-
Price
All these girls know each other. They are pushing the price up. I've seen people comment about inflation as an excuse. I know a lot about this world. The game. If you want to know more pm me. For now I can tell you the dope hasn't gone up. The hotels haven't really gone up for them. Maybe slightly. They don't eat other than fast food and polar pops. LOL. The don't have insurance. They have no living expenses like most of us do. The dope man is their biggest expense. 90% of these girls were street walkers, not high line escorts. Taking 40 for sex just 2 years ago. Nothing has changed for them. Most of their expenses have stayed the same. Capitalizing on internet. Most of the services have gotten worse because the dope is stronger. I own a business. My expenses have gone up 70% and I've not increased my prices but made my business more effective and grown by 200%. Increased my profits considerably. We need to as a group control their pricing and bring it down to a level that's right for service and area. I've texted with another monger and thought he had a great idea. About maybe 10 of us finding 2-3 girls and make sure between us we take good regular care of her and she not see other guys outside of our circle. But also not pay outrages prices. And tip extra for extra good services. I will continue this on a thread. But wanted to get some feedback on us stopping inflated pricing for not such good service or get them to clean up a little. Thanks guys.
-
[QUOTE=Arapahoe;6153206]All these girls know each other. They are pushing the price up. I've seen people comment about inflation as an excuse. I know a lot about this world. The game. If you want to know more pm me. For now I can tell you the dope hasn't gone up. The hotels haven't really gone up for them. Maybe slightly. They don't eat other than fast food and polar pops. LOL. The don't have insurance. They have no living expenses like most of us do. The dope man is their biggest expense. 90% of these girls were street walkers, not high line escorts. Taking 40 for sex just 2 years ago. Nothing has changed for them. Most of their expenses have stayed the same. Capitalizing on internet. Most of the services have gotten worse because the dope is stronger. I own a business. My expenses have gone up 70% and I've not increased my prices but made my business more effective and grown by 200%. Increased my profits considerably. We need to as a group control their pricing and bring it down to a level that's right for service and area. I've texted with another monger and thought he had a great idea. About maybe 10 of us finding 2-3 girls and make sure between us we take good regular care of her and she not see other guys outside of our circle. But also not pay outrages prices. And tip extra for extra good services. I will continue this on a thread. But wanted to get some feedback on us stopping inflated pricing for not such good service or get them to clean up a little. Thanks guys.[/QUOTE]You already know I am down let's hope these other guys feel the same way. It's not about taking control it's about making it mutually beneficial for us as well as the girls.
-
Agreed
[QUOTE=StreetEye;6153554]You already know I am down let's hope these other guys feel the same way. It's not about taking control it's about making it mutually beneficial for us as well as the girls.[/QUOTE]I concur, count me in PM with details.
-
[QUOTE=StreetEye;6153554]You already know I am down let's hope these other guys feel the same way. It's not about taking control it's about making it mutually beneficial for us as well as the girls.[/QUOTE]Sounds like a good idea in theory.
-
[QUOTE=Arapahoe;6153206]All these girls know each other. They are pushing the price up. I've seen people comment about inflation as an excuse. I know a lot about this world. The game. If you want to know more pm me. For now I can tell you the dope hasn't gone up. The hotels haven't really gone up for them. Maybe slightly. They don't eat other than fast food and polar pops. LOL. The don't have insurance. They have no living expenses like most of us do. The dope man is their biggest expense. 90% of these girls were street walkers, not high line escorts. Taking 40 for sex just 2 years ago. Nothing has changed for them. Most of their expenses have stayed the same. Capitalizing on internet. Most of the services have gotten worse because the dope is stronger. I own a business. My expenses have gone up 70% and I've not increased my prices but made my business more effective and grown by 200%. Increased my profits considerably. We need to as a group control their pricing and bring it down to a level that's right for service and area. I've texted with another monger and thought he had a great idea. About maybe 10 of us finding 2-3 girls and make sure between us we take good regular care of her and she not see other guys outside of our circle. But also not pay outrages prices. And tip extra for extra good services. I will continue this on a thread. But wanted to get some feedback on us stopping inflated pricing for not such good service or get them to clean up a little. Thanks guys.[/QUOTE]Count me in. I might even have a aa girl that would be down.
-
1 photos
This B.
I made the mistake of going to see this one today. Wow, what a nasty attitude. I left before she closed the door.
-
[QUOTE=BigDSrq;6154061]Count me in. I might even have a aa girl that would be down.[/QUOTE]Is that the rub101 referral.
-
[QUOTE=BigDSrq;6154061]Count me in. I might even have a aa girl that would be down.[/QUOTE]Excellent idea, I'm very interested. It could be a win win for everyone involved including the girls.
-
Idea Arapahoe mentioned
These are all subject to change but current thoughts on what Arapahoe posted.
Group Directive.
Here are the goals and reasoning behind this idea to make it better for both sides.
1. We offer the small group of women we select a decent amount of regulars so they don't have to see randos all the time.
2. We cut down on most of the negotiations, back and forth, and time wasting.
3. Both parties have some say to keep each other in line and above board.
Guidelines.
