K-girls

The link did not work for me but if you google K Elite Girls Louisville it comes right up with the same address as the link and loaded just fine. Not sure why one way works and the other does not. Looks like Jamie starts Friday and Gina is currently the only one working. Am not familiar with either but am looking forward to seeing them both.

[QUOTE=BigBlueBoy69;6981192][URL]https://www.k-elitemodels.com/portfolio[/URL]

If it doesn't post correctly. It's currently on page 4. Post #412.

Enjoy![/QUOTE]

Hey boys.

I will be in the area this weekend and am looking to get in with a reliable KGirl agency. Are there multiple in the area or one specific go to?

[QUOTE=BennyBen;6982934]Hey boys.

I will be in the area this weekend and am looking to get in with a reliable KGirl agency. Are there multiple in the area or one specific go to?[/QUOTE]Just one that's mentioned below.

[QUOTE=SouthSonny;6983354]Just one that's mentioned below.[/QUOTE]Reached out and I'm having no luck. Any other way of getting a hold of them aside from the contact form on the site?

[QUOTE=BennyBen;6985254]Reached out and I'm having no luck. Any other way of getting a hold of them aside from the contact form on the site?[/QUOTE]Dropping a text is the quickest way to get a response. I know they were sending out text message last night tying to pre-book Jamie for her first day here.

[QUOTE=PureMagnum;6985355]Dropping a text is the quickest way to get a response. I know they were sending out text message last night tying to pre-book Jamie for her first day here.[/QUOTE]For 50 fine gentleman and the one fugly, getting an unsolicited text from K-EM trying to pre-book them is simply unacceptable.

[QUOTE=BennyBen;6985254]Reached out and I'm having no luck. Any other way of getting a hold of them aside from the contact form on the site?[/QUOTE]Don't use the contact form. Send a text.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6985390]For 50 fine gentleman and the one fugly, getting an unsolicited text from K-EM trying to pre-book them is simply unacceptable.[/QUOTE]Trying to figure out if I was one of the 50 or the fugly one.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6985390]For 50 fine gentleman and the one fugly, getting an unsolicited text from K-EM trying to pre-book them is simply unacceptable.[/QUOTE]Wait, everyone gets one? I thought I was special. #sarcasm.

Checks mirror hoping I'm not the fugly one.

So if you had to pick? Jamie or (new) Heju. Looking to see if I made the right pick.

[QUOTE=WhatsIn;6986661]So if you had to pick? Jamie or (new) Heju. Looking to see if I made the right pick.[/QUOTE]Both have good reviews on the other site. Heju (who also goes by Jamie #346148) has few more recommendations than Jamie (346148). Both appear to be winner winner chicken dinner's. Depends on you body type and fun preference (GFE / PSE).

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6986724]Both have good reviews on the other site. Heju (who also goes by Jamie #346148) has few more recommendations than Jamie (346148). Both appear to be winner winner chicken dinner's. Depends on you body type and fun preference (GFE / PSE).[/QUOTE]Thanks for the reference posts. Saw Heju reviews and glad I did, wowww. Just can't seem to find elite Jamie any where.

Correction to review numbers posted below #476
377677 heja / Jamie.
346148 jamie

Two different jamies.
1st GFE vs 2nd PSE.
Both great reviews.

[QUOTE=WhatsIn;6986768]Thanks for the reference posts. Saw Heju reviews and glad I did, wowww. Just can't seem to find elite Jamie any where.[/QUOTE]Both are good. Heju is much taller. She's taller with Latina body. Nice face, big tits and ass. She's quite popular with great service and she swallows. Jamie is smaller and more typical K girl. She also gives good service, has tight pussy, pretty face and seemed a bit younger. Does BBFS as well, but I don't partake. I prefer Jamie as I like the smaller / shorter girls. I still had a great time with Heju and I was in the mood for her body type at the time. Can't go wrong with either as long as you know what you are getting.

It's easy to search Heju and get her reviews on this site. Below are two reviews of Jamie which convince me to see her last summer.

[QUOTE=DMVAverageJoe;6477096]Very Pretty face, Korean young actress*Roh Yoon-seo looks alike, 5'0 thin / athlete frame w / enhanced 33 BB to C-cup. Great attitude and 100% aim to please Typ. AMP bluetoast, in-tub foreplay w / BBBJ preview and P2 P. Passionate DFK thru-out, above average BBBJ / some DT, intense P2 P, O while DATY & very tight due to her petite frame.

Face / body / attitude / performance / repeat / rating.

8. 75/8/9/9/ definitely yes /(8/9).

[URL]https://asiangem.site/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=136[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Derilious89;6481974]Saw Jamie at AG and I give her a big recommendation. I'm always a fan of girls that don't have the standard plastic look and Jamie definitely has a naturally beautiful look. I'm sure she has had work done but it wasn't noticeable to me.

F: 9. Beautiful face. No outward signs of extensive work (obviously, most all girls have had some work done).

B: 8. Slim body without being rail thin. She's small but with a really tight body that most will enjoy. MMs are a little hard, but her butt has a little meat and is soft.

A: 9. She gives off a youngish vibe. I always assume late 20's at best but she gives off a realistic vibe of being younger with her mannerisms. Things like bopping to the music and the way she talks about things. She was open to taking direction and gives off a "cute" vibe as opposed to sensual. No complaints from me.

S: 9. BBBJ was was decent. It's not very deep but she works well and it slowly built to release. Lots of DFK from the beginning and she's very tight. Lately, the girls have been giving some half-hearted CG but she did it well so I rated her higher. 2 shots are available.

I don't do BB so I don't know about that.[/QUOTE]

There was talk about this place in town that GINA used to work out of. Does anyone know whatever happened to them? The last I know they were supposed to come up with their own website and everything.