Asian Providers

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6476613]Hear me now, believe me later: Do Not see her. I've posted about her too many times to count, covering the LA KBB thread and the SJ one, including her real pic.[/QUOTE]I should have taken heed to this post.

I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.

It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.

[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6631269]I should have taken heed to this post.

I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.

It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.[/QUOTE]Interesting. If you wouldn't describe her as slim or slender what would she be? She for sure isn't fat. My experience with her was pretty much the same as BigCoomer's.

[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6615311]I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.

Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.

BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.

She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.

She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.[/QUOTE]I went to SstuntCock's post of her real pic and that is definitely not the Mimi I saw. I've attached the pic below as a reference. The girl in the pic looks to have large bolt-ons and a tatoo on her stomach. The current Mimi at SAG has small A's with the tattoo on the left side of her leg as you mentioned.

[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6631269]I should have taken heed to this post.

I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.

It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.[/QUOTE]Truth be told, they are two different Mimi's. The one I referenced (and you quoted) is an absolute wildebeest, as seen in her REAL pic below, mixed in with the various levels of P.S. Pics that were used to advertise her. Be lucky you dodged that bullet. I made my therapist filthy fkn rich with the countless hours of therapy we put into healing from that trauma.

The one currently at LG is different; and yes she has that medium length script-tattoo going down her thigh. And yes she's fkn annoying. As far as her "baby-talking" goes, she needs to shut tf up. Super annoying. Kept asking me if I was "OK. " Super awkward. Insisted on showering, even tho I pre-showered and don't smell like gawd damn goat curry. Asked me to cum outside. Booo! Decent suction BBBJ but she didn't go deep enough to pop her throat. CIM finish but sadly no swallow. Seemed like she preferred to stick to her own routine including an excessively lengthy cat bath. (Eye roll). Your money is better spent on well-reviewed all-in girls in WLA. Just make sure to stop by Costa Mesa to see Gisella. Next!

[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6627665]
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
[/QUOTE]Agreed. All the fun is gone when you have to withdraw. Reminds me of the high school days. Better to deposit than withdraw, my bank also likes that.

[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6627665]It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AllCock;6631474]Agreed. All the fun is gone when you have to withdraw. Reminds me of the high school days. Better to deposit than withdraw, my bank also likes that.[/QUOTE]I would encourage telling us the girls name / agency when this happens. We can take our notes and information of this sort, no matter how small, helps everyone on this board.

[QUOTE=SirBishop;6589267]Always a game with the Indies and Agencies. 10 years ago when RedBook was here we heard RBGFE, 5 years ago all we heard was GFE, 2 years ago BBFS was finally out of the closet and K-girls drove that. Now I'm seeing K-Agencies on the West Coast changing girls to PSE. A quick msg to a booker and he said "PSE means she is more willing to swallow, BBBJ, hot sex". How did we manage to move BBBJ and CIM from GFE into this PSE acronym? It's like going to Ralph's and discovering that beer has been moved two aisles over! WTF?

Another booker said girls don't always want to go bare and will use the PSE as an option. They won't rule out bare but it turns back into a YMMV situation. That's no good either. If I want the Ferrari and you give me a Yugo then I'm going to be pissed. I've already agreed to the premium payment which has already grown astronomically and rendered my mongering to fewer and fewer days. Don't make me cry when I booked that early '20's HYA and mamasan comes out for a HJ! Shit, PSE back in the day also meant "Porn Star Experience" which meant bare. Not today so WTF has happened to our clearly used acronyms from the RedBook days?[/QUOTE]For the ones who use PSE as an option, mainly the ones who don't have an uncharge right? So they can decide on the spot to see if they are attracted enough to do so?

[URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3306857[/URL]

Well, looks like this agency might have read my previous (negative) review as my recent visit was much better. Actually got a partner in the shower this time, light preview BBBJ, standing camel slides, lots of hugging and kissing, etc. Much more GFE'ish. Only thing she didn't do was DFK which I didn't mind. Out of the shower, did some more outside teasing and then strapped on the cover and just went to town. Doggy and then finish in mish. Afterwards, she offered me food. So yeah, a complete 180 from my previous experience where the provider was stand off-ish and didn't even join me in the shower. Looks wise, she is young, pretty, and curvy. The pic in the ad is accurate.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6631417]Truth be told, they are two different Mimi's. The one I referenced (and you quoted) is an absolute wildebeest, as seen in her REAL pic below, mixed in with the various levels of P.S. Pics that were used to advertise her. Be lucky you dodged that bullet. I made my therapist filthy fkn rich with the countless hours of therapy we put into healing from that trauma.

