Printable View
[QUOTE=Dxddxd;5114620]It's too bad; hoping she will coming back.[/QUOTE]I keep hoping, but it's been just about a year since she left. When I last visited her around December 10th or so last year, and she told me about the trip, she said she would be gone for a month, and hence expected her back near the latter part of January. Unfortunately, did not happen, and then COVID hit about 6 or 7 weeks later.
[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;5114507]She has gone by a few different names. But seems kinky as hell. Read reviews that spell out that she is into being pissed on etc etc. Her ad openly says she is into getting slapped around etc. The quintessential sub.
Anyone sampled the goods on her. Some of her older pics show a not so appealing face. Not sure. On the fence.
[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/album.php?albumid=44318&attachmentid=1403430[/URL][/QUOTE]I haven't seen her but I remember one of the pics. Unless I'm mixing her up with someone else, I think she used to go by Its Okay. She worked out of a trailer or something in someones backyard.
I think you described what pooners generally saw her for. It wasn't for her face. I think she used to charge $100 or so.
[QUOTE=Jonderin;5114813]I haven't seen her but I remember one of the pics. Unless I'm mixing her up with someone else, I think she used to go by Its Okay. She worked out of a trailer or something in someones backyard.
I think you described what pooners generally saw her for. It wasn't for her face. I think she used to charge $100 or so.[/QUOTE]Things have certainly changed. She charges a lot more now.
[QUOTE=Jimmysixxx7;5114854]Things have certainly changed. She charges a lot more now.[/QUOTE]Heavy drug user at the time as well. I was interested in seeing her years ago when the rates were low and she never showed her face. But reviews said she was so out of it that even the low rate session wasn't worth it. Plus there was often a question of hygiene.
It's silly to see such high rates for her.
[QUOTE=Jonderin;5114868]Heavy drug user at the time as well. I was interested in seeing her years ago when the rates were low and she never showed her face. But reviews said she was so out of it that even the low rate session wasn't worth it. Plus there was often a question of hygiene.
It's silly to see such high rates for her.[/QUOTE]What amazes me is that people pay it. That's a premium for a non premium look.
[QUOTE=Jonderin;5114813]I haven't seen her but I remember one of the pics. Unless I'm mixing her up with someone else, I think she used to go by Its Okay. She worked out of a trailer or something in someones backyard.
I think you described what pooners generally saw her for. It wasn't for her face. I think she used to charge $100 or so.[/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure you are confusing Mia with someone else (Jessica Crush? I have seen Mia for a BDSM session but she didn't agree on bareback and she didn't look like a chemical user to me. (Well I'm no doctor, lawyer or cop).
I saw her because I wanted to see a girl who likes belt on ass and she is very pro at that but no bareback. (others may have different experience as I have no game and no big pile of cash to throw).
[QUOTE=RedHot11;5114920]I'm pretty sure you are confusing Mia with someone else (Jessica Crush? I have seen Mia for a BDSM session but she didn't agree on bareback and she didn't look like a chemical user to me. (Well I'm no doctor, lawyer or cop).
I saw her because I wanted to see a girl who likes belt on ass and she is very pro at that but no bareback. (others may have different experience as I have no game and no big pile of cash to throw).[/QUOTE]No, I'm positive it's her. I checked out her gallery and several pics are the same as years ago.
Perhaps she's off drugs now I have no idea, but that's definitely her.
OK, my "Canada budget," that I barely used since March, the well is going to run dry. I REALLY want to report to all of you, because if you look at my LOOKS rankings, service and overall, I think that you can all "connect the dots. ".
The doog and dab about Julie: She's cute. The pictures are her, glammed hope, but not OVERLY glammed up. She reminds me of a cute petite Japanese girlfriend I had. Smiley and friendly enough. Body is ok. Breasts are not perky, but she has huge puffy nipples.
NOTE: If you see KAngels, give them 350 first, then distinctly give your 100 tip right after that. I want to give Lexy and Julie the benefit of the doubt, but both thought I was doing CFS. I told them when they got the condom, that I paid 450.
Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.
I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.
I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:
Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:
Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.
Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.
Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.
Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.
Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.
Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.
