Printable View
[QUOTE=NoseJelly;4695950]*Doooooshbag* or *Douche Bag*?[/QUOTE]Number 3 still looking for a few more come on "Benz" army the ass sniffers are only 3 so far and to all you "grammar" scholars your on a fricking monger site 😂128514;128514; raise your hands which one of you are teachers in a school?
"Nosejelly" umm humm great analogy of name your #3.
Witty response BJ! Kudos!
Watcha going to whine about next?
[QUOTE=NoseJelly;4696498]Witty response BJ! Kudos!
Watcha going to whine about next?[/QUOTE]Your spin on words make you what? About 8th grade? Boy, you really got me!
[QUOTE=DjBiker;4696287]Number 3 still looking for a few more come on "Benz" army the ass sniffers are only 3 so far and to all you "grammar" scholars your on a fricking monger site 😂128514;128514; raise your hands which one of you are teachers in a school?
"Nosejelly" umm humm great analogy of name your #3.[/QUOTE]This just reeks of someone that seems to have a bit of envy. Reminds me of situations back in the Scorp and EV days. Wish I could remember names but there was a member that was a pro photographer that did a lot of the pics for the providers. We all enjoyed the sexy photos but it didn't take long for some mongers to start causing trouble and complaining that the photog must be getting free sessions or special attention from the ladies. I for one appreciate the effort that Benz puts in to help all of us. It seems he has more time and resources to invest in finding the good and bad ones which in turn saves a lot of hassle for the rest of us. Thank you Benz!
[QUOTE=LoveTheLips;4696798]This just reeks of someone that seems to have a bit of envy.[/QUOTE]It smells like an a $$hole to me.
[QUOTE=DjBiker;4696287] raise your hands which one of you are teachers in a school?[/QUOTE]This site is used by all types of mongers; skilled tradesmen, teachers, accountants, doctors, lawyers, artists, whatever. It's hard to say who's who on here except for those that continually make an ass out of themselves.
It's probably time we all just drop it and get back to reviewing providers.
[QUOTE=DjBiker;4696725]Your spin on words make you what? About 8th grade? Boy, you really got me![/QUOTE]Like shooting fish in a barrel with a Amateur like you!
I agree with the way you put #5. However, that said, #1 is the original issue at hand.
#1: A provider, whether she's been around the block for 20 years or 2 months doesn't matter. Asking for a guy's license as a default Requirement is ridiculous. The best I could see it as would be an exception to allow a guy to see her if she was UTR and wasn't wanting to see any newbies, as he had no references, but for whatever reason he was pushing it to try and have a session with her (still Bad practices by him). But to Expect it from guys when reaching out to newbies, No. It be wrong procedure to tell rookie Mongers to give our your I'd (LOL) to gals as some procedure. Even as an uncommon procedure to take part in. Don't do it. Not just an opinion. Otherwise, if a girl would Only take checks, it'd be constituted as OK to write checks to girls you're first seeing. Or even throw in sending her a mail-order PRIOR to the meet up. Umm, no. Not just my opinion or taste.
So I don't think one should be criticized if they go "WHOAH, NO!" to the notion of writing checks or giving out your drivers license to girls out on the market. It's objectively Deserving of criticism, hence, deserving criticism of any gal Demanding it as an Expected Requirement as if it's Reasonable and "what a monger should do. ".
#2: Depends on the context and the experience with the gal. If she's clearly a junkie, you can call her a junkie. If she has a Big Large Ass, well, some girls advertise it as a good thing. I agree not to say "fat ass" in a Bashing way where it's coupled with universal negative remarks, if she was otherwise a decent girl and looked close to her pics online. But it certainly can be said in a way that's attributing to something you may like, or in a neutral way -- to just describe. Kind of like Gap Tooth Nikki. Not bashing, just describing & differentiating between others.
#3: The only info one should be advised to give is a 'screen name', and what one likes in the sack. That's about it. Expecting more to be "fair" to a provider is pushing it. But if you get to know a provider well, spending a bit of time off the clock chatting and what-not, yeah some more info to some extent can be fine. But it's ill-advised for it to be personal info linked to your real life on Any level.
#4: You can be charged with stuff without any real weight for conviction on things. That said, what you want to avoid is being hit up by those who could even charge you, good judgement or not on their part. Your #1 thing to do is avoid That 100%. It's going to be advised to Mongers that it's silly to give out drivers license information to any provider. Common sense.
