude Cuddling $300 Hourly Rate. No touching genitals.
- Nude Cuddling+ $400 Hourly Rate. External touching only.[/QUOTE]She looks good in the pics. Pity she does nothing like so many others.
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7343805]I found her profile on Fet (MistressMiraDom: [URL]https://fetlife.com/MistressMiraDom[/URL]) which has a link to her Tryst site. She charges EXORBITANT rates for not much in return:
[URL]https://tryst.link/bdsm/mistress-mira#rates[/URL]
For example:
- Sensual Cuddling $250 Hourly Rate. Includes clothed, non-sexual touch, intimate glances and flirtatious conversation.
- Nude Cuddling $300 Hourly Rate. No touching genitals.
- Nude Cuddling+ $400 Hourly Rate. External touching only.[/QUOTE]Didn't take long for her to get banned on CC.
[QUOTE=GinVermo;7343847]She looks good in the pics. Pity she does nothing like so many others.[/QUOTE]Eh she looks like a 300 hr girl. Not $850/ hour.
[QUOTE=Loopguystl;7325849][URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/yoursafespace[/URL][/QUOTE]I saw her. I'll not recommend.
She first gave me wrong address. Parking in Seattle is difficult. I paid for parking. Later she gave me right address. It was some sort of check. It was 10 minutes away drive from the first one. I found another paid parking.
She does not look like picture. She goes to gym.
I like girls going to gym. But her physique is more like power lifter. Some big tummy and big shoulders. I hope you understand what mean.
She asked for extra money. I was really pissed off. I even did not cuddle and gave the half price cuddle donation.
I think she is now banned too.
Has anyone met SitaRosee on CuddleComfort? She has lots of reviews.
[QUOTE=Donato21;7391184]Has anyone met SitaRosee on CuddleComfort? She has lots of reviews.[/QUOTE]Saw her a year or so ago. Meh. Nice place. Slightly chubby body. She thinks she works out and thus look hot. Huge upsell for a nude cuddle.
I did not and will not repeat.
I met a few cuddlers recently, mixed bag of results.
Snugglebuggy23 cuddlecompanions.
She is sweet and nice and fun. Plenty of extras available for a fee. She gets very wet and soaks the sheets. CFS. Insatiable nympho.
Zondrabright cuddlecompanions.
She's smart and nice, photos are accurate. Not a looker but is wide open. Cuddle quickly turned in to an hourlong fuckfest. BBBJ, DT, fiv, BBFS, bb Greek, CIP.
Indicaprinc3 ss cuddlecomfort.
Basically an escort, sweet, she was pretty high when she invited me over to her studio in Belltown. Deep BBBJ and loves to gag and drool, BBFS, cip.
Littlebear82 cuddlecomfort.
I had heard from other mongers that she can be YMMV for extras. I got no mileage on my visit other than a topless cuddle with nothing else. Can't win them all haha.
I'd LOVE intel on other cuddlers who are YMMV for extras and want to get their own pleasure out of a cuddle. In particular, I'd be interested in:
Luxury33.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/luxury33[/URL]
VixxieSnuggle13.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/VixxieSnuggle16[/URL]
[QUOTE=DrTraveler;7393422]
Indicaprinc3 ss cuddlecomfort.
Basically an escort, sweet, she was pretty high when she invited me over to her studio in Belltown. Deep BBBJ and loves to gag and drool, BBFS, cip.
[/QUOTE]She's on seeking solo and with a duo partner. Think I saw her on STG once. Others have reported similar service in the non-pro and bb threads. Some said she had kind of a weird body, looks that way in her seeking pics.
https://members.seeking.com/member/927d2f52-3305-4ac0-8206-dacf1ed5d1a3
All her pics are kinda inviting. But the text says otherwise.
[QUOTE=Loopguystl;7393684]All her pics are kinda inviting. But the text says otherwise.[/QUOTE]Sending PM.
Public consumption: IMHO very low potential for extras, but always YMMV.
[QUOTE=Loopguystl;7393684]All her pics are kinda inviting. But the text says otherwise.[/QUOTE]Agree: pics for [B]cuddlebuggy444[/B] are inviting. Part of her profile implies extras, and part of it says that it's platonic only.
What's with that third pic, kitchen drawers fully extended? Did she interrupt a burglary or home invasion?
[QUOTE=WillShookup;7394929]Sending PM.
Public consumption: IMHO very low potential for extras, but always YMMV.[/QUOTE]
Wondering if anyone has experience with cakecat_cuddles on cuddle comfort? She sounds like a good time, but also specifically says she provides platonic cuddles. I often wonder if that's partially to appease the site management. I mean, she has a split tongue!! Would love to see it in action 😊.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/cakecat_cuddles[/URL]
Howdy, gentlemen. Long-time reader, first-time writer. I've spent years trolling the BBFS sub-forum to keep an eye out for anyone currently in my rotation, so I can kick them out when they get named. I'm certain that I'm Eskimo Bros with at least a hundred of you. Nice to finally meet you, haha!
I'm surely a selfish bastard on the BBFS front, but the "Cuddlers" sub-forum doesn't get enough love, and I thought I'd finally contribute something of modest value. I went on an absurd run in late '24 / early '25 and got more than my share of secret-squirrel pussy, but a lot of those girls got banned (or left the scene of their own volition), and we seem to be in the middle of a line change with respect to outgoing / incoming talent. So, now seems to be a good time to do an intel drop.
