Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=CookyJar] Are you saying; this 18 year hooker with a valid Texas driver’s license, arrived here in PA, ran down to the Dept of Transportation and got a new PA license, and then, ran back home and started hooking. Most of us aren’t that diligent. It took me a year to change my address and I drive.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Davey1965]I saw this girl the other day out riding her bike and playing with another girl and boys "her age"[/QUOTE]


I can't speak for the PENNDOT habits of everyone but I know a valid PA license when I see it. All you have to do is flip it slightly in the light to see the 2 distinctive holograph patterns if you have any serious doubts. Maybe she needed it to cash checks or pick up wires from home or whatever other reason within the 6 months since she moved here, hence the urgency to change the license; I can't say. All I can say is that if this chickie hadn't had one, she looked and acted all of 18 to me, but had a baby face, and I would gladly have passed rather than risk the moral or legal hassle.

And "retarded?" She was naive, inexperienced and relatively quiet perhaps, but hardly mentally challenged. I have encountered many SWs with lower IQs than her on the Ave. This profession doesn't exactly require a degree from Harvard.

As for Davey's sighting, I am almost certain it is a case of mistaken identity. I am sure there are a lot of look alikes in a city as big as Philly, and I would have been much more interested in seeing a pic to compare or info on the neighborhood of the sighting because SWs tend to almost always work close to home when they live near the Ave, and I picked her up on Torresdale at Magee. Is this the neighborhood of the sighting Davey?

It was [b][url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=79957]Picture 050[/url][/b] that got me to wondering both about her age and mental state. If you say you checked her ID, that’s good enough for me. But, I do believe I am going to pass on this one. Thanks for the info.

CookyJar

PS: Check out [b][post=470596] Alexis vs. the Hunter with a conscience
[/post][/b]to see how I handled a similar situation.

[quote=supereloquent]as for davey's sighting, i am almost certain it is a case of mistaken identity. i am sure there are a lot of look alikes in a city as big as philly, and i would have been much more interested in seeing a pic to compare or info on the neighborhood of the sighting because sws tend to almost always work close to home when they live near the ave, and i picked her up on torresdale at magee. is this the neighborhood of the sighting davey?[/quote]

actually saw her 3 times, from the area of the ******* and again
on her bike with the same three other kids/friends hanging around the
******* at ************.

this matter could be debated and argued over and over again, but
i choose to not bring this matter more to the forefront by continually
bumping this thread. so i spoke my peace, my discontent of the
exploitation of possible **** children on this site and that is that.
if your pic post mean that much to you to have possible children as
part of your repetoire, then let them stay on the forum.

i've posted more info than i ever recieved back from this site, and actually
as cj can attest to, sometimes what posted comes back to haunt you from
people passing this info on to the girls. as you may notice my posting has
become less specific and just more general information.

many times i've backed off of posting here because of what i just mentioned
above, the lack of the moderator to give a shit about people coming here
to harass and chase away good posters, but at other time moderating or
deleting something from a good poster here. i also know of a girl who's pics
were posted here a while back when she was ****. her mom actaully
saw the pics and emailed jackson whom basically told her to fuck-off. i met her when she was about 20 and became pretty good friends with her. talking with her and her mom one day she showed me the email correspondence.
so i guess the rule here of jacksons actions of allowing pics of alleged
**** children on his site, disappearing when flamers come just to
harass senior good posting members (hey it's all about post count) and
to many lurkers taking info back to the streets is enough for me to
seek out shelter where cj has been hiding. later dudes!!

After my last post I thought for a moment and decided that it would be in
this girls best interest to delete the locations I have seen her at. Knowing
how guys take this info to track down girls, I wish to no longer give any
potential pedophiles info to find and abuse this young girl (if she is in fact
under 18).
In ref to a recent post from a serial antagonist, no I am not trying to be
hollier than thou, as I have had my share of fun on the ave and do not
believe myself to be better than anybody else out here. But there is a line
everyone draws and thats mine.

