Streetwalker Reports

[QUOTE=Hizark21]I was with this hot blonde the other day and I can assure you she is not a cop.....

A purse or backpack is not a sure sign she is not a cop. Nothing wrong with stopping for them.[/QUOTE]


Not every girl wearing Sensible Shoes ; or a Back·Pack ; or a Purse with an over·the·shoulder Strap , is an UC·LEO

ALL I'm saying is = THAT is how they dress ; just exercise Caution when approaching any·one that fits that description

Another Tip = Any Street 'Walker' who isn't Walking is Suspect

Follow her for a few blocks , and make sure the girl is really Walking — because LEOs will often just pace back and forth on the same Block , to give the Illusion of 'walking' [ they do this because they don't want to get out of range of their back·up units ]

Psyber Zombie, here is an example of a Hizark post.

"Was in the area this evening around 7pm. ECB was completely dead.

Did anyone crusie (sic) last night....?? "

He has over 800 posts and I bet 500 are just like the one above, 100 are opening stupid threads that no one ever uses and the others are asking for info or making some other inane comment like the one he made below. I don't think he has ever been with a SW judging by his posts. He cruises so much that he must own stock in Shell. By the way, he did not post anything anywhere about the "hot blonde" he was with "the other day".

It's hard, but I just try to ignore him.

[quote=Easy Rider 2]By the way, he did not post anything anywhere about the "hot blonde" he was with "the other day".[/quote]
Actually, he did:

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=421373&postcount=153[/url]

[QUOTE=Baltimonger]Actually, he did:

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=421373&postcount=153[/url][/QUOTE]Actually, Hizark has previously posted about doing a facial with Jessica. In the above post Hizark now claims that Jessica won't do facials. He's described Jessica quite differently on multiple occasions. And all of us hardcore mongers know who hot, blonde, Jessica is. We know what she looks like, how much she charges and what she will/won't do and we've posted about it before. Hizarks posts directly contradict this info. And his inconsistencies in reporting about Jessica confirm what most of us already know - that Hizark is completely full of shit. I bet he'll try to say that his "Jessica" is a different one. After all it's a common name. Whatever. I think he's LE. I think he read previous posters reports on Jessica and tried to play it off like he's dated her in order to ingratiate himself on these boards. I encourage everyone to ignore and avoid him.

Joe

UPDATE
There is a picture of Jessica posted on these boards. That is indeed the Jessica I, and many others, know. Hizark has confirmed through a post that the picture is his Jessica as well. And a quick review of Hizark's posting history will reveal his inconsistencies in regards to this subject. I STRONGLY urge the members of this board to be discreet and to avoid Hizark like the plauge he is.

Well this is not true at all. LAPD never records the prostitution violations. LAPD don't record jack s--t.

[QUOTE=PsyberZombie]My good friend Webcams is mistaken about this = ALL John Stings are recorded these days , to avoid the old "I was just asking for directions" Defense [ a.k.a. the "He said / She said" Defense ]

The UC·LEO will be carrying a fairly large purse with an over·the·shoulder strap . Inside will be either a tape recorder or a radio with an open mike transmitting to both her back·up and to a recorder [ If it isn't a radio , the LEO will communicate with her back·up using hand signals ]

Your best bet that a girl is NOT a LEO is if she's Empty·Handed = especially no purse

Avoid young women with back·packs = a lot of them are school·girls and you don't need them writing down your
plate # because you stopped for them because they innocently made eye contact with you

Here's an example of the type of Purse that should make you wary =

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=422476&postcount=169[/URL]

.... but this girl is NOT wearing Sensible Shoes , so she's the Real Item[/QUOTE]

Anyone ever notice the few motor-home/RVs that are parked facing all the right spots on SB? Take a look next time. They make a very convenient Observation post.

[QUOTE=Member #2128]Here in the Valley (staying with the thread!) Everyone today focuses on "decoys". LE Stings with "decoys" waving in parking lots. At bus stops. Is she LE? Is she SW? Too good-looking to be LE! Blah...blah and blah.

However, in the heyday of the Sunset days, pre-Bratton, when vice was not something mongers worried about 24/7 like today, I picked up a "new friend" in Hollywood WHO WAS STANDING ON THE CORNER and we drove to my favorite no-tell on Western, where I had been dozens of times without trouble or incident. After we were in the room about 10 minutes, there's a loud knock on the door and 3 vice officers storm inside, flashing badges and yelling "Police Officers!" Then..."Did you know this woman is a known prostitute?" "Did you give her any money?"