[QUOTE=GMacMan;4683955]A few comments for this forum to clarify my position on some of the points you make for the lurkers on this board, then we take it over to the pugilist page if you want to discuss further.
1) She sounds "bitchy" to those that don't like her requirements. She has just as much right to protect herself just as we want to protect ourselves. If someone doesn't like it, they can move on, but she has never been bitchy with me.
2) Calling providers "fatass" is completely unecessary. I certainly have never called a provider any derogetory names regardless of whether I have had a bad or good experience with them. Respect is currency.
3) I don't give all providers my info. There is a level of quality difference between providers like her and ones that live and work from a hotel room and / or post a million ads a day.
4) As far as legal issues, just someone having my name and extra info about me will not lead to a conviction for anything. Regarding extortion, I don't leave that as an option. I don't take out billboard ads, but I don't hide that I play either.
5) We all take riskes in this and will continue to do so until this activity if fully decriminalized. I make measured risks based on my circumstances and goals, which may not be suitable for everyone.
In the end, she a solid mature BBW provider with some requirements to protect herself. The guests on this board can decided if they want to pay to play or if they want to take a pass. All without needing to resort to derogetory name calling.[/QUOTE]
Anyone else have any odd experiences with the Kalamazoo posters?
According to them the only AMP to offer extras is the TLC Spa. So. I went to a new AMP in Portage and was surprised that extras were on the menu. I made a simple post of my experience and that has been met with outrage from a few of the local. Of course they've accused me of inventing the experience. Then stating that the MMS is scared to death due to my posts.
Given I am a new poster my posts get censored before posting. As I've included the original posts of the White Knights, the moderator has removed or redacted their posts, even though they are seniors. So I'm a persona non grata at the Kalamazoo forum.
Really odd. If white knights are allowed to attack, why is the Kalamazoo forum even running? Shouldn't it be either free to post actual experiences or simply shut it down?
All this has done is bring more attention to my posts. The morons never even pm me. They just attempt to discredit my posts, which only makes me more engaged. And I respond. And then a new white knight whines about it.
Am I missing something? Or are these guys missing the point of this forum? I understand if they want to keep something on the down low, but that's where a pm works. A full on blast post attacking my accuracy simply brings more attention.
Any thoughts?
[QUOTE=DjBiker;4696287]Number 3 still looking for a few more come on "Benz" army the ass sniffers are only 3 so far and to all you "grammar" scholars your on a fricking monger site 😂128514;128514; raise your hands which one of you are teachers in a school?
"Nosejelly" umm humm great analogy of name your #3.[/QUOTE]Only 3 in the "army"? Your math skills align with your verbal / spelling / grammar skills.
Counting is really easy. Use your fingers. First. Remove from nose. Then count. Simple.
[QUOTE=Charlie441;4697331]I agree with the way you put #5. However, that said, #1 is the original issue at hand.
#1: A provider, whether she's been around the block for 20 years or 2 months doesn't matter. Asking for a guy's license as a default Requirement is ridiculous. The best I could see it as would be an exception to allow a guy to see her if she was UTR and wasn't wanting to see any newbies, as he had no references, but for whatever reason he was pushing it to try and have a session with her (still Bad practices by him). But to Expect it from guys when reaching out to newbies, No. It be wrong procedure to tell rookie Mongers to give our your I'd (LOL) to gals as some procedure. Even as an uncommon procedure to take part in. Don't do it. Not just an opinion. Otherwise, if a girl would Only take checks, it'd be constituted as OK to write checks to girls you're first seeing. Or even throw in sending her a mail-order PRIOR to the meet up. Umm, no. Not just my opinion or taste.
So I don't think one should be criticized if they go "WHOAH, NO!" to the notion of writing checks or giving out your drivers license to girls out on the market. It's objectively Deserving of criticism, hence, deserving criticism of any gal Demanding it as an Expected Requirement as if it's Reasonable and "what a monger should do. ".
[/QUOTE]This will be called more white knighting, I'm sure, but Charlie, I did not criticize him for giving a "whoa no". Instead, I was being criticized for being ok with the procedure. There are girls that ask, but I would not give out that info to the kinds of girls that move around a lot, work out of low to mid range hotels (forget Red Roof, Amway Grand, please) or who run frequent discount rates and post 80 times a day on STG. In other words, the kinds of girls that the criticizer sees. However, for the higher end girls or the reliables that work out of their own home in a nice neighborhood, I don't begrudge them wanting to verify and upon meeting, I should have the freedome to choose. I was simply offering that this girl is safe and trustworthy and I get reamed out on here for that. As far as expect it, there are only two that post on STG that do, and they don't post frequently. For the most part, if I were to see someone from STG, I would NOT give out my I'd. Also, I wouldn't take my own car to the location either. You think "managers" don't write down your license plate number while you're inside?? The provider in question is a rare breed that will post occasionally on STG to give new guys a chance that would not normally shop on P411, Eros Guide or any of the other sites where the better quality girls do their business. She's a low cost access point for a reference to the high-end providers and a safe reliable bet in a pinch.
