Streetwalker Reports

[QUOTE=SluggaP;2513376]Was out roaming about today and went down 5 by sis and saw a thick ass latina or mixed maybe. Real short. She was wearing thigh high jeans with heels. Goldish brown hair. Ass out of this world. Never seen her over there before but does anyone know who talking about?[/QUOTE]This is who I was referring to. Any info? I see her out sometimes by kenton / mad area also.

[URL]http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/50-incall-special-beautiful-babe-real-girl-love-my-pix-you-will-love-me-in-person/30696915[/URL]

[URL]http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/sweet-sexy-bria-50-incall-special/30654445[/URL]

Just curious as to how these two scenarios are different.

Scenario 1: First name and photos of a woman are provided in a post on this board. Often including details of what some would say are "illicit or compromising" acts. Often including pictures that on some sites would be considered "revenge porn". Many times even rating what / how this woman performs and for how much.

Scenario 2: Information is provided about a woman with a STD. Rumor or truth? Not sure anyone can provide statements on this board that 100% of us would accept as being true.

So Scenario 1 pretty much devastates a woman's reputation and is online for all to see. Scenario 2, perhaps equally so. Why is one type of post allowed and the other not?

I am not advocating breaking forum rules, just questioning how we share information. Everyone that reads posts here should already know that "YMMV" when applying anything that is found here in your own experiences. We already know that SWs are a high-risk STD group. Any information that I find here in addition is only more useful in keeping myself safe. We all know it is bound to happen for some here. You may get an STD. I would sure as hell read your post if you then listed the last few SWs you were with. And often, the girls share information about other girls. As with everything else, it is up to us to decide how much faith to put into their information. But again, it gives me more details to act on. Maybe I ask someone else and hear something similar.

I guess my point is if this site is already OK with archiving posts and pictures of women's actions for all to see, are additional posts about STD risks really making things worse for these women?

BTL.

[BLUE]Everytime some guy has used our site for "revenge porn" and the person who's likeness was posted has contacted me, proved they are the person in the picture and convinced me (I keep that bar low) that they are not in the business I have removed the picture. There is currently a sick fuck in a city that keeps posting pics and talking about this chick that still lives at home with her folks. She's legal (barely) but she's not a hooker, she's some dumb kid that got talked into sending pics to some asshole. If I catch it (the guy keeps making new users) I delete them. If I miss it, her dad writes me and reports the post and I take it down.

If some chick has a backpage ad, too bad, she has released info. If some chick has an ad and no pics and she sends pics to some guy who puts them out in the wild we have a process for having them removed. Again, the bar to convince me that she's trying to fly UTR is pretty low.

STD accusations, they ruin somebodies business forever and 99.9999999% of the time they are bullshit. Some guy says it because he's pissed at some chick. Then forever it's "I seem to recall reading something"

Hope that clears it up.

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=BigTimeLoser;2729675]Just curious as to how these two scenarios are different.

Scenario 1: First name and photos of a woman are provided in a post on this board. Often including details of what some would say are "illicit or compromising" acts. Often including pictures that on some sites would be considered "revenge porn". Many times even rating what / how this woman performs and for how much.

Scenario 2: Information is provided about a woman with a STD. Rumor or truth? Not sure anyone can provide statements on this board that 100% of us would accept as being true.

So Scenario 1 pretty much devastates a woman's reputation and is online for all to see. Scenario 2, perhaps equally so. Why is one type of post allowed and the other not?

I am not advocating breaking forum rules, just questioning how we share information. Everyone that reads posts here should already know that "YMMV" when applying anything that is found here in your own experiences. We already know that SWs are a high-risk STD group. Any information that I find here in addition is only more useful in keeping myself safe. We all know it is bound to happen for some here. You may get an STD. I would sure as hell read your post if you then listed the last few SWs you were with. And often, the girls share information about other girls. As with everything else, it is up to us to decide how much faith to put into their information. But again, it gives me more details to act on. Maybe I ask someone else and hear something similar.

I guess my point is if this site is already OK with archiving posts and pictures of women's actions for all to see, are additional posts about STD risks really making things worse for these women?

BTL.[/QUOTE]

Admin2,

Your reply makes sense. I guess my point of view is more from a SW environment as opposed to those that take the step of posting ads and drumming up business. It's pretty much the wild west out there. Excluding the random BP girls that work an off night or two, the vast majority of SWs are random addicts or working for other desperate reasons. I highly doubt that they consent to their pics being distributed and archived here as well. I guess my point is that with the SW forum, all we have are random, unverified posts from users. We use forum cred / rep to decide how much faith to put into the accuracy of them. So if someone can drop 4 explicit pics into their SW post, why not details regarding potential STD risks? Seems like both instances are potential privacy concerns in an area where you probably may not get many complaints and, as an admin, would have a hard time deciding what was real and what was not. It's all about information to me. I'd rather have it and decide on my own. But that is my perspective and two cents.

Kudos to you for policing the blatant phony ads and keeping some level of accuracy around here.