They separated us to ask questions and soon get conflicting stories and basically, I'm busted. She was no decoy. She was real, but LE was hanging out somewhere in the shadows----watching her and waiting for some fool like me to pick her up....and then following us. She wasn't LE, but because she wasn't moving, they used her like a decoy anyway! BSW bobbing on the corner like bait, looking real tasty to a young trout like me. I guess they hooked their fish.

Today times have changed.
Watch your ass brothers! And watch it good!

#2128[/QUOTE] then why would they go through all of that trouble to bust you in the hotel? they just as well could have got you and your friend in the car on the track! what is going on with the pork?T59

Some clarification for all of you:

There is 2 Jessica's one is strawberry blonde ([url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/newr[/url]
eply.php?do=newreply&p=418366 ). This one did facial about a month ago (both posts have pics)..

Blonde Jessica 2: ([url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=422476[/url] ). This Jessica does not do facials. But if you don't believe me search on the SD CL erotic and you will see that there is 2 wsw Jessica's. Both of them work the street.

I'm not sure exactly why they followed me to the no-tell instead of pulling me over. It was an unmarked "vice car", but they have the lights and shit too, right?

I think that maybe they were wanting to catch me in the sex act...in the car, or in the no-tell, so they followed waiting to see where I would go and what would happen.

Funny thing is that it was a popular, well-known no-tell just off Western, south of Sunset and these vice-officers acted like it was the first time they were there! One of them acted surprised that the little girl at the counter didn't "register" me in, but just gave me the room key. Like they actually fill out registration forms at no-tells! Duh? Maybe this was a vice squad in training and it was their first bust and I was their first turkey!

End of story is that they let me off with not much more than a big-ass warning that they'd be looking for me in the area in the future! Again, I don't know why. Like I said, maybe this was just a training mission for new vice officers and like good fisherman---they threw back the little fish. I was unlucky to get busted and lucky to get off without much damage.

There you have it.

#2128

[QUOTE=Speck]Well this is not true at all. LAPD never records the prostitution violations. LAPD don't record jack s--t.[/QUOTE]

I find that very hard to believe , Speck , if you're talking about JOHN Stings

Considering that these busts only yield Misdemeanor charges , they are tremendous drain on any PD's resources , especially in terms of man·hours

One of the main reasons the John busts are recorded is to avoid having to have the LEOs appear in court , burning up even more man·hours = once the 'perp' realizes he's on tape propositioning an UC·LEO , the only question is WHAT charge he'll plead Guilty to

And , Dog forbid you ever find your·self in this situation = try to cop a plea to Dis·orderly Conduct or some other such minor offense , because *second* busts on Prostitution charges often [ depending on the State ] carry much greater penalties , like vehicle impoundment or sex offender registration

... not to mention a lesser charge is easier to explain away to prospective employers , etc , who may learn of your Record


p.s. = Member #2128's story doesn't have that 'ring of truth' to it ; but stranger things have happened , I guess ....

[QUOTE=Baltimonger]Actually, he did:

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=421373&postcount=153[/url][/QUOTE]

OK Baltimonger, I stand corrected. I missed this comment among his hundreds of other quality posts.

Really suprising that they did not bust you. What info did you give to the cop....?? In any case consider yoursell lucky. Just learn from the incident, follow a few simple rules and you won't get busted.

So far it is not Illegal to have consensual sex between to adults, Well you have to first make sure your both 18 or over, and then it's still legal as of the date of this post. You are well aware right wing wackos are trying there best to outlaw pre marital sex aren't you, as well as abortion and freedom of speech. Anyways when cops go to a motel room and catch two people having sex, it is not illegal it is only illegal if money, or [i]anything of value[/i] I.E.; clothes, room, dinner are exchanged for said sexual activity. Sounds like dating to me, But the only way that can be proven is if One of said two or three if your lucky partys decide to turn on the other party even then it is very hard to make a case. If LE breaks in on two people having consensual sex it is a lawsuit waiting to happen if the girl has no priors for prostitution, it is an easy lawsuit to win. If no calls for help came from the room, and no one made a call reporting a crime the cops have no legal right to be there, well unless that has been thrown into the Patriot act as well. We still have a Constitution in this country it's what has helped guide it through for many years let's hope we have something of it left in 2 years.

LAPD doesn't record jack.

If they do, prove it. Tons of people have sat on jurys in Los Angeles. They would know. The one first hand case I know of was from jury duty in Hollywood. Not only did LAPD NOT record it, the officer picked up the prostitute(a male off Santa Monica Bl in this case) and drove around for OVER 20 MINUTES before obtaining the violation.