1. Both parties must treat each other with respect (unless you have another agreement).
2. Either party is subject to removal from the group without warning for unacceptable behavior.
3. Either party is open to still see anyone they please outside of the group, but should prioritize parties within our group when available.
4.
How the girls are picked.
1. Any member may nominate a girl when a spot is available.
2. 70% of members much accept the nomination.
3. Girl must be open to all services group has under requirements.
4. Girl must accept flat donation rate.
5. We will try to keep a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio this will hopefully keep the small number of women we select busy and appreciative.
Required Services.
BBBJ.
Cfs.
GFE.
Donations 80,110, 160.
Additional Services may be offered depending on the girl but not included in the agreed upon flat rate donation.
Expect up charges for these services.
-
Group directive
[QUOTE=StreetEye;6154929]These are all subject to change but current thoughts on what Arapahoe posted.
Group Directive.
Here are the goals and reasoning behind this idea to make it better for both sides.
1. We offer the small group of women we select a decent amount of regulars so they don't have to see randos all the time.
2. We cut down on most of the negotiations, back and forth, and time wasting.
3. Both parties have some say to keep each other in line and above board.
Guidelines.
1. Both parties must treat each other with respect (unless you have another agreement).
2. Either party is subject to removal from the group without warning for unacceptable behavior.
3. Either party is open to still see anyone they please outside of the group, but should prioritize parties within our group when available.
4.
How the girls are picked.
1. Any member may nominate a girl when a spot is available.
2. 70% of members much accept the nomination.
3. Girl must be open to all services group has under requirements.
4. Girl must accept flat donation rate.
5. We will try to keep a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio this will hopefully keep the small number of women we select busy and appreciative.
Required Services.
BBBJ.
Cfs.
GFE.
Donations 80,110, 160.
Additional Services may be offered depending on the girl but not included in the agreed upon flat rate donation.
Expect up charges for these services.[/QUOTE]I love the idea. I'm in!
And I think there's a few girls that would be interested. I know that the stressful part for them is the random guys, potentially LEO, no shows, inconsistent cash flow. But those are their concerns, unless the demons take priority!
From my perspective, the "stress" is similar to their concerns, ie no LEO, reliable providers, easy communication etc. But also want clean, safe environment, solid performance with a good attitude. I think we all have our go to providers that check a lot of boxes, and if I was a better negotiator I imagine those suggested donations would be accepted or acceptable to them. Honestly I'd probably visit those 2 or 3 weekly myself!! Hell I could probably schedule it in advance.
Definitely interested in pursuing this.
-
1 photos
She is back
You remember this little nugget?
She is back.
-
Luv the theory
[QUOTE=StreetEye;6154929]These are all subject to change but current thoughts on what Arapahoe posted.
Group Directive.
Here are the goals and reasoning behind this idea to make it better for both sides.
1. We offer the small group of women we select a decent amount of regulars so they don't have to see randos all the time.
2. We cut down on most of the negotiations, back and forth, and time wasting.
3. Both parties have some say to keep each other in line and above board.
Guidelines.
1. Both parties must treat each other with respect (unless you have another agreement).
2. Either party is subject to removal from the group without warning for unacceptable behavior.
3. Either party is open to still see anyone they please outside of the group, but should prioritize parties within our group when available.
4.
How the girls are picked.
1. Any member may nominate a girl when a spot is available.
2. 70% of members much accept the nomination.
3. Girl must be open to all services group has under requirements.
4. Girl must accept flat donation rate.
5. We will try to keep a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio this will hopefully keep the small number of women we select busy and appreciative.
Required Services.
BBBJ.
Cfs.
GFE.
Donations 80,110, 160.
Additional Services may be offered depending on the girl but not included in the agreed upon flat rate donation.
Expect up charges for these services.[/QUOTE]In theory this makes perfect sense but logic and sound judgment are not these girls' strong points. I wish you luck and if it works out I would be game if you allow infrequent flyers. My hobby time has really decreased the last couple years.
I totally agree there are benefits for the girls but I have doubts their lifestyles fit a long-term arrangement of any type.
-
Yes Sir
[QUOTE=Burner99;6154995]You remember this little nugget?
She is back.[/QUOTE]Not sure she ever left, more utr, but back in the open now. She has lost weight again, 161 in the ad is wrong, candy must be in full force. Not complaining and thumbs up!
-
[QUOTE=Ebhunter;6155075]In theory this makes perfect sense but logic and sound judgment are not these girls' strong points. I wish you luck and if it works out I would be game if you allow infrequent flyers. My hobby time has really decreased the last couple years.
I totally agree there are benefits for the girls, but I have doubts their lifestyles fit a long-term arrangement of any type.[/QUOTE]Great idea but not sure the girls will go along with it? I'd be in 100% as I have a number of UTR contacts and find them preferable to rolling the dice in general. I like the listed criteria.
Count me in if this goes forward. Thanks for the effort. I'm a senior member and frequent contributor to the forum.
-
She's back. ?
[QUOTE=Burner99;6154995]You remember this little nugget?
She is back.[/QUOTE]Hey brother, I don't recognize that photo or her looks in general? Who is this?
Is it a scary kind of "she's back" or excited "she's back"?