Causation or correlation.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;3215148]Others have noted a correlation between the moon and SB activities. We are coming off a new moon, but in about a week we will have a full moon and I expect our action on SA will pick up dramatically. I have now bookmarked a site that shows the phase so I can keep up w / this factor.[/QUOTE]Careful trying to get to sucked in to causality.
I saw a huge spike in SB activity, but I attribute it to -- girls on break from college needing spending money and having some time; New Years resolutions to get out of debt or more out of life; women overspening at the holidays; mid-20's / early 30's gals annoyed by their families asking why they aren't married / depressed not having NYE dates, being alone for the holidays.
While after proximity to other women, lunar cycles is a high ranking impact on menstrual cycles, I don't think the moon is what's driving the recent spate of horny babes.
Careful with SOs and Weight loss
At least at the moment you can use NY resolutions as the excuse, but sudden weight loss / interest in fitness is a high ranking sign someone is cheating.
Tale of two titties (4 actually)
Not meaning to tread old ground, complaining about GPS, but two contacts recently provided odd / interesting data points.
MnG w / an absolutely true high fashion model, 20's, knockout, tall, Slavic like they all are. SA username includes Lula. I asked her the craziest offer she'd had and she replied 8 K / mo. However, she said no b / c he was a creep. I'm a nice guy, she said she liked me, invited me over. Hmm. She said we should have a trial date before concluding an arrangement. I offered 800, and she turned me down - 1000 was her minimum. Not broken-hearted. I didn't feel any connection w / her.
Messaging today w / a 21 YO girl Ashley0895. She complains she can't find any guys she connects w / on SA, but thinks I'm nice. We're talking about meeting, and she wants to know what's possible. I direct her to the lifestyle on my profile (hers is Negotiable). The reply? Not good enough. She claims two friends get 10-15 k / mo, and one GF got a deposit put on a house (whatever that means. To buy? To rent? Vastly different). Finally she comes out with: "I know what I'm looking for is out there. " My reply was of course, I don't believe you, and if that guy is out there, go for it, girl. But, her complaint she couldn't find a 'connection' was actually that she couldn't find a guy who would pay insane amounts.
Thread: Sugarbaby Thread Highlights, Index, and FAQ
[QUOTE=WillyHost;3218707]Hi sorry for non info post seeking assistance. I see many posts referring to "SA" I'm guessing this is not referring to the site "[URL]https://www.sa.org/[/URL]" aka Sexaholics Anonymous rather something which more along the line of the term seekingarrangement? Thanks in advance from a new guy.[/QUOTE]Also, you might want to make use of this resource, right here on the Richmond thread (below this one on the list).
[B]Sugarbaby Thread Highlights, Index, and FAQ[/B]
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?15100-Sugarbaby-Thread-Highlights-Index-and-FAQ[/URL]
Post #2 has Common Acronyms and Phrases.
Not always GPS. Part of the charade
Not every gal who has high expectations -- especially relative to HWG's low ball strategies -- is about GPS.
A lot of it is about them keeping up the masquerade that they aren't escorts.
One recent GND, masters degree type drowning in student debt was pretty straight forward -- she does not want lavish gifts or experiences, just a nice dinner out and the ability to cover the monthly $1 k student loan payment. So she is looking for someone to meet 2-3 x a month for $4-500 per. Seeing someone regularly feels less whorish.
You have to play into the mindset -- when called for -- it can go along way and can easily turn those looking for LT into a fun fling.
The flip side to GPS is moderate expectation serial cock gobblers. Met a seemingly nice GND type, agreed to $500 for a full afternoon of fun. Over the course of her time together, she made it quite clear, she has no intention of working a 9-5 job so long as she has the looks and appetite for cock that can land her 4-5 dates a week and she would be happy to work me in to the rotation whenever our sdchedules permitted. NTY -- one of the appeals of SBs is the illusion that she was not gargling with some other guys cum earlier in the day within the past 24 hours!
Good thing you prescreened her on SA.
[QUOTE=BikeRider;3219770]You find the profile of the Whole Foods cashier you've been flirting with for a few weeks on SA. Asking her out next time I'm in her line. .
I think it may be a good year![/QUOTE]Had been flirting with the cashier at the new costco. Young, thin, pretty -- no boobs, but I can overlook that.
One days she she is sporting a diamond fleck engagement ring. I ask "who is the lucky guy?" She points to the dumpy African American girl working the next register and says "Her, we met here at work".
At least I know the cute little redhead asst manager of the bank across the parking lot has a boyfriend, but at Christmas I asked if she was on the Naughty or Nice list and she said "always on the Nice list, without even blushing. " Should have asked if she wanted to change that!
KittyS is on SA and richmond
I think she is open to fun.
Question About Total SB Compensation
I have dabbled with the AMP and escort scenes for a few years and, like many on this forum, have not gotten the level of intimacy that I am looking for. After finding this forum, I am interested in the sugar dating world and have read this and other USASG forums regarding the subject. Thanks to everyone who has posted for the incredible depth of advice that has been offered!
I understand the per visit arrangement amounts that are discussed here. HWG and a few others have shared information in great detail, however, these fellows seem to be anomalies.
My situation is that I can realistically only see an SB two times a month on a steady basis. I am looking for SB's in the 6,7,and 8 range. Do I need to look at offering $$$ or $$ per meet to be in an acceptable total compensation range or should I stick with the "standard" $$ or $$. 5 per visit regardless of visit frequency?
Thanks to all for your advice!