Printable View
[QUOTE=NC Transplant; 1206180]I am wondering, what does a 38 EEE feel like?
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/n-e-w-t-o-c-i-t-y-m-a-s-s-i-v-e-b-o-o-b-s-eees-a-l-l-y-o-u-r-s-23/5721493[/url]
No reviews or any history or I would be calling to find out? [/QUOTE]Southwestern Missouri, Oh! Maybe she's a real cow-girl? I saw that too, came up with nothing for research and skipped it. The girl in the photo is cute too.
Senior members (& Regulars who have shared w / me in PM) can PM me for more details. For everyone else, this is a safe bet. I know the motorcycle photo is real, she's got a few tats. A whole lot of fun. Haven't done her friend. . . Yet. Don't ask me which one goes by which name.
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/local-and-reviewed-oo-2-intoxicating-brunettes-oo-ready-to-play-27/4059103[/url]
Actually if you remembered your high school biology class you would know cats and dogs are different "SPECIES" not different "RACES", Race is referring to different genetic variation WITHIN THAT SPECIES. So a valid distinction woudl be that dogs and cats are different SPECIES, while German Shepards and Pit Bulls are different RACES within a SPECIES. Now that thats out of the way there is really no point addressing the rest of what you said because it was based on your initial false facts.
By the way here is the definition of race I copied from biology-online. Org (the first one is a general defini9ttion the second pertains specifically to humans) :
1."A population of interbreeding species that develops distinct characteristics differing from other populations of the same species, especially as caused by geographical isolation"
2."A group or population of humans categorized on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics (such as color of skin, eyes, and hair).
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1206120]Race implies the "inability to breed". Canine and Feline are different races. They can't make babies. Race when pertaining to Humans are a misnomer, perpetrated by supremacists and fascists the world over. What they are really talking about are breeds. Instead of Cats and Dogs, you're now talking about poodles and terriers. So, yes, I stand by my words.
Sure, if you're on a dating sight and say something like,"Interested in meeting someone from the Asian Pacific Rim" cause you dig Asian chicks, more power to you. But you don't say,"No chinks!" That's just rude.
If some girl is asking you to shell out $$ to bend her over and tickle her fancy sure, she's allowed to be picky because it's her preference, fine. All I was saying was she should have some class and not say it so she looks like a total ass-rag.
This reminds me of an ad I saw that said the provider wanted a photo of the john because she was picky. I replied to that and told her to go on Adult Friend Finder, that the escort section of backpage was not a dating service. Maybe she had class and that was her way of avoiding 90% of the pimps and hagglers. Cause from what I read before that a provider said."all pimps and hagglers have black skin."
Guys, by definition. Linguistically. It's racist. Here's my take on it. I like non-smokers. Smoking's a choice. If you want to do the horizontal shuffle with me, you can stop. Skin color. Oh, damn Michael Jackson. Whatever!
I'm also grumpy because I had a date with a really awesome girl today and she called in sick. I was so looking forward to it too. [/QUOTE]
LOL thats what restarted this debate.
[QUOTE=Solarmta;1206157]How about the black providers that have in their ad no black men.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ThumpUSA;1206215]JJ is on point. Race is a modern construct (500 years or so) of people who wanted to humiliate and dominate other humans. Before that, people were considered French, English, Egyptian, etc.[/QUOTE]Right. Why can't we simply turn the clock back to time of the conquistadors when everything was hunky dory?
Sorry, couldn't resist. "Race" is just a newer term for age-old biases. Now that I've had the last word, can we PLEEZ move on?
This is totally untrue, race goes back 1000's of years, as does the inclination for humans to "humiliate and dominate" each other. As soon as man learned how to make weapon he attacked other humans and took the woman and children as slaves. At one point just about every race on earth has been both the slaves and the slave owners, for some reason many black poeple seem to think slavery started and ended with them, but anyone ever heard of the roman empire? It was built on slavery, anyone every see the pyramisds in egypt? Those were all built by slaves too (jews owned by black africans to be precise) And even regarding the african races, it was other africans capturing and selling their own kind to the white slave traders, and slavery exists to this very day when you consider all the indentured servants in debt bondage in many coutries. So no one is really innocent.
And yes while 500 years ago people were considered "french, english, egyptian, etc" but how is that different from today? Most people still consider themselves French English Egyptian etc, it's only in the US where so many RACES mix that we have blurred the lines, (but then again ask anyone what they are and they will tell you "french english German or a mix of them all so thats not even lost in this country) race does not only mean skin color, Jews and Germans are both Caucasian but the Germans considered Jews a different race (and technically by definition they are correct) The Spaniards consider themselves a different race than the English who consider themselves a different race from the french etc. And this again also pertains to blacks as well, in the US they pretty much just get labeled "African american" but go to Africa and they will separate themselves, the Ethiopians don't consider themselves the same as the Nigerians who don't consider themselves the same as the Sudanese etc.
