General Reports

[QUOTE=BeachDan9999;5734963]Looks like Mariah to me. Didn't know she's RIP. Anyone know what happened?[/QUOTE]Hi this is Valentina, I was the other girl pregnant while she was with the same guy back then. She got really really lost even her teeth looks everything disappeared and lost in Washington homeless for years then finally found her in the hospital with a baby with unfortunately a guy doing the same drugs as her. However now she's in a program with the baby being sober and hopefully praying she gets her life together. But I think her being in the program for as long as she can is the best for her and her baby. P.S. Thank you to everyone that has left me a positive review and had my back I only see a few when I can currently a full time student thank you.

Okay weird question. But hear me out.

At the one end of the spectrum you have what seems to be the entire Jax scene: specifically go to a place and pay a lady to bump uglies with you. At the other, you have clothing-optional places like public baths, clothing-optional beaches, and chill dive bars.

The former includes our strip clubs, AMPs, and obviously escorts and the like. You rush in, go 0-60, and get out. It's fun but quick and then over. I think the allure of the AMP is that of those it's at least slightly less like that. If you book an hour, you ease into things, enjoy a massage, and there's at least a pretense of it being a normal interaction that just "happens" to steam up.

The latter, I've seen in other parts of the world, especially Europe. It's chill to go to a beach or bath and just have a mostly innocent time but see some boobies without having to play the strip club hustle. This finally brings me to my question:

Do we have any places in Jax that are only slightly naughty? So far the best I've found is Wild Bill's. 90% of the time I've been it's just been a normal bar that happens to have a couple stripper poles. It's also small and out of the way enough that I could become a regular when I was going regularly. And then once in a while, people there started having some more fun, and some of the staff dropped their clothes and worked the poles a bit. It was all good fun. But is that the only chill place around?

[QUOTE=Papidaddy502;6838877]Hi this is Valentina, I was the other girl pregnant while she was with the same guy back then. She got really really lost even her teeth looks everything disappeared and lost in Washington homeless for years then finally found her in the hospital with a baby with unfortunately a guy doing the same drugs as her. However now she's in a program with the baby being sober and hopefully praying she gets her life together. But I think her being in the program for as long as she can is the best for her and her baby. P.S. Thank you to everyone that has left me a positive review and had my back I only see a few when I can currently a full time student thank you.[/QUOTE]If you're still seeing a few, how does a person get ahold of you?

In case you're wanting to know, Kim has recently left Uncles house. She's been popping off on my time line.

[QUOTE=AMnnos;6869185]In case you're wanting to know, Kim has recently left Uncles house. She's been popping off on my time line.[/QUOTE]Might want to read on her before going to see her.

[QUOTE=PDC90;6873186]Might want to read on her before going to see her.[/QUOTE]I put it as a public announcement since she's been blowing up my SM thread. How one takes the info is up to them. Wasn't sure but I thought there were maybe a couple fans of hers on here. After reading the recently robbery reports, I just smh.

There's been a lot of debate and skepticism about sending a picture of yourself to providers who say they require it. Trust me, I understand more than a lot of you why this could be a problem. However I am not in that situation currently. If any of you guys are on social media, you could easily tell your spouse or whomever that someone stole that picture from your Facebook page or whatever if you were being blackmailed. Carry on.

[QUOTE=Busta69;6928569]There's been a lot of debate and skepticism about sending a picture of yourself to providers who say they require it. Trust me, I understand more than a lot of you why this could be a problem. However I am not in that situation currently. If any of you guys are on social media, you could easily tell your spouse or whomever that someone stole that picture from your Facebook page or whatever if you were being blackmailed. Carry on.[/QUOTE]If you're married it's simply not worth it. Even if you send via Snapchat they can save the pic. Maybe FaceTime via Snapchat? Other than that it's not worth it. Way too many other choices. Most of these girls are junkies, or desperate in some way or another, or they wouldn't be hookers. They would rat you out in a heartbeat if they felt it was profitable. High end providers, really high end, most require vetting. That's a choice if you want to play with them. But a stg's ho. No way I'm sending a pic. Jaded thinking but unfortunately true. In my humble opinion.