Below, an honest accounting of my experiences, both hits-and-misses. As anyone who plays the Cuddling Game knows, this is the quinessential "YMMV" adventure. Just because I got there doesn't mean a lay-up for you, and vice versa. But I'm no Adonis and I only shell out an upcharge if it is both unavoidable and reasonable, so my results should be broadly attainable by anyone who knows what they are doing (polished approach, well-developed "soft skills," etc.). Note that this list covers active girls on both boards (Cuddle Comfort is way more populous than Cuddle Companions, so all usernames are for the former unless I note otherwise) for both WA / or (I travel, and so do they), and -- with rare exception -- I only target the top quartile in attractiveness, so this is hardly all-encompassing.
Here we go, in no particular order:
[B]LittleBear82[/B]: She comes up often enough, so I'll start here. There have been a few reports of success with her, but I got the same thing most of you did, which was a topless cuddle and playing with her tits. Nice girl, clean incall, etc, so I didn't regret the experience. I suspect more is there with additional time spent, but she isn't quite my type, so that was that.
[B]SitaRosee[/B]: Cute, friendly, and that's about it. Gentle hints on her end that more was available with a repeat visit (and near-certain upsell); I didn't press it any further. If significant in-roads are not made on the first visit, that's usually the end of the line for me. Like LittleBear, she's popular enough, so I'm certain that quite a few of you are hitting that. Just not really my jam.
[B]Sammy478[/B]: LOL, this chick is a trip. I was eating her pussy about 90 seconds into our first "cuddle. " Great body (much cuter than pictures), fabulous in bed, and fun personality. But, just like most of these girls, she's flaky as hell and has the usual set of problems. Barebacked her for a couple of months before I finally got tired of her nonsense. She travels to Seattle frequently, so when you see her, hit her up and give it a run. I got lucky and saw her at "cuddle rates only," but she's grown wise to that, so expect to be upcharged and count blessings if you aren't.
[B]Kindnessleads[/B]: Her bio screams "Platonic Only," but I was curious, so I took the plunge. Really nice woman; quite attractive for a 50-year-old. I chatted her up quite a bit, and I think I got luckier than most here, as she laid on top of me in the straddle position about halfway through and grinded out an over-the-clothes orgasm while we made out. No upcharge, just an "in the moment" thing. I'd love to repeat, but she texted the next day with "I don't really do that and we shouldn't do it again," and then I got blocked. Girls are silly. Oh well. Fun while it lasted.
[B]KuddlerLiz[/B]: Ugh, I wish I had this one back. Did a lot of texting beforehand; really vibing well. Met her for drinks, clicked wonderfully in person, and thought this was a slam dunk. Then when we got to the cuddling, all she did is prattle on about her problems and all the therapy she's going through. I got uncharacteristically impatient with the chatter and made a move earlier than I knew I should, and was rebuffed. Got a bit awkward after that. She's heavy into the bratty-sub kink lifestyle, so I have no doubt she gets railed plenty through the cuddle site. Chalk up an "L" for me.
[B]Ivybabyy[/B]: If you want to fuck a cute, athletic girl who isn't old enough to legally drink, now's your chance! I saw her earlier this year when she was 19 (and bareback was clearly on the menu. Fucked her twice before she went dark for a while, and now she's back. Not even "YMMV" on this one -- she knows why she is on the board, and getting that pussy is almost a foregone conclusion, so it's really just about negotiating her upcharge (for the record, it was +$$ for me). Fun Fact: Her mother (MandyJo or something like that) travels from Idaho and "cuddles," too. Average looks at best for mom, but you'd better believe I fucked her anyway (no upcharge), and got the "Mother / Daughter" certificate of achievement.
[B]Raven88[/B]: Portland-based only (rarely travels up here). Attractive, athletic girl. She'll require a video call and clearly give you her menu. Upcharges for stuff up to her ceiling of what amounts to nude mutual masturbation, but no "fluid exchange," because -- and I quote -- she "doesn't sell sex. " LOL, of course you don't, honey. Anyway, I was bored / curious and went for it, and ended up eating her pussy as a bonus, but was stonewalled when I went for the grand finale. I wouldn't repeat. It was fun for what it was, but I certainly paid for indulging my curiosity.
[B]Saharapdx[/B]: She'll come up to Seattle every month or so. Fucked her on the first meeting (no upcharge; got lucky here); she insisted on the condom, which sucks, but whatever. It was okay-ish, I guess. I really only did it because I knew she was friends with Sammy478, and I wanted to rail both of them and let them both know I did it. Suffice it to say I'm not in their good graces, haha!
[B]HealingSiren[/B]: A rare dip into the lower quartiles of the attractiveness pool for me, but we vibed well via chat / text, so I made the haul to Olympia to see what's-what. She's partnered, poly, and into BDSM-type kink. Felt her up plenty, made out for a while, but nothing beyond that for a first visit. It was made clear to me that I could advance the ball down the field with a subsequent visit, but she's a bit rougher in person (versus photos) and while it was fun "in the moment," I was not at all motivated to go back.