[QUOTE=ThumpUSA;1206215]JJ is on point. Race is a modern construct (500 years or so) of people who wanted to humiliate and dominate other humans. Before that, people were considered French, English, Egyptian, etc.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1206249]LOL thats what restarted this debate.[/QUOTE]Sorry I missed a few post and started on the middle.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy; 1206248][. . . ]
1."A population of interbreeding species that develops distinct characteristics differing from other populations of the same species, especially as caused by geographical isolation"
2."A group or population of humans categorized on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics (such as color of skin, eyes, and hair). [/QUOTE]Except those various sets are qualitative and not quantitative. It's not science, it's pseudo-science, concocted to perpetrate bigoted notions of superiority and subjugation. And that's from my fancy graduate level anthropology and sociology classes.
I do stand corrected though. I didn't convey my thoughts succinctly. My apologies. What I was trying to say is that race was ORIGINALLY devised as a new word for SUB-SPECIES in HUMANS specifically. There are no "races" of birds. There are no "races" of dogs. The concept is late 19th to early 20th century and was heavily used by the fascists of the early to mid 20th century. Race is more akin to Breeds. And as many can attest to the new breeds in dogs that have cropped up in the last 20 years, there are an infinite number of possibilities and characteristics to choose from.
But I'll listen, show me show me how SCIENTIFICALLY a child from a 1/2 Korean and 1/2 Irish Father and a 1/2 Brazillian and 1/2 Nigerian Mother is quantitatively classified in this new-fangled racial classification science please.
Until then, Pseudo-science I say! Whipper-snapper! And I'm relying on my not so recent, modern, state university learning to base these here arguments upon.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1206264]This is totally untrue, race goes back 1000's of years, [. . .][/QUOTE]Linguistically speaking, Race is a modern construct that was devised for a plethora of bigoted reasons. There are no ancient writings that classify people by the color of their skin or the width of their nose. They were classified by their national origins, Spartan, Egyptian, Roman, etc. And slaves could be of any nationality from neighboring countries. They weren't just Africans.
JJ,
My readings lead me to agree with you, though will no longer argue the matter so that we can return the discussion to the search of good pu pu.
[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1206042]A woman has a right to see who she wants and share her body with who she wants just like we have the right to see who we want. This is a personal choice when you are talking about having sex with someone? I personally find a lot of tats a turn off and piercings as well. Some guys may prefer blonds or redheads. Too many things get turned into a race thing these days? You would think we would be past that by now? How many times have guys been rejected solely on personal taste or appearance without getting to know what someone is about inside? How many people men and women alike get rejected because of their weight? How many guys on here shun BBW providers? If a woman don't want to see someone, that is her business and if your business if you want to see her or not.[/QUOTE]NCT, I couldn't have said it better! I'm surprised this has become such an issue. I have seen that disclaimer on alot of the escort's sites. I never really gave it much tought as to her being racist. If the provider is a good one, then there is a certain level of intimacy that should be involved in the session. It should be her choice what type of person she gets that close to.
There are alot of the escorts that are in the surrounding area, that I've never even considered seeing. Their race never figured into it. There is a specific type of girl that I like, so I don't call the others. With the girls it's the same, but they aren't the ones doing the calling, so they post it in their adds to save everyones time, and maybe an awkward moment at the door of her incall.
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1206357]But I'll listen, show me show me how SCIENTIFICALLY a child from a 1/2 Korean and 1/2 Irish Father and a 1/2 Brazillian and 1/2 Nigerian Mother is quantitatively classified in this new-fangled racial classification science please.
[/QUOTE]Does this refer to a local provider? I would like to see that combination. It would either produce a beauty queen, or a butt ugly individual, LOL!
If it produced the beauty queen," I'd hit that ", no matter what race, religion, or nationallity. No matter what kind of " tag " she was labeled with!
There is no such thing as a BLACK man and there is no such thing as a WHITE man. I can say with total truthfulness, we are all BROWN. Yes, that is absolutely right, we are all brown! Just different shades.
Depend son what you mean by ancient, I mean if your talking cave painting yeah your right, but the texts form the bible are well over 2000 years old and it has references to different races, (Jeremiah 13:23, Numbers 12:1-16, Exodus 34:10-17, Deuteronomy 7:3-4, and Luke 10:25-37) The romans had texts thats referred to different races as well, and so did the Greeks going back to Alexander the greats time. (it is well known that the Macedonians who followed Alexander thought themselves above the other races they encountered while Alexander was conquering his empire) Is that ancient enough for you?
