Grand Rapids Pugilistic Society

Agreed. At the end of the day, giving out information like work and anything of that nature is insane. I mean I can't speak for everyone but it's just not worth giving up your livelihood for an hour of fun. There's plenty of providers who don't need this kind of sensitive information and just have as much as fun. I get why you want to white knight but it's a review board and people rely on honest reviews. Glad that your experience with her has been good but as always YMMV so that's why these reviews have to be as unbiased as possible. I mean don't get me wrong I have my favorites and go to but if they start to change as far as quality or whatever the case is I am going to give an updated review stating so. I understand safety for everyone but I am not going to put anyone's well being over mine. Its greedy but you bet your ass that the providers will do the same.

[QUOTE=Monger01;4684146]Yes, you can take any risk you find acceptable and yes we all do to a point. But disclosing where you work to a provider is plain dumb, sorry.

As for the "fatass" comment, she's a bbw. Her ass is fat. Are we pretending its not? I recently posted a review of jasmine stating tight round ass. I also mentioned her tits are saggy. Also true. My goal isn't to be in Jasmine's good graces. Its to post my experience and opinion of her for other Mongers. This includes negatives.

This isn't a diplomatic refuge. We review hookers!

Below in another discussion Benz called Jen Savage "Jen the junky". Is it disparaging? Yes buts its also accurate. I liked Jen. Saw her many times but I'm not all butt hurt over Benz's comments because I'm not her white knight. I was her customer.

My post warning mongers against giving out vital info. That could hurt them later stands. Its good advice I gave.
And the guests on this board can also decide if my warning is worth considering hence it is posted too.
I hope you get many free dates with Jordan for all the whiteknight posts you put up lately.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Monger01;4684146]Yes, you can take any risk you find acceptable and yes we all do to a point. But disclosing where you work to a provider is plain dumb, sorry.

As for the "fatass" comment, she's a bbw. Her ass is fat. Are we pretending its not? I recently posted a review of jasmine stating tight round ass. I also mentioned her tits are saggy. Also true. My goal isn't to be in Jasmine's good graces. Its to post my experience and opinion of her for other Mongers. This includes negatives.

This isn't a diplomatic refuge. We review hookers!

Below in another discussion Benz called Jen Savage "Jen the junky". Is it disparaging? Yes buts its also accurate. I liked Jen. Saw her many times but I'm not all butt hurt over Benz's comments because I'm not her white knight. I was her customer.

My post warning mongers against giving out vital info. That could hurt them later stands. Its good advice I gave.
And the guests on this board can also decide if my warning is worth considering hence it is posted too.
I hope you get many free dates with Jordan for all the whiteknight posts you put up lately.[/QUOTE]You do like your name calling. I've been called a lot of things by a lot of people, but being called a white knight is a first.

I wasn't white knighting Jordan, I was defending your attack on my personal choices. I invite you over to here to settle this, since you obviously had some chip to get off your shoulder and you double down on the personal attacks. I don't get you. I put up a post about my experience with someone and my willingness to share info with a higher end provider and come unhinged. Katana requires verification with a picture of you with your I'd (Driver's License) and I didn't see you coming unhinged over that. What kind of forum is this going to be if guys like you personally attack other posters? You like putting on display that anyone that posts something you don't agree with is going to get attacked? I post a positive experience, where, in the forum, nobody had any experience with her and there were questions about her. What do I get for it? Someone starts making personal attacks. Good example to show the 6000 lurkers that Benz was talking about that view this board but don't contribute.

Do you offer sound advice? Certainly, for the kinds of girls you usually see. However, there are those of us that want something different than you. Shocker, I know. I offered clear direction on where she stands and whether she is legit and safe. Isn't that what this board is for? Everyone doesn't have to agree with me, but there are those that will like to know that if someone wants to see your LinkedIn page, is she as confidential and safe as she says. Don't like that some guys are free to share that much? Fine, state your difference and move on, no need to attack me personally.

I'm not sure why you bring up diplomacy, I was saying that your name calling shows a lack of respect. Which you have reinforced by doubling down in your response me. There is a difference between saying "She has a fat ass" and "She's a fatass. " Is there anyone else on the board that thinks those say the same thing?

Bottom line: I posted that I've seen a provider that requires validation. I offered my experience and my thoughts on her process. I expressed that she is safe, she isn't a junky and has never violated my trust. It was information relevant based on the posts before hand. I just don't see how any of this is white knighting. But, if name calling and cating doubt on the validity of my post makes you feel better, good for you!