[QUOTE=Jonderin;5114927]No, I'm positive it's her. I checked out her gallery and several pics are the same as years ago.
Perhaps she's off drugs now I have no idea, but that's definitely her.[/QUOTE]You are right! I couldn't remember the old handle, but recognized a photo.
I had a terrible time in her trailer, she didn't want to do anything once she had the money, I left in disgust.
I remember she made me wait because she had to shower. When she let me in she obviously hadn't showered for some time, and she had money stashed in her bra that she kind of forgot about. When it fell to the floor she was surprised. She was not a handsome women.
This is the photo I remembered, and if you search the Review over yonder using (its.okay) you will see the connection.
[QUOTE=Cambodian206;5112089]I'm seeing a lot of people asking who to avoid, please fill me in or dm me who to avoid. Thanks in advanced![/QUOTE]I sent a few DMs out about this but haven't heard anything back (I think I know who it was.). Did this name ever surface, or can someone DM it to me?
Thank you.
[QUOTE=RottenRobert;5114967]You are right! I couldn't remember the old handle, but recognized a photo.
I had a terrible time in her trailer, she didn't want to do anything once she had the money, I left in disgust.
I remember she made me wait because she had to shower. When she let me in she obviously hadn't showered for some time, and she had money stashed in her bra that she kind of forgot about. When it fell to the floor she was surprised. She was not a handsome women.
This is the photo I remembered, and if you search the Review over yonder using (its.okay) you will see the connection.[/QUOTE]Correct. Thanks a lot. Great intel here. A lot of people responded to this. Thanks - all consistent in messaging. Guess I will have to take my kink elsewhere.
[QUOTE=Jimmysixxx7;5015260]I saw her a few days ago. Wouldn't let me do what we do here. Otherwise great appointment. She was adamant.
As always, with everyone... YMMV. What I did not do was point out I heard about her on this board[/QUOTE]She is back in Renton. No longer enticing if she has changed her menu. Also she has been using the same pics for ever wonder if she still looks like her pics.
[QUOTE=WongHing;5114956]OK, my "Canada budget," that I barely used since March, the well is going to run dry. I REALLY want to report to all of you, because if you look at my LOOKS rankings, service and overall, I think that you can all "connect the dots. ".
The doog and dab about Julie: She's cute. The pictures are her, glammed hope, but not OVERLY glammed up. She reminds me of a cute petite Japanese girlfriend I had. Smiley and friendly enough. Body is ok. Breasts are not perky, but she has huge puffy nipples.
NOTE: If you see KAngels, give them 350 first, then distinctly give your 100 tip right after that. I want to give Lexy and Julie the benefit of the doubt, but both thought I was doing CFS. I told them when they got the condom, that I paid 450.
Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.
I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.
I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:
Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:
Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.
Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.
Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.
Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.
Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.
Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.[/QUOTE]Really appreciate your posts on the K-Girls! Very informative.
[QUOTE=SeattleMG;5115048]I sent a few DMs out about this but haven't heard anything back (I think I know who it was.). Did this name ever surface, or can someone DM it to me?
Thank you.[/QUOTE]Can I get this info too please?
I have found several Thai women sexy, that I've had BBBJ with.
Any decent-looking Thai or Laotian women (Asian or American born) who offer BBFS?
I have seen three KAngels, who were the prettiest, and who, surprise surprise, gave the least service.
Angel / Jo, Misty and Julie.
If I wanted to repeat with one of them, conceding that service would be mediocre, BUT just enjoy a BBFS with a pretty girl, I would be most inclined to repeat with:
Angel / Jo. I think that with repeat visits, things could get slightly better, as she would be more comfortable and familiar with the client.
I would be least inclined to repeat with Misty, as she did NO kissing at all.
[QUOTE=TheThinker808;5115724]Can I get this info too please?[/QUOTE]Sent. The messages I received confirm it's the provider I had in mind.
Is it a violation of the Board rules to post her name?
[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;5115649]She is back in Renton. No longer enticing if she has changed her menu. Also she has been using the same pics for ever wonder if she still looks like her pics.[/QUOTE]I saw her 3-4 times about 2 years ago. She agreed to forum activities once for +$100 in the heat of the moment (2nd appointment I believe), but declined in subsequent sessions.