[B]Rorasnuggles[/B]: It's a traaaaaap! Well, probably. You look at the bio (Cuddle Companions for this one) and the photos, and you'd think you'd have a shot. She knows exactly what she's doing here: Present as very flirty and suggestive, make you drive out to Fox Island (might as well be on Mars), and promptly get blue-balled. At least that was my experience, and that of a couple of other reliable sources I know. If one of you has that cutie bouncing on your cock, more power to you. I actually left my session early with her because I was just that bored.
[B]Indicaprinc3ss[/B]: Yes, yes, we've all fucked Spring. She's on "the other board," but I didn't know that at first. Went over, had some wine, went up to her little loft area and went at it. Bigger girl that I'd normally go after, but she seemed cool and I was 98% sure that I could spray my man chowder in there with reckless abandon, and so it was. No upcharge. Didn't repeat, though.
[B]SunshineKat[/B]: Finally, a Touring Girl. Lives in Austin, regularly visits Boston and Seattle, among other places. She claims to be a print model of some sort, and she definitely has the body for it. Tall, lithe, quirky, and hot in her own way. I got lucky here and got in her pants without the upcharge (incredibly full Bush down there; she grows it out like a chia pet), but when I tried to repeat, the line from her was that she "usually keeps it platonic" and I was quoted an astronomical upcharge for a repeat. No-go for yours truly -- it was fun, but not *that* fun. Moral of the story is that fun-and-games is on the table if you play your cards right, but what you do-or-don't pay is a moving target.
There you have it. If I haven't mentioned her, it's because (a) she doesn't meet my criteria, (b) I'm working on them right now, or (c) in the case of exactly two of them, I'm actively fucking them and not quite done. My username is spot-on, though, so it won't be long before I move on and I'll surely report back.
No DMs hitting me up with questions, please. Just post them here and I'll answer as best as I can. Good luck out there.
This one doesn't interest me at all as it looks like she is TRANSitioning and not my type anyways. And I may just be paranoid but if my assumption is correct, I would be really pissed if I had met her because her ad says she is a woman. They should be up front on if they have an adams apple and a prostrate. More power to them, they should let it be known.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/elysecuddler[/URL]
I messaged her. She told me she is trans. Not my cup of tea, but as you said more power to her and I am sure there are folks who'd like to book.
[QUOTE=BuckNaked123;7395597]This one doesn't interest me at all as it looks like she is TRANSitioning and not my type anyways. And I may just be paranoid but if my assumption is correct, I would be really pissed if I had met her because her ad says she is a woman. They should be up front on if they have an adams apple and a prostrate. More power to them, they should let it be known.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/elysecuddler[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BuckNaked123;7395597]This one doesn't interest me at all as it looks like she is TRANSitioning and not my type anyways. And I may just be paranoid but if my assumption is correct, I would be really pissed if I had met her because her ad says she is a woman. They should be up front on if they have an adams apple and a prostrate. More power to them, they should let it be known.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/elysecuddler[/URL][/QUOTE]Agree. Good for them for living their best life, yet it is in their best interests to disclose.
Put aside for a moment the question of whether a trans-woman -- in this very specific set of circumstances -- should feel obligated to disclose her sex / gender assigned at birth. This is about their safety. Like Buck here, I'd be pissed if I learned mid-cuddle (or mid-whatever), but the worst I would do is get up and leave. There are enough assholes out there who would be so enraged as to physically harm someone who they felt "misrepresented" themselves. No one wants that.
I forgot a cuddler on my earlier list. Ali Iris on Cuddle Companions is on "the other board. " Her older photos (you can see some on the GPS board) make her look a lot more feminine than she actually is in person. When I first met her, I honestly thought she was trans. Deep raspy voice, flat as a 2 x4, ripped as all hell. Once we got comfortable, I was relieved to discover that all was well south of the border. She has a biological child, so there's that. Giant clit, too. The steroids will do that to you, I guess. For a woman who wasn't really my type in the first place (and got worse upon arrival), I actually had a decent time with her. She's very nice and hosts in a safe place. If you are into her look, have at it.
Lots of cross-pollation of cuddlers into the escort space, past-and-present. I railed Firewatcher back when she was "Jenfire" and didn't upcharge for the fun-and-games. Glisten (from Unbound's crew) was there for a long time before getting the axe. LatinOwl was brought up last year; she spent a little time on the board. Probably 2-3 others I'm not thinking about at the moment.
Have you seen m3 rmaids? I've only gotten platonic over 3 sessions. Great cuddles but 0 hint at more. She seems too wholesome.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7395586]Howdy, gentlemen. Long-time reader, first-time writer. I've spent years trolling the BBFS sub-forum to keep an eye out for anyone currently in my rotation, so I can kick them out when they get named. I'm certain that I'm Eskimo Bros with at least a hundred of you. Nice to finally meet you, haha!
I'm surely a selfish bastard on the BBFS front, but the "Cuddlers" sub-forum doesn't get enough love, and I thought I'd finally contribute something of modest value. I went on an absurd run in late '24 / early '25 and got more than my share of secret-squirrel pussy, but a lot of those girls got banned (or left the scene of their own volition), and we seem to be in the middle of a line change with respect to outgoing / incoming talent. So, now seems to be a good time to do an intel drop.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MartinWa90;7395906]Have you seen m3 rmaids? I've only gotten platonic over 3 sessions. Great cuddles but 0 hint at more. She seems too wholesome.[/QUOTE]Negative. Her profile screams "Platonic Only" to me, so I never engaged. I do believe that there is no such thing as a "0% Probability" with any of these girls -- given the right situation, given the right guy, etc, etc, -- but that one has several red flags that tell me it's a long shot.
