Cowboy Fans
Printable View
Cowboy Fans
This shows that you can prove mathamatically what we all know.
Had one more it says it was too big to load.
this Is Hilarious
CLICK ON THE PIC OF THE DOG.
I Found An Old Picture Of Me And My Babysitter.
I Miss Her Alot!
Voted Best photo 2007
AJohn, I would have given my right ARM to have been the photographer! LOL
[QUOTE=A John]This was taken just after that babysitter left.[/QUOTE]
That must have been some babysitter, lol.
Someone pm'ed me that the Monica Lewinsky button was politically charged, so in the interest of being FAIR AND BALANCED let's throw some shit in the direction of one of the biggest hypocrites in talk radio....
This is an actual puzzle that ran in the January 25th Washington Post.
([url=http://jcnemecek.com/grosvenor/?p=40]Nasty, Nasty Scrabble Gram[/url])
That first word is NOT what you expect.
Relations
[QUOTE=LordBlackAdder]This shows that you can prove mathamatically what we all know.[/QUOTE]Okay, before you all stone me, I know this is meant to be a joke. But there are a couple of problems with the proof that women = problems.
The first is a minor issue with time "and" money meaning multiplication rather than addition. However, in most algebraic systems, the "and" operator acts more like multiplication while "or" is more like addition, so I'll let that one go.
Another issue is the statement in #4. Money is not the root of all problems, the quote is that the love of money is the root of all evil. To have money is not the problem, to love the money beyond other things is the problem. Furthermore, the author of the proof has not established that problems are evil.
Even forgoing that one, there is a mathematical mistake in step 5. The square root of something squared is the absolute value of the radicand, but that's not what we have here. We have the root first and the square outside that, so it's the radicand as long as the radicand is non-negative.
So a more mathematically precise proof would be to continue one step beyond what was done. Step 5 can say that women = problems as long as the problems are not negative.
Step 6 should be that since problems are usually negative, the square of (root problems) is essentially the empty or null set.
Therefore, rather than proving that women are problems, this argument shows that women are non-existent.
However, I would caution that when your proof contradicts what is known to be true, that there is probably something wrong with your proof.
[QUOTE=Warpig2000]Someone pm'ed me that the Monica Lewinsky button was politically charged, so in the interest of being FAIR AND BALANCED let's throw some shit in the direction of one of the biggest hypocrites in talk radio....[/QUOTE]
O'Reilly is the biggest asshole. I would like to see him get the crap beat out of him from some of our vets for denying the truth about them.
Warpig2000:
If you're attempting to be Fair & Balanced, you've failed. O'Reilly never denied the existence of homeless vets. He disagreed with former Senator and Presidential candidate John Edwards' assertion that homeless vets are homeless because of the economy. O'Reilly countered that many of the homeless vets are in their situation because of addictions and/or mental problems. And there are organizations and programs to help.
O'Reilly has backed up his claims interviewing representatives from veterans and homeless groups, something Edwards has never done. Unless you count snarky soundbites during rallies and appearances on Letterman.
Further, O'Reilly has been adamant on military affairs. He is one of the few in radio or TV that went to Guantanamo. And he's been to both Iraq and Afghanistan. And, he was one of the first to challenge the NYT's claim that returning vets are five-times as likely to commit murder. Has Senator Edwards done any of these?
If it sounds like I'm defending O'Reilly, you're right...I am. I'm a viewer of his program and occassional listener to the radio program. Above that, however, I respond to your (and Larks comments) because I believe in honesty, especially when it comes to the military. I'm a veteran, afterall. I've seen a lot of the problems plaguing some vets first-hand. It ain't because of the economy.
When to Cancel Your Wife's Gym Membership
[QUOTE=Satiating]Step 6 should be that since problems are usually negative, the square of (root problems) is essentially the empty or null set.[/QUOTE]Oh, no you don't. It most assuredly [b]isn't[/b] a null set. Mathemagicans have devised the concept of an [i]imaginary[/i] number space, designated as [i]i[/i]=SQRT(-1). I'll leave it to others to draw the next conclusion...