[QUOTE=Tampahunter]Had chance to try BP girl Mecca. Pictures do not do her justice, great 1/2 and 1 hr rates, knows what she's doing, all covered. A litle spacey, but great price for two good cups.[/QUOTE]
Dude, you hit that?
Printable View
[QUOTE=Tampahunter]Had chance to try BP girl Mecca. Pictures do not do her justice, great 1/2 and 1 hr rates, knows what she's doing, all covered. A litle spacey, but great price for two good cups.[/QUOTE]
Dude, you hit that?
Hello, everyone,
I just moved here from california and I look forward to sharing my tampa experiences. Last week I saw rachel from backpage. She is in her early forties but has a super tight body. Her incall is near downtown and was neat and clean.
We began with small conversation and after undressing got down to business. Her BBBJ was slow and deep with me returning the favor from 69. My dream continued with a cover being placed and in mish feeling her muscle control. She is the tightest I've felt in a long time. I finished this way and will be back. I do hope for some kissing at next visit but for $ this was great.
[QUOTE=Joe Montana II]Hello, everyone,
I just moved here from california and I look forward to sharing my tampa experiences. Last week I saw rachel from backpage. She is in her early forties but has a super tight body. Her incall is near downtown and was neat and clean.
We began with small conversation and after undressing got down to business. Her BBBJ was slow and deep with me returning the favor from 69. My dream continued with a cover being placed and in mish feeling her muscle control. She is the tightest I've felt in a long time. I finished this way and will be back. I do hope for some kissing at next visit but for $ this was great.[/QUOTE]
I guess Rachel has blossomed. As I recall, she did not allow DATY when I saw her. I dont remember if BJ covered or not.That was some time ago however. I dont recall if I reported. Anyway, its good that she is delivering all that for $.
Or it could just be a case of YMMV.
*I'm ITALIAN* 24YRS* 5'2* 115LBS* 36B* I PROVIDE EXCLUSIVE HIGH CLASS SERVICES FOR MATURE GENTLEMEN ONLY!
- INCALL & OUTCALLS ARE AVAILABLE.
- NON-RUSHED.
- REAL UPDATED ME.
• Other ads by this user:
- SUPER Sexy ITALIAN Beauty..24 (60-BRANDON) adult entertainment: escorts
- The REAL Deal.100% Sexy ITALIAN Beauty..24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
-Sweet SEXY ITALIAN Real Beauty..24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
- I Am The REAL Deal Baby-100% ITALIAN BEAUTY..24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
- Sexy REAL ITALIAN Beauty...24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
Anyone have info on this one? I've been seeing her ad for quite sometime but no insight about her on here? Any info will be helpful. Thanks.
[QUOTE=Teghatch; 1073602]*I'm ITALIAN* 24YRS* 5'2* 115LBS* 36B* I PROVIDE EXCLUSIVE HIGH CLASS SERVICES FOR MATURE GENTLEMEN ONLY!
- INCALL & OUTCALLS ARE AVAILABLE.
- NON-RUSHED.
- REAL UPDATED ME.
• Other ads by this user:
- SUPER Sexy ITALIAN Beauty.24 (60-BRANDON) adult entertainment: escorts
- The REAL Deal.100% Sexy ITALIAN Beauty.24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
-Sweet SEXY ITALIAN Real Beauty.24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
- I Am The REAL Deal Baby-100% ITALIAN BEAUTY.24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
- Sexy REAL ITALIAN Beauty.24 (and. Dale Mabry / Hillsborough Ave) adult entertainment: escorts
Anyone have info on this one? I've been seeing her ad for quite sometime but no insight about her on here? Any info will be helpful. Thanks. [/QUOTE]Yes, I have seen her. For real and absolutely stunning.
Teg, FWIW, the Italian provider Michelle has 13 reviews on the oThER board going back as far as February 2009. Unfortunately, I don't have membership there so can not read most of those reviews nor would I put much stock in them even if I could, but if someone who does belong to that site could relate the gist of what those other guys have said we might at least be able to glean some semi-usable info. For example, since rating inflation is so rampant on that site (with average scores of 8 out of 10 and supposedly "once in a lifetime" 10 ratings occuring on a weekly if not daily basis), I would say that any escort averaging only 7 or less over there should be considered highly suspect as to quality. On the plus side, this particular gal at least reportedly uses accurate pics. On the negative side, her last few reviews have been mixed with the last one stating basically that the beauty of the girl that greeted him at the door was the essentially the highlight of his visit, with the rest of it only being average and not really worth repeating. Hopefully, someone here who has actually seen her can provide much better info than this.
I read her reviews. She started off wtih several somewaht favorable reviews but they seem to have migrated to a YMMV sort of deal. At first she was an enthusiastic BBBJ and now it seems CBJ is the norm however several have said that she said it would get better with repeat visits.
It was also reported that she may not be very enthusiastic for HH sessions. Understandable in my mind.
All however have commented on how attractive she is and the pics are of her.
Hope that helps.
TDT.