[quote=davey1965]actually saw her 3 times, from the area of the ******* and again on her bike with the same three other kids/friends hanging around the******* at ************. [/quote]

[quote=coconut poke]of course it wasn't the neighborhood of the sighting. and he will probably avoid admitting that and hide behind his statement that he will not discuss the issue further. every now and again a "holier than thou" wave sweeps over some members here. you've explained your actions and your position quite well.

and now, in addition to wrongly implying a girl in your photo is **** we have a claim she is "mentally challenged". that's an absurd conclusion and is just his way of getting back at you for becoming the top photo poster in philly.[/quote]

"holier than thou," as you said coconut poke, was right on the money.

i wrote davey a pm (with no reply) on this because airing anything here seemed pointless, since this entire discussion was moot given my checking of id. but he chose to continue to pound away in here even though he said he spoke his piece on the subject and that is that (apparently not). i asked davey to specify his sighting for corroboration and he demurred on the pretense that he is "protecting" her? he could have sent it to me in a pm so i have just one word for that: bullshit!

i have had my share of rock throwers in this forum and cj and i have had it out before, so his rock was no surprise. but this is a new mo for davey. so now he is the protector of young sws, even after they have been checked for valid id.

draw your "line" anywhere you want, that is your business, but don't continue to insinuate that i am even the slightest bit interested in **** sws.

I joined this forum because I valued the info on it and hoped I could also contribute a tiny piece of my experience in case anyone cared or was interested. I'm not looking to blow smoke up anyone's asses, but Cooky, Davey and SuperE have continually provided priceless info and photos on this site. Cooky has already cut back by 99%, Davey is now looking to bail, and SuperE is in the middle of this current pissing match.

In the words of the great philosopher Rodney King----"can't we all just get along? "

This is supposed to be a "Community" of sorts--guys helping each other to monger safely and to share access to some of the prize booty that they have found.

If everyone gets mad at one another and stops contributing, then we all lose--because it's fucking dangerous out on the streets and we all have a better chance to stay safe if there is cooperation.

I hope you three can take it off-line and iron things out.-possibly some compromise can be used to work it out (would it hurt to have the pics that started this removed if it gets everybody back on the same page? ).

Can a 3rd party (mods? ) settle this?

Just my.02$ worth.

Peace out

super, i hate to see you getting in a pissing match with davey, who despite your current anger at him i'm sure you'd agree has historically been one of the most frequent and helpful contributors to the board.

worse however, is teaming up with coconut poke, a freak of genetics who pretends to be a girl and only shows up to flame seniors with a long history of contributions, to throw davey under the bus. just check out his history and see if you're still proud of who you've chosen to get in bed with. other than **** hookers, that is. (sorry, just kidding there, but it was there and i had to use it)

we all have an ego, but siding with coconut poke on any issue is pretty much sucking the devil's dick in terms of who is and isn't an asset to the board.

[quote=dark phoenix]super, i hate to see you getting in a pissing match with davey, who despite your current anger at him i'm sure you'd agree has historically been one of the most frequent and helpful contributors to the board.

worse however, is teaming up with coconut poke, a freak of genetics who pretends to be a girl and only shows up to flame seniors with a long history of contributions, to throw davey under the bus. just check out his history and see if you're still proud of who you've chosen to get in bed with. other than **** hookers, that is. (sorry, just kidding there, but it was there and i had to use it)

we all have an ego, but siding with coconut poke on any issue is pretty much sucking the devil's dick in terms of who is and isn't an asset to the board.[/quote]

in response to your comments: i am not deliberately in a pissing contest with anyone, nor in bed with anyone. normally i provide information and respond to what people write about me and my information, either agreeing or disagreeing. i have strong opinions and i don't take well to criticism. attack me and you are likely going to get a reflex response akin to that of a rattlesnake. if over reaction is my character flaw, well, sue me. why do you think i have my own thread? so people can avoid the diatribes that seem to result between me and rock throwers, of whom there seem to be an unending supply. if someone has a long and contributory history, maybe they should be cut a little slack most of the time, but not when they accuse me of picking up **** or retarded sws or insinuate the same, and continue to do so after i have made it quite clear otherwise. then it is time to stand up for what i know to be true, regardless of the detractor and his reputation. if that is a "pissing contest," then so be it. let's start pissing.

[QUOTE=Chriseff]I joined this forum because I valued the info on it and hoped I could also contribute a tiny piece of my experience in case anyone cared or was interested. I'm not looking to blow smoke up anyone's asses, but Cooky, Davey and SuperE have continually provided priceless info and photos on this site. Cooky has already cut back by 99%, Davey is now looking to bail, and SuperE is in the middle of this current pissing match.

In the words of the great philosopher Rodney King----"can't we all just get along? "

This is supposed to be a "Community" of sorts--guys helping each other to monger safely and to share access to some of the prize booty that they have found.

If everyone gets mad at one another and stops contributing, then we all lose--because it's fucking dangerous out on the streets and we all have a better chance to stay safe if there is cooperation.

I hope you three can take it off-line and iron things out.-possibly some compromise can be used to work it out (would it hurt to have the pics that started this removed if it gets everybody back on the same page? ).

