Printable View
Angelgirltori.
Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9663-d207-4897-907f-c1e3b83de0b5[/URL]
[QUOTE=TryinAgain2;4038858]Angelgirltori.
Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9663-d207-4897-907f-c1e3b83de0b5[/URL][/QUOTE]Thank you so much for providing links to your reviews, even if the user may delete their profile in the future.
With the deletion of the advanced search button on SA, it's so much easier to follow links here straight to the profile.
[QUOTE=DrSummer;4038404]Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.
1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.
2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.
3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.
4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.
Play safe.
Dr. S.[/QUOTE]My brain was telling me the same things. I do age validate and ask for state issues I'd at the first meet. Don't talk expectations other than a general SD / SB relationship in the setup, and only offer to OT for the meet, and maybe some trivial specific expense just for meeting.
In this case, the cooncidence of the delays in meeting, the ask for identifying clothing, a guy sitting in a truck scoping me out (probably bored and just people watching), and then the arrival of a plain clothes female officer in a marked car. Spooked me. I realize the worst that could have happen would have been a "talking to of the risks of prostitution" and nothing more, but the circumstances just told me to leave.
I did reconnect with xxSexxiLexxi and apologized for ditching the meet, and I think we are good now.
[QUOTE=DrSummer;4038404]Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.
1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.
2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.
3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.
4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.
Play safe.
Dr. S.[/QUOTE]There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.
Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.
[QUOTE=WreckItRight;4039302]There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.
Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.[/QUOTE]Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?
1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.
2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.
SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.
[QUOTE=Romeoinsd;4038926]Thank you so much for providing links to your reviews, even if the user may delete their profile in the future.
With the deletion of the advanced search button on SA, it's so much easier to follow links here straight to the profile.[/QUOTE]The profile text search feature is back. Still good to send links though if you can.
[QUOTE=TryinAgain2;4039532]Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?
1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.
2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.
SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.[/QUOTE]Well, Bob0324 says via text that he's fucked the 17 year old, and while she denies it, she still swears she's only 17. So one of them is lying and possibly Bob fucked an under age girl. Keep that in mind about the safety of his recommendations.
[QUOTE=TryinAgain2;4038858]Angelgirltori.
Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9663-d207-4897-907f-c1e3b83de0b5[/URL][/QUOTE]You are correct that her communication is one of the worst, she can have a piss poor attitude and she acts like she's gods gift. However, on 2 occasions she has texted me out of the blue wanting to meet up. She showed both times and we had a great time. She is cute and has a great body. Obviously I wouldn't put a lot of effort into her, but if you keep her on your radar she may surprise you sometime when she's hard up for some cash.
I met up with Xoxoxo_xoxoxo. She is very tiny like her pics show. Probably 5 ft tall 100 lbs. Kinda in a rundown house on the Westside. Not sure I would go in the dark. She does have a female roommate but she didn't bother us. Really good BBBJ and on went the cover and she rode me cg and then doggy. She is very tight and gets very wet and creamy. I pulled out off went the cover and finished with CIM. Not too bad for $.2. I think she is a pro though. Maybe hit it again in a pinch.
[QUOTE=MljThick7;4041245]I met up with Xoxoxo_xoxoxo. She is very tiny like her pics show. Probably 5 ft tall 100 lbs. Kinda in a rundown house on the Westside. Not sure I would go in the dark. She does have a female roommate but she didn't bother us. Really good BBBJ and on went the cover and she rode me cg and then doggy. She is very tight and gets very wet and creamy. I pulled out off went the cover and finished with CIM. Not too bad for $.2. I think she is a pro though. Maybe hit it again in a pinch.[/QUOTE]Pretty dirty and big time drug use. She scared me. Did suck good for $. Will not be back way to filthy.
Is the only way to read or send a message by subscription on SA? Does that go for both men and women?
Anyone know how to direct contact (PM please) or has she ghosted the sugar scene? Not on seeking much.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8734a20d-d409-4c3e-aeb6-4c3ed20c4a60[/URL]
[QUOTE=Dnims;4045380]Is the only way to read or send a message by subscription on SA? Does that go for both men and women?[/QUOTE]Long answer: "Attractive" accounts are free, I believe. That's why so few take them seriously. I think a premium account just offers more controls and filters, etc. "Successful" accounts have to be a paid account in order to read msgs. I believe if your account is new, and you load a photo, it says you can send msgs, but they are edited. You can't just send your contact info to bypass paying and you still can't read replies, so that's a misleading way to get someone to join and then get acquainted with the site before realizing the high cost, LOL.