[QUOTE=Chase Star;1073949]Teg, FWIW, the Italian provider Michelle has 13 reviews on the oThER board. Unfortunately, I don't have membership there so can not read those reviews nor would I put much stock in them even if I could, but if someone who does belong to that site could relate the gist of what those other guys have said we might at least be able to glean some semi-usable info. For example, since rating inflation is so rampant on that site (with average scores of 8 out of 10 and supposedly "once in a lifetime" 10 ratings occuring on a weekly if not daily basis, I would say that any escort averaging only 7 or less over there should be considered highly suspect as to quality. On the plus side, this particular gal at least reportedly uses accurate pics. Hopefully, someone here who has actually seen her can provide much better info than this.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Stickerman;1073946]Yes, I have seen her. For real and absolutely stunning.[/QUOTE]You can do better than that.
As Tampa said, I've read on this site that she was pretty. She is covered everything. No kissing, no DATY. CBJ and FS and go.
At 200 and 250 she cant be pretty enough if the above is true.
Stickerman, can you elaborate some on your visit?
[QUOTE=Tampa Daytrade;1073957]... several have said that she SAID it would get better with repeat visits. ...[/QUOTE]I hope none of you fall for that line. Several have SAID she said that but how many actually went back and reported that was actually true (other than the toadies who gave her overly glowing reports the first time around)? Okay, sometimes when providers say this it actually winds up being true (after some unspecified number of visits), but a lot of times it winds up never really happening, or at least never really to the extent you were hoping it would (or takes so many visits where you're not getting your full money's worth that it really isn't worth all the investment). After all what are they going to say? "I know I just provided you mediocre service and not all the activities you were hoping to get, but that is as good as it gets. So why don't you come back any way so I can screw you (over) again? " They want to get you back so that they can make more money off of you and so are probably willing to say anything to acheive that end. Besides, you just got shortchanged by paying top dollar for minimal service and you're going to risk throwing more good money after bad by taking a chance again on a provider who already demonstrated the first time that she was not all that she could be? That just doesn't make any sense to me. There are too many decent looking decent service providers out there who will provide true GFE-level service right out of the gates. True, you always take a chance the first time you see a provider whether she will be one of those types of providers or not, but your odds HAVE to be better with those new gals than they are with a provider who has ALREADY proven herself short of expectations once. I say just accept your mistake and move on.
TDT. [/QUOTE]
several have said that she said it would get better with repeat visits.
TDT. [/QUOTE]
When I first saw her ads all I could think of was how hot that caboose would look from below while in a 69. After reading that it may take multiple visits to get to DATY I thought screw that, that's civilian dating. We did exchange an email before I heard the bad news and she seemed nice enough. I doubt I'll have the time today, but I'll try to check the other site and see if there's anyone seemingly legit who verified a change in service.
[QUOTE=Chase Star;1074058]I hope none of you fall for that line. Several have SAID she said that but how many actually went back and reported that was actually true (other than the toadies who gave her overly glowing reports the first time around)? Okay, sometimes when providers say this it actually winds up being true (after some unspecified number of visits), but a lot of times it winds up never really happening, or at least never really to the extent you were hoping it would (or takes so many visits where you're not getting your full money's worth that it really isn't worth all the investment). After all what are they going to say? "I know I just provided you mediocre service and not all the activities you were hoping to get, but that is as good as it gets. So why don't you come back any way so I can screw you (over) again? " They want to get you back so that they can make more money off of you and so are probably willing to say anything to acheive that end. Besides, you just got shortchanged by paying top dollar for minimal service and you're going to risk throwing more good money after bad by taking a chance again on a provider who already demonstrated the first time that she was not all that she could be? That just doesn't make any sense to me. There are too many decent looking decent service providers out there who will provide true GFE-level service right out of the gates. True, you always take a chance the first time you see a provider whether she will be one of those types of providers or not, but your odds HAVE to be better with those new gals than they are with a provider who has ALREADY proven herself short of expectations once. I say just accept your mistake and move on.[/QUOTE]It's in the Craigslist Reviews forum, post #2431 (back before there was a seperate Backpage Reviews forum. She did allow DATY, but no kissing, CBJ only. I have not repeated, for many of the reasons Chase specifies here.
I will say for anyone who is looking only for FS (I. E. A safe monger, this girl would be top of my list. Pics are real and accurate, she was very friendly and pleasant when I saw her, just extremely safe. But from reading what others have written, I get the impression that her level of enthusiasm varies based on her mood, how attracted she is to you, who knows what else. As someone said earlier, that's more like civilian dating.
I saw her last year. I personally do not think that she is a total knockout. She has a slight double chin and might plump up in a few years. Still, she is very nice and fun to be around. She definitely wanted to please. We did it doggie style twice, so I will vouch for her ability at GFE. If you like her pics, then she is definitely a keeper.
Thats what I'm talking about. These are reports we can all use.
Hello everyone!
Thanks for the info on Michelle. I'll be giving her a call soon. Our time together will be shared to all in return.
[QUOTE=Seffner Monger;1071886]Dude, you hit that?[/QUOTE]Like I said, fairly impressed. Lost quite a bit of wight since then, looks good in person at 40 yo.