If I were the girl's defense counsel.
I'd get photos of the undercovers ossifers, and have the girls do a press conference describing the intimate details the police equipment used.
I don't think. They got their info from this board.
[QUOTE=I Love HJs;1752523]I can tell you why it took a year long investigation. They couldn't get the girls on anything. I've been going there for years. The most you will get is little willie getting soaped up when you get a table shower. They don't jack you off. It's more incidental contact as they washed. I bet what happened is yhat over time as LEO started seeing more and more money being wasted as they chased shadows, they hsd to justify the money being spent. Notice how ALL of the reports don't say anything about sex, just of naughty bits being rubbed. I refer you to my shower scenario. With lack of any real charges, they trumped up a prostitution charges."weeelllll, she did touch his pee pee anf got a tip. Let's call it prostitution!" what really sucks is they took all of the owners money, so he can't even afford a good lawyer. This bust should scare the crap out of all of us. If they start using such broad parameters to define prostitution, they will be able to shut down anyone and everyone with little effort. The new standard will be any contact with naughty bits. Think about it.[/QUOTE]If they did they knew that no sexual activity was going on there in spite of the best efforts of Indys most determined mongers. They got their information from the infallible rumor mill at the neighborhood beauty shop. I've probably had more stimulation of my genitals by my female MD. i wonder if the local Taliban will go after her next. What a farce.
Money Making Opportunity for a Smart Attorney
A smart attorney would take on the owners of the Carmel AMP in return for a contingency on the 250k forfeiture. I think they could beat the charges at jury trial. The undercover officer himself said the genital contact was not stimulating. So how can it be sex for money?
It would be a lot of fun to do the cross on the undercover. The officer would have to argue that he was not sexually stimulated, but that the ordinary person would be. 5 times and never stimulated? Does the officer have some medical problem preventing erection? Is he some kind of zen monk who's been trained to control himself? If he's not stimulated after 5 times, how does he know anyone else would be? Did they do a study? Then there's the whole question about whether genital washing by a professional providing some other service (whether its massage therapy or surgery preparation) should be characterized sex for money. If so, there's some CNAs out there who have a lot to answer for.
This case has more warts than a 10th Street girl on the stroll. I think a trial would reveal the whole set up to be a wasteful and slightly racist money grab. If this was the white girls across the street at the beauty parlor doing a wash up before a bikini wax, do you think anyone would have been arrested?