Della, age and other info
[QUOTE=RojoBear;6362240]Several years ago I would have happily given Della the title "enticing beauty" but that ship has sailed. She's mis representing her age, and unfortunately she now sports a middle age belly. She does rock the unique hair styles well but if you're looking for business only provider you will probably be only a little disappointed. Unfortunately GFE ain't happening, she makes it clear "it's only a job". For 3 bennies you could do so much better. I'm waiting for the day her rates reflect her services and looks. Until then she's a hard pass.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PureGent;6362414]She's misrepresenting her age?
This is pretty much standard practice since the caveman days. Ha ha. Add 5 to 10 to the posted age of any provider and you'll be right most of the time.[/QUOTE]Right? Don't they all fib on their age? As to Della specifically, she keeps the pics in her ad pretty current and she posts on SC nearly daily. Check out her pics and you'll know exactly what she looks like. If she's your type, give her a call. If not, don't.
Re: Bad to the Blonde previous review
[QUOTE=Jabbott;6367388]Just curious did you check her reviews first.[/QUOTE]To answer your question, no about doing a previous search. I do check this forum very regularly and keep track (or try to) of reviews and keep a dance card up to date. Her name or nickname isn't stated in her ad so I would have a time searching previous posts. Keywords like Blonde, Hot, Bad, etc. Would have several hits. The links that are posted in the reviews are great. However, the links don't work if the posts are removed or as STG did a few months ago, redo their site and old links won't work. Sometimes I don't click on all the links to see the ad of the subject. Some advertisers use identical names which makes searching more challenging.
I include a picture when I post a review. To me it makes it much easier when looking through older posts and not needing to click on hundreds of posts.
If there is a easier way or more efficient way of searching this forum anyone please let me know. It would be appreciated.
Rusty Z.
1 photos
Re: Samantha a. K. a. Bad to the Blond
[QUOTE=Feckless;6367696]She went by Samantha at one time -among LOTS of names and phn numbers--which is a TELL}. Taking her {anyone} on your car to the conven store / ANYWHERE was not a good move--you're not their uber or concierge, and don't know what illegal subst they might have on them. Once there, you should have dumped her. She's a terrible provider, bordering in SCAMMER. THe boobs are terrible fakes and the nipples are tattoos -- not real. ANd, of course, she's closer to 59 than 39. The attached pic IS a good idea to help people aviod these--espec since they change names or avoid names all together.
Consider the $40 an inexpensive lesson -but really-- if they pull that 'drive me to_ # tell them to BLOW and give them ZERO.
F1.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the all the advice F1.
I was up in Cocoa for visit with a provider that bailed at the last minute and was a last minute knee jerk reaction to hit her up. I agree with your assessment 100%. When I was driving away I was thinking the same thought. Kind of on the edge of scamming. Yes, exactly. Inexpensive lesson.
Something must be in the water up in the ville.
Rusty Z.
Two Juicy. Who is reviewed?
I actually look for reviews. There are reviews for a Juicy but it isn't clear who she is. Now there are two. I wouldn't want the wrong one to be misinterpreted as not good (if she is) one is advertised as 30 and added a J in her name - [URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/space-coast/female-escorts/caucasian_w/juicy-j-is-here-to-stay--/498154064319[/URL].
The other advertising as 45 or 48 - [URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/palmbay/female-escorts/caucasian_e/do-you-like-it-wet/578735654200[/URL] or [URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/palmbay/female-escorts/caucasian_e/juicy/261922382183.[/URL].
Anyone wants to repost and clarify who is not so good?