Printable View
[QUOTE=EasyeOne;7630984]Fresh profile, after a few messages, wants to start online, quick to offer a number or telegram.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/599f970e-919b-4028-be45-c20f50c40a3b[/URL][/QUOTE]Same thing with me. Was good in texts on SA but as soon as we went to reg texts, 100 for pics, 150 for videos. I said no and she blocked me.
Any intel on this one she use to be on CC a few years back.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/T1i99TdV03ji9z1lWPOsc8iQpemNVtBrX6Ud[/URL]
[QUOTE=Sobe69;7632313]Any intel on this one she use to be on CC a few years back.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/T1i99TdV03ji9z1lWPOsc8iQpemNVtBrX6Ud[/URL][/QUOTE]She quoted me $1 k per meet. Passed.
Just curious. Not trying to be argumentative. I always lurk on this thread, and to me its always a waste of time more times than not when it comes these sugar sites from what I read. These girls just try to get money, attention, and free meals and sell you the possibility of putting out. Its more like a "foody" call, friend zone site that's just above onlyfans as far as being explicit. And indicative of the entitlement of modern women, but in this case they're trying to get the benefits of a pro without being a pro. Similar to being in the friend zone where they get the benefits of a girlfriend without being your girlfriend.
If not for onlyfans and "foody call" meetups from sugar sites the ladies would have to get real jobs and downward adjust their lifestyle, or actually go all in on tryst, eros, stg, lc if they want to monetize their sexuality.
So what is the actual success rate. And is it worth the time and money. No cap. I've considered sugaring myself cause the ladies on these site are at least a cute mid to a girl next door and at least a healthy weight but that could be a bunch of filters. And sadly we used to have ladies like that in the good ole days of backpage and only the true baddies were on tryst.
Eros and the GPS was not like it is now. If they're not on the sugaring sites. I see the same cute mids and girl next door, and hell even plain janes on tryst that charge 600+ and the true baddies are like 800+ where you could find similarly attractive ladies on backpage years back for 120-200 and the baddies would be like 350-400 and most were a healthy weight. So adjusted for inflation perhaps no more than 200-350 for a plane jane,Cute mid,Girl next door and 600+ for a true baddie.
Just curious. End Rant.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7632467]Just curious. Not trying to be argumentative. I always lurk on this thread, and to me its always a waste of time more times than not when it comes these sugar sites from what I read. These girls just try to get money, attention, and free meals and sell you the possibility of putting out. Its more like a "foody" call, friend zone site that's just above onlyfans as far as being explicit. And indicative of the entitlement of modern women, but in this case they're trying to get the benefits of a pro without being a pro. Similar to being in the friend zone where they get the benefits of a girlfriend without being your girlfriend.
If not for onlyfans and "foody call" meetups from sugar sites the ladies would have to get real jobs and downward adjust their lifestyle, or actually go all in on tryst, eros, stg, lc if they want to monetize their sexuality.
So what is the actual success rate. And is it worth the time and money. No cap. I've considered sugaring myself cause the ladies on these site are at least a cute mid to a girl next door and at least a healthy weight but that could be a bunch of filters. And sadly we used to have ladies like that in the good ole days of backpage and only the true baddies were on tryst..[/QUOTE]Are sites like seeking a waste of time? I'd say depends what you're looking for. When I got in the game there were enough attractive 20 something girl next door types (students, young professionals, etc) looking for an illicit fling that you could be guaranteed to meet a few if you were decent looking and had some game. Those women are just not there anymore. The few you find are straight up business with unrealized expectations (to me anyway) because there's always some guy out there willing to overpay thus she "knows her worth. " Or they are content peddlers or "foody calls" as you put it (good one BTW) that know how to manipulate men into buying a meet up lottery ticket. So for me it's a waste, as what I'm looking for is hard to find these days.
However, if your standards or preferences are different than mine (no shade, we like what we like) then I think you can have success. I see plenty of women that I would not personally pursue who I figure get a decent amount of attention because I see them on every time I check my account so somebody must be chasing them. Or they're playing the whale lottery LOL. I suppose like anything YMMV but it seems to me if you have a broader set of preferences than I do then you can find success.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7632467]Just curious. Not trying to be argumentative. I always lurk on this thread, and to me its always a waste of time more times than not when it comes these sugar sites from what I read. These girls just try to get money, attention, and free meals and sell you the possibility of putting out. Its more like a "foody" call, friend zone site that's just above onlyfans as far as being explicit. And indicative of the entitlement of modern women, but in this case they're trying to get the benefits of a pro without being a pro. Similar to being in the friend zone where they get the benefits of a girlfriend without being your girlfriend.