Can a 3rd party (mods? ) settle this?

Just my.02$ worth.

Peace out[/QUOTE]

Here's some change for your 2 cents.

I checked her ID; she was validly 18; case closed.

Regardless, let's erase the damn pics. I couldn't care less. I checked ID but, so what? Since nobody else seems to have done even that, let's ban and erase all the pics in this forum if we think they are 27 or under, just like they have to do when carding for cigarettes. Better yet, let's make this a "MILFs only" site; then we can be dead certain.

I don't need a pic lynch mob, with torches, led by a few "respected senior members," after the fact, with hairs across their asses, and quotations from the law, and supposed bicycle and playmate sightings, or anyone else for that matter, to pressure me into a damn thing just to "play nice" or "get on the same page." I am not presently on that page; I don't care to BE on that page, and I am not GOING to be on that page.

PS: Maybe it's time to get off THESE pages entirely.

I have no reason to doubt that what you have stated in regards to the session with this girl is true. It seems as if you become overly indignant when anyone dares to question or post a comment regarding anything written by you--and I'm not referring solely to the "Torresdale Chubster" matter.

I can assure you that I will not post on THESE pages (YOUR "private" thread) again, since my attempt to request that you, Davey, and Cooky try to settle your differences was construed as a personal affront, causing you to further spew your venom at me.

PS: Enjoy yourself and may everyone out on the K continue to stay safe.

When I stated that maybe it was time to get off THESE pages I was referring to myself, not you. I did not view your posting as a personal affront. I should have made that clear. Rather, your post was just a catalyst that touched a nerve regarding the situation, not your well intentioned suggestion. In retrospect, I should have just sounded off in general and not reprinted your post as my reference point. My "venom" was not directed towards you, just to this whole situation. If you took it that way, I extend my apologies.

[QUOTE=Chriseff]I have no reason to doubt that what you have stated in regards to the session with this girl is true. It seems as if you become overly indignant when anyone dares to question or post a comment regarding anything written by you--and I'm not referring solely to the "Torresdale Chubster" matter.

I can assure you that I will not post on THESE pages (YOUR "private" thread) again, since my attempt to request that you, Davey, and Cooky try to settle your differences was construed as a personal affront, causing you to further spew your venom at me.

PS: Enjoy yourself and may everyone out on the K continue to stay safe.[/QUOTE]

I appreciate your apology and I respect your position on the situation. I hope that eventually all of the parties in this matter will still be willing to post their valuable information on this board--but I can understand it if all three of you stop contributing. Take care all.

Super, you've always been straight up with the board. Keep it up!

Enough sh*t from the cheap seats.

Let's move on, please.

Three cents because I have three things to share today...

1) I can't believe anyone would take this hobby so seriously that they would visit the girls in the bighouse, especially considering the stuff you have to go through to get in there.

2) One of the ladies showed me where the $10 place was on Coral. All I can say is - Bring your own Sheets, and bug spray, and disinfectant, and -- yuck. Doubt I'll go back there.

3) Met up with Janine (cute spinner readhead). Very enthusiastic, pretty much a GFE, a nice girl. A tad too thin but she knows that and says she's trying to put some weight back on. Funny thing - I mentioned that I learned about the K stroll on the Internet and she immediately mentioned Supereloquent without me saying another word. Super, she called you the "Siskel & Ebert of the Street girls". I think she's seen some of your posts!

Later!

[QUOTE=Member #1658] Met up with Janine (cute spinner readhead). Very enthusiastic, pretty much a GFE, a nice girl. A tad too thin but she knows that and says she's trying to put some weight back on. Funny thing - I mentioned that I learned about the K stroll on the Internet and she immediately mentioned Supereloquent without me saying another word. Super, she called you the "Siskel & Ebert of the Street girls". I think she's seen some of your posts [/QUOTE]

Lisa and Janine would be my "most likely" votes for having a computer. Both are suburban dwellers and not typical addicted SWs on the Ave. Lisa and I have had detailed computer discussions (plus she is a PHENOMENAL dirty talker, showing how interesting, imaginative and erotic a SW with brains can be). Janine is well aware of what gets posted on the internet, and is VERY camera shy as a result; she won't even allow a g-rated pic.

But "Siskel and Ebert?": Gene Siskel died 10 years ago. Either Janine is a bit out of touch with movie critics and ratings, or is just using a phrase that has become a part of the language, or maybe she is making the tongue-in-cheek comparison that I am half dead? LOL