The Rat Trap

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2735325]That our very senior members are boasting reviews on chicks for all of you to see and run to call and never disclosed the fact that her ad was BS and not even the chick in the pics, and she has a pimp. Thank you sir for your honesty.

Swags.[/QUOTE]Daughter,

It sounds like you are calling some of us out for our reviews and accusing us of being less than honest.

A quick count of reviews of this young lady comes in at 10 positive, 3 negative and one no response. Add six positive reviews over on the oThER site and even two on the site we will just call "M," and she isn't doing bad. I think pretty much every review comments that the pics aren't hers, some think she is better looking than the pics, some think less. I can't speak for the pimp. I saw no evidence of that. If anything, I saw evidence her room mate is a non pro girl. I am not challenging the observation of the gentleman. He may have seen something none of the rest of us did.

I CAN speak for the positive reviews. They are all accurate to my experience. 10 different guys gave 10 reviews that I have no problem believing based on my own experience. I cannot comment on the negative reviews except to reiterate what most of us know, YMMV.

I want to point out that every SP that has been around gets positive and negative reviews. That includes you. Hopefully, gentlemen will read them all, measure the pros and cons and make intelligent decisions.

But you calling us out on that is out of line. We all indicated the pics were not her. I am sure she has a reason for that and, trust me, I for one suggested it was not good and even took a few pics for her and suggested she use them instead. But it is her decision. It is her business and I am sure there are guys that will not see a chick using pics of someone else.

When I first contacted her she immediately told me and sent recent pics. That may be a fairly unorthodox way of doing business but who am I to say?

So, here's my question, what's your point? Because, no names mentioned, but there are a few more mature ladies around that post pics when they were a lot younger. Isn't that the same thing and should that not deserve being mentioned?

Just curious your take on that.

C3.

[QUOTE=Camera3;2735652]
[b]The reviews seem to be accurate, IMHO[/b]

Daughter,

It sounds like you are calling some of us out for our reviews and accusing us of being less than honest.

A quick count of reviews of this young lady comes in at 10 positive, 3 negative and one no response. Add six positive reviews over on the oThER site and even two on the site we will just call "M," and she isn't doing bad. I think pretty much every review comments that the pics aren't hers, some think she is better looking than the pics, some think less. I can't speak for the pimp. I saw no evidence of that. If anything, I saw evidence her room mate is a non pro girl. I am not challenging the observation of the gentleman. He may have seen something none of the rest of us did.

I CAN speak for the positive reviews. They are all accurate to my experience. 10 different guys gave 10 reviews that I have no problem believing based on my own experience. I cannot comment on the negative reviews except to reiterate what most of us know, YMMV.

I want to point out that every SP that has been around gets positive and negative reviews. That includes you. Hopefully, gentlemen will read them all, measure the pros and cons and make intelligent decisions.

But you calling us out on that is out of line. We all indicated the pics were not her. I am sure she has a reason for that and, trust me, I for one suggested it was not good and even took a few pics for her and suggested she use them instead. But it is her decision. It is her business and I am sure there are guys that will not see a chick using pics of someone else.

When I first contacted her she immediately told me and sent recent pics. That may be a fairly unorthodox way of doing business but who am I to say?

So, here's my question, what's your point? Because, no names mentioned, but there are a few more mature ladies around that post pics when they were a lot younger. Isn't that the same thing and should that not deserve being mentioned?

Just curious your take on that.

C3.[/QUOTE]All well said, C3.

I would add that Swags needs to go back and read his review again. He had never seen her before, so he is really only "assuming" who he saw was her. Call it a coincidence if you want, but I'd say there is at least a 50-50 chance that who he saw was NOT her anyway.

My 2-cents.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2735325]That our very senior members are boasting reviews on chicks for all of you to see and run to call and never disclosed the fact that her ad was BS and not even the chick in the pics, and she has a pimp. Thank you sir for your honesty.

Swags.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Camera3;2735652]Daughter,

It sounds like you are calling some of us out for our reviews and accusing us of being less than honest.

A quick count of reviews of this young lady comes in at 10 positive, 3 negative and one no response. Add six positive reviews over on the oThER site and even two on the site we will just call "M," and she isn't doing bad. I think pretty much every review comments that the pics aren't hers, some think she is better looking than the pics, some think less. I can't speak for the pimp. I saw no evidence of that. If anything, I saw evidence her room mate is a non pro girl. I am not challenging the observation of the gentleman. He may have seen something none of the rest of us did.

I CAN speak for the positive reviews. They are all accurate to my experience. 10 different guys gave 10 reviews that I have no problem believing based on my own experience. I cannot comment on the negative reviews except to reiterate what most of us know, YMMV.

