The Sugar Thread: Intel / Reviews / Contacts

[QUOTE=FunNthaSun;5275479]Wait. Off the site conversations?? Wow I guess I could have been kicked off the site a long time ago from 'off the site' conversations. Personally I've never been kicked off the site but it's crazy to think that they could ban you from the site from conversations you have off the site. What business is it of theirs what's talked about off the site?? They don't know what type of relationship you've developed with a sb. They don't know if the sb is only providing a one-sided conversation. I've never got into a heated back and forth with a sb but I just don't see how they can kick you off the site for a disgruntled sb.[/QUOTE]I copied and pasted that from his email. Maybe he shouldn't have told me that. They do keep a tight lip as to how they do their shit and how they decide to ban people, but he probably wasnt thinking when he sent the email. AND, he also post 6 months worth of alias emails I used too. Kinda unsettling.

They knew all that.

[QUOTE=Hal1957;5274291]Never never never get in a pissing contest with an SB, on the site or off the site. They report out of spite and even if you think you won the argument with her, you lose the argument with SA. It isn't worth the shit you have to go through later. Just block and move on.[/QUOTE]HA, I know this already and as much as I do try, sometimes I just get too pissed off and respond.

[QUOTE=Sicilly;5278284]I copied and pasted that from his email. Maybe he shouldn't have told me that. They do keep a tight lip as to how they do their shit and how they decide to ban people, but he probably wasnt thinking when he sent the email. AND, he also post 6 months worth of alias emails I used too. Kinda unsettling.

They knew all that.[/QUOTE]If you just skimmed over Sicily's post or just don't think it's important. Here is your gut check. You are NOT anonymous to big tech. Maybe other users, SBs, STG Girls etc; But big tech is all up in your junk and has been since you started. There are so many ways to link your online shit together, it boggles the mind. Bottom line: if part of your justification for playing the game is your presumed anonymity, then you should get out now. I'm only pointing this out because I see a bunch of posts around defeating the I'd tech and such as that, it just all leaves me SMH. Now it IS true that the mechanics of singling out a user and fucking with them in a meaningful way based on this truth is problematic. I am not saying it's imminent that someone from SA is going to call your wife and rat you out or show up to your door with some cement shoes. But the thing that saving you ass from that is the numbers, not the knowledge. They 100% know who you are.

This one must be hard up for money. We messaged a couple of months ago, exchanged numbers, I sent her a pic and heard nothing back after asking for the same. Figured I wasn't her type, that's cool. Out of the blue she texted me today, wanting to 'have some fun' for 600. Gave her an 'LOL' and she dropped it to 500. Told her she was way off, and good luck.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1d9c4601-8400-4698-9a72-9e8308db70c5[/URL]

Well I guess I spoke too soon on my last post about never having my account suspended. Logged on the other day to find out I've been permanently banned because of. Well, you know. But in all honesty SA is not what it used to be and there are more and more profiles that only want to sell pics or have online arrangements. The ones that actually do want to meet are asking for wayy too much allowance in my opinion. I definitely had fun the time I was a member and didn't have really any bad experiences. Some was just a one time meeting and others I continued to see. I still have about 3 or 4 that I can meet with at any time and I'm pretty satisfied with that plus was able to get contact info from four others before I was banned that I have the opportunity to pursue. I've read the ordeals some of you had to go thru to get back on like IP and email changes etc and I just don't feel like going thru all that LOL. Maybe when my well runs completely dry I'll try or maybe that may be a sign to step away from the hobby altogether who knows.

Happy hunting guys -Fun-.

[QUOTE=FunNthaSun;5289001]Well I guess I spoke too soon on my last post about never having my account suspended. Logged on the other day to find out I've been permanently banned because of. Well, you know. But in all honesty SA is not what it used to be and there are more and more profiles that only want to sell pics or have online arrangements. The ones that actually do want to meet are asking for wayy too much allowance in my opinion. I definitely had fun the time I was a member and didn't have really any bad experiences. Some was just a one time meeting and others I continued to see. I still have about 3 or 4 that I can meet with at any time and I'm pretty satisfied with that plus was able to get contact info from four others before I was banned that I have the opportunity to pursue. I've read the ordeals some of you had to go thru to get back on like IP and email changes etc and I just don't feel like going thru all that LOL. Maybe when my well runs completely dry I'll try or maybe that may be a sign to step away from the hobby altogether who knows.

Happy hunting guys -Fun-.[/QUOTE]Might be worth a try.

