KAngels Discussion

I realized I visit KA and AP all the time but I never remember if I've seen the girl or not on a previous visit cause a lot of them aren't memorable LOL so I'm going to start reviewing after most sessions just to refresh my memory.

Saw Lime at KA yesterday, I didn't have a bad time but I'm not sure I'd repeat.

The entire session felt like the most standard kgirl service I've ever had. Everything felt super average except for the fact she was tight.

The listed height is pretty close but I'd still say she's taller, maybe around 5'6 or even 5'7 maybe?

Her face wasn't too bad but she did have thin lips. I'm pretty sure her lips were as thin as a single udon noodle lmao. With me she wasn't very enthusiastic about kissing and was never really proactive in it.

In addition to the fact that her donations are higher than standard (as listed on the site) I'm not really interested in repeating especially while there's a lot of other kgirls at both KA and AP rn.

[QUOTE=TotalChad;7440248]New talent landed at Seattle mumu.

Hanna: [URL]https://www.seattle-mumu.com/1-details[/URL].

Weiwei: [URL]https://www.seattle-mumu.com/2-details[/URL].

Nana: [URL]https://www.seattle-mumu.com/copy-of-2-details[/URL].

Did some digging, only info I could find was for Nana out of NY subs. Reported as a very thin spinner, long legs.

If anyone has info on the girls, feel free to share. I'll report back after I have time to partake.[/QUOTE]Really wish there was a way to get screened without the level of risk providing personal details. They say they'll delete verification pics after screening, but that's no guarantee. Is it in the agency's interest to retain that info? Or does it behoove them to purge their black books?

[QUOTE=Eric4321;7442482]I realized I visit KA and AP all the time but I never remember if I've seen the girl or not on a previous visit cause a lot of them aren't memorable LOL so I'm going to start reviewing after most sessions just to refresh my memory.

Saw Lime at KA yesterday, I didn't have a bad time but I'm not sure I'd repeat.

The entire session felt like the most standard kgirl service I've ever had. Everything felt super average except for the fact she was tight.

The listed height is pretty close but I'd still say she's taller, maybe around 5'6 or even 5'7 maybe?

Her face wasn't too bad but she did have thin lips. I'm pretty sure her lips were as thin as a single udon noodle lmao. With me she wasn't very enthusiastic about kissing and was never really proactive in it.

In addition to the fact that her donations are higher than standard (as listed on the site) I'm not really interested in repeating especially while there's a lot of other kgirls at both KA and AP rn.[/QUOTE]How close is she to the 95 lbs she's listed at? If the height AND weight are accurate, I'll have to take her for a spin.

[QUOTE=SnS69;7442537]How close is she to the 95 lbs she's listed at? If the height AND weight are accurate, I'll have to take her for a spin.[/QUOTE]To be honest, I don't really remember much but she wasn't big or fat at all. Tall and skinny / lean? Probably above 95 but she wasn't all bone either so probably not much above the listed weight. Light enough for me to toss her onto the bed and I'm weak as hell but still heavy enough to pin me down while she was on top riding. Tits were pretty accurate and not far off

It appears that girlfriendinseattle, now the Utah agency, has taken over kangels.

[QUOTE=ShinamotoJason;7442739]It appears that girlfriendinseattle, now the Utah agency, has taken over kangels.[/QUOTE]What does this mean moving forward?

[QUOTE=NampaBoi;7443082]What does this mean moving forward?[/QUOTE]Hopefully easier access to other locations in other cities if they're affiliated and can vouch instead of going through verification at each place.

[QUOTE=ShinamotoJason;7442739]It appears that girlfriendinseattle, now the Utah agency, has taken over kangels.[/QUOTE]Where did you get this info? What is 'utah agency'?

Anybody got intel on Mai and/or Mina. I don't want to pick a provider based on profile pics alone. Learned my lesson with Lucy at KA.

[QUOTE=DS080;7443219]Anybody got intel on Mai and/or Mina. I don't want to pick a provider based on profile pics alone. Learned my lesson with Lucy at KA.[/QUOTE]After previous experiences I won't see one without TER reviews. I base the decision off that.

Are the reviews on AP profiles pages real? Has yours really posted there? Maybe the number of reviews can be a good indicator for how good the providers are. For example, Mai got only one, while others who've been at AP shorter got way more reviews.

[QUOTE=DS080;7443441]Are the reviews on AP profiles pages real? Has yours really posted there? Maybe the number of reviews can be a good indicator for how good the providers are. For example, Mai got only one, while others who've been at AP shorter got way more reviews.[/QUOTE]They are real, my comments to the booker usually shows up on the site. If the encounter was less than average I usually don't rely to booker asking for feedback. In my experience the length / number of reviews that booker posts generally correlates to a more favorable encounter.

[QUOTE=Arisotto;7443450]They are real, my comments to the booker usually shows up on the site. If the encounter was less than average I usually don't rely to booker asking for feedback. In my experience the length / number of reviews that booker posts generally correlates to a more favorable encounter.[/QUOTE]I've had the same experience. When they have asked for feedback and I have responded positively, I've seen my comments show up the next day.

Pics are fairly unrepresentative. I like her look but it might not be for everyone, huge cheekbones but in what I think is a cute way. She's low / mid 30's, good energy, fun, likes to laugh. English is 3/10. Small C bolt ons, hard, no movement. Best part was her ass, it was legit. Rare to find a k-girl with junk in the trunk but it was juicy and round and just right. Doggy was a lovely sight esp when I stayed still and she was twerking it on my cock. She's also got larger legs than most k-girls, more of a latina-like bottom half which I enjoyed.

BBBJ is on point, golf ball through garden hose. Serious suction and max pleasure. Pussy is not tight (except when she cums / squeezes) and she queefed the entire time. It was pretty hilarious how much. During the second round I'd been hitting her from behind for a long time and I took matters into my own hand to try to finish. She got up and on her knees but otherwise vertical and let out a long, slow, quiet queef that I think embarrassed her. She said "so much air" and I laughed which seemed to relax her.

Anyway, was a good time, would recommend unless you need a tight one. 1xCIP, couldn't get the second round off but she gave it a good try. She massaged me for a few minutes between rounds and seemed to know what she was doing, it felt good and not like a physical assault which is how some of them do it.

I haven't been to Kangels in forever cause photos are never real and I always got grannies.

I noticed they are saying "real photos" for some of the girls now. Not all.

Has this been accurate?