If not for onlyfans and "foody call" meetups from sugar sites the ladies would have to get real jobs and downward adjust their lifestyle, or actually go all in on tryst, eros, stg, lc if they want to monetize their sexuality.
So what is the actual success rate. And is it worth the time and money. No cap. I've considered sugaring myself cause the ladies on these site are at least a cute mid to a girl next door and at least a healthy weight but that could be a bunch of filters. And sadly we used to have ladies like that in the good ole days of backpage and only the true baddies were on tryst..[/QUOTE]I get what you're saying. In my experience, there are still some great girls on the sugar sites. You just have to follow the right process to weed out the junk. You can get some info from this forum. Otherwise, I just ask for a video call and / or an unpaid M+G. If they aren't willing to do that, they aren't serious.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7632467]Just curious. Not trying to be argumentative. I always lurk on this thread, and to me its always a waste of time more times than not when it comes these sugar sites from what I read. These girls just try to get money, attention, and free meals and sell you the possibility of putting out. Its more like a "foody" call, friend zone site that's just above onlyfans as far as being explicit. And indicative of the entitlement of modern women, but in this case they're trying to get the benefits of a pro without being a pro. Similar to being in the friend zone where they get the benefits of a girlfriend without being your girlfriend.
If not for onlyfans and "foody call" meetups from sugar sites the ladies would have to get real jobs and downward adjust their lifestyle, or actually go all in on tryst, eros, stg, lc if they want to monetize their sexuality..[/QUOTE]It just depends on what you want tbh. For me, I enjoy using it to at least go on dates with multiple women that will end in sex, or just straight up sex. There are more options than a run of the mill escort where you pay for your time and that's it. Plus, having less stress about getting robbed by some wannabe thugs is worth it as well. For example, I went out with this spinner chick last night who was cool to hang with, we watched the cane's game, drank and stayed out until 2 am, and then fucked, and then she stayed over. It's just a much more fun experience than just paying for a qv or hh, with the girl being robotic, and then running out of time.
I agree with you that the prices shouldn't be where they're at now with the quality of women that are putting out. Sadly, that is what this life is now.
Ultimately, the seeking website is like a choose your own adventure novel, you control what you want to do with these women at the cost of money. That's my experience at least. Secret benefits is filled with women who think that they deserve money just for existing, so I avoid that one.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7632467]Just curious. Not trying to be argumentative. I always lurk on this thread, and to me its always a waste of time more times than not when it comes these sugar sites from what I read. These girls just try to get money, attention, and free meals and sell you the possibility of putting out. Its more like a "foody" call, friend zone site that's just above onlyfans as far as being explicit. And indicative of the entitlement of modern women, but in this case they're trying to get the benefits of a pro without being a pro. Similar to being in the friend zone where they get the benefits of a girlfriend without being your girlfriend.
If not for onlyfans and "foody call" meetups from sugar sites the ladies would have to get real jobs and downward adjust their lifestyle, or actually go all in on tryst, eros, stg, lc if they want to monetize their sexuality.
So what is the actual success rate. And is it worth the time and money. No cap. I've considered sugaring myself cause the ladies on these site are at least a cute mid to a girl next door and at least a healthy weight but that could be a bunch of filters. And sadly we used to have ladies like that in the good ole days of backpage and only the true baddies were on tryst.
Eros and the GPS was not like it is now. If they're not on the sugaring sites. I see the same cute mids and girl next door, and hell even plain janes on tryst that charge 600+ and the true baddies are like 800+ where you could find similarly attractive ladies on backpage years back for 120-200 and the baddies would be like 350-400 and most were a healthy weight. So adjusted for inflation perhaps no more than 200-350 for a plane jane,Cute mid,Girl next door and 600+ for a true baddie.
Just curious. End Rant.[/QUOTE]The sugar allure for me is not finding prostitutes. I like the innocent "I'm not a prostitute" type. I've found 3 fairly hot chicks in the past month. 2 of them for 200-250 and one really hot blonde for 4. All under 25 and 2 out 3 BBFS no limits. All 3 hosted. They're out there. But you have to put the time in.