Nobody that has been through her screening has complained yet that they feel their info is at high risk. The main complaints are that you can find better service without all the hassle. That is true, you can, but you also encounter different risks as well, which have been well documented on here. Cash and dashers, robberies, make an apppointment, drive to the place, then crickets, drug use, and so on. Nobody on here that has seen this particular provider has said anything about having any of those issues. Me, if I want a reliable appointment that is going to be kept and will be satisfying for what I am looking for at the time, then a higher end provider that does I'd verification is the way to go. If you want it to be a game, even with your go-to cheap girl, then that is fine, too, your choice and I won't criticize. Debating this on here is like trying to debate a $150 bottle of wine with someone who has never had anything but Bud or Bud Light. They just won't get it.
I put out my clarifications so that the new guys on here will have an understanding of the risks involved with each type of an encounter. Out west, this is standard practice for the best providers to verify identity. Because that was my starting point, I have less qualms and a better understanding of the risks involved than if I'd started out here. However, unlike out there, here there is no forum dedicated to providers giving feedback on their customers from this board, so that you don't have to keep handing out your I'd over and over. I did it once out here, and have not had to since, I have my reference to all other premium providers that I want now. I don't need a "password" or any of that nonsense spouted on this board. However, it is becomming very clear that this is no longer a site to share experiences but instead is a board dominated by one primary voice. Anyone that has a point of view that contradicts that voice is subject to criticism and marginalization, which doesn't make for a useful board.
Also, the difference between saying someone has an ass that is fat and a fatass should be self evident and if not, a quick look up on Urban Dictonary will clear up any misconceptions about which one is descriptive vs. Derogatory. He meant it to be derogatory, I don't know why he felt he had to cover it up by a lame, "Well she is fat, so duh, her ass is fat" excuse.
Good luck out there!
Good lord? Another wall of text?
I knight thee Sir GMacMan! Defender of Jordan, champion of giving personal info. To a hooker, and most importantly expert on which hooker is trustworthy with thine personal info.
My original reply in escorts thread did not name you and was not about YOU. Reread it. All my comments were about your beloved Jordan.
But you as her whiteknight took it all personally.
P.S.: yes, I called her fatass. Growup and stop being so hyper sensitive. We're reviewing hookers for God sakes! Not engaging in diplomacy.
And on that note THAT also wasn't about you. But as her white knight you also dove all over that too.
Good day Sir GMacMan!
[QUOTE=GMacMan;4698067]Thiwrs will be called more white knighting, I'm sure, but Charlie, I did not criticize him for giving a "whoa no". Instead, I was being criticized for being ok with the procedure. There are girls that ask, but I would not give out that info to the kinds of girls that move around a lot, work out of low to mid range hotels (forget Red Roof, Amway Grand, please) or who run frequent discount rates and post 80 times a day on STG. In other words, the kinds of girls that the criticizer sees. However, for the higher end girls or the reliables that work out of their own home in a nice neighborhood, I don't begrudge them wanting to verify and upon meeting, I should have the freedome to choose. I was simply offering that this girl is safe and trustworthy and I get reamed out on here for that. As far as expect it, there are only two that post on STG that do, and they don't post frequently. For the most part, if I were to see someone from STG, I would NOT give out my I'd. Also, I wouldn't take my own car to the location either. You think "managers" don't write down your license plate number while you're inside?? The provider in question is a rare breed that will post occasionally on STG to give new guys a chance that would not normally shop on P411, Eros Guide or any of the other sites where the better quality girls do their business. She's a low cost access point for a reference to the high-end providers and a safe reliable bet in a pinch.