As for your statement about ancient people using "national orgins" inmstead of race that is totally invalid, for ancient people national origin was race. You can see racial differenced between pure blooded italians and pure blooded sweeds and pure blooded Spaniards etc, different nationalities fit the definition of different races (A population of interbreeding species that develops distinct characteristics differing from other populations of the same species, especially as caused by geographical isolation; A group or population of humans categorized on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics (such as color of skin, eyes, and hair))
Again race has been around for 1000's of years the main difference is many "modern" people have boiled it down to Mongoloid Caucasoid and Negroid (thats white black and yellow in case you didn't know) the difference in the past was people saw MORE racial differences not less, many modern "white" people especially americans would look at a Frenchman, or an englishman or a german and think "oh well he is white so we are the same race" but thats actually a false premise. Frenchman are technically a different race that and englishman or an italian. Agian this is a very new concept not even as old as your arbitrary 500 year time line, in the early 1900's many people in this country considered anyone of a different nationality a different race, Irishman were considered a "lower race" when they started migrating to the US, Jews got it maybe the worst out of the "white races" poeple even believed they had horns and thats why they wore thei beanies (sorry don't mean to offend anyone jewish, I just forgot what the beanie is called)
Agian I already proved your statement wrong before you posted it, read my other post different breeds of dogs are by definition different races, you say there are no "races of dogs" but again by definition a german sheppard would be one race and a pitt bull would be another etc. Any animal that has more than one breed that "develops distinct characteristics differing from other populations of the same species," has different races inside it's species.
As for what race a person is if they have four different races in their family tree, now I think your just playing dumb because this is not a hard question to answer, they are technically of no true race. Again ill use the animal analogy, if you mix a German sheppard a golden retreiver a pitt bull and a rottweiler that dog is no longer belongs of any of those "races" or breeds it is a mutt or a mongrel, Humans have rarely been referred to as "mutts" (I have even refferred to myself half seriously as a "mutt" at times because its easier than going through all the different RACES I belong to.) but people of mixed races have often been referred to as mongrels as well. Other terms have been "half breed" and "Mestizo" for mixed native americans, Mulatto for black / white mixed, Zumba for latin / black mix,"pardo" for brazilaian mixed, and "Metis" for Canadian white / native mixes, and then of course for the politically correct there is "biracial" and "Multiracial" (do you need more examples I haven't even touched europe or asia yet)
Last but not least, while you are sort of right about race being only 500 years old, thats only referrs to the word race not the meaning behind it. Yes the english word race is approximately 500 years old, but there are word in many other languages dating back 1000's of years that have the same meaning as race.
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1206357]Except those various sets are qualitative and not quantitative. It's not science, it's pseudo-science, concocted to perpetrate bigoted notions of superiority and subjugation. And that's from my fancy graduate level anthropology and sociology classes.
I do stand corrected though. I didn't convey my thoughts succinctly. My apologies. What I was trying to say is that race was ORIGINALLY devised as a new word for SUB-SPECIES in HUMANS specifically. There are no "races" of birds. There are no "races" of dogs. The concept is late 19th to early 20th century and was heavily used by the fascists of the early to mid 20th century. Race is more akin to Breeds. And as many can attest to the new breeds in dogs that have cropped up in the last 20 years, there are an infinite number of possibilities and characteristics to choose from.
But I'll listen, show me show me how SCIENTIFICALLY a child from a 1/2 Korean and 1/2 Irish Father and a 1/2 Brazillian and 1/2 Nigerian Mother is quantitatively classified in this new-fangled racial classification science please.
Until then, Pseudo-science I say! Whipper-snapper! And I'm relying on my not so recent, modern, state university learning to base these here arguments upon. [/QUOTE]
Just thought I'd add this to the mix. Saw this yesterday. Two girls who want black men only. [url]http://greensboro.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/52611-u-name-the-donation-we-name-the-time-bbws-4-blk-males-100/5702143[/url]
I mean, really? I know this is my first post but I've been a long time lurker. It's a provider's body, and until it becomes legal, it can't be regulated. If you don't fit her bill, who gives a shit, its less $$$ for her and gives you an option to look elsewhere.
Getting a little clogged up?
This board definitely is. I was going to send out a pm or two about it, but after reading all the recent weeks postings (in all categories) I decided to pad my post count one more time.
