Juiciest Julez. Worth it or not?
I have had my eye on Juiciest Julez and lately she has been on STG. For whatever reason. With the first of the month checks coming this week she may go MIA for a while. In any case. I am so wanting to pull the trigger and visit her. Her pics are f-ing hot IMO. So let me ask has anyone been with her lately and if so what do you think. Is she worth it or not? PM with details if you want. Thanks!
They will not ever find my IP address bro
[QUOTE=XmasBeagle;5331553]The warrant thing this guy mentions is true. Trust me on this. It's easy for LEO to submit a warranted request and have your IP address in, like he said, 24 hrs.
So, you want a true burner phone, paid in cash. Not an app that's downloaded to your personal phone whose bill you pay with your CC.[/QUOTE]No you are absolutely wrong I use TOR and I use incognito as well. I don't use the same apps and I sure don't use any real email info or even real passwords. Zero is traceable. Period. This is about as bad as the fools that believe wearing a mask saves lives! Ughh. And for What? Solicitation IS A misdemeanor crime! Furthermore as there are several girls that deserve a far worse demise the fact is this not one person would. Miss them and nobody would. Ever think twice if they died. Nobody cares at all about them that's how they became junkie girls. They are nothing. So the paranoia is insane. LOL.
All good ideas but houses are not foolproof
[QUOTE=JohnBGood1113;5332948]Things not to do:
Stop going to hotels.
Stop paying deposits, only pay when WG is nude.
Police are not doing stings at houses.
Also vet the WG. Has she been a hoe for a while of is the ad new?
If it is too good to be true it's fake or worth ignoring. One girl said she loves pre cum LOL nope. Not real at all bro. A real WG does not say incriminating shit in their ads. Unless they are drugged out and stupid but a WG we all know to be a junkie. Like junkie Jen. Like crazy abbey like many others.
If their weight is in kg it's fake bro LOL we live in the USA.
If they look like a model. Its fake! These bitches are crack girls that look like trains hit them! No they ain't models! Fake. Be smart.[/QUOTE]Arrests just announced today in Akron at a residential location. It actually doesn't state that in the article. However looking up the offenders on Akron municipal case search you can see its a residential address. Which again, these guys could have avoided if they simply looked up the auditors website and seen that it was owned by the land reutilization company. Going to be interesting to see what becomes of these cases. by how this looks this is a carbon copy of the sting they did in Feb, only with a different address and of course with the increased penalty. very eye opening that the last one in summit co was in feb and this is only a couple months later. [URL]https://fox8.com/news/10-men-including-teacher-arrested-during-summit-county-human-trafficking-operation/[/URL].
Interesting info from court records if I am reading right
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5334886]Arrests just announced today in Akron at a residential location. It actually doesn't state that in the article. However looking up the offenders on Akron municipal case search you can see its a residential address. Which again, these guys could have avoided if they simply looked up the auditors website and seen that it was owned by the land reutilization company. Going to be interesting to see what becomes of these cases. by how this looks this is a carbon copy of the sting they did in Feb, only with a different address and of course with the increased penalty. very eye opening that the last one in summit co was in feb and this is only a couple months later. [URL]https://fox8.com/news/10-men-including-teacher-arrested-during-summit-county-human-trafficking-operation/[/URL].[/QUOTE]Appears this was clear back around February 10th? Most are the same location but at least one was different. I found one that was dismissed without prejudice. So do they wait until all cases are closed before announcing? Hmmm.
There has been a second one now.
[QUOTE=Member#2862;5335402]Appears this was clear back around February 10th? Most are the same location but at least one was different. I found one that was dismissed without prejudice. So do they wait until all cases are closed before announcing? Hmmm.[/QUOTE]The Feb sting results are in besides a couple of them, a lot of the people plead guilty (foolishly in my opinion, I would have fought it to a reduced charge.) one of them got a disorderly conduct and yes I believe one was dismissed. This sting that happened last week is under the brand new statute, and yes, all but one were charged at a residential location in both the Feb. Sting and the may sting. Both homes owned by the land reutilization company at that time. I think they actually wait until they are arraigned to announce the arrest, as the offense date is 4/26 but the articleis announced on 5/4 when their arraignment happened. The interesting thing is one of the guys was charged at a random location in the middle of the street with no physical address about 23 miles away on the county line from the sting house. As I mentioned on the CLE boards, I wonder if this guy drove by and fled and they tracked him down. Definitely can't see that one holding up in court. But what I'm interested in is what plea bargains these guys will get.