Also, as a matter of OPSEC, I never see a girl that requires a photo (I don't have one on my bio, either). I've been able to talk my way around that requirement in the past, but my experience is that if a photo is required, it is a strong (but not perfect) indicator that play-time is not on the table.
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7395506]Wondering if anyone has experience with cakecat_cuddles on cuddle comfort? She sounds like a good time, but also specifically says she provides platonic cuddles. I often wonder if that's partially to appease the site management. I mean, she has a split tongue!! Would love to see it in action 😊.
[URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/cakecat_cuddles[/URL][/QUOTE]She no longer offers FS. But she does bdsm.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7395586][B]Rorasnuggles[/B]: It's a traaaaaap! Well, probably. You look at the bio (Cuddle Companions for this one) and the photos, and you'd think you'd have a shot. She knows exactly what she's doing here: Present as very flirty and suggestive, make you drive out to Fox Island (might as well be on Mars), and promptly get blue-balled. At least that was my experience, and that of a couple of other reliable sources I know. If one of you has that cutie bouncing on your cock, more power to you. I actually left my session early with her because I was just that bored.
[/QUOTE]I really appreciate all the intel you shared here. Such a great summary of so many cuddlers. Especially RoraSnuggles. She's been on my radar for such a long time but I haven't had the opportunity to drive that far for an expensive cuddle, and now I'm glad I never did. Though part of me still thinks "maybe I would be the one to break through. " hahaha.
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7398722]I really appreciate all the intel you shared here. Such a great summary of so many cuddlers. Especially RoraSnuggles. She's been on my radar for such a long time but I haven't had the opportunity to drive that far for an expensive cuddle, and now I'm glad I never did. Though part of me still thinks "maybe I would be the one to break through. " hahaha.[/QUOTE]Haha -- yeah, I thought the same thing! I'm pretty sure she knows what she is doing, hence the Admiral Ackbar impression from yours truly.
That said, and to be fair, I've clicked in some way with every cuddler I've seen. Except her. The vibe was just "off" for some reason. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that someone is banging her on the regular -- I think all of them have at least one favorite that gets Ye Olde Special Treatment. And that's what we all want, right? There is no better pussy than "Exception-To-The-Rule Pussy."
Anyway, happy to make a meaningful contribution. I'm mildly surprised my phone hasn't blown up with some pissed-off cuddler quite yet. I was unflinchingly specific with the nature of my encounters.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7398823]I'm mildly surprised my phone hasn't blown up with some pissed-off cuddler quite yet. I was unflinchingly specific with the nature of my encounters.[/QUOTE]Yeah, MurderDeath tracked me down on fet and thanked me for getting her banned and losing half her income (BTW, she's still active on the other cuddle site and the other various links I shared). I would have been open to talk to her about it, but she seemed pretty upset so I ended up blocking her.
Part of me feels bad for her, but on the other hand, it was pretty easy to connect the dots. I don't think it was my fault. It's not like I reached out to a cuddle site and got her banned. I just posted some of her links here. I also didn't talk about any personal experience with her (which I didn't have since I never reached out to her and we never met).
[QUOTE=Efurufe;7398968]Yeah, MurderDeath tracked me down on fet and thanked me for getting her banned and losing half her income (BTW, she's still active on the other cuddle site and the other various links I shared). I would have been open to talk to her about it, but she seemed pretty upset so I ended up blocking her.
Part of me feels bad for her, but on the other hand, it was pretty easy to connect the dots. I don't think it was my fault. It's not like I reached out to a cuddle site and got her banned. I just posted some of her links here. I also didn't talk about any personal experience with her (which I didn't have since I never reached out to her and we never met).[/QUOTE]I am happy to clear your conscience, my friend, and I'll do it right out here in the open.
I guarantee that you didn't get her banned -- because I did.
I won't get into the full details of my interactions with her and the "why" of it all. Suffice it to say that I found her to be an haughty hypocrite, so when she jumped on Tryst, I didn't hesitate to out her to the forum admin as a net consequence for her unwarranted discourtesy toward me. The ban hammer was swift and merciless, and I chuckled with satisfaction when I saw the post come up here less than 24 hours later to confirm the same.
I don't care how these women make their money. I really don't. Live and let live. Except the rude. They get what is coming to them.
I tried seeing MandyMoon at least four times over a few years and she is an incredible flake. I broke all the rules because I thought she was hot and she talked a big game. She sent me sexy photos, one was a dildo in her ass that totally turned me on and I had to see her. I sent her money a few times for the pictures, I even rented a hotel room as she promised she was on her way. As I am sitting in the room, she texted she needed gas money to get there. I had to send it as I was so invested already. After I sent it, I wait and wait and I wait. I text her asking where she was and if she was close, she texted back and said "Jack in the Box" and that was it. The gall of that had me laughing but fuck, I was out $130 in hotel plus the $20 for gas. All in, I wasted over $200 on her and got nothing but headaches.
