Personal reactions to skin issues
This isn't tied to any specific girl but in general. Over the course of seeing various girls, at least a handful or more, had skin issues. Eczema, Psoriasis, skin picking, general rash, etc. At least one girl a couple yrs a go someone tried to report a skin issue as something more serious and contagious when she had prescription cream in the bathroom for eczema. Must of these aren't contagious at all and even look very different from each other. I get it that ultimately guys would love a flawless woman for cheap rates which is pretty much unlikely. If guys want to pass up great girls bc they aren't educated on what to worry about and what's harmless that's up to you. I've had a couple decent regulars with very reasonable rates bc guys got scared of what they don't understand. In this day and age, you can simply take a pick of the skin issue and narrow it down to what it is.
It's a bit more complex than that
Many years back Rose had deep open skin sores all over both arms and elsewhere. It was well know she was a major junkie.
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/hartford/female-escorts/highly-addictive-hot-blonde-se/757456501788[/URL]
Supposed went to rehab and recent ad pics show less skin issues. Unlikely she's completely clean, but just goes to show it's just about how well they can hide it.
A demon free completely "normal" provider on STG is a pipe dream.
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7582676]Correct. Most girls on STG have a habit. The question is do you catch them in the early stage of the habit (good) or the late stage (bad).[/QUOTE]
Re: Bringing an escort especially a streetwalker to Art cinema is a Horrible idea.
[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7686166]I would say if she's frequenting the Art and clearly making transactions, that would be exposing. I think worst case is she would have to leave the theatre but no further altercation.
Simply someone being an escort doesn't make them an illegal person overall. I've hooked up with girls that were escorts but I wasn't doing a date with them. I wasn't aftaid of being exposed. Have to prove a transaction occurred. There has already been mention of certain escorts going to the Art already as well as swingers parties through Fetlife.
With that being said, I have never been to the Art but have considered in general and not as a short stay option.[/QUOTE]Hello, DonnnyBravo.
Allow me to elaborate.
Bringing a well-known streetwalker from the South End to The Art Cinema or any lifestyle venue risks putting the business in jeopardy. This practice is strongly frowned upon within the lifestyle community, and it is not acceptable regardless of whether others do it.
If the staff or owner discovers that you are attempting to bring a prostitute into the theater, you will be banned for life. I have seen this happen on numerous occasions, including individuals being removed for soliciting sexual services.
Additionally, escorts operating on FetLife risk having their accounts deleted, as this violates the platform's Terms of Service.
Furthermore, if you have never been to The Art Cinema, it is unclear why you are offering input on this matter.
Take care!
Donny brings up a good point yet again
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MQLlMbS-Y[/URL]
Flock is such hypocrisy. This video showcases a journalist investigating Flock facilities and they didn't appreciate being surveilled yet run a company that surveils the mass public without consent. SMH.
Like it or not, Flock is another reality that is just growing around this country.
[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7689688][URL]https://maps.deflock.org/[/URL]
For those of you that pick up streetwalkers or do car dates, it might be good to know where cameras are being installed. They'll know if you frequent the areas. LA is putting them up on Figueroa. Fun times.[/QUOTE]
1 photos
Flocking cameras private and public
[QUOTE=MaxThrust;7690126]Found that WFSB did an interview with the Simsbury PD and they acknowledged having a half dozen of the cameras installed. Then, much like in the video. They refused to give their location for 'public safety' reasons.
LMFAO, so if they're only there to 'protect' the public, shouldn't be an issue letting the public know where they are now should it? Wonder if the residents of that town know their lowlife police are covertly monitoring them (likely not).
Ok. I'm off my soapbox for the day.[/QUOTE]Too much info for me to go thru, first link is associated to picture below, all other links are self explanatory, [URL]https://www.law360.com/articles/1450472/lapd-case-sheds-light-on-agencies-social-media-monitoring[/URL] [URL]https://connecthartford.org/[/URL] civilians cameras can register with, [URL]https://www.atlasofsurveillance.org/search?agency=Hartford[/URL]+Police+Department [URL]https://www.google.com/search?q=is[/URL]+there+a+site+that+shows+where+police+in+hartford+placed+cameras&oq=is+there+a+site+that+shows+where+police+in+hartford+placed+cameras&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCjcwMjc5 ajBqMTWoAgGwAgE&sourceid=chrome&source=chrome. Rb&ie=UTF-8.