That's all open for correction if someone knows better than I.
I know most here want NSA or a harem of girls, but if one wants a true SB, monogamous commitment without thousands in monthly allowance, they can be found. Had one short term in last Spring (most amazing girl I've ever met), but now I think she's dancing, dammit. And it's taken quite awhile but I just found another one and we both disabled our accounts yesterday. I've talked to several that say they want that, but few actually do. Worth the find if that's what you're looking for!
I met up with a nice young girl who is just beginning this type of adventure. She is a very small BBW. Very nice ass and small b cup tits. Extremely tight. The only catch is you have to see her during the day because she lives with her boyfriend so she plays while he's at work. She's not a GFE yet but I think with time that's an option. Still kinda timid. I will not give out her information on here because the last time I posted something to help us all out someone contacted her and told her that I wrote a blog about her on here. What a d__ck! Senior members only contact me for her username on SA. I will not give out her number.
Saw her yesterday. She has a hotel room in Carmel till Tuesday. Yes she is a pro but very nice body and the best BBBJCIM that I have had in years. Thin small tits pm me for more! JB.
Cool girl. Playful and easy going. No limits as far as I could tell. Not my type, a little thick and a moms body. But if you like her pics she is a good time.
She's been on a while and she's all business so I know one of you has intel. I'm on the fence.
[QUOTE=ZakkWylde;4048411]She's been on a while and she's all business so I know one of you has intel. I'm on the fence.[/QUOTE]Should have searched before I posted. She's a no go. Colts fucked me up today. Head ain't right lmao.
[QUOTE=ZakkWylde;4048407]Cool girl. Playful and easy going. No limits as far as I could tell. Not my type, a little thick and a moms body. But if you like her pics she is a good time.[/QUOTE]Damn she looks pretty good to me.
Scam. Avoid.
Another scam. Unfortunately.
[QUOTE=JohnBuddy;4047836]Saw her yesterday. She has a hotel room in Carmel till Tuesday. Yes she is a pro but very nice body and the best BBBJCIM that I have had in years. Thin small tits pm me for more! JB.[/QUOTE]Janna890 is Kristen. She is much talked about in the Escort thread.
Went ahead and pulled the trigger on this one. Pretty late 20's MILF, healthy slim athletic build, a few baby stretch marks nothing bad, tall prob 5'9, cool chick though, pretty intelligent, smokes a little weed but not into anything else I detected. Typical 2 small kids, struggles financially and finally figured out she's settin on a moneymaker! Very open menu. WITH the exception she doesn't really like to give head. She will but you can tell she's not a head master! All other acronyms apply and she loves to get off! It was reported before on this thread she was asking 250 quick visit! She got a reality check! I would try 150 a whatever. She's not a clock watcher and new to this seen. Has incall but would prefer you get a room because her sitter watches her 2 kids at her place.
TB.
What was the allowance you gifted her to meet?
[QUOTE=JaxSon07;4040407]You are correct that her communication is one of the worst, she can have a piss poor attitude and she acts like she's gods gift. However, on 2 occasions she has texted me out of the blue wanting to meet up. She showed both times and we had a great time. She is cute and has a great body. Obviously I wouldn't put a lot of effort into her, but if you keep her on your radar she may surprise you sometime when she's hard up for some cash.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;4051433]What was the allowance you gifted her to meet?[/QUOTE]She told me there's no way she'll play on the first date, only the second IF you click, and she wants 200 for the first date before talking about further dates. I think Jax May have caught her before she adopted this attitude but again, I can't speak for him.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
I have been trying SA now for a couple of months. I have enjoyed it for the most part! Sometimes the girls can get annoying but I think its the same for providers as well. I will be honest I typically go for the girls that make it the easiest. I don't put a lot of effort into it. I have found that most of the dates can be had for $$ 5. I have invested some time in a few to see where it goes. Here has been my last 30 days or so.
Taylor169 - I would say she is a semi-pro. She is definitely a talker for sure. Hot little body and definitely fun $$. 5.
Blondescorpio1 - I have put a fair amount of time into this. She is super hot and I just want to meet. Lots of texting sent lots of pics but I can't lock down a meet.
Aalex918 - Seems like she is down for what ever. Met for a car date $. 60.
Cookiedancer98 - Super hot, easy to text with. Profile says Indy but she is in Bloomington. Have not had time to meet her.
Daisy00 - Very nice, seems down to earth. Great body. Met for several car dates $. 60.