You mention the guests on here and I have to say, I find it hard to believe anyone is going to want to post their experinces and risk getting attacked.

You've done a real bang up job here. Good going!!

[QUOTE=GRDiver;4684369]Agreed. At the end of the day, giving out information like work and anything of that nature is insane. I mean I can't speak for everyone but it's just not worth giving up your livelihood for an hour of fun. There's plenty of providers who don't need this kind of sensitive information and just have as much as fun. I get why you want to white knight but it's a review board and people rely on honest reviews. Glad that your experience with her has been good but as always YMMV so that's why these reviews have to be as unbiased as possible. I mean don't get me wrong I have my favorites and go to but if they start to change as far as quality or whatever the case is I am going to give an updated review stating so. I understand safety for everyone but I am not going to put anyone's well being over mine. Its greedy but you bet your ass that the providers will do the same.[/QUOTE]White knighting implies that I have gone to excessive lengths to defend a woman / provider. I have simply stated what I know about her and provide some context, again from what I know, to the claims that she is a b*tch becaues she requires screening. That is not excessive and is, what I thought this board was about. I was answering the post for those that had not seen her and had questions. Period. I do take offense to Monger01's name calling when he's talking through his ass about me and calling my post into question. Will I lose sleep over it? Nope. I'm just going to respond and I'm going to move on.

We just had a discussion on honest posts. If this is how honest posts are going to be treated when someone doesn't agree, so much for honest posts on here.

Your wall of text posts speak for themselves dude. I posted my opinion of her policy. I'm hardly the first monger to call out an over the top verification policy. Countless posts here call out providers asking for pics from the monger for example. Where was your giant opinion then? Oh wait! It wasn't Jordan those times!

You've posted 3 walls of text defending her since my post that, by the way, was not directed at or about YOU. You attacked me in response.

You are indeed a white knight for her.

You like her? Great. You are ok giving her personal info. Great. But I am within my rights to comment on her policy same as you are within yours to state its ok with you because she's, in your opinion, better and more trustworthy than the girls the rest of us see. That's a bunch of crap in my opinion but whatever floats your boat.

3 walls of text so far in response to my simple post stating sharing your job info. Is a bad idea. What's your definition of excessive?

Keep repeating you're not a white knight dude. Your posts all say otherwise.

[QUOTE=GMacMan;4685067]White knighting implies that I have gone to excessive lengths to defend a woman / provider. I have simply stated what I know about her and provide some context, again from what I know, to the claims that she is a b*tch becaues she requires screening. That is not excessive and is, what I thought this board was about. I was answering the post for those that had not seen her and had questions. Period. I do take offense to Monger01's name calling when he's talking through his ass about me and calling my post into question. Will I lose sleep over it? Nope. I'm just going to respond and I'm going to move on.

We just had a discussion on honest posts. If this is how honest posts are going to be treated when someone doesn't agree, so much for honest posts on here.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Monger01;4685986]Your wall of text posts speak for themselves dude. I posted my opinion of her policy. I'm hardly the first monger to call out an over the top verification policy. Countless posts here call out providers asking for pics from the monger for example. Where was your giant opinion then? Oh wait! It wasn't Jordan those times!

You've posted 3 walls of text defending her since my post that, by the way, was not directed at or about YOU. You attacked me in response.

You are indeed a white knight for her.

You like her? Great. You are ok giving her personal info. Great. But I am within my rights to comment on her policy same as you are within yours to state its ok with you because she's, in your opinion, better and more trustworthy than the girls the rest of us see. That's a bunch of crap in my opinion but whatever floats your boat.

3 walls of text so far in response to my simple post stating sharing your job info. Is a bad idea. What's your definition of excessive?

Keep repeating you're not a white knight dude. Your posts all say otherwise.[/QUOTE]Dude why you "white knighting" him? You should zero in on your bff the biggest white lighter of all time you and few others on here you so lovingly call "the professor" that dude is a white knight / b / s'er but what ever.

Have a great day all.

Usasexguide abbreviation for White Knight.

White Knight; A poster who defends or "comes to the rescue" of a provider who has been reviewed poorly, regardless of whether the review is accurate.

[QUOTE=Benz1;4687260]Usasexguide abbreviation for White Knight.

White Knight; A poster who defends or "comes to the rescue" of a provider who has been reviewed poorly, regardless of whether the review is accurate.[/QUOTE]Thanks for clarifying things to Monger! Hopefully this ends this insanity.