Needless to say, 10 minute deliberation and "not guilty".

Anywho, should be easy to prove that LAPD tapes stuff. But it might take you a while longer than it should. They don't tape jack.

Another method you could use is to ask any Los Angeles city attorney or more than a handful of Los Angeles County DA's. Or even a defense attorney.

LAPD does not record narcotics arrests or u/c stings, nor does it record u/c prostitution arrests of johns or ho's. Except in one case I know of where a LAPD narco unit started bringing in their own cameras and video recorders to counteract the exact things you pointed out.

As to the use of resources and the burning up of man hours....you totally misunderstand LAPD and Los Angeles politics in general. No one cares, except the poor citizens. See, Los Angeles politics places no priority whatsoever on crimes against property. House gets broken in, you might get the lazy ass cop assigned to the "u-boat" to come out about 8-10 hours later and take a crappy report with no prints and no hope of ever catching the criminal. Get your car broken into? You have to drive your car with no window to the police station. They will not come out.

Bratton has officially become an idiot if he does not recognize that the way to bust gang members and violent criminals in Los Angeles is to aggressively target gangs and also to aggressively target property crimes. But I doubt the left wingers with COMMUNIST views and IDEOLOGIES on the city council will allow the police department to take that direction. Better off targeting crimes like narcotics and prostitution that CAN NEVER BE ELIMINATED.


[QUOTE=PsyberZombie]I find that very hard to believe , Speck , if you're talking about JOHN Stings

Considering that these busts only yield Misdemeanor charges , they are tremendous drain on any PD's resources , especially in terms of man·hours

One of the main reasons the John busts are recorded is to avoid having to have the LEOs appear in court , burning up even more man·hours = once the 'perp' realizes he's on tape propositioning an UC·LEO , the only question is WHAT charge he'll plead Guilty to

And , Dog forbid you ever find your·self in this situation = try to cop a plea to Dis·orderly Conduct or some other such minor offense , because *second* busts on Prostitution charges often [ depending on the State ] carry much greater penalties , like vehicle impoundment or sex offender registration

... not to mention a lesser charge is easier to explain away to prospective employers , etc , who may learn of your Record


p.s. = Member #2128's story doesn't have that 'ring of truth' to it ; but stranger things have happened , I guess ....[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Speck]LAPD doesn't record jack.

If they do, prove it. Tons of people have sat on jurys in Los Angeles. They would know. The one first hand case I know of was from jury duty in Hollywood. Not only did LAPD NOT record it, the officer picked up the prostitute(a male off Santa Monica Bl in this case) and drove around for OVER 20 MINUTES before obtaining the violation.

Needless to say, 10 minute deliberation and "not guilty".

Anywho, should be easy to prove that LAPD tapes stuff. But it might take you a while longer than it should. They don't tape jack.

Another method you could use is to ask any Los Angeles city attorney or more than a handful of Los Angeles County DA's. Or even a defense attorney.

LAPD does not record narcotics arrests or u/c stings, nor does it record u/c prostitution arrests of johns or ho's. Except in one case I know of where a LAPD narco unit started bringing in their own cameras and video recorders to counteract the exact things you pointed out.

As to the use of resources and the burning up of man hours....you totally misunderstand LAPD and Los Angeles politics in general. No one cares, except the poor citizens. See, Los Angeles politics places no priority whatsoever on crimes against property. House gets broken in, you might get the lazy ass cop assigned to the "u-boat" to come out about 8-10 hours later and take a crappy report with no prints and no hope of ever catching the criminal. Get your car broken into? You have to drive your car with no window to the police station. They will not come out.

Bratton has officially become an idiot if he does not recognize that the way to bust gang members and violent criminals in Los Angeles is to aggressively target gangs and also to aggressively target property crimes. But I doubt the left wingers with COMMUNIST views and IDEOLOGIES on the city council will allow the police department to take that direction. Better off targeting crimes like narcotics and prostitution that CAN NEVER BE ELIMINATED.[/QUOTE]


I totally respected your post, right up until the end.

Let me fill you in....

First, I side with neither the left or right. I spent 4 years living in one of the most right-winged cities in Texas and guess what.... their philosophy on crime was EXACTLY the same as here. It isn't a left or right issue, contrary to what you would like us to believe. It is a moral issue, and while we are speaking of moral issues, RIGHT-WINGERS fight issues of questionable morals. I seriously hope that you aren't a "Right-Winger," because the acts that you partake in seriously defy the ideals that you stand behind. I wouldn't want anyone to think you were a hypocrit.

In other words.... For the sake of the message board, please keep your Political attacks to yourself.