-
[QUOTE=SR7D1;5837058][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/460a5156-e421-4cf4-a618-868824f015d7[/URL]
I have no idea where these girls get the idea of their value? Stated her PPM is 800.[/QUOTE]The Seeking ladies are, generally speaking, not escorts. They don't have the same "admission" fee for all comers, puns intended. Met with this one, nice, smart, party girl in a tight spot, and negotiated $400 ppm. Passed, but the point is they will insist on more $ for dudes they are less attracted to (no offense) or who didn't invest in a conversation or meeting to get a better price.
-
Stephgracebaby
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a83c25a3-6a08-4a9d-819a-ba8ce5ab7a34[/URL]
Has anyone partaken?
-
[QUOTE=Vudu33;5840843][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a83c25a3-6a08-4a9d-819a-ba8ce5ab7a34[/URL]
Has anyone partaken?[/QUOTE]I abandoned communication when she offered KIK. I assume anyone who won't offer up a phone number is a con of some type.
KIK olivia_baby_sugar
-
[QUOTE=PainWint;5840961]I abandoned communication when she offered KIK. I assume anyone who won't offer up a phone number is a con of some type.
KIK olivia_baby_sugar[/QUOTE]You're going to miss out on a lot of meets if you assume that. The average female doesn't have a burner phone app. Why would they? They like safety and privacy, just like we do. Not everyone is going to just hand out a phone number. Would you? Younger women use snap and kik for hookups, sugar baby or not. You have to respect that the average female is more vulnerable to violence or just creeps in general.
I have no idea if she's legit or not, I'm speaking in generalities.
-
[QUOTE=TooManyLadies8;5841164]You're going to miss out on a lot of meets if you assume that. The average female doesn't have a burner phone app. Why would they? They like safety and privacy, just like we do. Not everyone is going to just hand out a phone number. Would you? Younger women use snap and kik for hookups, sugar baby or not. You have to respect that the average female is more vulnerable to violence or just creeps in general.
I have no idea if she's legit or not, I'm speaking in generalities.[/QUOTE]Snap or text are the only two I find legit girls using. My record from those that offered KIK was 100% failure for a period of time long enough that I deleted the app from my phone and disregard those that offer no other options. This one "felt" fake the 1st look at her profile. add the KIK thing and I am on to the next. I trust my instincts. I could be wrong it happens all the time. I'd love to hear someone railed her for the weekend and the had to beg her to stop sucking.
-
[QUOTE=PainWint;5840961]I abandoned communication when she offered KIK. I assume anyone who won't offer up a phone number is a con of some type.
KIK olivia_baby_sugar[/QUOTE]Same. 100% of all KiK for me has been a scam.
90% of snap and What's App have been scams. (I hooked up with one SB over WA).
That has been my experience.
-
[QUOTE=PainWint;5841354]Snap or text are the only two I find legit girls using. My record from those that offered KIK was 100% failure for a period of time long enough that I deleted the app from my phone and disregard those that offer no other options. This one "felt" fake the 1st look at her profile. add the KIK thing and I am on to the next. I trust my instincts. I could be wrong it happens all the time. I'd love to hear someone railed her for the weekend and the had to beg her to stop sucking.[/QUOTE]All I am getting at is it's an alternative method of chatting. I thought you meant if it was anything other than texting you weren't interested.
Kik is now likely to be non-legit, not due to anything inherent about the app, but simply because it is not that popular anymore. A few years ago it was the default app to use for privacy on any kind of dating site when wanting to be private and I had no issues with people on there. Much success actually. Now yeah, you're probably right, but some are still using it. Snap seems to.
Be the most popular now. The ratio of scammers there is simply because there are a lot of scammers around. If you're on Tinder or whatever there's profile after profile that are just scams and they all use Snapchat. Here's the rub though, so do all the real girls! All I'm saying is it's very common to have a legit girl not want to use their real number and they are more likely to have snap, WA, insta. Than a texting app. That's my only point.
-
Zara
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/17cac005-08d9-4c03-b605-3a952953485e[/URL]
Been messaging Zara, have not met yet, can't tell if she is a time waster yet. Anyone?
-
Littlebird31
Let's just say I took one for the team.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8ea74560-08b3-4381-bdf5-436e1133a548[/URL]
-
Ok
And the results were?
[QUOTE=NeonRt70;5845841]Let's just say I took one for the team.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8ea74560-08b3-4381-bdf5-436e1133a548[/URL][/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=BudBowl2001;5846641]And the results were?[/QUOTE]I think I have seen her when she was under another screen name, bigger then claims, nice girl, huge tits, she will blow up your phone later though, lots of drama in her life, I was 1 and done, she was open to anything regular and reasonably priced like a Benjamin.
-
[QUOTE=NeonRt70;5845841]Let's just say I took one for the team.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8ea74560-08b3-4381-bdf5-436e1133a548[/URL][/QUOTE]What does that mean?
-
Scarlett
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/218883d8-2f75-4e06-a5dd-0cd64bdcfae1[/URL]
Met Scarlett, nice woman. Little bigger / thicker than I prefer but nice and real in case you saw her profile and needed a little more info.
-
Lillbitt
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/592a4b4a-6654-4baf-9958-7fa31e1e71b2[/URL]
This one is requesting pic fairly quick from 567 area code. I told her she is out of coverage.
-
[QUOTE=Danut;5850354][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/592a4b4a-6654-4baf-9958-7fa31e1e71b2[/URL]
This one is requesting pic fairly quick from 567 area code. I told her she is out of coverage.[/QUOTE]She told me Edgewater and needs $ to meet for food / drinks.