[QUOTE=KidTorrid;6928692]If you're married it's simply not worth it. Even if you send via Snapchat they can save the pic. Maybe FaceTime via Snapchat? Other than that it's not worth it. Way too many other choices. Most of these girls are junkies, or desperate in some way or another, or they wouldn't be hookers. They would rat you out in a heartbeat if they felt it was profitable. High end providers, really high end, most require vetting. That's a choice if you want to play with them. But a stg's ho. No way I'm sending a pic. Jaded thinking but unfortunately true. In my humble opinion.[/QUOTE]I try to establish "Connections " on sm apps, and they always posting pics of hobbyist. Especially on snapchat. Than its not just her, if somebody, who knows you follow her, and just so happens he think you a dick. Guess whose getting anonymous phone calls and text? Worst what if you get 1 preg (it happens) , and trying to find your info off your pic. Know how fast she'll get it on fb if she said she looking for the deadbeat papi qho skippes out. Be found in a say. Even regarding phone #s we anonymous as possible. I don't wvwn hand our my real name.

Something to think about. A new law just passed. "the take it down act". If you post an image on the internet of someone that is not consensual, it is a felony punishable by 2 years. Maybe think twice about posting private "hobby" pics?

[QUOTE=Busta69;6936036]Something to think about. A new law just passed. "the take it down act". If you post an image on the internet of someone that is not consensual, it is a felony punishable by 2 years. Maybe think twice about posting private "hobby" pics?[/QUOTE]The "law" has been introduced. It has yet to go through committee or been voted into actual law.

[URL]https://www.wtap.com/2024/06/18/manchin-bipartisan-colleagues-introduce-take-it-down-act/[/URL]

[QUOTE=BobbSledd;6936140]The "law" has been introduced. It has yet to go through committee or been voted into actual law.

[URL]https://www.wtap.com/2024/06/18/manchin-bipartisan-colleagues-introduce-take-it-down-act/[/URL][/QUOTE]From what I'm seeing, it will be law soon.

[QUOTE=Busta69;6936036]Something to think about. A new law just passed. "the take it down act". If you post an image on the internet of someone that is not consensual, it is a felony punishable by 2 years. Maybe think twice about posting private "hobby" pics?[/QUOTE]Specifically talking about these junkies that we all see, I don't see them pursuing any action of taking down any images posted of them since most post their own nudes in their ad. If a provider says that you can film them or take a photo, where's the proof that they didn't initially give consent, or not? I'll have to read up on it, but it definitely won't be an issue with STG sluts.

Hell, I see my dick in tons of pics and videos that they've posted, so there's another felony for them. LOL.

[QUOTE=ClitEastwoodJx;6936302]Specifically talking about these junkies that we all see, I don't see them pursuing any action of taking down any images posted of them since most post their own nudes in their ad. If a provider says that you can film them or take a photo, where's the proof that they didn't initially give consent, or not? I'll have to read up on it, but it definitely won't be an issue with STG sluts.

Hell, I see my dick in tons of pics and videos that they've posted, so there's another felony for them. LOL.[/QUOTE]Clit, you must be the dude with the BBC all the black chicks are sucking!

[QUOTE=ClitEastwoodJx;6936302]Specifically talking about these junkies that we all see, I don't see them pursuing any action of taking down any images posted of them since most post their own nudes in their ad. If a provider says that you can film them or take a photo, where's the proof that they didn't initially give consent, or not? I'll have to read up on it, but it definitely won't be an issue with STG sluts.
Hell, I see my dick in tons of pics and videos that they've posted, so there's another felony for them. LOL.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I have a supporting actor role in a few videos and pics, too.

Rich.