Pics were pretty flattering a few years ago and she was living a pretty fast life style, so I'd suggest moderating any expectations in that area.
Also, be prepared for a long, drawn out scheduling process full of all the cliche excuses and a high probability of being no showed.
[QUOTE=SeattleMG;5116284]Sent. The messages I received confirm it's the provider I had in mind.
Is it a violation of the Board rules to post her name?[/QUOTE]Yes. Anyone who cares who it is, knows about it by now and she's probably got it fixed. If you want to do bareback constantly there's no need to demonize someone that catches an STD because of it. It's a risk you take.
Shit. I'm starting to sound like the hookers on the other board.
[QUOTE=Michael1967;5116323]Yes. Anyone who cares who it is, knows about it by now and she's probably got it fixed. If you want to do bareback constantly there's no need to demonize someone that catches an STD because of it. It's a risk you take.
Shit. I'm starting to sound like the hookers on the other board.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you do, LOL.
A simple "Yes" would've worked, and I only asked because people are still inquiring about this as recently as today (on this thread) and sending me messages about it. You made a whole lot of assumptions regarding what people know / don't know or my intentions for possibly wanting to post it (e. G. Posting it out of a sense of pragmatism).
Any post I would have made would have been simple and objective (as my posting history demonstrates).
[QUOTE=BusSit69;5114221]Career, kids, family, no game, no swag? Hope he's not telling these hoes who he is LOL. From a burger flipper, construction worker to a politician. We all here for azz! I for 1, don't like dealing with women's B. $, that's why I pay and done! I have $poken.[/QUOTE]Fair enough LOL.
[QUOTE=WongHing;5114956]
Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.
I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.
I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:
Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:
Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.
Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.
Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.
Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.
Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.
Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.[/QUOTE]You're a champ for this. I saw Jo / Angel back when she debuted. I chalked the experience off as she was new to the area. It's too bad she actually doesn't like what she does. I'll have to give someone from this lineup a go. The last kgirl I experienced we ended up seeing each other after hours between here and LA. She didn't come back here after her first stint though. Miss that one for sure.
[QUOTE=SeattleMG;5115048]I sent a few DMs out about this but haven't heard anything back (I think I know who it was.). Did this name ever surface, or can someone DM it to me?
Thank you.[/QUOTE]I never got a dm.
[QUOTE=WongHing;5116015]I have seen three KAngels, who were the prettiest, and who, surprise surprise, gave the least service.
Angel / Jo, Misty and Julie.
If I wanted to repeat with one of them, conceding that service would be mediocre, BUT just enjoy a BBFS with a pretty girl, I would be most inclined to repeat with:
Angel / Jo. I think that with repeat visits, things could get slightly better, as she would be more comfortable and familiar with the client.
I would be least inclined to repeat with Misty, as she did NO kissing at all.[/QUOTE]Have not seen either. Venus is on my hitlist. But hey. Misty with no kissing. Completely a non-starter for me. That is too important for me to build chemistry.
[QUOTE=Michael1967;5116323]Yes. Anyone who cares who it is, knows about it by now and she's probably got it fixed. If you want to do bareback constantly there's no need to demonize someone that catches an STD because of it. It's a risk you take.
Shit. I'm starting to sound like the hookers on the other board.[/QUOTE]Big difference between catching a STD and a STI.
STI are a simple fix.
Pop 1000 mgs and wait 7 days.
[QUOTE=Potato13;5073430]Figured with covid restrictions coming up today I'd get with sarababy before getting shut in again.
[URL]https://seattle.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/sexy-tight-wet-pregnant-new/546309399676[/URL]
Wasn't bad, $$5. Was the damage for a hh for this thread's theme. Which I don't mind since I have a thing for preg. Was a bit mechanical, but still good. Can confirm that she is pregnant, but did say that she will be getting an abortion within the month. Term limits and all that for being able to get an abortion.[/QUOTE]She hit me up last night confirming all of the above, and it's been a month, so I'm guessing no abortion is forthcoming. Going to try to put a load in her this week, the pics she's uploaded are pretty good. Really great looking pussy.