I want to point out that every SP that has been around gets positive and negative reviews. That includes you. Hopefully, gentlemen will read them all, measure the pros and cons and make intelligent decisions.

But you calling us out on that is out of line. We all indicated the pics were not her. I am sure she has a reason for that and, trust me, I for one suggested it was not good and even took a few pics for her and suggested she use them instead. But it is her decision. It is her business and I am sure there are guys that will not see a chick using pics of someone else.

When I first contacted her she immediately told me and sent recent pics. That may be a fairly unorthodox way of doing business but who am I to say?

So, here's my question, what's your point? Because, no names mentioned, but there are a few more mature ladies around that post pics when they were a lot younger. Isn't that the same thing and should that not deserve being mentioned?

Just curious your take on that.

C3.[/QUOTE]Swags post is dead on correct and here's why. This Nova chick was billed by very old SENIOR MEMBERS on this site as the Second Coming! Nova was going to save the mongering world per Camera3 and Justcruzin. I was the first one to call C3 out for his blatant over the top review of Nova. Everyone on here gave me a hard time and come to find out I was absolutely correct About this chick. When did it become ok for a SP to use FAKE Pics? What mongers signed off on that besides C3 and a few other foolish mongers. My personal take on this situation is that Camera3 has fallen in love with this chick and feels he can save her. Camera3 even went so far as to get the EXACTLY count of her reviews on this site AND other site's as well to White knight this chick. Who does that? Out of 10 REVIEWS she got 3 bad one's? I concentrate fully on the negative reviews over the positive reviews! Swags is correct in saying so. When did it become ok for SENIOR MEMBERS to say a chick with FAKE Pics is acceptable?

Not only fake pics, but poor performance in bed along with horrible teeth and smoker breathe and also rushing MONGERS out the door before there time is up. C3 this is what you're selling to this board? Seriously? No one is buying it! She could at least cover her face and use her own body pics. She refused to do so and is using completely FAKE Pics! You old friend whether you agree with me or not have been pussywhipped by this FAKE chick. You're in love with her and your last post showed how much you have fallen for this chick. I personally feel you owe this board an apology for going way over board with this chick. What are you her management now C3? I called you out immediately on this! Now C3 does ask well how about the other chicks who use pics from there younger days?'fair question!! That is not right either, HOWEVER I would take an older pic or a chick any day compared to a completely FAKE Pic! C3 you are dead wrong on this issue. My advice to you is to marry this chick and get it over with. Save us the time to hear your ridiculous excuses about this chick nova.

You owe us an apology.

Chris5.

Swags,

Did you go to the sissy chrissy, Not a Monger school of reading? Your side kick bailed before he could even confirm it was her. But you choose to build a fantasy out of a post that isn't a review, just that he went with his gut instinct, rightfully so and bailed. Can't say it is her because she doesn't use her real pics, which everyone know. No surprise there. Good on him for bailing. There are more fish in the sea. Not sure why he posted in the Rat Trap, not really the right thread unless for some reason some people just like to start shit? Please don't use the same reading tutor sissy chrissy, Not a Monger uses. Let me guess, now you are going to post a youtube video link.

Happy New Year!

JC

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2735325]That our very senior members are boasting reviews on chicks for all of you to see and run to call and never disclosed the fact that her ad was BS and not even the chick in the pics, and she has a pimp. Thank you sir for your honesty.

Swags.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=Chris5;2735783]You have blocked this member.
[/QUOTE]I am going to go out on a limb here and guess this moron made some sort of rant about this straight forward honest discussion. So far, it has been above board and we have all been gentlemen. I am going to guess further and say it had nothing to do with reality, at all, that his rants are made up shit, as usual.

Hey, idiot! Didn't you learn your lesson when you dared to stick your nose in the Boston Massholes thread? Those guys are bat shit crazy up there. Those Easties ate your lunch. You're lucky to get out of there with only a few chew marks in your ass. Fucker, tuck your tail back between your legs, get in your blue smoke Mustang and go back to giving your daily ho count on Ho be T. No danger of you catching something that will make your dick fall off because you won't spend any money there, just count ho's.

Gentlemen, blocking him was one of the best things I ever did.

C3.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]You are all missing the point. Regardless if you think someone is fabulous you failed to report to the board properly. If having fake pics is approved of and encouraged then why did A2 delete her ads. The problem isn't thinking she us fabulous, hey that's great, the problem lies with false reviews. If you don't alert your brothers to the fact that while you had a fantastic time and the girl is great, she is not the girl in pics but in your opinion represents them. Although the recent reviews state complete opposite but you guys bank in how senior status you are so you should be more believed. I call this "The Vino Effect". It only tarnishes your status to others.