[QUOTE=Fishguy717;5286018]This one must be hard up for money. We messaged a couple of months ago, exchanged numbers, I sent her a pic and heard nothing back after asking for the same. Figured I wasn't her type, that's cool. Out of the blue she texted me today, wanting to 'have some fun' for 600. Gave her an 'LOL' and she dropped it to 500. Told her she was way off, and good luck.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1d9c4601-8400-4698-9a72-9e8308db70c5[/URL][/QUOTE]Haha. The true funniest part of this is the last line in her profile "Money is nice of course but I'm not looking to be anyone's escort. ".

Ummm. Okay. Haha.

First let me say I was surprised that they did. But they did. A couple things up front:

*I was accused essentially of offering compensation for action. I try to be careful about that sort of thing, but probably screwed up with somebody I was texting- but had no specific memory of it! I believe they will ban guys after a complaint but no specific evidence.

*I ended up exchanging a couple of emails back and forth with SA about this issue. Ultimately, as a condition of re-instatement the person at SA I had to state in a follow up email that I had re-read the rules and would comply going forward, Easy enough!! Re-instated in 48 hrs.

*Your situation is unique to you so don't write them with exactly what I did, mix it up a little bit with your wording etc.

OK- first, once they deactivate you, you can't just go to their help desk, so you need to address your email to: [EMAIL]support@seeking.com[/EMAIL]. Compose your email from the email address associated with your banned account (so they at least know who it is).

*BTW, I think this is only likely to work if you have been banned VERY RECENTLY. I would suggest you not try it otherwise.

*Here is essentially the Letter I wrote to them:

"To Whom it may concern.

I received an email today telling me that my account was permanently banned for "soliciting sex for compensation". I would like to be provided with some explanation of why this action was taken against my account.

In my profile I had stated that I would like intimacy to be part of an agreement if possible which I believe is probably not an uncommon hope of most men on the site. Additionally, I stated I expected to provide spoiling and an allowance as part of an agreement which I believe most women are expecting on SA. I do not think this means I was "soliciting" or anything of the sort. SA approved my profile so I assumed it was perfectly fine.

Let me finish by saying I have had members on SA who have reacted badly to completely civil conversations if they don't like the exchange, issue an insult and then abruptly block me. My concern is such a person may have made bogus claims to have me removed from SA.

I am hoping this situation can be reviewed and resolved and my account reinstated as soon as possible.

Best regards".

SO THAT'S IT. MIX UP YOUR WORDING IF YOU WRITE THEM. IF A BUNCH OF YOU JUST CUT AND PASTE THIS VER BATIM THEY WILL BE ONTO IT IN NO TIME!!

THEY RESPONDED TO THIS INITIAL QUERY AND WITHIN A FEW EMAILS BACK AND FORTH I HAD MY ACCOUNT REACTIVATED.

Hope this helps someone!

[QUOTE=Scooter6;5291634]Haha. The true funniest part of this is the last line in her profile "Money is nice of course but I'm not looking to be anyone's escort. ".

Ummm. Okay. Haha.[/QUOTE]To be fair, she's playing the same game we are. If she came out and said she was an escort, she'd be banned.

Seen them a bit before but would like to pin them down. Any guidance on Yourfavorite baby or tequilandtanlines?

Tequilandtanlines.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c6cb3981-35b7-4499-b032-829a9f4bfa9e[/URL]

Yourfavorite baby [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ade55dc5-c145-401b-8127-abce995c2493[/URL].

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;5292004]To be fair, she's playing the same game we are. If she came out and said she was an escort, she'd be banned.[/QUOTE]Trust me, I totally get that. Of course she is.

I just think it's hysterical.

[QUOTE=PicHunter;5292070]Seen them a bit before but would like to pin them down. Any guidance on Yourfavorite baby or tequilandtanlines?

Tequilandtanlines.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c6cb3981-35b7-4499-b032-829a9f4bfa9e[/URL]

Yourfavorite baby [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ade55dc5-c145-401b-8127-abce995c2493[/URL].[/QUOTE]Met her for coffee. Much heavier in person. Does not look nearly as good as pics. Cannot believe she has the nerve to say her body is "average". I felt kind of catfished So I offered her less than market value for an arrangement and she got offended. This was about a year ago.

This one came out of the box wanting to text, first red flag. Then sent me a hot pic (attached here) that was TGTBT. Then sent me a link to a site that says it's for group chat, but my pc is pretty well protected, and detected a virus in the little app they want you to run. I would avoid.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3ffca668-decf-4c0c-ac49-7558245afafa[/URL]

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;5292004]To be fair, she's playing the same game we are. If she came out and said she was an escort, she'd be banned.[/QUOTE]I know this isn't my side of the house, but I'd like to add my. 02 on this if I may. I've been wanting to speak this w / out offending the brethrens of this hobby.