[QUOTE=EvilScout;5073423]Filled her up yesterday. Super submissive (let her know ahead of time what I wanted) and she was great, really filthy girl and that mouth. Almost blew the load there but saved for her kitty which was surprisingly tight.
Saw mentions of deposit below but that didn't come up so YMMV on that I guess, maybe rent is due.
Cool attitude made me feel great will repeat! Have fun.
ES.[/QUOTE]She still taking loads for $$ HHR?
$$ 5 for how long? That for just the fh, or longer?
[QUOTE=WongHing;5114956]OK, my "Canada budget," that I barely used since March, the well is going to run dry. I REALLY want to report to all of you, because if you look at my LOOKS rankings, service and overall, I think that you can all "connect the dots. ".
The doog and dab about Julie: She's cute. The pictures are her, glammed hope, but not OVERLY glammed up. She reminds me of a cute petite Japanese girlfriend I had. Smiley and friendly enough. Body is ok. Breasts are not perky, but she has huge puffy nipples.
NOTE: If you see KAngels, give them 350 first, then distinctly give your 100 tip right after that. I want to give Lexy and Julie the benefit of the doubt, but both thought I was doing CFS. I told them when they got the condom, that I paid 450.
Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.
I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.
I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:
Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:
Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.
Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.
Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.
Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.
Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.
Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ItssHHuk;5116629]You're a champ for this. I saw Jo / Angel back when she debuted. I chalked the experience off as she was new to the area. It's too bad she actually doesn't like what she does. I'll have to give someone from this lineup a go. The last kgirl I experienced we ended up seeing each other after hours between here and LA. She didn't come back here after her first stint though. Miss that one for sure.[/QUOTE]Ah, I will pass on Angel / Jo for a second date. I think you just told the truth: She really dislikes what she does. Unlike Venus and Lexy, who make it look like they're having a decent time, and happy to serve us.
[QUOTE=Potato13;5117577]$$ 5 for how long? That for just the fh, or longer?[/QUOTE]One hour with a KAngel is 350, plus 100 tip for BBFS.
Steep, but I'd still trade 2-3 "frustrating Vancouver BC dates," for one KAngel BBFS date.
I saw her post and hadn't seen her before. She said bb with an upcharge but is she reliable? From her pics, she looks a little sketchy.
[QUOTE=WongHing;5117874]One hour with a KAngel is 350, plus 100 tip for BBFS.
Steep, but I'd still trade 2-3 "frustrating Vancouver BC dates," for one KAngel BBFS date.[/QUOTE]I just wish KAngel gals were not so expensive! I can speak a good amount of Korean, and thus the sessions would be a lot of fun. Was that way when I saw an independent Korean gal about a year or so ago, and also with a cute Chinese gal that spoke fluent Korean at an AAMP about 1 1/2 tears ago. Really miss them.
Looks like there's a new girl arriving for GSL & she looks just my type.
[QUOTE=Ashun;5118634]Looks like there's a new girl arriving for GSL & she looks just my type.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.dreamasian.club/summer[/URL]
[QUOTE=Ashun;5118634]Looks like there's a new girl arriving for GSL & she looks just my type.[/QUOTE]Where is GSL or what is the abbreviation stand for?
[QUOTE=MikeJennings;5117115]She still taking loads for $$ HHR?
[/QUOTE]Mike I couldn't say, I did the HR. My old age I can't always get there in HHR! Just SO damn glad I found her, her nasty sub skills are top shelf. A little tough to schedule but she is on time and ready and cool when you get the appointment on the books.
ES.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5118635][URL]https://www.dreamasian.club/summer[/URL][/QUOTE]Interesting. Didn't know they are affiliated. Been painful getting into the before. No BB from what I hear.
[QUOTE=TeaBitch666;5118034]I saw her post and hadn't seen her before. She said bb with an upcharge but is she reliable? From her pics, she looks a little sketchy.[/QUOTE]What was the upcharge bud? Did she specify?
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5118635][URL]https://www.dreamasian.club/summer[/URL][/QUOTE]Rates are still too high! Need to get down to between $200 and $250 before I participate (and that needs to include BBFS).
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5118635][URL]https://www.dreamasian.club/summer[/URL][/QUOTE]I might TOFTT when she arrives. Hopefully it's the same girl, just visiting Seattle.