The one currently at LG is different; and yes she has that medium length script-tattoo going down her thigh. And yes she's fkn annoying. As far as her "baby-talking" goes, she needs to shut tf up. Super annoying. Kept asking me if I was "OK. " Super awkward. Insisted on showering, even tho I pre-showered and don't smell like gawd damn goat curry. Asked me to cum outside. Booo! Decent suction BBBJ but she didn't go deep enough to pop her throat. CIM finish but sadly no swallow. Seemed like she preferred to stick to her own routine including an excessively lengthy cat bath. (Eye roll). Your money is better spent on well-reviewed all-in girls in WLA. Just make sure to stop by Costa Mesa to see Gisella. Next![/QUOTE]Stuntcock! I'm just now processing that she did ask if I was ok a few more times than I probably liked haha. I thought maybe it was just me looking like I wasn't enjoying myself or something. I think I can see the baby voice being annoying for some people so I get it. I didn't notice it too much but I'll def mention those type of things next time — apologies for missing that!

Not sure about the lack of deepthroat though. She was going all the way down for me — maybe she was tired by then, or maybe you have a massive cock? Depending on which it is, I'm sorry or Congrats!

[QUOTE=BKane80;6633043][URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3306857[/URL]

Well, looks like this agency might have read my previous (negative) review as my recent visit was much better. Actually got a partner in the shower this time, light preview BBBJ, standing camel slides, lots of hugging and kissing, etc. Much more GFE'ish. Only thing she didn't do was DFK which I didn't mind. Out of the shower, did some more outside teasing and then strapped on the cover and just went to town. Doggy and then finish in mish. Afterwards, she offered me food. So yeah, a complete 180 from my previous experience where the provider was stand off-ish and didn't even join me in the shower. Looks wise, she is young, pretty, and curvy. The pic in the ad is accurate.[/QUOTE]This agency is Thai and this is what I meant when I said some of their girls are amateur (just started). Pro is they have all been young so far (early 20's), Con is they aren't as skilled / professional as the Korean providers. I don't mind, but I know others only care about that so I'd mention.

The Thai agency girls give what I call an "actual GFE" experience for better or worse, as in they don't always know what they're doing but want you to turn them on and do this and that to them, even as I'm trying to do what I want to them. Megan for example insisted we fuck so she could watch us in the mirror. Another girl insisted I eat her first before she sucked me. She asked me to do various things that turned her on, every time I visited her. It's like having sex with an actual girlfriend, but like I said I don't mind. Whereas they are also amateur because they'll make lots of mistakes like forget a towel or suddenly get up to search their storage for condoms (not sure of where they are stored, it was her first day), etc. Not getting in the shower like the other guy mentioned. You know, exactly like some actual girlfriends I've had. Not the marketing 'GFE' that SDAG means.

Whereas the SDAG are usually much more skilled, even as a friend put it "ritualistic". Not in a bad way for most people, but I do like the spontaneity of amateurs too.

Hope that helps.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6633454]This agency is Thai and this is what I meant when I said some of their girls are amateur (just started). Pro is they have all been young so far (early 20's), Con is they aren't as skilled / professional as the Korean providers. I don't mind, but I know others only care about that so I'd mention.

The Thai agency girls give what I call an "actual GFE" experience for better or worse, as in they don't always know what they're doing but want you to turn them on and do this and that to them, even as I'm trying to do what I want to them. Megan for example insisted we fuck so she could watch us in the mirror. Another girl insisted I eat her first before she sucked me. She asked me to do various things that turned her on, every time I visited her. It's like having sex with an actual girlfriend, but like I said I don't mind. Whereas they are also amateur because they'll make lots of mistakes like forget a towel or suddenly get up to search their storage for condoms (not sure of where they are stored, it was her first day), etc. Not getting in the shower like the other guy mentioned. You know, exactly like some actual girlfriends I've had. Not the marketing 'GFE' that SDAG means.

Whereas the SDAG are usually much more skilled, even as a friend put it "ritualistic". Not in a bad way for most people, but I do like the spontaneity of amateurs too..[/QUOTE]Agree on all points. Lines up with what I've experienced with this agency. Maybe they should market as providing the "real" GFE.

[QUOTE=AllCock;6631474]Agreed. All the fun is gone when you have to withdraw. Reminds me of the high school days. Better to deposit than withdraw, my bank also likes that.[/QUOTE]Exactly, no upcharges for COP (cum outside) is a diff story, otherwise no point in opting the upgrade on raws.