To me? My post was an opinion of her policy and you write walls of text defending her. Are YOU clearer now?

[QUOTE=GMacMan;4687448]Thanks for clarifying things to Monger! Hopefully this ends this insanity.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Monger01;4687541]To me? My post was an opinion of her policy and you write walls of text defending her. Are YOU clearer now?[/QUOTE]

I am perfectly clear that you are still not clear. I quoted the post I was responding to (7009) in my post, I had not seen the others when I made my response, otherwise, I would have let things stand. I simply hadn't realized I wasn't on the most recent post. Simple mistake.

It could have ended there with a quick note to me, again, this has to do with respect. You are a more senior member than I, so you could have just sent me a message and asked if I'd seen the other posts on her between 7009 (original) and 7045 (mine), maybe even suggest it looks like I'm white knighting. I would have said, "Oh, thanks dude, I didn't see that. " and ask the admin to delete my original post. End of story. We would both have been respected and the boards would be free of drama.

Intead, you resort ot bullying, personal attacks and insults. Is that really what you want this board to be about? Personally, I think guests and many seniors (not to mention the Admin) would prefer that we respect each other, despite our differences of opinions.

What do you think?

Makes me wish I drank coffee.

[QUOTE=Benz1;4689004]Timing is everything, when you go to Serenity.

I occasionally stop by for a cup of coffee, this time it was closing time and all three were free. The girls are usually cuming and going for appointments or shift change, All three with nothing to do but me is rare. It was a nice reunion.

I would like to thank Hayley (the director and her Ladies) Layla and Jade for the time of my life. That day anyway.

Timing is everything with any girl you ever meet anywhere.

I will repeat with Serenity girls anytime. Especially the new one, Marie the Lactating ex stripper with Awesome TaTas.

[URL]http://grand-rapids.skipthegames.com/massage/exotic/marie/297863996763[/URL][/QUOTE]You had a big definition of "white knighting" just curious does this post fall under that?

[QUOTE=Benz1;4687260]Usasexguide abbreviation for White Knight.

White Knight; A poster who defends or "comes to the rescue" of a provider who has been reviewed poorly, regardless of whether the review is accurate.[/QUOTE]
I think the White Knight definition is very clear.
Reading while drinking might make it confusing.

Dj, posting positive info. On a provider isn't white knighting. If that was the case every positive review would be white knighting.

Vehemently defending a provider is.

Benz just described an experience and opinion.

[QUOTE=DjBiker;4689867]You had a big definition of "white knighting" just curious does this post fall under that?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Monger01;4690371]Dj, posting positive info. On a provider isn't white knighting. If that was the case every positive review would be white knighting.

Vehemently defending a provider is.

Benz just described an experience and opinion.[/QUOTE] IMO this is a Perfect Example of White Knighting
Quote Originally Posted by TeddBear.

I just have one thing to say Jenn's pics are real so you know what your getting before you see her. She's a very pretty girl that provides a great service. Plus she has many reviews that a good. If you are baseing your review on appearance and not quility. Your pretty shallow. If you want to see girls only by looks that usually in my experience give very poor service. Then you should do your homework and look at reviews so you get what you're looking for. I think it's not fair to give Jenn a poor review based on looks because she provides a great service and I will repeat and recommend highly and will most of the mongers on this site.

His response to logical reasoning is printed below.

11-13-17 23:16#222
TeddBear TeddBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 478
Benz your right
I should have put my opinion on this board if Bobbyjoe77 wants to buttfuck Rome123 for being shallow then so be it I don't usually get in to arguments I just state my opinion weather it be right or wrong they can't eat a dick it's still my opinion

Rome123 review
11-12-17 08:46#15286
Rome123 Rome123 is offline
Senior Member


Posts: 117
Savage Jenn with the purple hair
I saw Jenn for the first-time earlier this week and it was a big let down. She was nice and has a cute face but from the neck down was not good at all. When her clothes came off I pretty much just wanted out of there. I got a quick BBBJ and called it good. I definitely would not repeat

IMO Looked pretty simple too me. No need to send in the White Knight.

[QUOTE=DjBiker;4689867]You had a big definition of "white knighting" just curious does this post fall under that?[/QUOTE]Not even close to white knighting. First off no one gave a bad report on these ladies, so no opportunity to white knight, just a real fun, positive story. Don't get why guys want to try creating issues when there aren't any.