Rants and Stupid shit in Hartford

Merry Christmas to all you great mongers and to all the providers. While most of you will be spending time with friends and family, don't forget to sent a short Merry Christmas text to your favorite providers. Looking on STG there are some posting today and there are some that realize biz will be likely almost nonexistent today. Many of these great girls are out there just trying to survive and many likely don't have much of an attachment with family. Even one short text will likely brighten their day in their potentially lonely world. If you do venture out to see one (or two), this is the season of giving but some gifts are worth getting. Be smart, be safe.

Have a great one guys and stay safe.

First, I want to say I appreciate EVERYONE on this board. Those that actually put forth effort to help each other out and those that bring attention to new providers and problematic providers bring value to the board. We should all be here with the same goal of making the hobby safer for each other.

So I've been compared to BMD and Chad as well as called an imposter. Nice! I am not BMD nor can any of us replace his wisdom of the hobby. As for Chad, I don't think I've ever listed extraordinary dreams as he had in his self absorbed world. As for being an imposter, I have 3 and's in my username. Was it intentional or a mistake? It definitely wasn't to mimic some other monger that I have never seen on this board.

A lot of you, DM me or post valuable intel. We are all grateful, especially me. The game is getting harder not easier. Girls are raising their rates. Girls that are of lesser quality are becoming practically gems due to lack of talent in the area. "New" girls that look TGTBT are gaining momentum as bait and switch artists or scammers. Some participants in this game rely on others as their sole source of intel. Googling a number should be basic level intelligence. That ad I mentioned had no reviews, so anyone TOFTT should have at least a basic level to not engage.

Maybe those upset that I framed it the way I did instead of exposing the ad at the start has other motives. I don't know and don't care. Frankly, if there is an ad directed at collecting pedos, I'm all for it. Those guys have no business in our game. The Dr that got picked up for engaging an under girl and unalived himself shortly after, remember that? Notice anyone missing from the board abruptly?

Once again thank you to EVERYONE for their input.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7485846]First, I want to say I appreciate EVERYONE on this board. Those that actually put forth effort to help each other out and those that bring attention to new providers and problematic providers bring value to the board. We should all be here with the same goal of making the hobby safer for each other.

So I've been compared to BMD and Chad as well as called an imposter. Nice! I am not BMD nor can any of us replace his wisdom of the hobby. As for Chad, I don't think I've ever listed extraordinary dreams as he had in his self absorbed world. As for being an imposter, I have 3 and's in my username. Was it intentional or a mistake? It definitely wasn't to mimic some other monger that I have never seen on this board.

A lot of you, DM me or post valuable intel. We are all grateful, especially me. The game is getting harder not easier. Girls are raising their rates. Girls that are of lesser quality are becoming practically gems due to lack of talent in the area. "New" girls that look TGTBT are gaining momentum as bait and switch artists or scammers. Some participants in this game rely on others as their sole source of intel. Googling a number should be basic level intelligence. That ad I mentioned had no reviews, so anyone TOFTT should have at least a basic level to not engage..[/QUOTE]I have no clue about BMD. But interestingly I was chatting with a gal who mentioned to me that became the live in girlfriend of a client. Subsequently she is back on skip & she told me that her boyfriend took his life. I immediately thought of BMD. I never thought that he was the guy from the underage sing, but either way he's gone. So if either is him, rest easy Big Mac daddy.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7485846]First, I want to say I appreciate EVERYONE on this board. Those that actually put forth effort to help each other out and those that bring attention to new providers and problematic providers bring value to the board. We should all be here with the same goal of making the hobby safer for each other.

So I've been compared to BMD and Chad as well as called an imposter. Nice! I am not BMD nor can any of us replace his wisdom of the hobby. As for Chad, I don't think I've ever listed extraordinary dreams as he had in his self absorbed world. As for being an imposter, I have 3 and's in my username. Was it intentional or a mistake? It definitely wasn't to mimic some other monger that I have never seen on this board.