[URL]https://cuddlecompanions.org/cuddler/mandymoon/[/URL]
[QUOTE=BuckNaked123;7399548]I text her asking where she was and if she was close, she texted back and said "Jack in the Box" and that was it. The gall of that had me laughing but fuck, I was out $130 in hotel plus the $20 for gas. All in, I wasted over $200 on her and got nothing but headaches.
[URL]https://cuddlecompanions.org/cuddler/mandymoon/[/URL][/QUOTE]That's funny as hell. (I'm laughing with you, not at you.) Unlucky with that one. I agree that, prima facie, she seems like she'd be down for a good time.
Or a cheeseburger. One of the two.
Cuddle Companions is hard work, what with the mandatory deposit before you can exchange numbers. There's certainly no incentive for the girl to ghost post-deposit, since it is the website that gets it, not her. I've actually had pretty good luck there (3-for-4), but the girls that fit my criteria are so few in number that it took years to get to that specific count.
Off-topic, I have my own white whale that pops up on STG every so often. I've tried to see her six times. She has ghosted me in the parking lot of her hotel six times. I don't know why I keep pursuing her, other than (a) I'm really into her specific look, and (b) it's a personal challenge and I want to plant my flag.
All that to say, I totally get making exception-after-exception for someone you just really fucking want to fuck.
Thanks BoredTooEasily for all this great intel, I have seen several of these ladies and had some very similar experiences.
LittleBear. Seen her a few times. Cute and very sweet girl. She has gained a few pounds since her photos were taken. She wears fairly seductive looking clothes, shorts with no panties. But I never pushed boundaries with her as I liked her too much as a person. She talked about the guys who try for more and I valued her opinion too much to be one of those guys. Great cuddler though.
SitaRosee. Seen her once. She was cute, loves her marijuana as it was like a Cheech and Chong movie when I walked in the door. She cute and was wearing a sexy nightie, cuddled well, but I never got a green light. I won't see her again.
Indicaprinc3 ss. Saw this one once. She is fairly cute, a little bigger than the pictures. She is a fun girl who also loves her marijuana. After going at it for quite sometime, she passed out when we took a break. Like really snoring. I waited it out for awhile and woke her up to finish. She is cool, great attitude but I only saw her once.
Sammy478. I saw this one and she is hotter than her pictures. Incredible body, pretty cool attitude until it comes time to talk money. She up-charges at least for me. But was a good fuck and finished with a load deep inside her. She is a flake though and was in a cheap hotel on Aurora when I saw her. I won't see her again.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7395586]
[B]LittleBear82[/B]: She comes up often enough, so I'll start here. There have been a few reports of success with her, but I got the same thing most of you did, which was a topless cuddle and playing with her tits. Nice girl, clean incall, etc, so I didn't regret the experience. I suspect more is there with additional time spent, but she isn't quite my type, so that was that.
[B]SitaRosee[/B]: Cute, friendly, and that's about it. Gentle hints on her end that more was available with a repeat visit (and near-certain upsell); I didn't press it any further. If significant in-roads are not made on the first visit, that's usually the end of the line for me. Like LittleBear, she's popular enough, so I'm certain that quite a few of you are hitting that. Just not really my jam.
[B]Sammy478[/B]: LOL, this chick is a trip. I was eating her pussy about 90 seconds into our first "cuddle. " Great body (much cuter than pictures), fabulous in bed, and fun personality. But, just like most of these girls, she's flaky as hell and has the usual set of problems. Barebacked her for a couple of months before I finally got tired of her nonsense. She travels to Seattle frequently, so when you see her, hit her up and give it a run. I got lucky and saw her at "cuddle rates only," but she's grown wise to that, so expect to be upcharged and count blessings if you aren't.
[B]Kindnessleads[/B]: Her bio screams "Platonic Only," but I was curious, so I took the plunge. Really nice woman; quite attractive for a 50-year-old. I chatted her up quite a bit, and I think I got luckier than most here, as she laid on top of me in the straddle position about halfway through and grinded out an over-the-clothes orgasm while we made out. No upcharge, just an "in the moment" thing. I'd love to repeat, but she texted the next day with "I don't really do that and we shouldn't do it again," and then I got blocked. Girls are silly. Oh well. Fun while it lasted.
[B]KuddlerLiz[/B]: Ugh, I wish I had this one back. Did a lot of texting beforehand; really vibing well. Met her for drinks, clicked wonderfully in person, and thought this was a slam dunk. Then when we got to the cuddling, all she did is prattle on about her problems and all the therapy she's going through. I got uncharacteristically impatient with the chatter and made a move earlier than I knew I should, and was rebuffed. Got a bit awkward after that. She's heavy into the bratty-sub kink lifestyle, so I have no doubt she gets railed plenty through the cuddle site. Chalk up an "L" for me.
[B]Ivybabyy[/B]: If you want to fuck a cute, athletic girl who isn't old enough to legally drink, now's your chance! I saw her earlier this year when she was 19 (and bareback was clearly on the menu. Fucked her twice before she went dark for a while, and now she's back. Not even "YMMV" on this one -- she knows why she is on the board, and getting that pussy is almost a foregone conclusion, so it's really just about negotiating her upcharge (for the record, it was +$$ for me). Fun Fact: Her mother (MandyJo or something like that) travels from Idaho and "cuddles," too. Average looks at best for mom, but you'd better believe I fucked her anyway (no upcharge), and got the "Mother / Daughter" certificate of achievement.