[QUOTE=JMot87;7632651]The sugar allure for me is not finding prostitutes. I like the innocent "I'm not a prostitute" type. I've found 3 fairly hot chicks in the past month. 2 of them for 200-250 and one really hot blonde for 4. All under 25 and 2 out 3 BBFS no limits. All 3 hosted. They're out there. But you have to put the time in.[/QUOTE]That's my type too. I'm "helping them out" not "paying them for sex" l ol. I've been on Seeking since 2017 and have met on average 14 girls a year that ended up in the sack (many many more than that if you count the m&g's that didn't go anywhere, but at least they were real people). Some have been one and done, the longest has been 6 years and still going (inconsistently consistent haha). They've all been between 18 and 45 but most were on the younger end of that range and way better looking than anything I've ever seen on STG for the same money. Almost all of them have been multi hour or overnight experiences (or sometimes even whole weekends). I still keep in touch with some of them and I've been to 4 graduations and 1 wedding of girls I used to see from there. A lot of the guys on the escort thread would laugh at that and say nobody needs more than 15 minutes with a druggies wet hole, but for those of us who enjoy spending time with someone before and after the deed it's a much better and more rewarding experience. And while they may be seeing other guys as well, most of them are much better people and significantly lower volume than any escort. I almost never see escorts anymore except as a last resort, although I do occasionally when girls are scarce and the little head wins. That being said it's definitely gone downhill in the last few years. It's much harder and more time consuming to find good ones and I have many more m&g's that don't go any further, either because of personality differences or gps or whatever. I think we overwhelmingly discuss the bad ones on here, nobody wants to give up the good ones until things are over so there's probably a bias in the reports that you're reading because of that. I know that eventually Seeking won't be worth it anymore because almost every change they make makes the site worse in some way, but it's been a great ride and I'm enjoying it as long as I can.
Hey gents, am I missing something with Seeking? Do you have to be a verified or paid member to see more profiles?
When I have looked at the site I see the same 4 or 5 tired looking profiles, none of whom have logged in for months. I can never pull up any of the profiles that get posted here in this thread. Thanks all.
RS.
Well, I guess that is why its call sugar "dating" so you have to invest some time like regular dating. Thats the one thing I don't have. If you're single looking for a no strings attached relationship or situationship then I can see the allure of sugaring if you can find some ladies for a rotation who are not on some BS and GPS.
[QUOTE=JMot87;7632651]The sugar allure for me is not finding prostitutes. I like the innocent "I'm not a prostitute" type. I've found 3 fairly hot chicks in the past month. 2 of them for 200-250 and one really hot blonde for 4. All under 25 and 2 out 3 BBFS no limits. All 3 hosted. They're out there. But you have to put the time in.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RickStorm2019;7633150]Hey gents, am I missing something with Seeking? Do you have to be a verified or paid member to see more profiles?
When I have looked at the site I see the same 4 or 5 tired looking profiles, none of whom have logged in for months. I can never pull up any of the profiles that get posted here in this thread. Thanks all.
RS.[/QUOTE]You should be able to see profiles without paying. Make sure you don't have some filter set up or limited geographic range.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7632467]even plain janes on tryst that charge 600+ and the true baddies are like 800+ where you could find similarly attractive ladies on backpage years back for 120-200 and the baddies would be like 350-400 and most were a healthy weight. So adjusted for inflation perhaps no more than 200-350 for a plane jane,Cute mid,Girl next door and 600+ for a true baddie.
Just curious. End Rant.[/QUOTE]Clearly time to get Hobbie prices included in the CPI. Let's start a lobby.
[QUOTE=Gcthe1;7633187]Well, I guess that is why its call sugar "dating" so you have to invest some time like regular dating. Thats the one thing I don't have.[/QUOTE]Right. They're not supposed to be escorts. It's supposed to be about experiences. Fine dining, travel etc. It's still trading sex for money but it's not on an hourly basis for a couple hundred bucks.
1. Melanie.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3cfe4f11-6a0b-454e-b1d1-fcf1c73a8ae0[/URL]
This is that girl Rosie who has terrible reputation here, I have personally met her before and regretted it. So guys avoid at all cost.
2. Alexis.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5e138e64-5d6a-4ff8-8f97-7d4538d1ec7e[/URL]
Tries to sell you online experience with nudes, videos etc. Do not know if she ever meets in real life.
3. Dove / Jade.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/27589702-d64f-4b75-bf9b-18dd09c90d8e[/URL]
Straightforward, DTF, but gives pro vibes. As she does not chat much, just wants to book time to meet. Asks around 500.
4. Nicole.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/733f6881-b681-4187-a045-ad7ab9ddea27[/URL]
She kept on chatting aimlessly, did not end up cont conversation as I got bored.
5. Kelly / Kaj.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f677935c-282e-4c56-bab1-069421da403d[/URL]
Lives 1+ hr away, can not host. 500 per hour. I had a video call with her, fatter on video compared to her pictures. Did not meet as she came across very cold on video.
6. Margaux.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/163d32c6-a27f-40c5-9809-614fa7250d9f[/URL]
Another one who lives 1.5+ hours away, asking 700 ppm. Came across fun girl. Have not been able to make time to meet. If someone has met her, let me know how was the experience?