A lot of you, DM me or post valuable intel. We are all grateful, especially me. The game is getting harder not easier. Girls are raising their rates. Girls that are of lesser quality are becoming practically gems due to lack of talent in the area. "New" girls that look TGTBT are gaining momentum as bait and switch artists or scammers. Some participants in this game rely on others as their sole source of intel. Googling a number should be basic level intelligence. That ad I mentioned had no reviews, so anyone TOFTT should have at least a basic level to not engage..[/QUOTE]That Drs obit is from 3/13/24. I can't tell when BMD stopped posting but could it be nearly 2 yrs already.

[QUOTE=DrJohnson2;7486028]I have no clue about BMD. But interestingly I was chatting with a gal who mentioned to me that became the live in girlfriend of a client. Subsequently she is back on skip & she told me that her boyfriend took his life. I immediately thought of BMD. I never thought that he was the guy from the underage sing, but either way he's gone. So if either is him, rest easy Big Mac daddy.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DrJohnson2;7486031]That Drs obit is from 3/13/24. I can't tell when BMD stopped posting but could it be nearly 2 yrs already.[/QUOTE]Misinterpreted what I wrote. I wasn't trying to imply it was BMD. BMD preferred older women. His last post was November 2024. I'm sure he stopped for unrelated reasons.

I am not getting any notifications when I get a PM. I have been missing messages that others send me. The option is set on in my profile.

With increased ICE activity across the country. Especially in blue states, I am surprised we have not seen federal raids on AMPs and hotel Asians.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7518387]With increased ICE activity across the country. Especially in blue states, I am surprised we have not seen federal raids on AMPs and hotel Asians.[/QUOTE]Valid point. Could be like shooting fish in a barrel.

[QUOTE=Kimbsl1998;7518462]Valid point. Could be like shooting fish in a barrel.[/QUOTE]It's not the demographic they're going after. They're looking for illegals that crossed the boarder. Most of these Asians are on work visas. Maybe you guys should stop watching the news. Even when they bust a spa in most cases they don't deport the girls.

We need to come up with a code of honor / ethics for hobbiests. So the kids coming up will learn.

- Don't steal stuff from providers. Stuff they have in their hotel room is probably all their possessions.

- If you pick up a street girl and don't want her services, kick her a few dollars for a coffee.

- Don't give a deposit online.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7524741]We need to come up with a code of honor / ethics for hobbiests. So the kids coming up will learn.

- Don't steal stuff from providers. Stuff they have in their hotel room is probably all their possessions.

- If you pick up a street girl and don't want her services, kick her a few dollars for a coffee.

- Don't give a deposit online.[/QUOTE]Bingo! We should all memorize and follow these three simple rules.

Most of the "old guard" is retiring or slowing down. Things are now in the hands of the entitled generation. Poo.

Love it. Don't be an ass.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7524741]We need to come up with a code of honor / ethics for hobbiests. So the kids coming up will learn.

- Don't steal stuff from providers. Stuff they have in their hotel room is probably all their possessions.

- If you pick up a street girl and don't want her services, kick her a few dollars for a coffee.

- Don't give a deposit online.[/QUOTE]

Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.

To your home is a very bad idea. No matter how good they may seem at the moment, things can change in an instant. If I want to do outcall then I would get a cheap hotel in my home turf unless I am travelling and in a hotel.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]Yep, not smart at all. What could possibly go wrong? LOL.

I've only done this once, years ago, with Alex the Asian MILF. IMHO, she was a class act who loved sex perhaps even more than Tess. Alex had (has?) a real job and there wasn't even a hint of drug use. I posted about it and was told not the smartest thing. I can't disagree, but she really was a different level of provider (at least for me). My reasoning that day was the motel in Moosup wasn't avail. Doubt I'll ever meet another like her so not likely I'll bring anyone home again. FWIW, we met somewhere and I picked her up to bring her to my home; she didn't drive to my place. Last half mile she ducked below the dash.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]

I have come to prefer outcall over incall, specially once I've thoroughly vetted the gal and I'm picking her up. But never to my house.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]I did it one time about 20 years ago, different times back then, but I would never do it now.

I also did outcall to where I worked that was more than 30 years ago, it was 2 girl session and their driver waited in the parking lot. It was fun banging them on the boss's desk.

A friend has done outcall to his home and not had an issue but that was about 20 years also.

Once upon a time, my friend managed the Hartford Sheraton during the overnight hours. At the time, many pro golfers stayed there during the TPC Tournament.

