General Reports

[QUOTE=ThermoNuclear;2207699]I am having some luck. Too early to tell for sure, but I am thinking SA coincides more with what I am looking for.

I'll open a thread when I become a Seor sometime next month.

I agree some discussion would be very helpful to alert others to masquerading providers, ridiculous expectations, dead ends, &etc.[/QUOTE]Good idea to have one, I'd only suggest that you make it a rule that no one posts the sa girls usernames in the thread. They tend to be a much more private / utr bunch than escorts, I'm just thinking we might scare off all the local talent if they find out there is a public forum where they're being discussed. Pm can take care of specifics like that if needed. Just IMHO tho. Your thread, your rules.

What is SA?

[QUOTE=Orbits;2208439]Good idea to have one, I'd only suggest that you make it a rule that no one posts the sa girls usernames in the thread. They tend to be a much more private / utr bunch than escorts, I'm just thinking we might scare off all the local talent if they find out there is a public forum where they're being discussed. Pm can take care of specifics like that if needed. Just IMHO tho. Your thread, your rules.[/QUOTE]Good advice. I do not want to scare off the ladies. Unsure how to resolve. Certainly no one on this board would tell them!

You are exactly right-on with the UTR comparison, yet somehow they are being discussed here (PMs?

Lisa in Sevierville has moved into a new apartment and is wanting her old friends and some new ones to help break it in.

[QUOTE=TheLoad2;2207000]Is this MadysenLuvz girl real? What about the Bella from bp chick? I get Pm'd asking questions all the time so spare me the search engine mumbo jumbo! Any info guys?[/QUOTE]She's a great good looking provider.

[QUOTE=Nobody246;2208545]What is SA?[/QUOTE]It took me a minute or two, but I'm guessing that's "Seeking Arrangements. ".

[QUOTE=GaltGuy;2209314]It took me a minute or two, but I'm guessing that's "Seeking Arrangements. ".[/QUOTE]Hell I didn't no what that SA meant either. SA suddenly appeared and I guess we all was suppose to immediately know what it meant. "not".

There should be a USA rule, if you use a new acronym please right it out that way everyone will learn it and no it. LOL.

Just my to cents worth.

[QUOTE=Thumper2662;2209022]She's a great good looking provider.[/QUOTE]I saw her before she pm'd and reminded me I just didn't know her name (smh)! I will see her again soon.

[QUOTE=Niceone1;2209348]Hell I didn't no what that SA meant either. SA suddenly appeared and I guess we all was suppose to immediately know what it meant. "not".

There should be a USA rule, if you use a new acronym please right it out that way everyone will learn it and no it. LOL.

Just my to cents worth.[/QUOTE]Sorry, I just assumed.

[QUOTE=GaltGuy;2209314]It took me a minute or two, but I'm guessing that's "Seeking Arrangements. ".[/QUOTE]Just wondering, would that not be the same thread as "MEMBERS seeking women" that we already have? Or am I missing something?

[QUOTE=EchoEcho;2210076]Just wondering, would that not be the same thread as "MEMBERS seeking women" that we already have? Or am I missing something?[/QUOTE]Check out Richmond VA's "sugarbabies" thread, I guess it would be sort of like that. It's pretty different from the seeking women thread.

[QUOTE=EchoEcho;2210076]Just wondering, would that not be the same thread as "MEMBERS seeking women" that we already have? Or am I missing something?[/QUOTE]I am thinking it would be more akin to the UTR thread:

To discuss and trade intel on the ladies on arrangement sites.

Rather than "MEMBERS seeking women": advertise for ladies for specific situations.

And to those baffled by the use of "SA": that caught me too, but a Señor graciously explained that to me.

Glad to know I'm not the only one not to know all the lingo.

"When everything old is noob again. ".

I have had excellent luck for a decade with SA and have had 2 long term relationships from it. AMPs are my source of comfort in the absence of an SA chick.

Seeks.

There are eight guys on the list this morning. All eight for patronizing within 100 ft of a church or 1. 5 miles of a school. Anybody got any details?

Yurengr.

[QUOTE=Yurengr;2212212]There are eight guys on the list this morning. All eight for patronizing within 100 ft of a church or 1. 5 miles of a school. Anybody got any details?

Yurengr.[/QUOTE]With no ladies on the list, sounds like a sting to me.