[B]Raven88[/B]: Portland-based only (rarely travels up here). Attractive, athletic girl. She'll require a video call and clearly give you her menu. Upcharges for stuff up to her ceiling of what amounts to nude mutual masturbation, but no "fluid exchange," because -- and I quote -- she "doesn't sell sex. " LOL, of course you don't, honey. Anyway, I was bored / curious and went for it, and ended up eating her pussy as a bonus, but was stonewalled when I went for the grand finale. I wouldn't repeat. It was fun for what it was, but I certainly paid for indulging my curiosity.
[B]Saharapdx[/B]: She'll come up to Seattle every month or so. Fucked her on the first meeting (no upcharge; got lucky here); she insisted on the condom, which sucks, but whatever. It was okay-ish, I guess. I really only did it because I knew she was friends with Sammy478, and I wanted to rail both of them and let them both know I did it. Suffice it to say I'm not in their good graces, haha!
[B]HealingSiren[/B]: A rare dip into the lower quartiles of the attractiveness pool for me, but we vibed well via chat / text, so I made the haul to Olympia to see what's-what. She's partnered, poly, and into BDSM-type kink. Felt her up plenty, made out for a while, but nothing beyond that for a first visit. It was made clear to me that I could advance the ball down the field with a subsequent visit, but she's a bit rougher in person (versus photos) and while it was fun "in the moment," I was not at all motivated to go back.
[B]Rorasnuggles[/B]: It's a traaaaaap! Well, probably. You look at the bio (Cuddle Companions for this one) and the photos, and you'd think you'd have a shot. She knows exactly what she's doing here: Present as very flirty and suggestive, make you drive out to Fox Island (might as well be on Mars), and promptly get blue-balled. At least that was my experience, and that of a couple of other reliable sources I know. If one of you has that cutie bouncing on your cock, more power to you. I actually left my session early with her because I was just that bored.
[B]Indicaprinc3ss[/B]: Yes, yes, we've all fucked Spring. She's on "the other board," but I didn't know that at first. Went over, had some wine, went up to her little loft area and went at it. Bigger girl that I'd normally go after, but she seemed cool and I was 98% sure that I could spray my man chowder in there with reckless abandon, and so it was. No upcharge. Didn't repeat, though.
[B]SunshineKat[/B]: Finally, a Touring Girl. Lives in Austin, regularly visits Boston and Seattle, among other places. She claims to be a print model of some sort, and she definitely has the body for it. Tall, lithe, quirky, and hot in her own way. I got lucky here and got in her pants without the upcharge (incredibly full Bush down there; she grows it out like a chia pet), but when I tried to repeat, the line from her was that she "usually keeps it platonic" and I was quoted an astronomical upcharge for a repeat. No-go for yours truly -- it was fun, but not *that* fun. Moral of the story is that fun-and-games is on the table if you play your cards right, but what you do-or-don't pay is a moving target.
There you have it. If I haven't mentioned her, it's because (a) she doesn't meet my criteria, (b) I'm working on them right now, or (c) in the case of exactly two of them, I'm actively fucking them and not quite done. My username is spot-on, though, so it won't be long before I move on and I'll surely report back.
No DMs hitting me up with questions, please. Just post them here and I'll answer as best as I can. Good luck out there.[/QUOTE]
I'm pleased to share the information. I hope it continues to inspire some conversation and keep this thread alive. It's an interesting pursuit, this Cuddling Game. I'm wired a bit differently when it comes to all this: I need some sort of psychological challenge, or it just isn't quite as much fun.
[QUOTE=BuckNaked123;7399569]
Sammy478. I saw this one and she is hotter than her pictures. Incredible body, pretty cool attitude until it comes time to talk money. She up-charges at least for me. But was a good fuck and finished with a load deep inside her. She is a flake though and was in a cheap hotel on Aurora when I saw her. I won't see her again.[/QUOTE]Haven't been successful with her. She wanted me to pay for train ride from portland and also host which seems contrary to posts here.
[QUOTE=GameMaker007;7400392]Haven't been successful with her. She wanted me to pay for train ride from portland and also host which seems contrary to posts here.[/QUOTE]I can't speak to the frequency of her Seattle visits anymore, but I do know that it happens. She lists Seattle as a secondary city on her Cuddle Comfort profile, and she also exists as "raygun857" on Cuddle Companions with Seattle being her primary city. I imagine she probably comes up this way when she thinks she can profitably "tour" with new requests and the smattering of regulars that she has managed to retain.
All that to say: I recommend you just tell her that you'd be happy to see her when she is coming up next, and wait it out. She'll do it eventually. She typically gets an AirBnB when she does, so there wouldn't be any need to host. But also, don't hold your breath. One of the reasons I dropped her is because scheduling was like pulling teeth. She's pretty good in bed and I'd rail her when she was in town and convenient for me, but that is the extent of the effort I'd put into that girl.
Dang. 350 for a 2-hr cuddle. And the extras were ala carte?
I've tried to crack the code: which cuddlers are more likely to provide a sexy cuddle instead of a platonic cuddle? Profile pics have helped a bit, this thread has helped a LOT, and I've assumed that hourly rates are a possible indicator of extras. In your experience, does a higher hourly rate correspond with extras?