About 2 AM one morning, he watches a woman smartly but calmly zip through the lobby and out the door. A few minutes later, a household name level golfer comes running out of the elevator and asks if anyone saw a woman just leave, as she stole his wallet and a bunch of cash. My friend immediately starts to call the police. The golfer stops him, states she's a hooker, and says he doesn't want the publicity.

Moral of the story: Even the high class talent can be a thief.

LOL! Tell me your exact location without telling me your exact location.

[QUOTE=CravenMorehed;7526676]I did it one time about 20 years ago, different times back then, but I would never do it now.

I also did outcall to where I worked that was more than 30 years ago, it was 2 girl session and their driver waited in the parking lot. It was fun banging them on the boss's desk.

A friend has done outcall to his home and not had an issue but that was about 20 years also.[/QUOTE]Years ago I did more and I've had some in recent years. I live in an apartment and can always watch out the window to make sure they are alone. I don't do it often these days since most want you to uber them to you.

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7526664]I have come to prefer outcall over incall, specially once I've thoroughly vetted the gal and I'm picking her up. But never to my house.[/QUOTE]I think it totally depends on the girl, the situation, prior experience. I've had several over for visits. Never had an issue but not the strung out junkies. Nicolette, totally cool respectful, Ariana jollee, Maggie / Karen, def got to do your homework beforehand. Some are definite NO WAY.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7524741]We need to come up with a code of honor / ethics for hobbiests. So the kids coming up will learn.

- Don't steal stuff from providers. Stuff they have in their hotel room is probably all their possessions.

- If you pick up a street girl and don't want her services, kick her a few dollars for a coffee.

- Don't give a deposit online.[/QUOTE]An additional one.

- Don't ever send a face photo of yourself to a provider.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7526334]Are people really bringing providers into their actual homes? I think the only times I have used outcall was on a business trip to New Orleans and once got a short stay after the Alpha closed down. But never have I ever let a provider have my home address.[/QUOTE]Beyond the myriad things that can go awry bringing a 'date' to your home (too many to list! Now you've provided her with your home address, name (not hard to ascertain at that point) and a likely record of the 'meet' (won't that be fun when / if she gets busted).

Oh, and let's not forget about the fact she now has a certain degree of leverage to coerce $$ from you should she need to (uhhh, yeah. You'd be surprised to the extent some of these girls will go to get their next fix).

Never brought one to my home and rarely do any kind of outcall.

Crazy.

[QUOTE=DrJohnson2;7527031]I think it totally depends on the girl, the situation, prior experience. I've had several over for visits. Never had an issue but not the strung out junkies. Nicolette, totally cool respectful, Ariana jollee, Maggie / Karen, def got to do your homework beforehand. Some are definite NO WAY.[/QUOTE]Ditto. The last one I had over was Camille a few years back. I used to do more when the agencies were much more reliable with clean hot women at reasonable prices. I wouldn't consider most of the STG girls to bring home.

I have a regret I wanted to share. For those of us who were around for the Alpha spa. In the lounge we could meet each other. I always kept to myself and quickly selected a lady or had one pre-scheduled. I regret never chatting or getting to know other members of the community in person.

Don't any of the girls do LEO checks anymore? I remember years ago in Florida the girls used to do LEO check upon entry.

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7528658]I have a regret I wanted to share. For those of us who were around for the Alpha spa. In the lounge we could meet each other. I always kept to myself and quickly selected a lady or had one pre-scheduled. I regret never chatting or getting to know other members of the community in person.[/QUOTE]Well, Gordon Freeman is a silent type. . .

[QUOTE=GordonFreeman;7528658]I have a regret I wanted to share. For those of us who were around for the Alpha spa. In the lounge we could meet each other. I always kept to myself and quickly selected a lady or had one pre-scheduled. I regret never chatting or getting to know other members of the community in person.[/QUOTE]I miss that place. There was almost always someone there worth seeing. I never talked to any of the guys there either. There were a couple of women from there I wish I could have kept seeing after the place got shut down. If only they had been a cash only business. I did run into 1 of the managers, Jo, outside of the club a couple of times. We'd say hi in passing but didn't really talk more than that. A dirty secret I wish Hartford still had.