BTL.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2729730][BLUE]Everytime some guy has used our site for "revenge porn" and the person who's likeness was posted has contacted me, proved they are the person in the picture and convinced me (I keep that bar low) that they are not in the business I have removed the picture. There is currently a sick fuck in a city that keeps posting pics and talking about this chick that still lives at home with her folks. She's legal (barely) but she's not a hooker, she's some dumb kid that got talked into sending pics to some asshole. If I catch it (the guy keeps making new users) I delete them. If I miss it, her dad writes me and reports the post and I take it down.

If some chick has a backpage ad, too bad, she has released info. If some chick has an ad and no pics and she sends pics to some guy who puts them out in the wild we have a process for having them removed. Again, the bar to convince me that she's trying to fly UTR is pretty low.

STD accusations, they ruin somebodies business forever and 99.9999999% of the time they are bullshit. Some guy says it because he's pissed at some chick. Then forever it's "I seem to recall reading something"

Hope that clears it up.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SluggaP;2729441]This is who I was referring to. Any info? I see her out sometimes by kenton / mad area also.

[URL]http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/50-incall-special-beautiful-babe-real-girl-love-my-pix-you-will-love-me-in-person/30696915[/URL]

[URL]http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/sweet-sexy-bria-50-incall-special/30654445[/URL][/QUOTE]Yea, chubby / fat girl with a big can. Her and her girlfriend live near mad-ken. She's a total lez, but does a decent BBBJCIM when she's not high as a kite.

Today I saw two WSW by bridge near Fullerton and Central. One was young looking and small with short brown hair. The other was chubby and little taller. I just thought I would mention this since I have not seen any post about this area. I did not talk to either.

What's out there at this time. Going to be hitting up the and side this evening.

[QUOTE=Dominick69;2730121]Today I saw two WSW by bridge near Fullerton and Central. One was young looking and small with short brown hair. The other was chubby and little taller. I just thought I would mention this since I have not seen any post about this area. I did not talk to either.[/QUOTE]By the bridge? You mean by the police station? Probably just left court. .

[QUOTE=ElGoloso;2729295]I'm still looking for some action for tomorrow. Haven't had any luck yet and time is running out. Does anyone know of any SW that are out abd about after 9 am or. I really want to take advantage of the day.[/QUOTE]I would like to go out all day on the 25th. Any thoughts if any WSW would be anywhere? I am far northwest side, however I can get around. Now I would also be looking for a safe notel in any area you guys would suggest. It's been so many years since I was a monger I don't even remember being called one! Things change, but I guess we really don't. Still live for those open passages! Thanks guys. Incredible knowledge here and well maintained.

[QUOTE=Mannheim;2730030]Yea, chubby / fat girl with a big can. Her and her girlfriend live near mad-ken. She's a total lez, but does a decent BBBJCIM when she's not high as a kite.[/QUOTE]How much that usually go 4?

Tried to have a dream last night. Went down Cic from 47 to Belmont. It was pretty much a waste of a quarter tank. Saw 2 SW by 290, one BSW on Cic and other was street behind it couldn't get a good look as LEO was parked further down street with lights on. Around 3-430 AM.

[QUOTE=SluggaP;2731429]How much that usually go 4?[/QUOTE]Anything in that neighborhood can be had for a dub. She's a feisty negotiator, I think she got me for 30 both times.

[QUOTE=Thuqit;2731790]Tried to have a dream last night. Went down Cic from 47 to Belmont. It was pretty much a waste of a quarter tank. Saw 2 SW by 290, one BSW on Cic and other was street behind it couldn't get a good look as LEO was parked further down street with lights on. Around 3-430 AM.[/QUOTE]Thanks for this info. I took a ride down there as I am unfamiliar with that particular area, however I do live in chicago. As mentioned prior it's been years since I looked for SW's so I am proceeding slowly. I also saw lots of le in the area. I went from about pershing to somewhere in the 50's on south cicero. Looped back at the interstate, went back up on cicero to 47th and then east on to western. What time seems to be the best? Hours of day and days of week? Also I notice a motel skylark down there somewhere. Any thoughts on that notel?

[QUOTE=Adelita;2728135]I remember I could hit king drive 67th to 61st then from 61st & prairie all the way too 43rd & pick up mostly BSW,71st & halsted too & 76th halsted is tranny land all I see is ts over there the 76th exchange area still good every now & then I get lucky on a 159th st met a WSW calls herself Jackie she had some good cookies nice & clean not loose I skipped CBJ & dived right in looks were a 7.[/QUOTE]Good Question. Tiimes change and so so neighborhoods and the people who live there. Also don't forget public action closes down the old familiar places. I personally think the biggest change agent of the SW's is the internet. They seem to have all migrated there. More money, less public notice, and in their mind much safer. Still though, there are good finds to be had. Stay safe everyone. Happy Holidays.

G2.

Came across Michelle last night, around pul-north area around 8 pm. Short cute MILF latina, nice and BBBJ is on point, for. 20. Will def. Repeat. Told me about her epilepsy. How was any one else's experience w / her?