Mia32114 - Easy to talk with down to meet but she has GPS for sure. I wasn't that into her for the money she was asking.
Sbb8832 - Have been talking on and off for awhile now. I have tried to meet several times but can make it work. She has a super hot body so I'm putting in the extra effort.
That's about it for now. I have a few other regulars I see as well. I have also seen some of the pros off the Site as well but they have been talked about in the past.
[QUOTE=Bob0324;4052158]The morons are the ones paying for pictures, videos and public meets.[/QUOTE]Two women have told me, and now TB told me the same thing from one of his SB's, that you, Bob0324, sent them screenshots of this site and the reviews, out of the blue, trying to stir shit up with the guys they've seen that have reported here. I'm not sure if that's against A2's rules or not,[blue][Deleted by Admin]
If I could step in, no it's not against the rules for some idiot to show chicks the site, we don't try and police people in their private lives.
Let me tell you what is against the rules though, starting a stupid fucking fight like this on a review thread. That's against the rules.
Let me clue you into something while I'm taking the time to write. One guy can't move the market. If one guy paid one chick 800 bills for a piece of ass it doesn't mean that everybody else is paying more. Chicks need to pay the rent every month and NONE of these hookers you guys are calling Sugar Babies have actual financial arrangements with anybody so they allways need to find new dick to suck to pay the bills and with BackPage gone finding those guys is harder. if they want some ridiculous amount say no and go fuck one of the other hookers who's calling herself a sugar baby.
If you really want to know what's driving up the prices it's evey single one of you idiots who keeps calling these hookers sugar babies instead of prostitutes. That's what's driving up the price.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Me7239;4052217]I have been trying SA now for a couple of months. I have enjoyed it for the most part! Sometimes the girls can get annoying but I think its the same for providers as well. I will be honest I typically go for the girls that make it the easiest. I don't put a lot of effort into it. I have found that most of the dates can be had for $$ 5. I have invested some time in a few to see where it goes. Here has been my last 30 days or so.
Taylor169 - I would say she is a semi-pro. She is definitely a talker for sure. Hot little body and definitely fun $$. 5.
Blondescorpio1 - I have put a fair amount of time into this. She is super hot and I just want to meet. Lots of texting sent lots of pics but I can't lock down a meet.
Aalex918 - Seems like she is down for what ever. Met for a car date $. 60.
Cookiedancer98 - Super hot, easy to text with. Profile says Indy but she is in Bloomington. Have not had time to meet her.
Daisy00 - Very nice, seems down to earth. Great body. Met for several car dates $. 60.
Mia32114 - Easy to talk with down to meet but she has GPS for sure. I wasn't that into her for the money she was asking.
Sbb8832 - Have been talking on and off for awhile now. I have tried to meet several times but can make it work. She has a super hot body so I'm putting in the extra effort.
That's about it for now. I have a few other regulars I see as well. I have also seen some of the pros off the Site as well but they have been talked about in the past.[/QUOTE]Taylor169 is heather definitely a Pro.
[blue]Fuck, they are ALL pros, when a guys is reviewing this many chicks they are not sugar babies they are hookers.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Me7239;4053405]I believe the target moves depending on the type of SB you are trying to talk with. This range can vary but I believe the scale below is fairly accurate. I like to stay in the $$ per meet but I will be the first person to admit I have paid more if its someone that I really want to see. However $800 seems a little bit crazy even for me. Its one thing if you are seeing a high end provider and know what you are getting but in the SB world its a huge gamble. I typically stick to the scale below. It has worked for me in the past.
I put all SB in four groups. College 18-24, Moms 18-30, Milfs 35-45, Semi Pro. Pro.
College 18-24: Typically the hottest girls. A lot of them this is their first time in the hobby. They read an article about some girl making $2000.00 and think it will happen to them. You get lucky with some of them but most require a lot of work and hand holding to get to the finish line. These profiles also disappear the fastest. You have to jump quick. I have paid from $ - $$$.5 to meet.
Moms 18 - 30: Reality has set in on most of these girls. They have finally realized that life is hard. The girls are definitely still hot, however they are more realistic and its typically easy to talk with and set up a meet. I have paid $ - $$.
Milfs 35-45: They know what's up. Typically a meeting can be set in very little time. Typically have a place and are down to meet. I have paid between $-$$.
Semi Pro. Pro: These are the girls you know are down. You can tell by the wording in the profile / Pictures they post. Easy set up have incall and are ready to meet. You can typically find and add for them somewhere as well. I have paid between $ - $$. 5.