I will say I'm glad I started going there when I did. I was going there before they required memberships. The managers knew me so I could get in without having a card on file. I think I paid with a credit card a few times but the last time I did was long enough before that the statue of limitations expired either before they got raided or shortly after so I didn't get caught up in any legal mess. I don't know if they decided to go after any of the customers, but at the time it sounded like they wanted to try.

[QUOTE=MikeFly;7529218]Don't any of the girls do LEO checks anymore? I remember years ago in Florida the girls used to do LEO check upon entry.[/QUOTE]I haven't had one in years, but I remember a few in CT.

[QUOTE=MikeFly;7529218]Don't any of the girls do LEO checks anymore? I remember years ago in Florida the girls used to do LEO check upon entry.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Woody50;7529764]I haven't had one in years, but I remember a few in CT.[/QUOTE]LEO checks are all bogus. Undercover is allowed to do anything except directly engage sexually. If the provider asks to touch them or see genitals, they are allowed to respond as requested. LE just cannot expose themselves unprovoked. They also cannot ask to be touched. "Are you associated with LE?" Undercover can say "no". It's not entrapment. People don't realize that it isn't entrapment when going to a site and engaging with providers and clients where it's expected. Entrapment is more like going to random people on the street and soliciting where it isn't expected to happen normally.

Girls that have never been arrested for this think this is how tonprotect them and gives them a false sense of security.

*I am not a lawyer. Always consult a qualified attorney for exact legal advice.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7529923]LEO checks are all bogus. Undercover is allowed to do anything except directly engage sexually. If the provider asks to touch them or see genitals, they are allowed to respond as requested. LE just cannot expose themselves unprovoked. They also cannot ask to be touched. "Are you associated with LE?" Undercover can say "no". It's not entrapment. People don't realize that it isn't entrapment when going to a site and engaging with providers and clients where it's expected. Entrapment is more like going to random people on the street and soliciting where it isn't expected to happen normally.

Girls that have never been arrested for this think this is how tonprotect them and gives them a false sense of security.

*I am not a lawyer. Always consult a qualified attorney for exact legal advice.[/QUOTE]This is very interesting. I thought if the provider showed her tits when I asked, I was in the clear of uncle LEO. Does anyone have any other way to check for LE?

[QUOTE=LuckyCT;7530062]This is very interesting. I thought if the provider showed her tits when I asked, I was in the clear of uncle LEO. Does anyone have any other way to check for LE?[/QUOTE]Just another reason to never, never pay up front. If there's no $$ shown, they have no bust (as long as you were smart enough to avoid discussing $$ in your prior communications).

You'll notice the experienced or 'smart' girls out there do not discuss $$ in any texts.

I've had girls insist on payment up front at which time I simply walk. Granted, it's cost me a number of 'experiences' with legit providers, but it's also spared me the 'experience' of getting busted and having my life turned upside down.

Trust me. The; "It'll never happen to me" mindset is a very misplaced and dangerous attitude.

My. 02.

[QUOTE=LuckyCT;7530062]This is very interesting. I thought if the provider showed her tits when I asked, I was in the clear of uncle LEO. Does anyone have any other way to check for LE?[/QUOTE]The checks I'm familiar with are the girl checking me. The last one I remember was punk rock Jessie in Windsor Locks.

By the time you've gotten far enough to ask her to do something as a check at an incall, you've probably already provided probable cause to at least be detained.

[QUOTE=Woody50;7530106]The checks I'm familiar with are the girl checking me. The last one I remember was punk rock Jessie in Windsor Locks.

By the time you've gotten far enough to ask her to do something as a check at an incall, you've probably already provided probable cause to at least be detained.[/QUOTE]This is accurate. PD generally arrests first and lets the courts sort out the details. Pretty much as soon as you initiate contact (phone, email, text), that's Evidence #1 and the case builds from there. They can, and will, arrest when you show up for the appointment, thus leveraging everything [I]before[/I] you got to the location as the probable cause.