Swags.[/QUOTE][blue]I didn't delete her ads because of fake pics, I deleted them because she had 20 fucking ads running. I had written her to talk to her about it and she never answered. So, I deleted her ads and posted the note. I figured if she saw they were all gone then she would want to know what happened. She wrote me, I told her, she said she was sorry, and hasn't done it again. That issue is gone.

Fake pics; we discourage them but we don't prohibit them. There was a chick in Cincy that was using some internet models pics, I forget who. Anyway I busted her for posting fake pics and told her to knock it off. Then a couple guys wrote and told me, "dude, she has a ridiculous fucking body and looks just like that model but with a different face. " So I wrote her, she sent me a pic and I'll be damned if she didn't. So I told her, you can either use your pics, or you can put a statement in the ad saying words to the effect "In order to protect my privacy I borrow pictures from model X, they are representative of what you will meet if you see me. " Then guys could say "she doesn't look anything like that chick. " Or "Fuck, she looks just like that chick" and other guys could make their own decision based on that information.

Nobody reputable has ever written me to tell me the chick in question isn't using her own pics.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Camera3;2736089]I am going to go out on a limb here and guess this moron made some sort of rant about this straight forward honest discussion. So far, it has been above board and we have all been gentlemen. I am going to guess further and say it had nothing to do with reality, at all, that his rants are made up shit, as usual.

Hey, idiot! Didn't you learn your lesson when you dared to stick your nose in the Boston Massholes thread? Those guys are bat shit crazy up there. Those Easties ate your lunch. You're lucky to get out of there with only a few chew marks in your ass. Fucker, tuck your tail back between your legs, get in your blue smoke Mustang and go back to giving your daily ho count on Ho be T. No danger of you catching something that will make your dick fall off because you won't spend any money there, just count ho's.

Gentlemen, blocking him was one of the best things I ever did.

C3.[/QUOTE]I know you have me on IGNORE and I can RESPECT that. LOL! But can you please answer ANY of my questions? You just rambled on like a cracked out crack ho old man! Are you in love with Nova? Admit it!! You're just pathetic and foolish old man. She has pussywhipped you fool!

Please whomever is c3 boy, tell him Chris is demanding an apology to the board for his captain save a ho actions.

Smh.

Chris5.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]You are all missing the point. Regardless if you think someone is fabulous you failed to report to the board properly.

Swags.[/QUOTE]Savanna, you and I have always gotten along fine but you are full of shit on this one. I am pretty sure that every post, positive and negative, and that is a total of over 18 reviews on three sites, all state the pics are not her but they are close. Some think it is very close. Some don't. So, what are you smoking? Go read the fucking reviews and THEN get back to us.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]If having fake pics is approved of and encouraged then why did A2 delete her ads.

Swags.[/QUOTE]A2 addressed this. You are wrong. Get over it.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]The problem isn't thinking she us fabulous, hey that's great, the problem lies with false reviews.

Swags.[/QUOTE]I have read all the reviews and no one said she is "fabulous. " We all pretty much enjoyed our time for good reason. I think all reviews that I read are accurate. She is young, attractive and a good time. I don't think anyone said she was the Holy Grail, just attractive, young, tight and fun. So, put up or shut up. Who wrote a fake review? Name one. Because I will go after that shit. You know that. I stuck up for you when you were under attack and I would do the same for any lady. You are attacking this lady with a bull shit argument. Fact.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]If you don't alert your brothers to the fact that while you had a fantastic time and the girl is great, she is not the girl in pics but in your opinion represents them.

Swags.[/QUOTE]Go back and read the fucking reviews. Everyone said that. That is 10 guys on this side, six on the oThER site and two on the "W" site. Take your socks off and add it up. That is 18 reviews and everyone said the same thing. The pics are not of her, most indicated she says so, she has a reason (and I have no problem with her reason). So, if you would please, tell me who indicated they were her? Let's both call that shit out. But you won't find it. It isn't there.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]Although the recent reviews state complete opposite but you guys bank in how senior status you are so you should be more believed.

Swags.[/QUOTE]The recent review, which was posted here and not in the review thread for some reason, states he saw a black guy with a chick. He didn't stick around to see if it was her. Maybe it was. I have no idea. He bolted so we will never know. There are a few discrepancies in his post, not the least being she hasn't been in any hotel on I-drive in a couple weeks. She has been advertising in a different city and her current ad puts her near the airport. So, the review is probably a couple weeks old, at best. Why post here and why now? I really don't care, just a point.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2736136]I call this "The Vino Effect". It only tarnishes your status to others.