Thanks.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7400406]I can't speak to the frequency of her Seattle visits anymore, but I do know that it happens. She lists Seattle as a secondary city on her Cuddle Comfort profile, and she also exists as "raygun857" on Cuddle Companions with Seattle being her primary city. I imagine she probably comes up this way when she thinks she can profitably "tour" with new requests and the smattering of regulars that she has managed to retain.
All that to say: I recommend you just tell her that you'd be happy to see her when she is coming up next, and wait it out. She'll do it eventually. She typically gets an AirBnB when she does, so there wouldn't be any need to host. But also, don't hold your breath. One of the reasons I dropped her is because scheduling was like pulling teeth. She's pretty good in bed and I'd rail her when she was in town and convenient for me, but that is the extent of the effort I'd put into that girl.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Original703;7401028]Dang. 350 for a 2-hr cuddle. And the extras were ala carte?[/QUOTE]Well. No. I saw her under her Cuddle Comfort profile, which (a) was $125 / Hour at the time, and (b) did not require a 2-Hour minimum. I don't do deposits and what-not unless absolutely mandatory, and it sure as hell wasn't in this case. The extras came at no-charge for me, but I was fortunate to catch her early in her "cuddling" journey. She would have definitely up-charged me had I encountered her with some experience under her belt, and just before I stopped seeing her, she did start making strong hints about "tipping her. " Haha, nope. Thanks for the pussy, babe.
[QUOTE=Original703;7401028] I've tried to crack the code: which cuddlers are more likely to provide a sexy cuddle instead of a platonic cuddle? Profile pics have helped a bit, this thread has helped a LOT, and I've assumed that hourly rates are a possible indicator of extras. In your experience, does a higher hourly rate correspond with extras?[/QUOTE]You'd think so, wouldn't you? If anything, it actually works the *other* direction: Girls with lower rates are more apt to offer extras. They do this because they want to keep the "base experience" affordable, so they can upcharge for the extras without it breaking the bank for the guy.
Here's a perfect example: [URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/raven88[/URL] I think we can agree that she's easily in the top quartile for attractiveness amongst PNW cuddlers, and based on that alone, *should* be charging more like $150/ H. But she charges much less. Why? Because that's just the admission fee for the platonic-only stuff. Get on the phone with her prior to the appointment (which she requires) and she'll flat-out tell you the extras she offers right from the jump. If you'll forgive the analogy: She's making bank from the huge mark-ups on the alcohol sales from the bar, not the tiny margins on the lunch special that she advertised on the display board out front.
So, the girls with the higher rates. What are *they* doing? More often than not, they are leveraging the fact that they are more attractive than the competition and charging a premium for being in their divine presence. Here's an extreme example: [URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/cuddleangeltt[/URL] At $230/ H, one might be led to conclude that she will jerk you off with one hand while doing your taxes with the other. And maybe she will! YMMV, right? But doubtful. Extremely doubtful. The message here is very frequently "I'm hot, so I can charge more. " Full stop. It's not much different than the message from all the "former models" on Tryst that supposedly have two doctorates and speak eight languages. "Oh, I'm so exclusive! Pay me more! Pay me for my image!
How to improve your odds, then? Half of this is getting really, really good at reading profiles. It's never just "one thing" that is a giveaway; it's a combo platter of small things. Price point, type of photos, whether or not she hosts, length of bio, word choice in bio, what she says (and doesn't say) in the bit with her stats, and so on. I'm not going to write a novel on this (this shit is long enough already), but what I will tell you that this is less about looking for clues that she is inviting Sexy Fun Times, and more about observing the lack of elements that intentionally discourage those inquiries.
To wit: If a girl absolutely does not want that kind of action, she will cite the forum rules and make severe warnings about visiting such indecorous behavior upon her exalted person. Yeah, probably stay away from those, unless you're an idiot like me and relish the challenge. But, if you just see a passing "Oh, platonic only please!" note in her bio, there is a good chance she's just doing that to cover her ass with forum admin. Many of them will keep completely silent on the subject, and the rare few will be ever-so-slightly suggestive (Sammy has a line that reads "Looking forward to new acquaintances and intimate connections. " Well, yahoo.)
Once you've opened dialogue with your target, the other half of this is having excellent "soft skills. " Be charming, be funny, listen to her, get to know her, yada-yada-yada. I mean, sure, some of them will make it lay-down easy for you and just text you their fucking menu. Order your value combo of choice. But there are a lot of these women -- mainly the attractive ones, if I'm honest -- that are the epitome of YMMV and will wait to see how they feel about you in person before deciding whether to open the doors to the holy temple. That's where the soft skills come in. If you can make her feel special, and somehow make yourself feel "different than the others" to her, your batting average will skyrocket. After all, they are girls on a cuddle forum. They are deliberately electing to get as intimate as you can while clothed, with a complete stranger, and get paid for it. They aren't stupid. They know what's up and a lot of them are into it. But you have to show them "respect" first -- let them know that you wouldn't ever dream that they are anything other than the innocent angels that they are.
Then you fuck them and it's glorious. The whole time they are all "Oh golly, I never do this!" and you're all "Wow, I know, I feel so special!" You're lying, she's lying. It's fucking awesome.
Jesus Chris, this was a long post. Sorry if I put anyone to sleep.
