Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Mr.Inch;7135066]I would never eat cat at a kamp (I don't think I ever did, could be wrong tho LOL), yeah, it's the other.[/QUOTE]I have but it's up north or West Coast.

[QUOTE=Mr.Inch;7134739]So. I ate cat the other day from an older Asian, 45+, but that cat was smooth and tasty as fukk, I'm confused. When I fingered her, tighter then anything I ever had. Can these Asian cats really be this tight after being in business for 20 years or so. And yeah, she been in business since I started. Etc. I can't explain. Smooth Cat. Side and all. . Delicious. Like, super soft and smooth. No Arby's downstairs etc. How is my question?[/QUOTE]Suspect genetics has something to do with it. Have know a few that where snug for their age. Course if any kids where via c-section that helps. But with anything if not kept up or high volume, size, normal child delivery or don't care anymore that can change.

Remember Donna (FOTB) when she started at Ease, snug and encapsulated. After time and locations. When she left aAdore (went by Monica then) was loose with curtains.

Others have surgery to trim the Arby's and / or snug the tunnel. Kelly (coco / librarian) cums to mind. An Active keggles routine helps. There is actually a keggle game (like donkey Kong) they play on their phone were the jumping is done via pressure on an insert.

Or the Amy (a lot of various procedures) that most know (#1, Pearl, Rose, Sisi, etc). Who remembers back when she was the hidden gem at barefoot (roswell). Few joked they should change name to bareback.

Not many feelings better than, upon entry, their ring closes around the helmet.

[QUOTE=NickyMassage;7133475]Sent you a PM about Massage Pro my good man![/QUOTE]Sorry Nicky! I responded.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.[/blue]

[QUOTE=Mr.Inch;7135812]Good job. We need more like you. That spot was good earlier this year, dried up now. And, what's with this 60 for half hour and 70 for hour these days, math is not mathing. We need boycott them all for 2 weeks or so till price goes back to 40/60 LOL.[/QUOTE]To be honest, that's not something I would typically do. But this time I was pretty upset as I was really hoping / expecting for some happiness especially with this younger, fairly good looking girl.

And yeah, the math doesn't make sense at all. I'm down for a boycott.

[QUOTE=Mr.Inch;7135794]Her asshole smelled and was wet (in a bad way) . Small tits. Shortest one there. She looked Vietnamese. Nice awesome girl besides the stinky booty. Romantic player she is. If that's amber, let her be amber. Small frame, tight high quality yoga pants. Nice arch etc. Probably like 4'9" tall. . Now, what's the blonde one's name?[/QUOTE]There seems to be some confusion about these two MS-SS masseuses: Coco has blonde tinted hair and possibly looks Vietnamese. Amber is a very young brunette that is the smallest girl in the shop.

Went by to check them out. Short mama-san was really nice and welcomed me in. House fee was. 6 (extra 5 bucks if you don't have cash but they offer atm).

Only had 1 girl at the time. Might be the dd girl of myth. They were at least d. Really nice and upbeat. Decent overall, maybe mid 30's.

Asked if they were busy that day b / c there was a 5 min wait. She said ya but they had a new girl starting on Monday.

FS was $$, CBJ was 1. 5. Thought this was a bit high so I just asked for a massage and l1. Massage was fully nude, with touching, mouth roaming, fiv, and simulated riding HJ. Never had it before but was probably the best l1 I'd ever gotten. Much diff than the Chinese wack-a-mole.

Cheerful and playful the whole time. Warm towel, dressed me, hugs, playing / teasing and saw me out.

Mamasan asked how the service was, gave a thumbs up and waddled off.

After the fact I searched the archives and saw poor reviews for them. I guess they listened and are trying to do better. Maybe new management. Still a bit pricey for me, but $. 6 cover was much lower than most CAMPs.