SD rate too low for girls
[QUOTE=JackHolly;7690320]I agree about the different standards. I saw Ella, Areum, and Hannah, separately, a couple months ago, and at the time, those seemed to be the top reviewed K-girls in SD. I didn't have a bad time with any of them, but for me, personally, they were all just ok. I've clicked with most of the K-girls I've seen over the years (mostly in LA, OC, Vegas, and Honolulu), and I didn't click with any of them. Could've just been me not clicking with them. That said, there was nothing wrong with them at all in terms of looks or service (or pricing. The 340-380 price point is awesome), and I don't think anyone would have a bad time with them.
I think the different standards are kind of like how the one sushi restaurant in some town in the middle of nowhere in a flyover state might get rave reviews, but wouldn't hold a candle to a sushi place in a major city. At least when I was seeing the three girls down in SD a couple months ago, there were only like 4-8 K-girls in SD, compared to the 100+ in LA and OC. But over the past few months, we've seen a huge push by all the bookers big and small (CGLA, LGP, RokM, Get9, etc.) in to San Diego, so I'm guessing we'll see a huge influx of K-girls in San Diego over the next year or so. As long as the pricing doesn't go up (or comes down! That'll be good for everyone.[/QUOTE]There are multiple factors why girls don't go to SD, 1st, their rate is lower, 2nd low density of population, 3rd too many cheap Latina easy to come by, 4th too many retiree are on budget, 5th too close to TJ, 6th not much to do when they are off a week for their period. Yes they tour around but L. A still get the most opportunity and but most competitive on looks, skills and highest price vs SF and SD. Somehow we are more expensive than both other city in CA.