The bookends are remarkable in DC
[QUOTE=BuckNaked84;6965443]Why do I keep trying.
Laurs.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7ec415ef-5c70-4f6c-9ef1-fc7062268b92[/URL]
She needs a full advance payment.
I know I shouldn't click. Ugh.[/QUOTE]I've been chatting with her. Normally the "online only" is a quick pass. But she also hasn't suggested a payment for pictures, etc. What I can't figure out is whether she's legitimately a nervous new SB and just thinks this is the route to satiate her curiosity or she's a total scam / pic seller. She assures me she's real and can send some pictures to prove it but I haven't responded. Don't want to breathe life into her approach. If she's real, she'll soon learn no one wants online only. So its either leave the site or meet someone.
Met another GND cutie recently (still pursuing). Similar look as this one just mentioned. Really cute in person but not objectively hot. Her personality made her more attractive. I brought up allowance, thinking I might even go to 5 oo, which I thought was more than she's being offered, and she said she's looking for $8 K monthly. She could see the astonishment on my face and then quickly said she'd compromise to bi-monthly for me so it wasn't all one payment. I told her that's $96 K annually after tax income for me for 2-3 dates a month and she said "we don't need to pay taxes on it", having no idea what I meant. She's still texting as she keeps saying she's open minded to what I want to do. I swear these girls get some really bad advice from somewhere.
So these are the bookends of the DMV. Online scams and insane GPS. But there are still a few gems inbetween.
Left click vs right click
[QUOTE=TheCurve;6966651]Serious question. Is there a view either on computer or mobile, where it looks like the full profile of someone, but when you link to it. It's a useless "messages" link?
That's got to be the only way so many fuck that up here so much. Some are multiple offenders in a single post.[/QUOTE]As someone else said, it's ultimately probably people not paying attention. But if you're in your inbox and you left click a profile, it takes you to their profile in the same browser window. However, if you right click the same profile and select to open it in a new tab, it takes you to the messages instead. No idea why it works differently. That would be my best guess on how people get it wrong since intuitively, both should open the same page, with the only difference being same window vs different window.
Asking info on a couple and sharing some
Anyone has intel on her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/21c7acf3-3bbd-4627-a1a6-98b9ccbdc5df[/URL]
Luna.
She's been reported before as a dancer at a club and seeking customers for visit to club. Beyond that can anyone met her, can confirm her looks?
Similar question:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b34a3e8f-5ef9-452c-9ed8-af32994ab731[/URL]
Amelia.
She's a dancer as well, and in fact I can confirm she looks like her pictures, anyone has experience what she's open to beyond visit to club?
Just want to know what these dancer girls are willing to be open to. I've had great experience with another one last year when she took a break, so you never know.
Couple of recent interactions below:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e5bcb8f-1e44-4dbc-a228-18567ac9a351[/URL]
Northstarbaby.
She's been reported before, iDTF, interaction is spotty, so I am skipping, pro vibe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dd0e4e85-12ad-40ea-a189-496cd8b29f2d[/URL]
Sugarsweet13.
Anyone meet or interact with her? She sounds promising, been around a while.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/99c10ecc-23a8-4838-80d2-04af6135547f[/URL]
Mercy.
She reached out to me, looks fake or bot, not sure whether to take the bait.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/273ae5f9-a583-4a71-a655-8cc26d4fda0b[/URL]
Kitty.
DTF, you can have her for 200 if desperate and down for a fat chick. She really is fat as pictured, on the plus side she's clean as she's not been getting too much sex and open to bb.
More cushion for the pushin
Don't under estimate the larger ladies. I prefer athletic / fit, won't do skinny / anorexic / NYC model thin, and will occasionally smash a big girl. Had a great SB (no longer active) who was wicked smart and loved to fuck. Tig ol bitties, skinny waste and a big round bottom, all bare, $400 and she hosted. Dropped me for a civie, but it was fun for about 6 months. If Kitty were in NoVa or DC, would give her a shot. One of you who hunts in the Rockville area should take a run at her.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/273ae5f9-a583-4a71-a655-8cc26d4fda0b[/URL]
----
Kitty.
DTF, you can have her for 200 if desperate and down for a fat chick. She really is fat as pictured, on the plus side she's clean as she's not been getting too much sex and open to bb.
She was smileylady. She is now Goodvibes
She is not ugly by a stretch. Saw her dozens of times. Not going to disparage, but 20 now, and not seeing her again.
0. 0 gag reflex. Nada. What once was, isn't anymore.
[QUOTE=Itfcd;6961085]Here's her SB account:
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/24b5017a9d2f33a8[/URL]
She went by smileylady on SA for a while, too (has had at least one other account), and I think I remember someone posting something about her, but that was quite a while ago, so I couldn't find the exact commentary, and, frankly, it seems like a lot of people around here are bordering on face-blind and that may be why no one else noticed her. Then again, she's a butterface, so you'd sort of have to be face-blind. Would be surprised if she's 20, though. Might be a year or two older unless she started literally the day she turned 18.
EDIT: Actually, I tried just searching "smiley" at first. Guess that doesn't bring back partial matches, probably one of those search engine quirks I never learned how to manipulate. Using "smileylady" as the search term brings back hits. Wouldn't be surprised if it's the same chick in Ohio as here, maybe she goes to school at OSU or Case Western or something.[/QUOTE]
Second That on North Star Baby
[QUOTE=Arty33;6968158]
Northstarbaby.
She's been reported before, iDTF, interaction is spotty, so I am skipping, pro vibe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e5bcb8f-1e44-4dbc-a228-18567ac9a351[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Second that on North Star Baby. Total waste of time. Spotty communication and setup times to meet three times then on the day of asks to change the time or comes up with a reason not to meet. If someone is around the Rockville to Frederick area and can meet during the weekdays maybe you will have better luck.