I suppose I should say this as a post-script: My last post primarily refers to the girls in the "Ambiguous Middle Ground" of the cuddle forums.
Here's what I mean: On one end of the spectrum, you get the Platonic-Only who actually think they are running a legit business, along with the psuedo-shamans who fancy themselves to be conduits of healing. Unlikely to get balls-deep in those women. On the other side, you've got the Obvious Pros -- chicks who are escorts elsewhere (there are a couple of them) or otherwise being very hint-hint about it all. Sure, those are easy wins, but why bother? Just go to TNA or whatever.
The meat of the bell curve are the "Will She, Won't She?" girls. This is where you don't really know going in and need to come ready for battle. Note that the more attractive they are, the harder the nut they will be to crack.
It is worth all the effort? I think it is. Personally, I love the thrill of the hunt. Yeah, sometimes it all ends up being an expensive hug. But when you win, boy-oh-boy, you win big. There is never any discussion about GFE, Not-GFE, Services, etc. When they do fuck you, they fuck you like they would their boyfriend. Not a condom to be seen (most of the time), clock goes out the window, and because they aren't escorts in the strict sense of the word, they are usually drug-free, drama-free, and disease-free. Frequently, you can get all this for just the cuddle rate, but even when there is an up-charge, you are still paying less than what you would for a TNA / STG girl that looks *much* worse.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7401128]I suppose I should say this as a post-script: My last post primarily refers to the girls in the "Ambiguous Middle Ground" of the cuddle forums.
Here's what I mean: On one end of the spectrum, you get the Platonic-Only who actually think they are running a legit business, along with the psuedo-shamans who fancy themselves to be conduits of healing. Unlikely to get balls-deep in those women. On the other side, you've got the Obvious Pros -- chicks who are escorts elsewhere (there are a couple of them) or otherwise being very hint-hint about it all. Sure, those are easy wins, but why bother? Just go to TNA or whatever.
The meat of the bell curve are the "Will She, Won't She?" girls. This is where you don't really know going in and need to come ready for battle. Note that the more attractive they are, the harder the nut they will be to crack.
It is worth all the effort? I think it is. Personally, I love the thrill of the hunt. Yeah, sometimes it all ends up being an expensive hug. But when you win, boy-oh-boy, you win big. There is never any discussion about GFE, Not-GFE, Services, etc. When they do fuck you, they fuck you like they would their boyfriend. Not a condom to be seen (most of the time), clock goes out the window, and because they aren't escorts in the strict sense of the word, they are usually drug-free, drama-free, and disease-free. Frequently, you can get all this for just the cuddle rate, but even when there is an up-charge, you are still paying less than what you would for a TNA / STG girl that looks *much* worse.[/QUOTE]AMG is precisely what I like about Bikini Baristas. Getting to cracking the nut with the few you can for take out.
[QUOTE=BoredTooEasily;7401079]
So, the girls with the higher rates. What are *they* doing? More often than not, they are leveraging the fact that they are more attractive than the competition and charging a premium for being in their divine presence. Here's an extreme example: [URL]https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/cuddleangeltt[/URL] At $230/ H, one might be led to conclude that she will jerk you off with one hand while doing your taxes with the other. And maybe she will! YMMV, right? But doubtful. Extremely doubtful. The message here is very frequently "I'm hot, so I can charge more. " Full stop. It's not much different than the message from all the "former models" on Tryst that supposedly have two doctorates and speak eight languages. "Oh, I'm so exclusive! Pay me more! Pay me for my image!
[/QUOTE]I know this one is used as an example for instructional purposes, but fuck, she doesn't even host, so throw out another 100+ for a hotel:
"My cuddle sessions are available exclusively in public spaces for safety and comfort. While hotels are a common choice, clients may also book sessions in private office spaces or other appropriate public venues if permitted.
Ideal Locations Include:
✔65039;Hotels (client-booked).
✔65039; Private office spaces.
✔65039; Lounge areas in coworking spaces.
✔65039; Other secure, professional settings".
Jfc.
[QUOTE=ScotchYoke;7401975]I know this one is used as an example for instructional purposes, but fuck, she doesn't even host, so throw out another 100+ for a hotel:[/QUOTE]The fact that she has 0 karma after being on the site for 8 months keeps me sane. In an alternate universe if she was on TNA she would charge 800/ hr and pick up a dozen fawning reviews in that time period.
[QUOTE=Donato21;7402016]The fact that she has 0 karma after being on the site for 8 months keeps me sane. In an alternate universe if she was on TNA she would charge 800/ hr and pick up a dozen fawning reviews in that time period.[/QUOTE]And her "Things I Hate Discussing" list would read like War & Peace, too. Don't forget those generous multi-session discounts. Save up to 8%! Everything must go!
I honestly don't care what these girls charge. To me, it's just a data point. If CuddleAngelTT were to teleport from way the fuck over in Gig Harbor to sitting on my lap right now, wearing nothing but a smile, and told me that I could bend her over my kitchen island and flip a coin for my port of entry while she quacks like a duck -- all for the low, low price of $800 (sorry kids, no repeat customer discount quite yet) -- I'm a solid favorite to spice up my Friday evening.
But all the pretentiousness that I read into her profile just turns me right off. She just throws out "I'm going to be an ice queen" vibes -- at least, that's my read. I tend to rely fairly heavily on my intuition, for better or for worse.