Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4965891]Is it just me or is this agency somewhat difficult. I tried booking a few different girls in their website. But the booker would only allow Erin to be booked. Saying I have to book her first before others.[/QUOTE]I can understand a booker pushing for a girl but to make her a gatekeeper for the rest is just ridiculous. Combined with some of the things that he's done in the past, I find that it's not worth the hassle. There's other kgirls just as good or better elsewhere.

[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4965891]Is it just me or is this agency somewhat difficult. I tried booking a few different girls in their website. But the booker would only allow Erin to be booked. Saying I have to book her first before others.[/QUOTE]That's a pretty crappy business practice. I have never heard of that requirement before. Maybe Erin isn't getting the throughput that his other girls are getting. Maybe Erin is the only provider in the rotation right now, and that's his way to get business. Both are dishonest as hell.

Erin isn't bad. She just isn't up to Roya's level. Her pictures are a few years old, and probably 15 lbs lighter, but she tries to please. Could be worth the investment, if it truly opens the door for future opportunities, but don't expect a legendary experience from Erin. Decent, but not legendary.

[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4965891]Is it just me or is this agency somewhat difficult. I tried booking a few different girls in their website. But the booker would only allow Erin to be booked. Saying I have to book her first before others.[/QUOTE]Interesting, I had the same feedback on Erin her pics made her way younger but service was good. Thing is I stopped booking there cause bait & switch. They used a picture and girl showed up was totally different. I took advice from another booker that, if a booker bait and switch you just walk out.

Just curious if anyone had experience trying out adultsearch? Been looking through and definitely some too good to be true. But I figure some of them maybe be real. This is just one example that potentially could be real. Though could also be taken from some unsuspecting girls instagram haha. Just don't want to get robbed or worse the first time trying it out.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/los-angeles/female-escorts/2028664[/URL]

[QUOTE=McNutties;4968738]Just curious if anyone had experience trying out adultsearch? Been looking through and definitely some too good to be true. But I figure some of them maybe be real. This is just one example that potentially could be real. Though could also be taken from some unsuspecting girls instagram haha. Just don't want to get robbed or worse the first time trying it out.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/los-angeles/female-escorts/2028664[/URL][/QUOTE]Recommend you learn how to use Google and Yandex reverse image search. Using those tools, it was easy to determine that she most definitely isn't "real".

Sometimes I forget most of why'all are older than me. This is Angie Varona who was somewhat famous online late 00's for being built like a woman in her early teen years, she now runs an underwhelming onlyfans. Extremely not real ad.

[QUOTE=McNutties;4968738]Just curious if anyone had experience trying out adultsearch? Been looking through and definitely some too good to be true. But I figure some of them maybe be real. This is just one example that potentially could be real. Though could also be taken from some unsuspecting girls instagram haha. Just don't want to get robbed or worse the first time trying it out.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/los-angeles/female-escorts/2028664[/URL][/QUOTE]

[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/sia[/URL]

Anyone know which booker Sia is with? Trying to book her but the number say she's not with them anymore. TER review is recent though. Seen her many times over a year ago but she was gone for awhile.

[QUOTE=Dewpsp;4969371][URL]https://www.foxylists.com/sia[/URL]

Anyone know which booker Sia is with? Trying to book her but the number say she's not with them anymore. TER review is recent though. Seen her many times over a year ago but she was gone for awhile.[/QUOTE]Usually See her listed with milk and honey on hx, but not consistently don't know if she's on vacay.

[QUOTE=Dewpsp;4969371][URL]https://www.foxylists.com/sia[/URL]

Anyone know which booker Sia is with? Trying to book her but the number say she's not with them anymore. TER review is recent though. Seen her many times over a year ago but she was gone for awhile.[/QUOTE]She was just in Irvine a few weeks ago. I can't remember which booker, but it was definitely one of the k-orgs that use HX. If she was in LA I would have seen her a few times that week.

[QUOTE=Bigwood;4969843]She was just in Irvine a few weeks ago. I can't remember which booker, but it was definitely one of the k-orgs that use HX. If she was in LA I would have seen her a few times that week.[/QUOTE]She was booked through Milk & Honey.

[QUOTE=JayKay213;4965503]Is that agency using real pics? When I tried them before it was a bait and switch[/QUOTE]Yah it wasn't 100 percent her but I got msog and the girl I saw was a cute Chinese lady, according to her. I wasn't enthralled like the models in the pic but I was ok with the product.

[QUOTE=JRock2400;4968892]Sometimes I forget most of why'all are older than me. This is Angie Varona who was somewhat famous online late 00's for being built like a woman in her early teen years, she now runs an underwhelming onlyfans. Extremely not real ad.[/QUOTE]Ok so maybe I did not pick a good example. Was mostly just curious if anyone has had a positive experience with adultsearch providers. Or is it all just fake or scam type nonsense?

I've met girls off of adultsearch before but they all had reviews or other ads to cross reference. Others may feel differently but my meetings have been with a lower "class" of providers than some other sites so I'd be shocked if any of the TGTBT ones you see are real (unless you can find reviews of that phone number here / TER / etc).

[QUOTE=McNutties;4970665]Ok so maybe I did not pick a good example. Was mostly just curious if anyone has had a positive experience with adultsearch providers. Or is it all just fake or scam type nonsense?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JayKay213;4965503]Is that agency using real pics? When I tried them before it was a bait and switch[/QUOTE]Still the same. Maybe 2 out of 10 are real pics. Carly was fun, real pics, BBFS. She's not Kgirl level, but almost worth the 200/ hhr.

As promised last week, I visited Nana and here's a quick review.

Website: [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Kpussycat[/URL].

Booking: I provided references from early this year and booked a few days ahead of time. On day of appt, messaging was clear and accurate, 270/ hr. Usual routine to get up to WLA appt, let in without knocking and doffed shoes. No affection at the door, then led to the room. Undressed, toasted, and showered. All business. Water, soap and a towel. Attempting to charm, the response was "no English". Later I learned she did know how to say 'sit down', 'lay down', 'turn over'me on top', and 'doggy?

Looks: pictures fairly accurate, booker claimed age 20 - could be, she's pretty fresh and fit, but not athletic. GND with natural Bs and nice ass. She should work out to get a better profile.

No DFK, but light brushing of lips, no touching of hair, or kissing on neck, in short, all business. While not mean, she was brusque in her manner, but I got her to smile a few times.

DATY and gentle FIV allowed and welcomed, along with BBBJ, although technique was a little rough. The best part was going BBFS without having to ask, which is not usual with my previous dates. After some 69 and mish, I pulled out and came on her belly. She cleaned up and after a few minutes went back to BBBJ then CG and RCG. But I'm not a 2-timer and she started saying that other timeless word 'time', so I called it quits. A quick shower together to remove the evidence and I was out in 50 minutes.

Upshot: I would not repeat, based on her attitude, but getting to go BBFS with a youngster was a treat. Looks: 7/10; Workout: 7/10.