Nobody that has been through her screening has complained yet that they feel their info is at high risk. The main complaints are that you can find better service without all the hassle. That is true, you can, but you also encounter different risks as well, which have been well documented on here. Cash and dashers, robberies, make an apppointment, drive to the place, then crickets, drug use, and so on. Nobody on here that has seen this particular provider has said anything about having any of those issues. Me, if I want a reliable appointment that is going to be kept and will be satisfying for what I am looking for at the time, then a higher end provider that does I'd verification is the way to go. If you want it to be a game, even with your go-to cheap girl, then that is fine, too, your choice and I won't criticize. Debating this on here is like trying to debate a $150 bottle of wine with someone who has never had anything but Bud or Bud Light. They just won't get it.
I put out my clarifications so that the new guys on here will have an understanding of the risks involved with each type of an encounter. Out west, this is standard practice for the best providers to verify identity. Because that was my starting point, I have less qualms and a better understanding of the risks involved than if I'd started out here. However, unlike out there, here there is no forum dedicated to providers giving feedback on their customers from this board, so that you don't have to keep handing out your I'd over and over. I did it once out here, and have not had to since, I have my reference to all other premium providers that I want now. I don't need a "password" or any of that nonsense spouted on this board. However, it is becomming very clear that this is no longer a site to share experiences but instead is a board dominated by one primary voice. Anyone that has a point of view that contradicts that voice is subject to criticism and marginalization, which doesn't make for a useful board.
Also, the difference between saying someone has an ass that is fat and a fatass should be self evident and if not, a quick look up on Urban Dictonary will clear up any misconceptions about which one is descriptive vs. Derogatory. He meant it to be derogatory, I don't know why he felt he had to cover it up by a lame, "Well she is fat, so duh, her ass is fat" excuse.
Good luck out there![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Monger01;4698382]Good lord? Another wall of text?
I knight thee Sir GMacMan! Defender of Jordan, champion of giving personal info. To a hooker, and most importantly expert on which hooker is trustworthy with thine personal info.
My original reply in escorts thread did not name you and was not about YOU. Reread it. All my comments were about your beloved Jordan.
But you as her whiteknight took it all personally.
P.S.: yes, I called her fatass. Growup and stop being so hyper sensitive. We're reviewing hookers for God sakes! Not engaging in diplomacy.
And on that note THAT also wasn't about you. But as her white knight you also dove all over that too.
Good day Sir GMacMan![/QUOTE]Firstly. Nice response Monger!
Second. If only so much thought effort and passion could be put into the reviews (not necessarily you guys, but the board in general). While it is Extremely entertaining to watch this snowball continue to roll, I'm beginning to think this board is for fighters, not lovers!
Some of these guys need a hobby. Like wood working, or I know, banging chicks and then reviewing their experiences.
If only there were such a forum for that.
[QUOTE=Monger01;4698382]Good lord? Another wall of text?
I knight thee Sir GMacMan! Defender of Jordan, champion of giving personal info. To a hooker, and most importantly expert on which hooker is trustworthy with thine personal info.
My original reply in escorts thread did not name you and was not about YOU. Reread it. All my comments were about your beloved Jordan.
But you as her whiteknight took it all personally.
P.S.: yes, I called her fatass. Growup and stop being so hyper sensitive. We're reviewing hookers for God sakes! Not engaging in diplomacy.
And on that note THAT also wasn't about you. But as her white knight you also dove all over that too.
Good day Sir GMacMan![/QUOTE]Two words: Heidi Fleiss.
[QUOTE=Gene2;4697641]Only 3 in the "army"? Your math skills align with your verbal / spelling / grammar skills.
Counting is really easy. Use your fingers. First. Remove from nose. Then count. Simple.[/QUOTE]Good job coming in after 6 posts and throwing your nonsense in, read first then add for yourself douche.
[QUOTE=Monger01;4698382]Good lord? Another wall of text?
I knight thee Sir GMacMan! Defender of Jordan, champion of giving personal info. To a hooker, and most importantly expert on which hooker is trustworthy with thine personal info.
My original reply in escorts thread did not name you and was not about YOU. Reread it. All my comments were about your beloved Jordan.
But you as her whiteknight took it all personally.
P.S.: yes, I called her fatass. Growup and stop being so hyper sensitive. We're reviewing hookers for God sakes! Not engaging in diplomacy.
And on that note THAT also wasn't about you. But as her white knight you also dove all over that too.
Good day Sir GMacMan![/QUOTE]Post #7051 - After you quoted me specifically then lay into the idea of sharing information with providers. How am I not supposed to take that as directed at me? Why didn't you blow up the same way about the post from someone else on Katana? She requires DL verification when you show up at rendezvous with her. Not a peep from you, just shots at me and my posts. I've tired of your drama making, go stir up trouble for someone else.
Gmac out.