I like to stay in the first two groups if I can. Sometimes I get tired and a sure thing is nice. Like WreckItRight said its a moving target most times and you just need to stay where you are comfortable. I agree we should not share this info with SB. It just doesn't help us out any. The good thing is everyday there is a new group that knows nothing about the life![/QUOTE]In my on and off again 5 yr SA experience know truer picture has ever been painted so concise! If your paying more than the above mentioned rates or anymore than 2-3 months in a year for SA and can't get overwhelmed by the possibilities maybe the 4th catagory is a more realistic option for you. There is obviously some bleed over from from one category to another but from the description to the rate range it's dead on the money. Unless overpaying compensates for your lack of experience, looks, game or money is just no object, it's a great "rule of thumb" for this area of the country!
Thanks for the post Me7239.
[QUOTE=A2][blue]
If I could step in, no it's not against the rules for some idiot to show chicks the site, we don't try and police people in their private lives.
Let me tell you what is against the rules though, starting a stupid fucking fight like this on a review thread. That's against the rules.
Let me clue you into something while I'm taking the time to write. One guy can't move the market. If one guy paid one chick 800 bills for a piece of ass it doesn't mean that everybody else is paying more. Chicks need to pay the rent every month and NONE of these hookers you guys are calling Sugar Babies have actual financial arrangements with anybody so they allways need to find new dick to suck to pay the bills and with BackPage gone finding those guys is harder. if they want some ridiculous amount say no and go fuck one of the other hookers who's calling herself a sugar baby.
If you really want to know what's driving up the prices it's evey single one of you idiots who keeps calling these hookers sugar babies instead of prostitutes. That's what's driving up the price.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]Look, I get your point but this thread is titled "Sugar Babies" and that's what at least SOME of us are looking for. I've had arrangements in the past and I'm working on one RN. A real arrangement with just one girl, or at least where SHE doesn't know I have others and she's not seeing 5-10 other doodes. The insight from reviews is good to see so I know who's doing who / what and root out what I'm looking for versus who to avoid. But Shit like a fucktard passing on reviews to piss a girl off at the guy reporting her just makes guys NOT want to put up reviews and that makes the thread less valuable to me and others. But if less reviews, therefore less views and less ad exposures / less revenue is cool with you, then by all means, get shitty with me for starting a stupid fight and let the fucktard keep doing what he's doing. . . .
[QUOTE=TryinAgain2;4053782]Look, I get your point but this thread is titled "Sugar Babies" and that's what at least SOME of us are looking for. I've had arrangements in the past and I'm working on one RN. A real arrangement with just one girl, or at least where SHE doesn't know I have others and she's not seeing 5-10 other doodes. The insight from reviews is good to see so I know who's doing who / what and root out what I'm looking for versus who to avoid. But Shit like a fucktard passing on reviews to piss a girl off at the guy reporting her just makes guys NOT want to put up reviews and that makes the thread less valuable to me and others. But if less reviews, therefore less views and less ad exposures / less revenue is cool with you, then by all means, get shitty with me for starting a stupid fight and let the fucktard keep doing what he's doing. . . .[/QUOTE]That's what a Sugar Daddy is. Fuck the guy who started this site isn't a monger, he's a full on SD. I know lots of guys who are and some of them have one and others have multiple chicks they have on retainer. Some of them pay a monthly stipend and throw bonus money, some do an all you can eat price, I even know a guy who pays them a set amount every time they make him pop. What they ALL have in common is that the guy is the sole source of the pay for play money.
Most of these chicks are low volume (at best) prostitutes. There is nothing wrong with prostitutes, I fucking love prostitutes but they are escorts not sugar babies and most of these guys are John's not SD's they just want to feel like they are somehow better than other "mongers" and the chicks are somehow one a higher level and all they are succeeding in doing is pushing the price point up and contributing to the overall GPS factor in Indy. I don't care what lies they tell the girls, that's all about the game and the girls lie just as much but they shouldn't be lying to themselves.
I just get irritated reading it sometimes. I probably should post about it in the prick yard and not here. Apologies.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;4054376]That's what a Sugar Daddy is. Fuck the guy who started this site isn't a monger, he's a full on SD. I know lots of guys who are and some of them have one and others have multiple chicks they have on retainer. Some of them pay a monthly stipend and throw bonus money, some do an all you can eat price, I even know a guy who pays them a set amount every time they make him pop. What they ALL have in common is that the guy is the sole source of the pay for play money.