What behavior PD can engage in, or how far girls can go, is a vague line that changes by jurisdiction. Not much in clear case precedent. Usually precedent is set by a state court, and in some instances courts have required PD to have clear guidelines they'll follow for busts, while not dictating specifically what that guideline must be. Meaning, the arresting agency may have a different level of touching allowed vs another agency. The confusion gets worse, as girls work between states what's not permissible by PD in State A might be 100% fine by State B.

Generally, courts have not allowed sexual penetration by PD, either initiated by PD or by PD allowing the girl to perform the act on them. But non-penetrative acts have been allowed. Courts mostly focus on fairness and entrapment. For example, if PD kicks in door to a massage parlor and arrests everyone purely for being there, a court might toss because your mere presence at a place that offers legal activities (massage) isn't evidence of a crime. The crime is "something of value", usually money, exchanged for sexual activity. Which does not have to be penetration. Even if money is paid to a third party, or hasn't been paid but there's an expectation it will. So paying after appointment doesn't help, nor does calling it a "donation", leaving in an unmarked envelope, or leaving on a dresser while never verbally acknowledging it.

It's a misdemeanor covered by C. G. S. 53 a-83, there's good attorneys who defend these cases. But, that doesn't stop your arrest, booking photo taken, name and pic in media, a public record of your charge, and the cost of hiring a lawyer and you showing up in court. The cost of defending yourself and loss of reputation is 100% worse than the $2,000 fine if guilty.

The real kicker is if cops nail you on the above AND the person is below 18 years of age. Then it's a class B felony.

[QUOTE=BoltonChaser;7530266]This is accurate. PD generally arrests first and lets the courts sort out the details. Pretty much as soon as you initiate contact (phone, email, text), that's Evidence #1 and the case builds from there. They can, and will, arrest when you show up for the appointment, thus leveraging everything [I]before[/I] you got to the location as the probable cause.

What behavior PD can engage in, or how far girls can go, is a vague line that changes by jurisdiction. Not much in clear case precedent. Usually precedent is set by a state court, and in some instances courts have required PD to have clear guidelines they'll follow for busts, while not dictating specifically what that guideline must be. Meaning, the arresting agency may have a different level of touching allowed vs another agency. The confusion gets worse, as girls work between states what's not permissible by PD in State A might be 100% fine by State B.

Generally, courts have not allowed sexual penetration by PD, either initiated by PD or by PD allowing the girl to perform the act on them. But non-penetrative acts have been allowed. Courts mostly focus on fairness and entrapment. For example, if PD kicks in door to a massage parlor and arrests everyone purely for being there, a court might toss because your mere presence at a place that offers legal activities (massage) isn't evidence of a crime. The crime is "something of value", usually money, exchanged for sexual activity. Which does not have to be penetration. Even if money is paid to a third party, or hasn't been paid but there's an expectation it will. So paying after appointment doesn't help, nor does calling it a "donation", leaving in an unmarked envelope, or leaving on a dresser while never verbally acknowledging it.

It's a misdemeanor covered by C. G. S. 53 a-83, there's good attorneys who defend these cases. But, that doesn't stop your arrest, booking photo taken, name and pic in media, a public record of your charge, and the cost of hiring a lawyer and you showing up in court. The cost of defending yourself and loss of reputation is 100% worse than the $2,000 fine if guilty.

The real kicker is if cops nail you on the above AND the person is below 18 years of age. Then it's a class B felony.[/QUOTE]Police will just write whatever they want in their report. It would be their word against yours or the provider. They do not care if there is an ultimate conviction or nolle. The punishment is the process.

[QUOTE=BoltonChaser;7530266]This is accurate. PD generally arrests first and lets the courts sort out the details. Pretty much as soon as you initiate contact (phone, email, text), that's Evidence #1 and the case builds from there. They can, and will, arrest when you show up for the appointment, thus leveraging everything [I]before[/I] you got to the location as the probable cause.

What behavior PD can engage in, or how far girls can go, is a vague line that changes by jurisdiction. Not much in clear case precedent. Usually precedent is set by a state court, and in some instances courts have required PD to have clear guidelines they'll follow for busts, while not dictating specifically what that guideline must be. Meaning, the arresting agency may have a different level of touching allowed vs another agency. The confusion gets worse, as girls work between states what's not permissible by PD in State A might be 100% fine by State B.