The board is for SEX. It's not for unrelated banterings and musings that are unrelated to SEX. On the 'Front Page' tab in the upper left corner, you can find the posting guidelines. I just read them. Under SPAM, it lists repetitive posts as one type. General BS is another as well as Deliberate Disinformation.
I think a concensus has been reached that it is a providers choice who they wish to see and the consumers choice who they wish to see. Beyond that, I am not interested in dog breeding, anthropology or other musings. It seems there are alot of posts that just seem to be made by a serial antagonist, which is also referred to in the No Spam area. Below are but a few examples of SPAM in the forum. They are definitely not the only one by this member or others.
Agian I already proved your statement wrong before you posted it, read my other post different breeds of dogs are by definition different races. By CG.
The first seven words shows the serial nature as well as the need to prove something. Neither of these are needed in this forum unless the response is to General BS relative to seeking SEX. Period. I see 'again' as repetitive. Once or twice wouldn't make me think twice but these forums are full of dozens of 'again' posts. Nobody cares! It proves nothing to nobody. I haven't learned anything. Does the post refer to a provider? I see the question asked but not answered.
Another:
As for your statement about ancient people using "national orgins" inmstead of race that is totally invalid. By CG.
And another.
Again race has been around for 1000's of years. By CG.
More to the point:
This is totally untrue, race goes back 1000's of years, as does the inclination for humans to "humiliate and dominate" each other. By CG.
I haven't learned anything. If every post responded to here is 'totally untrue', posting said statement does not disprove it. Use a source if you want to prove something. Site your source. I can't speak to race but the last comment about humiliate and dominate makes me wonder if that is what is going on here. I see alot of I am right, you are wrong here. This is not what the forums are for. I don't want CG to feel ostracized about my post here I just used his statements because they were all over the first page of the forum today. It's not personal. Also, I don't get my authority from a fantasty mayor, I just follow the rules and stay on task. So if you or your response comes in the form of a bandwagon- I am just not interested!
I don't want to wade through the banterings and musings. Is that repetitive? I shouldn't have to. I did not come here for fantasy football. One post doesn't bother me but I don't want anymore. That would be repetitive and general BS. I suspect there will be some haters as there are a group of them here. Take that shit to Yahoo.
On another note. ChickenHead50. Do you take a camera guy with you? Couple of those pics looked like you might have a tripod and lighting. Great job.
Ladies without a phone. Tracfones are $10 at MalWart. Double minutes for life and 60 minutes for $20. For $30 plus tax, one can have a phone with 2 hours of talk time, an untraceable (you know what I mean) number, a car charger, wall charger, peace of mind and you can throw it out the window (not that I suggest littering) if it will save you a bond. Members could pick one up for that special lady and tell her its a tip. I don't know anyone without a phone. If they tell you they don't have one, I believe they just don't give it out, but that they do in fact have one. This wasnt meant to disprove any previosly posted statements, again.
Peace out.
RH
Enough said on this subject.
[QUOTE=Rental Holes; 1206839]Getting a little clogged up?
This board definitely is. I was going to send out a pm or two about it, but after reading all the recent weeks postings (in all categories) I decided to pad my post count one more time.
The board is for SEX. It's not for unrelated banterings and musings that are unrelated to SEX. On the 'Front Page' tab in the upper left corner, you can find the posting guidelines. I just read them. Under SPAM, it lists repetitive posts as one type. General BS is another as well as Deliberate Disinformation.
I think a concensus has been reached that it is a providers choice who they wish to see and the consumers choice who they wish to see. Beyond that, I am not interested in dog breeding, anthropology or other musings. It seems there are alot of posts that just seem to be made by a serial antagonist, which is also referred to in the No Spam area. Below are but a few examples of SPAM in the forum. They are definitely not the only one by this member or others.
Agian I already proved your statement wrong before you posted it, read my other post different breeds of dogs are by definition different races. By CG.
The first seven words shows the serial nature as well as the need to prove something. Neither of these are needed in this forum unless the response is to General BS relative to seeking SEX. Period. I see 'again' as repetitive. Once or twice wouldn't make me think twice but these forums are full of dozens of 'again' posts. Nobody cares! It proves nothing to nobody. I haven't learned anything. Does the post refer to a provider? I see the question asked but not answered.
Another:
As for your statement about ancient people using "national orgins" inmstead of race that is totally invalid. By CG.
And another.
Again race has been around for 1000's of years. By CG.
More to the point:
This is totally untrue, race goes back 1000's of years, as does the inclination for humans to "humiliate and dominate" each other. By CG.