[QUOTE=BillyIsTheOne;6629284]I'm just going to play devils advocate here and say that I can see where they are coming from. I 've seen many sdag girls and have had great experiences with some that had a terrible review and and terrible experiences from some that had great reviews. Everyone clicks differently and if you leave a bad review, the girls rep is ruined and they have to leave and find a new name. Most reviews don't differentiate between 'didn't click' and 'service was terrible' and sometimes its hard to categorize the experience either way. With all that said, sdag has been bitching and whining about bad reviews for a long time and hey made a big mistake by making this threat. You can't control what anonymous people post online so they just have to get over it. FEC and others dont behave that way.[/QUOTE]First, I disagree with the whole concept of "you leave a bad review, the girls rep is ruined and they have to leave and find a new name".

If a girl has 25 great reviews and one bad review, her rep is hardly ruined.

Personally I always read negative reviews of any service and product I am buying first. In this biz negative reviews tend to be more detailed as to what went wrong and more detailed in general.

Second, it's hard for me to grasp why the rebrand practice is not considered a bad practice. A girl runs away from her reviews so she changes names until people figure out her old name or a new bad review pops up. This is just running from accountability all in the name of the almighty dollar. This shouldn't be encouraged or condoned. Is it really any different from con men who would travel from city to city and con people before the news of their con would reach the next city?

So I don't know. I maintain that they fucked up not in the optics / visibility level of this policy but in the policy itself. Let people write what they want in reviews provided they're not intentionally malicious or fake. Let quality of your product / service sell or at least speak for itself. Policing reviews like a hawk and creating hx circlejerks / echochambers isn't it.

[QUOTE=BKane80;6633043][URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3306857[/URL]

Well, looks like this agency might have read my previous (negative) review as my recent visit was much better. Actually got a partner in the shower this time, light preview BBBJ, standing camel slides, lots of hugging and kissing, etc. Much more GFE'ish. Only thing she didn't do was DFK which I didn't mind. Out of the shower, did some more outside teasing and then strapped on the cover and just went to town. Doggy and then finish in mish. Afterwards, she offered me food. So yeah, a complete 180 from my previous experience where the provider was stand off-ish and didn't even join me in the shower. Looks wise, she is young, pretty, and curvy. The pic in the ad is accurate.[/QUOTE]The photos in the HX ad are definitely her, the horse drawing is in the entryway. I'm not 100% certain she isn't a post-op tranny, the butt implants, pussy, and big feet really messed with my head when I left. I still feel dirty after my visit.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6631417]Truth be told, they are two different Mimi's. The one I referenced (and you quoted) is an absolute wildebeest, as seen in her REAL pic below, mixed in with the various levels of P.S. Pics that were used to advertise her. Be lucky you dodged that bullet. I made my therapist filthy fkn rich with the countless hours of therapy we put into healing from that trauma.

The one currently at LG is different; and yes she has that medium length script-tattoo going down her thigh. And yes she's fkn annoying. As far as her "baby-talking" goes, she needs to shut tf up. Super annoying. Kept asking me if I was "OK. " Super awkward. Insisted on showering, even tho I pre-showered and don't smell like gawd damn goat curry. Asked me to cum outside. Booo! Decent suction BBBJ but she didn't go deep enough to pop her throat. CIM finish but sadly no swallow. Seemed like she preferred to stick to her own routine including an excessively lengthy cat bath. (Eye roll). Your money is better spent on well-reviewed all-in girls in WLA. Just make sure to stop by Costa Mesa to see Gisella. Next![/QUOTE]I am so close to seeing Mimi because of that previous post about deepthroat and gagging. So is she not a HYA? Any talent down here in SD right now? Otherwise I will make my way up north next week.

[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;6633775]The photos in the HX ad are definitely her, the horse drawing is in the entryway. I'm not 100% certain she isn't a post-op tranny, the butt implants, pussy, and big feet really messed with my head when I left. I still feel dirty after my visit.[/QUOTE]The entire concept is a joke. So many trannies and they don't even tell you, for one I appreciate if they would just let me know that their trannies and they like to take it up the ass but they don't even do that Just because they are young does not mean that they can make you happy. 10 years ago in Sorrento valley it used to be incredible, but now it is awful. No kissing, Thailand girls are either all in or they're not, BJ is terrible always require a condom for sex I don't even know why these guys are still trying to compete at the current prices it makes no sense.