Generally, courts have not allowed sexual penetration by PD, either initiated by PD or by PD allowing the girl to perform the act on them. But non-penetrative acts have been allowed. Courts mostly focus on fairness and entrapment. For example, if PD kicks in door to a massage parlor and arrests everyone purely for being there, a court might toss because your mere presence at a place that offers legal activities (massage) isn't evidence of a crime. The crime is "something of value", usually money, exchanged for sexual activity. Which does not have to be penetration. Even if money is paid to a third party, or hasn't been paid but there's an expectation it will. So paying after appointment doesn't help, nor does calling it a "donation", leaving in an unmarked envelope, or leaving on a dresser while never verbally acknowledging it.

It's a misdemeanor covered by C. G. S. 53 a-83, there's good attorneys who defend these cases. But, that doesn't stop your arrest, booking photo taken, name and pic in media, a public record of your charge, and the cost of hiring a lawyer and you showing up in court. The cost of defending yourself and loss of reputation is 100% worse than the $2,000 fine if guilty.

The real kicker is if cops nail you on the above AND the person is below 18 years of age. Then it's a class B felony.[/QUOTE]Nailed it! Thanks for the write up!

[QUOTE=BoltonChaser;7530266]This is accurate. PD generally arrests first and lets the courts sort out the details. Pretty much as soon as you initiate contact (phone, email, text), that's Evidence #1 and the case builds from there. They can, and will, arrest when you show up for the appointment, thus leveraging everything [I]before[/I] you got to the location as the probable cause.

What behavior PD can engage in, or how far girls can go, is a vague line that changes by jurisdiction. Not much in clear case precedent. Usually precedent is set by a state court, and in some instances courts have required PD to have clear guidelines they'll follow for busts, while not dictating specifically what that guideline must be. Meaning, the arresting agency may have a different level of touching allowed vs another agency. The confusion gets worse, as girls work between states what's not permissible by PD in State A might be 100% fine by State B.

Generally, courts have not allowed sexual penetration by PD, either initiated by PD or by PD allowing the girl to perform the act on them. But non-penetrative acts have been allowed. Courts mostly focus on fairness and entrapment. For example, if PD kicks in door to a massage parlor and arrests everyone purely for being there, a court might toss because your mere presence at a place that offers legal activities (massage) isn't evidence of a crime. The crime is "something of value", usually money, exchanged for sexual activity. Which does not have to be penetration. Even if money is paid to a third party, or hasn't been paid but there's an expectation it will. So paying after appointment doesn't help, nor does calling it a "donation", leaving in an unmarked envelope, or leaving on a dresser while never verbally acknowledging it.

It's a misdemeanor covered by C. G. S. 53 a-83, there's good attorneys who defend these cases. But, that doesn't stop your arrest, booking photo taken, name and pic in media, a public record of your charge, and the cost of hiring a lawyer and you showing up in court. The cost of defending yourself and loss of reputation is 100% worse than the $2,000 fine if guilty.

The real kicker is if cops nail you on the above AND the person is below 18 years of age. Then it's a class B felony.[/QUOTE]The most impactful thing on a client is being posted in media as being arrested. Believe it or not only a small percentage of arrests of clients and providers actually result in a conviction. If you look up girls that you know their names, they are usually charges with drug offenses which are the primary charges possession and paraphernalia. LE is more concerned with underage, trafficking, and drug related issues that create parallel crimes in the same area. Cities like New Haven have stopped bothering conducting stings. Prostitution is not a violent crime and is more in the quality of life area.

I’d be more worries in a red state where it is a religious morality issue.

I venture between Florida and Hartford and the few girls I do see in Florida do not do any kind of checks. I guess it is more important to ensure you do your due diligence before venturing out in states like Florida.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7530640]The most impactful thing on a client is being posted in media as being arrested. Believe it or not only a small percentage of arrests of clients and providers actually result in a conviction. If you look up girls that you know their names, they are usually charges with drug offenses which are the primary charges possession and paraphernalia. LE is more concerned with underage, trafficking, and drug related issues that create parallel crimes in the same area. Cities like New Haven have stopped bothering conducting stings. Prostitution is not a violent crime and is more in the quality of life area.

Id be more worries in a red state where it is a religious morality issue.[/QUOTE]