I haven't learned anything. If every post responded to here is 'totally untrue', posting said statement does not disprove it. Use a source if you want to prove something. Site your source. I can't speak to race but the last comment about humiliate and dominate makes me wonder if that is what is going on here. I see alot of I am right, you are wrong here. This is not what the forums are for. I don't want CG to feel ostracized about my post here I just used his statements because they were all over the first page of the forum today. It's not personal. Also, I don't get my authority from a fantasty mayor, I just follow the rules and stay on task. So if you or your response comes in the form of a bandwagon- I am just not interested!
I don't want to wade through the banterings and musings. Is that repetitive? I shouldn't have to. I did not come here for fantasy football. One post doesn't bother me but I don't want anymore. That would be repetitive and general BS. I suspect there will be some haters as there are a group of them here. Take that shit to Yahoo.
On another note. ChickenHead50. Do you take a camera guy with you? Couple of those pics looked like you might have a tripod and lighting. Great job.
Ladies without a phone. Tracfones are $10 at MalWart. Double minutes for life and 60 minutes for $20. For $30 plus tax, one can have a phone with 2 hours of talk time, an untraceable (you know what I mean) number, a car charger, wall charger, peace of mind and you can throw it out the window (not that I suggest littering) if it will save you a bond. Members could pick one up for that special lady and tell her its a tip. I don't know anyone without a phone. If they tell you they don't have one, I believe they just don't give it out, but that they do in fact have one. This wasnt meant to disprove any previosly posted statements, again.
Peace out.
RH[/QUOTE]
Saw this BP posting today. One hour for 3. 5 (that's correct) ; who is she kidding?
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/anddiams-larissa-anddiams-gorgeous-hawaiian-filipino-hottie-sensual-and-sexy-call-now-specials-24/5860217[/url]
Saw her recently and recommend. SM can PM for more detail.
She has pretty good reviews on TEEEE EEEEE RRRRR site. She looks like a little spinner type. I never had any Hispanic pussy. The little 4'11" Michelle is the one I would like to try out sometime.
[QUOTE=Cpfan; 1206952]
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/anddiams-larissa-anddiams-gorgeous-hawaiian-filipino-hottie-sensual-and-sexy-call-now-specials-24/5860217[/url]
Saw her recently and recommend. SM can PM for more detail. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1206954]She has pretty good reviews on TEEEE EEEEE RRRRR site. She looks like a little spinner type. I never had any Hispanic pussy. The little 4'11" Michelle is the one I would like to try out sometime.[/QUOTE]Amen to that! (michelle) She also has reviews on the ter.
I just had a great great soothing BBBJ (with no toothing) and FS with an 18 year old (white) spinner in the Univ area who is most definitely UTR. She took my breath away. Completely drained.
Okay, now that I have made a post about about SEX, let me say that I think I agree that the race topic did get a bit out of control, and perhaps could have been dealt with via PMs. These things get started, good members can disagree and want to continue making their points. I'll be honest: I couldn't care less about their race debate. So I just didn't read these posts. It was THAT simple.
Some degree of bantering and musing (about sex) is fun and good for the forum, and the moderator for this forum is responsible to edit posts that do not conform to Forum Guidelines. But let me say, there is clear precedent for fun musings and banterings, mostly by SM, in most of the really good threads in other cities and other int'l countries. It's just the way that it is, and way it will probably remain. I agree that it is sometimes difficult to RTFF when you have to sift through these banterings.
Let's all try to stay a "little better" on track, but let's not think we can't have a little fun as well. I do think you were "out of bounds" in referring to CG as a "serial antagonist." He is well-respected here by many of us.
Finally, RH, your own long post had nothing to do with SEX. Hahaha. I couldn't resist adding that. . And I like the term "dog breeding" as maybe I will use that when I describe doing the doggie position. BTW, I didn't do any dog breeding with the cute 18 year old earlier today.
Peace,
JM (Fictitious Mayor)
[QUOTE=Rental Holes; 1206839]The board is for SEX. It's not for unrelated banterings and musings that are unrelated to SEX. Peace out.
RH[/QUOTE]
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-420-friendly-female-new-in-town-21/5860734[/url]
She not only posted the phone number, and I can only guess the extension is the room number, of the hotel she's staying at but she also said,"I smoke pot!" with her 420 reference. Wow! That's a train wreck waiting to happen. If our well meaning uncle is listening, I think we'll be getting much more realistic photos from her booking.
How does one find an 18 year old UTR girl like the one that drained you today? I guess they are all over UNCC but how does one find them? Just wondering how you lucked up?
[QUOTE=John Marigold; 1207067]I just had a great great soothing BBBJ (with no toothing) and FS with an 18 year old (white) spinner in the Univ area who is most definitely UTR. She took my breath away. Completely drained.