Swags.[/QUOTE]So, I get the point. Sweetie, you are hanging with the uncool kids, again. There is only one reason the Ass Wipe Kid rants on about any chick, it is because she won't see his cheap ass. We all know it. Why don't you? Geeze, that is a very long list of reputable ladies. Because, right now, you are attacking a young attractive chick for no apparent reason. You have done that before. Sour grapes much?

Or is there a real point that none of us can see? I started this post by stating that you and I have always gotten along. I expect that to continue. But you are picking the wrong side.

And cut the "white knight" bull shit. Where is that coming from, anyway? I don't think anyone has been her white knight, just straight forward reviews and a little bull shit from the Ass Wipe Kid who should stop inhaling that blue smoke coming out of the Mustang.

Just one man's opinion.

C3.

[QUOTE=Camera3;2736295]Savanna, you and I have always gotten along fine but you are full of shit on this one. I am pretty sure that every post, positive and negative, and that is a total of over 18 reviews on three sites, all state the pics are not her but they are close. Some think it is very close. Some don't. So, what are you smoking? Go read the fucking reviews and THEN get back to us.

A2 addressed this. You are wrong. Get over it.

I have read all the reviews and no one said she is "fabulous. " We all pretty much enjoyed our time for good reason. I think all reviews that I read are accurate. She is young, attractive and a good time. I don't think anyone said she was the Holy Grail, just attractive, young, tight and fun. So, put up or shut up. Who wrote a fake review? Name one. Because I will go after that shit. You know that. I stuck up for you when you were under attack and I would do the same for any lady. You are attacking this lady with a bull shit argument. Fact.

Go back and read the fucking reviews. Everyone said that. That is 10 guys on this side, six on the oThER site and two on the "W" site. Take your socks off and add it up. That is 18 reviews and everyone said the same thing. The pics are not of her, most indicated she says so, she has a reason (and I have no problem with her reason). So, if you would please, tell me who indicated they were her? Let's both call that shit out. But you won't find it. It isn't there.

The recent review, which was posted here and not in the review thread for some reason, states he saw a black guy with a chick. He didn't stick around to see if it was her. Maybe it was. I have no idea. He bolted so we will never know. There are a few discrepancies in his post, not the least being she hasn't been in any hotel on I-drive in a couple weeks. She has been advertising in a different city and her current ad puts her near the airport. So, the review is probably a couple weeks old, at best. Why post here and why now? I really don't care, just a point.

So, I get the point. Sweetie, you are hanging with the uncool kids, again. There is only one reason the Ass Wipe Kid rants on about any chick, it is because she won't see his cheap ass. We all know it. Why don't you? Geeze, that is a very long list of reputable ladies. Because, right now, you are attacking a young attractive chick for no apparent reason. You have done that before. Sour grapes much?

Or is there a real point that none of us can see? I started this post by stating that you and I have always gotten along. I expect that to continue. But you are picking the wrong side.

And cut the "white knight" bull shit. Where is that coming from, anyway? I don't think anyone has been her white knight, just straight forward reviews and a little bull shit from the Ass Wipe Kid who should stop inhaling that blue smoke coming out of the Mustang.

Just one man's opinion.

C3.[/QUOTE]First off Swags can handle her own but I must add the following. Camera3 is ONLY talking about this chicks POSITIVE reviews. No mention of the other several NEGATIVE reviews!! He refuses to address ANYTHING negative about this chick. She may be a nice girl HOWEVER let her defend herself! C3 is acting like her pimp and the ultimate white Knight. FAKE Pics are not ok. Savanna is dead correct on this issue. You are your buddy's can white knight this chick all day long. Truth is you clowns can have her. I personally predict that after all you old geezers are done with her that she will be on Paradise Trail very soon for me and my beloved street walker thread to enjoy.

Chris5.

[QUOTE=Chris5;2736383]First off Swags can handle her own but I must add the following. Camera3 is ONLY talking about this chicks POSITIVE reviews. No mention of the other several NEGATIVE reviews!! He refuses to address ANYTHING negative about this chick. She may be a nice girl HOWEVER let her defend herself! C3 is acting like her pimp and the ultimate white Knight. FAKE Pics are not ok. Savanna is dead correct on this issue. You are your buddy's can white knight this chick all day long. Truth is you clowns can have her. I personally predict that after all you old geezers are done with her that she will be on Paradise Trail very soon for me and my beloved street walker thread to enjoy.

Chris5.[/QUOTE]Kind of funny reading your crying about white knights when you ran to Fat Debs defense in MASSHOLES.

Practice what you preach you fucking pussy.

BB.