I don't think your reasoning is on point
[QUOTE=Josh88;2814659]I have to agree with Fatboy. Referring to us as fellow hobbiests doesn't necessarily send up a red flag but the way the review is written seems to be penned from a feminine point of view. I don't doubt Grace is GFE, but Beautiful / Hot may be a bit of a stretch based on the pics. Maybe I am a little skeptical when I am urged to treat a provider with "TLC" and "my rewards will be great". What does that mean? As if most of us treat these girls with disrespect and abuse them?. If we treat her with "TLC" will she perform services she doesn't normally perform? Unless they are a WK or a discount is involved, most mongers don't say these things.[/QUOTE]Nah. Dudes always come with that "she's good guys, let's take care of her" or "Let's keep her around" or "Treat her right guys". A lot. Seniors especially get the "I love her and I want to protect her" pussy drunk thing and will go into long detail about how his current ATF is AMAZING, etc. It's annoying.
As to the TLC and performance. We all know that some of us get more / better action with some girls than others. I know I've read conflicting reviews of girls I've seen and I had BBBJ where they complained of CBJ, or where I had DFK, and they complained of non-GFE. And the other way as well. This is also pretty standard and summed up by the concept of YMMV.
Finally, fellow hobbies is probably a typo. Dudes have typos all over the place. I doubt a provider decided she'd get creative and coin a new term for us just for the hell of it. Even if the review is fake, I'm guessing the "hobbies" bit was not because she thought it sounded more legit than hobbiests. It's two letters.