Okay, now that I have made a post about about SEX, let me say that I think I agree that the race topic did get a bit out of control, and perhaps could have been dealt with via PMs. These things get started, good members can disagree and want to continue making their points. I'll be honest: I couldn't care less about their race debate. So I just didn't read these posts. It was THAT simple.
Some degree of bantering and musing (about sex) is fun and good for the forum, and the moderator for this forum is responsible to edit posts that do not conform to Forum Guidelines. But let me say, there is clear precedent for fun musings and banterings, mostly by SM, in most of the really good threads in other cities and other int'l countries. It's just the way that it is, and way it will probably remain. I agree that it is sometimes difficult to RTFF when you have to sift through these banterings.
Let's all try to stay a "little better" on track, but let's not think we can't have a little fun as well. I do think you were "out of bounds" in referring to CG as a "serial antagonist." He is well-respected here by many of us.
Finally, RH, your own long post had nothing to do with SEX. Hahaha. I couldn't resist adding that. . And I like the term "dog breeding" as maybe I will use that when I describe doing the doggie position. BTW, I didn't do any dog breeding with the cute 18 year old earlier today.
Peace,
JM (Fictitious Mayor) [/QUOTE]
I thought that post was out of the ordinary and she posted $50 an hour earlier today? Sounded fishy to me. If you google that number it comes up Knight's Inn on Nations Ford Road. Either she is dumb as crap or you will find a set of silver bracelets waiting for you when you visit? I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot stick? Does anybody smell bacon?
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1207070]
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-420-friendly-female-new-in-town-21/5860734[/url]
She not only posted the phone number, and I can only guess the extension is the room number, of the hotel she's staying at but she also said,"I smoke pot!" with her 420 reference. Wow! That's a train wreck waiting to happen. If our well meaning uncle is listening, I think we'll be getting much more realistic photos from her booking. [/QUOTE]
Ok LOL you don't want me to feel ostracized but for whatever reason you decided to single me out, that makes sense, (by the way isn't that a "persoinal attack" and would fall under the SPAM category?) so let me start with saying, if the forum MODS have a problem with what I post THEY will do something about it, until then if you don't like what I post you can skip to the next one is that really too hard? It is not your job to tell me what I can or cannot post. I have seen posts get deleted all the time so I know the mods pay attention.
The board was dead so I started a topic that definitely put some life into the board. (and technically the posts were about backpage providers so it was forum appropriate DOH!) I think the debate while actively participated in was not in any way hostile nor did anyone on either side of the debate get out of hand or go overboard. While I didn't agree with the guys on the other side of the issue I respected their right to say it and heck without an opposing side you can't have a debate in the first place.
I don't really see a problem if some of us want to have a conversation on these boards, you don't have to read all the posts and it's not too hard to tell by the middle of the first sentence what type of post it is. You even had to comment on a post that wasnt even in this forum because you "don't want to read about fantasy football" well the title of that post was "fantasy football" if you kept reading after that thats your own fault.
I also re-read the SPAM guidelines. I hardly think my post was repetitive just because you have a few posts on the same topic thats not being repetitive thats having a conversation or a debate, you cannot do that with only one post. The closest I came to SPAM that I see is my references to parts of the bible in my last post, but that wasnt meant religiously it was only used as an example of an ancient text.
Also I'm not a "serial antogonist" is but while I have strong opinions and am not afraid to let them be known, I don't try to antagonize or start fights on here (but if you want to start with me I will defend myself)
Last but not least, your post was filled with alot of the same stuff you were complaining about others doing, not to mention the personal attacks (and accusing me of trying to humiliate and dominate this forum? Seriously?) And While I like and respect our "Fantasy mayor" JM, I hardly get any "authority" from him, I'm not even sure how that would work, so I am not sure why you even felt the need to bring him up (another personal attack?) You could have easily said what you wanted to say without all the extra "bantering and musings" If the Mods want me to stop I'm sure they will let me know and I will gladly do that, but sorry it's not your place to tell me what I can or cannot post here.
BTW. People that live in glass houses should not throw stones.
[QUOTE=Rental Holes; 1206839]Getting a little clogged up?
This board definitely is. I was going to send out a pm or two about it, but after reading all the recent weeks postings (in all categories) I decided to pad my post count one more time.
The board is for SEX. It's not for unrelated banterings and musings that are unrelated to SEX. On the 'Front Page' tab in the upper left corner, you can find the posting guidelines. I just read them. Under SPAM, it lists repetitive posts as one type. General BS is another as well as Deliberate Disinformation.