After reading many of these profiles it seems that SA allows the ladies to persue their wants and desires w / out consideration of other's. I really don't get how some SDs allow that for themselves, but ok, Whatever.

SURE, it's a dating site. But with the "Seeking" section of SA, these ladies are permitted to voice their terms. But the moment men / SDs try to negotiate or discuss, whether discretely or not-so discretely, they (the ladies) get offended and feel they're not inclined to give as much as they take. It's a 1 way street that guys are forced to drive on.

I suppose the reason for all this is so SA is not labelled another "hooker" site and get under Big Uncles radar such as in the case of BP. I personally believe SA is still a hooker site with men being the ones getting fucked w / out getting fucked. In general, I have more respect for the hoes on STG and those types of "dating" sites than I do with SA-type of sites. At least theres a sense of mutual agreement (tits for tat) -- w / out all the rip-offs of course. LOL.

As for those die-hard SDs who genuinely want to find a girl who they can spoil with monetary gifts or gifts in general w / out expecting nothing in return, more power to them. If that's how they (SDs) want to blow their wad w / out any expectancy of getting their wad blown-- wonderful. All theyve created is a bunch of egotistical money-hungry b!+chest who has no regards of others.

Once again, this is just my. 02. I don't mean to knock any SDs or their lifestyles. I'm sure theres plenty of SDs-SBs relationships that's working for some of ya'll. YES, I DO understand the quality of girls is way better according to some of the reviews I've read. Better looks, better accommodations, and less of the bullshit of that comes with main-stream Mongering. I wish you gents the best of luck and hope none of yall go falling in love w / any of these hoes. HA!

[QUOTE=AMnnos;5292773]I know this isn't my side of the house, but I'd like to add my. 02 on this if I may. I've been wanting to speak this w / out offending the brethrens of this hobby.

After reading many of these profiles it seems that SA allows the ladies to persue their wants and desires w / out consideration of other's. I really don't get how some SDs allow that for themselves, but ok, Whatever.

SURE, it's a dating site. But with the "Seeking" section of SA, these ladies are permitted to voice their terms. But the moment men / SDs try to negotiate or discuss, whether discretely or not-so discretely, they (the ladies) get offended and feel they're not inclined to give as much as they take. It's a 1 way street that guys are forced to drive on.

I suppose the reason for all this is so SA is not labelled another "hooker" site and get under Big Uncles radar such as in the case of BP. I personally believe SA is still a hooker site with men being the ones getting fucked w / out getting fucked. In general, I have more respect for the hoes on STG and those types of "dating" sites than I do with SA-type of sites. At least theres a sense of mutual agreement (tits for tat) -- w / out all the rip-offs of course. LOL.

As for those die-hard SDs who genuinely want to find a girl who they can spoil with monetary gifts or gifts in general w / out expecting nothing in return, more power to them. If that's how they (SDs) want to blow their wad w / out any expectancy of getting their wad blown-- wonderful. All theyve created is a bunch of egotistical money-hungry b!+chest who has no regards of others.

Once again, this is just my. 02. I don't mean to knock any SDs or their lifestyles. I'm sure theres plenty of SDs-SBs relationships that's working for some of ya'll. YES, I DO understand the quality of girls is way better according to some of the reviews I've read. Better looks, better accommodations, and less of the bullshit of that comes with main-stream Mongering. I wish you gents the best of luck and hope none of yall go falling in love w / any of these hoes. HA![/QUOTE]I can understand what you're saying.

In a perfect world, there'd be a higher-end market in Jax. When I lived in the Northeast, there were providers who were middle-to-high end. No IV drug use, even some who didn't smoke tobacco! Or even weed! Actual appointments in clean hotels. They'd screen, but not in a way that made you fear for your anonymity. A clear understanding of what services were and were not provided before you entered the room, and a clear understanding as to the donation. Real efforts at presentation- women that were showered, had makeup but only perfume if you wanted, some nice lingerie. Women that you'd enjoy have a bit of conversation before and after the deed. They didn't have to be 20-year old spinners; these were women between 30 and 50 who understood a man's needs and could make him feel respected in an hour's time.

I've been in Jax for close to two years. If there's a provider out there who actually provides that level of service for an affordable rate, I haven't found it. There's the STG girls, there's a handful of Eros girls who are far beyond my price range and are mostly mysteries. There's a handful of travelers. But there's no group of what I'm providing.

Maybe I'm the anomaly here. I'm not looking to fall in love, but I'd love to be an appreciative customer. No luck yet.

I can promise you that I'm not jacking up the rates, because I honestly haven't found anyone worth jacking the rates up for.

If this belongs somewhere else, I'm happy to move the post. I don't want to violate the rules.