Most of these chicks are low volume (at best) prostitutes. There is nothing wrong with prostitutes, I fucking love prostitutes but they are escorts not sugar babies and most of these guys are John's not SD's they just want to feel like they are somehow better than other "mongers" and the chicks are somehow one a higher level and all they are succeeding in doing is pushing the price point up and contributing to the overall GPS factor in Indy. I don't care what lies they tell the girls, that's all about the game and the girls lie just as much but they shouldn't be lying to themselves.
I just get irritated reading it sometimes. I probably should post about it in the prick yard and not here. Apologies.
A2.[/QUOTE]Appreciate the affirmation. And sorry for getting extra shitty in PM (assuming you've read it or don't ban me when you do, LOL).
[QUOTE=Admin2;4054376]That's what a Sugar Daddy is. Fuck the guy who started this site isn't a monger, he's a full on SD. I know lots of guys who are and some of them have one and others have multiple chicks they have on retainer. Some of them pay a monthly stipend and throw bonus money, some do an all you can eat price, I even know a guy who pays them a set amount every time they make him pop. What they ALL have in common is that the guy is the sole source of the pay for play money.
Most of these chicks are low volume (at best) prostitutes. There is nothing wrong with prostitutes, I fucking love prostitutes but they are escorts not sugar babies and most of these guys are John's not SD's they just want to feel like they are somehow better than other "mongers" and the chicks are somehow one a higher level and all they are succeeding in doing is pushing the price point up and contributing to the overall GPS factor in Indy. I don't care what lies they tell the girls, that's all about the game and the girls lie just as much but they shouldn't be lying to themselves.
I just get irritated reading it sometimes. I probably should post about it in the prick yard and not here. Apologies.
A2.[/QUOTE]If a chick only sucks one guys dick with a monthly allowance, he takes care of all her needs, is she a mistress or a prostitute by your definition? If she sucks two or more different dicks then I agree she is a prostitute.
[QUOTE=TommyButt;4053523]In my on and off again 5 yr SA experience know truer picture has ever been painted so concise! If your paying more than the above mentioned rates or anymore than 2-3 months in a year for SA and can't get overwhelmed by the possibilities maybe the 4th catagory is a more realistic option for you. There is obviously some bleed over from from one category to another but from the description to the rate range it's dead on the money. Unless overpaying compensates for your lack of experience, looks, game or money is just no object, it's a great "rule of thumb" for this area of the country!
Thanks for the post Me7239.[/QUOTE]Is the 31 - 34 year old's (not previously mentioned). Hot unmarried or recently divorced, just entering their sexual prime, wanting affection and company with NSA, fuck for dinner and companionship, not really needing a lot of $, they just like sex!
[QUOTE=PowerTool;4054784]If a chick only sucks one guys dick with a monthly allowance, he takes care of all her needs, is she a mistress or a prostitute by your definition? If she sucks two or more different dicks then I agree she is a prostitute.[/QUOTE]All sugar babies are prostitutes but not all prostitutes are sugar babies. Sugar Babies are not better they just work a different deal, usually one with a much higher CPO (Cost per Orgasm).
Prostitutes that are sucking many dicks are not sugar babies, they are only making you think so in order to charge a lot more.
I'm not saying it's a rule, I'm saying this is how I see it. I pay chicks for easy, casual sex on demand. When I want a nut I see a hooker. I have no need to complicate what is literally the worlds oldest profession. I do not judge real SD's, different strokes for different folks, I just tire of guys calling prostitutes sugar babies and acting like they are HH when they are just fucking a hooker.
A2.
[QUOTE=MljThick7;4041245]I met up with Xoxoxo_xoxoxo. She is very tiny like her pics show. Probably 5 ft tall 100 lbs. Kinda in a rundown house on the Westside. Not sure I would go in the dark. She does have a female roommate but she didn't bother us. Really good BBBJ and on went the cover and she rode me cg and then doggy. She is very tight and gets very wet and creamy. I pulled out off went the cover and finished with CIM. Not too bad for $.2. I think she is a pro though. Maybe hit it again in a pinch.[/QUOTE]She's now Sugarbabiixo. Two I's. I have not met her but based on the other report indicating heavy drug use, I don't plan to.
Beware Sierra23 not the girl in the pictures and will dash! Be safe JB.
[QUOTE=JohnBuddy;4064512]Beware Sierra23 not the girl in the pictures and will dash! Be safe JB.[/QUOTE]I was talking to Sierra23 and she wanted money sent upfront to "show (I'm) serious". I told her to fuck off and she blocked me. But is she back as Ashy1304? Can't tell for sure but the pics look similar.