I think a concensus has been reached that it is a providers choice who they wish to see and the consumers choice who they wish to see. Beyond that, I am not interested in dog breeding, anthropology or other musings. It seems there are alot of posts that just seem to be made by a serial antagonist, which is also referred to in the No Spam area. Below are but a few examples of SPAM in the forum. They are definitely not the only one by this member or others.
Agian I already proved your statement wrong before you posted it, read my other post different breeds of dogs are by definition different races. By CG.
The first seven words shows the serial nature as well as the need to prove something. Neither of these are needed in this forum unless the response is to General BS relative to seeking SEX. Period. I see 'again' as repetitive. Once or twice wouldn't make me think twice but these forums are full of dozens of 'again' posts. Nobody cares! It proves nothing to nobody. I haven't learned anything. Does the post refer to a provider? I see the question asked but not answered.
Another:
As for your statement about ancient people using "national orgins" inmstead of race that is totally invalid. By CG.
And another.
Again race has been around for 1000's of years. By CG.
More to the point:
This is totally untrue, race goes back 1000's of years, as does the inclination for humans to "humiliate and dominate" each other. By CG.
I haven't learned anything. If every post responded to here is 'totally untrue', posting said statement does not disprove it. Use a source if you want to prove something. Site your source. I can't speak to race but the last comment about humiliate and dominate makes me wonder if that is what is going on here. I see alot of I am right, you are wrong here. This is not what the forums are for. I don't want CG to feel ostracized about my post here I just used his statements because they were all over the first page of the forum today. It's not personal. Also, I don't get my authority from a fantasty mayor, I just follow the rules and stay on task. So if you or your response comes in the form of a bandwagon- I am just not interested!
I don't want to wade through the banterings and musings. Is that repetitive? I shouldn't have to. I did not come here for fantasy football. One post doesn't bother me but I don't want anymore. That would be repetitive and general BS. I suspect there will be some haters as there are a group of them here. Take that shit to Yahoo.
On another note. ChickenHead50. Do you take a camera guy with you? Couple of those pics looked like you might have a tripod and lighting. Great job.
Ladies without a phone. Tracfones are $10 at MalWart. Double minutes for life and 60 minutes for $20. For $30 plus tax, one can have a phone with 2 hours of talk time, an untraceable (you know what I mean) number, a car charger, wall charger, peace of mind and you can throw it out the window (not that I suggest littering) if it will save you a bond. Members could pick one up for that special lady and tell her its a tip. I don't know anyone without a phone. If they tell you they don't have one, I believe they just don't give it out, but that they do in fact have one. This wasnt meant to disprove any previosly posted statements, again.
Peace out.
RH[/QUOTE]
LOL I'd like to know that myself!
[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1207079]How does one find an 18 year old UTR girl like the one that drained you today? I guess they are all over UNCC but how does one find them? Just wondering how you lucked up?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207094][. . .] if the forum MODS have a problem with what I post THEY will do something about it, until then if you don't like what I post you can skip to the next one is that really too hard? [/QUOTE]Darn it! I agree. No debate here.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207094][. . .] And While I like and respect our "Fantasy mayor" JM, I hardly get any "authority" from him, I'm not even sure how that would work, [. . .][/QUOTE]It's my understanding his "Authority" is milky-white, sticky, and slightly salty. But that's hearsay,"second hand" knowledge if you will. I have never had any authority from him at all, nor do I want any.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207094]BTW. People that live in glass houses should not throw stones.[/QUOTE]Or walk around naked after a shower.
I don't see that 420 thing as too big a problem, I mean she is selling sex on the internet, thats much worse than a little bit of pot (if she even has any) , to me that's like a guy getting pulled over for DWI and worrying about a busted tailight. LOL. You really think cops see a girl posting 420 friendly and target her more than the rest? Personally I doubt it, I don't see putting 420 friendly in your ad as any worse than putting GFE or BBBJ or some other reference in it. And anyway posting 420 friendly doesn't necessarily mean she has any drugs on her it just means if you want to bring them she is ok with it. (lets just say I doubt she would do her drugs with you, she wants you to do yours with her. LOL)
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1207070]
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-420-friendly-female-new-in-town-21/5860734[/url]
She not only posted the phone number, and I can only guess the extension is the room number, of the hotel she's staying at but she also said,"I smoke pot!" with her 420 reference. Wow! That's a train wreck waiting to happen. If our well meaning uncle is listening, I think we'll be getting much more realistic photos from her booking. [/QUOTE]
Hey John John let me just say I have no problem with you and actually enjoyed our debate, if anything I said offended you or any other guys on the opposing side I'm sorry I was just having fun. Looks like you feel the same way from your post but I just wanted to say it since someone thinks I went overboard?
