Zuma you got mail.
[QUOTE=Zuma79;1560625]Well thanks for trying TTOFTT.[/QUOTE]
Printable View
Zuma you got mail.
[QUOTE=Zuma79;1560625]Well thanks for trying TTOFTT.[/QUOTE]
Any good suggestions for some good providers in Daytona for the weekend racing.
Thanks
Over on BP early this am a monger advised he was robbed (cash and dash) by this provider. BP took it down almost immediately. No first hand info. I would advise any monger to beware it seems BP is more concerned about it's bottom line the people's safety.
[url]http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/black-and-asian-persuasion-20/5951148[/url]
[QUOTE=Zuma79; 1563818]Over on BP early this am a monger advised he was robbed (cash and dash) by this provider. BP took it down almost immediately. No first hand info. I would advise any monger to beware it seems BP is more concerned about it's bottom line the people's safety.
[url]http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/black-and-asian-persuasion-20/5951148[/url][/QUOTE]Yes, there was a report last year about her doing something similar. Zuma, your comment on BP is spot on!
[QUOTE=Zuma79; 1563818]Over on BP early this am a monger advised he was robbed (cash and dash) by this provider. BP took it down almost immediately. No first hand info. I would advise any monger to beware it seems BP is more concerned about it's bottom line the people's safety.
[url]http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/black-and-asian-persuasion-20/5951148[/url][/QUOTE]Absolute scumbag junkie with thugs materializing once cash is exchanged. Be warned. But don't worry, she'll rot away soon enough.
Backpage probably didn't take it down just to take it down, enough people flagged it from different computers to have it pulled so they took it down. Don't have to worry about those kinds of things at my place, js.
We have never met and I understand you are a wonderful provider with good reviews and non-LEO background.
That been said: There were a number of recent postings on PB claiming the pics that providers were using were not of them. The postings provided the real picture (s) and ID of the person to whom they belong and the fake in it's altered state. For example, Christyl was using the pic of Rostislava Savchuk a Russian model. The posting notifying users of the facade was taken down by BP and the fake was allowed to continue it's posting. The individual contacted PB to determine why the warning posting was removed. Their response was, it was a violation of their "Terms of Agreement". A second e-mail went to PB advising that the providers fake posting was in violation also because of copyrighted material and criminal I'd theft. However the posting was allowed to remain. PB refused to respond to any other e-mails warning of the frauds. That was only one of 12 different girls using bogus pictures to ID themself (s) on that week alone.
A few things to think of on this practice.
(1) What about the innocent victim who's picture is used and her reputation is besmirched and career possibly compromised and or ruined?
(2) What about your own safety? If you are posting a fake pic of a super model and "Ugly Betty" shows up, what do you think a drunk "Billy Bob Bubba" will do?
(3) If the provider dosen't want her ID known (for numerous reasons) she could blur the face or swap pics by phone simple enough.
The posting in this case was of a guy that was robbed by a known rip-off artist. It was up for less than 30 minutes and taken down. Monique please don't try to insult my intelligence. You don't really believe that "people" see a warning about a thief and want it removed? Why, to what end? The only person who wants the posting taken down would be the "provider" or her pimp.
It's safe to say that BP has a vested interest in the status quo. They are making millions of dollars a day with very little overhead and they don't want to upset the apple cart. The issue here is, what is more important? BP making millions of dollars a day with postings (both real and fake) or the individuals right to their personel safety by not getting robbed or beat-down by a pimp?
Monique, BP takes these warning postings down in their own best interest. Get you head out of the sand!
[QUOTE=MidwestMonique;1564547]Backpage probably didn't take it down just to take it down, enough people flagged it from different computers to have it pulled so they took it down. Don't have to worry about those kinds of things at my place, js.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Zuma79;1564703]Get you head out of the sand![/QUOTE]Well, that's not very gentlemanly.
[QUOTE=Zuma79; 1564703]We have never met and I understand you are a wonderful provider with good reviews and non-LEO background.
That been said: There were a number of recent postings on PB claiming the pics that providers were using were not of them. The postings provided the real picture (s) and I'd of the person to whom they belong and the fake in it's altered state. For example, Christyl was using the pic of Rostislava Savchuk a Russian model. The posting notifying users of the facade was taken down by BP and the fake was allowed to continue it's posting. The individual contacted PB to determine why the warning posting was removed. Their response was, it was a violation of their "Terms of Agreement". A second e-mail went to PB advising that the providers fake posting was in violation also because of copyrighted material and criminal I'd theft. However the posting was allowed to remain. PB refused to respond to any other e-mails warning of the frauds. That was only one of 12 different girls using bogus pictures to I'd themself (s) on that week alone.
A few things to think of on this practice.
(1) What about the innocent victim who's picture is used and her reputation is besmirched and career possibly compromised and or ruined?
(2) What about your own safety? If you are posting a fake pic of a super model and "Ugly Betty" shows up, what do you think a drunk "Billy Bob Bubba" will do?
(3) If the provider dosen't want her I'd known (for numerous reasons) she could blur the face or swap pics by phone simple enough.
The posting in this case was of a guy that was robbed by a known rip-off artist. It was up for less than 30 minutes and taken down. Monique please don't try to insult my intelligence. You don't really believe that "people" see a warning about a thief and want it removed? Why, to what end? The only person who wants the posting taken down would be the "provider" or her pimp.
It's safe to say that BP has a vested interest in the status quo. They are making millions of dollars a day with very little overhead and they don't want to upset the apple cart. The issue here is, what is more important? BP making millions of dollars a day with postings (both real and fake) or the individuals right to their personel safety by not getting robbed or beat-down by a pimp?
Monique, BP takes these warning postings down in their own best interest. Get you head out of the sand![/QUOTE]Well said Zuma! Its always about "the money"! Here and on other sites you can see the bias is towardf protecting the income stream and, because they control the sites, we have little chance to rebutt!
To much BS with providers, so I am asking for infor from my brothers in arms for a good as above, not BBW, no games in $-$.5 prices PM me if you want thanks
[QUOTE=DoUHavePot;1564406]Just saw kelly the other night. Was kinda nervous cus she had someone bring her. But she got dropped off and boy did we have a night. Well worth what I spent and went over the time no problem wasnt even worried about time. Hope the second time is more fun though kinda scared now read thru all these posts should I stay or keep going?[/QUOTE]Don't ever get too comfortable. Always try and be aware of what's going on for everyones safety.
Monique, I am sorry, Vchaser is right. You have never done anything to me to deserve my disrespect.
How about "smell the roses". I hope that gets my meaning across without offending anyone.
[QUOTE=Vchaser;1564775]Well, that's not very gentlemanly.[/QUOTE]
This just popped up on BP. Lets see how long it last.
[url]http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/warning-do-not-hire-this-girl-she-will-rip-you-off-58/7177740[/url]
Hello,
I also am wondering what if any info is available on either.
Margo [url]http://daytona.backpage.com/BodyRubs/unwind-and-r-e-l-a-x-52/3904951[/url]
Or
Nina [url]http://daytona.backpage.com/BodyRubs/sensual-mature-women-experienced-in-full-body-rubs-30/7009318[/url]
If you are more comfortable with the pm that is understandable.
Thanks