Till the next great debate topic.
CG
PS from your description, I don't think I want any "authority" either. LOL.
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1207100]Darn it! I agree. No debate here.
It's my understanding his "Authority" is milky-white, sticky, and slightly salty. But that's hearsay,"second hand" knowledge if you will. I have never had any authority from him at all, nor do I want any.
Or walk around naked after a shower. [/QUOTE]
LOL I've been the that knights in, I think instead of someone giving you jewelry (aka the silver bracelets) it's more likely you have a few extra unwanted guests and end up getting things taken from you instead, very shady area, I'd be worried just walking from my car to the room.
[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1207081]I thought that post was out of the ordinary and she posted $50 an hour earlier today? Sounded fishy to me. If you google that number it comes up Knight's Inn on Nations Ford Road. Either she is dumb as crap or you will find a set of silver bracelets waiting for you when you visit? I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot stick? Does anybody smell bacon?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bouinage;1206962]Amen to that! (michelle) She also has reviews on the ter.[/QUOTE]I had a great date with Mya (a definite go for those that like HUGE boobs) , and she mentioned that she & Michelle were good friends, which put Michelle on my list. I knew they were from ATL, so I checked that forum, and the boys there hit it pretty good. I did find a comment about needing to take better care of her hygiene, which I had also noted in a review on an erotic site.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207102]I don't see that 420 thing as too big a problem[/QUOTE]Drug enforcement still trumps other vices from my conversations with my closest uncle. She wants you to do your drugs with her, and leave a little bit for her to do by herself later. Plus, I doubt they are going outside to smoke those blunts, so prepare for a nasty, smoky room. It's also my understanding that possession leaves little wiggle room while solicitation still can be a pain to prosecute against a good defense lawyer. YMMV. Just my take on it.
It's really the combination "pot-head" and "escort wannabe" that made me laugh. I purposely didn't post the Name of the Hotel, NCT. But I'd also bet that the extension was also the room number. I mean, how much easier does it get?
Forget about Uncle Leo for a minute. Let's take a pimp for example. He watches the room. Five, Six, Seven, guys come and go. Then he decides to bust in and rob her. Problem is, he missed you walking in. I mean, he knows she's got cash and drugs there and he knows where she is. You don't see that as inviting trouble?
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207108]Hey John John let me just say I have no problem with you and actually enjoyed our debate, if anything I said offended you or any other guys on the opposing side I'm sorry I was just having fun. Looks like you feel the same way from your post but I just wanted to say it since someone thinks I went overboard? [/QUOTE]Anytime someone tells me I'm wrong, I'm deeply-deeply offended."insert smiley face here"
I didn't think you went overboard. I just think you are wrong! LOL!
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1207127]Anytime someone tells me I'm wrong, I'm deeply-deeply offended."insert smiley face here"
I didn't think you went overboard. I just think you are wrong! LOL! [/QUOTE]Debate is good when there's no name calling, etc. Sadly much of society has lost that ability. If my comments were wrong, it wouldn't be the first time, not likely the last.
Bring on the ladies.
LOL I totally agree, but I think its more likely you get robbed going to see her than arrested, I doubt the pimp is watcher her room from the outside, he is probably already in there smoking weed with her waiting for some dumbass to show up.
[QUOTE=Johnjohn 30; 1207125]Drug enforcement still trumps other vices from my conversations with my closest uncle. She wants you to do your drugs with her, and leave a little bit for her to do by herself later. Plus, I doubt they are going outside to smoke those blunts, so prepare for a nasty, smoky room. It's also my understanding that possession leaves little wiggle room while solicitation still can be a pain to prosecute against a good defense lawyer. YMMV. Just my take on it.
It's really the combination "pot-head" and "escort wannabe" that made me laugh. I purposely didn't post the Name of the Hotel, NCT. But I'd also bet that the extension was also the room number. I mean, how much easier does it get?
Forget about Uncle Leo for a minute. Let's take a pimp for example. He watches the room. Five, Six, Seven, guys come and go. Then he decides to bust in and rob her. Problem is, he missed you walking in. I mean, he knows she's got cash and drugs there and he knows where she is. You don't see that as inviting trouble? [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207108]Till the next great debate topic.[/QUOTE]Until Saturday, then. *groan*
Perhaps, but that $50 an hour special sounded fishy to me.
[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1207111]LOL I've been the that knights in, I think instead of someone giving you jewelry (aka the silver bracelets) it's more likely you have a few extra unwanted guests and end up getting things taken from you instead, very shady area, I'd be worried just walking from my car to the room.[/QUOTE]