[QUOTE=Troop]That blows Jan. Same sort of thing happened to me not long ago. I feel ya brother.[/QUOTE]I knew that I'd seen those pictures before.
Reasin....yep, that's her.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Troop]That blows Jan. Same sort of thing happened to me not long ago. I feel ya brother.[/QUOTE]I knew that I'd seen those pictures before.
Reasin....yep, that's her.
I just saw this on BP and wanted to share with you all in case you missed it.
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful-22/4264414[/url]
Drugs are bad, mkay.
And is it me or does Tammy look like Frodo?
[QUOTE=Mr Horney]I just saw this on BP and wanted to share with you all in case you missed it.
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful-22/4264414[/url]
Drugs are bad, mkay.
And is it me or does Tammy look like Frodo?[/QUOTE]There is no way that 3rd and 4th pic are her. The first 2. Sad
You were right. I went there expecting to see Reasin and I was disgusted with who opened the door.
[QUOTE=PeterPiper52]I knew that I'd seen those pictures before.
Reasin....yep, that's her.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Speedfreak]There is no way that 3rd and 4th pic are her. The first 2. Sad[/QUOTE]
I think there's some confusion here. The first, third, and fourth pictures are all obviously of the same girl, Somer. The second picture is of Tammy. Both girls have worked the streets and as escorts.
[QUOTE=Mr Horney]I just saw this on BP and wanted to share with you all in case you missed it.
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful-22/4264414[/url]
Drugs are bad, mkay.
And is it me or does Tammy look like Frodo?[/QUOTE]That would be very useful information IF IT WERE TRUE, but how do we know if any of it really IS true? There is nothing in it that is really verifiable (no names or links to booking reports citing IV drug use or criminal transmission of HIV or even dates that the photos were taken) and it actually seems to me to have a very questionable tone to it. Why was it even posted? Was it really to warn us OR, as it seems to me, was it just written by someone who has some personal vendetta against these provider(s) and would resort to making things up. The 2nd photo is clearly a different person from all the rest (Tammy, I guess). The girl in the 3rd photo actually appears quite hot to me. I suppose she might or might not be the girl in the 1st mug shot (not nearly so hot), but how many ever really look that good right after they've been arrested? And the posting itself was very poorly written (e.g. addressed to us guys and then says "to earn your guy's money", as if written to our wives and girlfriends). The fact that Somer allegedly is involved with drugs is entirely credible (how many of these girls aren't to one degree or another?) but shared IV needles and HIV+? MAYBE yes, but IMHO it is AT LEAST just as possibly no.
Then there is also this OTHER posting on BP: [url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/re-caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful/4271316[/url]. According to THIS posting, the posting you linked to was actually posted by another provider and her pimp, who are really the ones who are bad news, and the info they provided about Somer/Beautiful/Chloe was all made up because this provider had the audacity to try and break away from that pimp and keep all the money she earns. And THAT posting at least provides FULL names that you can actually look up.
When reading ANYTHING, whether on this board or elsewhere, but particularly if you have no idea of who is posting it and why (which is particularly a problem on BP), one should always read it with a healthy dose of skepticism and a very critical mind. Does it make sense? Is it believable? Could something else be going on here? What seems more plausible? One can keep those postings in mind due to their POSSIBLE veracity, but should also put less stock in those postings to the degree they don't seem entirely credible. And, in my view at least, the posting about Chloe doesn't, at least not entirely. But who knows? Maybe BOTH postings have elements of truth in them along with a few embellishments.
Whoever it is that is posting about Tammy/Tammi has a real hard-on for her. If I get really mad at someone, I "might" post something. I say it and move on . This person just keeps up the pressure. True or not, this poster wants her out of the bizz. At least in the bay area.
I don't understand that there are guys out there that post mug shots and then coment on how ugly the girl looks. I can just see the just arrested hooker to tell the police, hold on a minute. I need to comb my hair and freshen up my makeup before you take that photo. Are you guys nuts? or what? Visualize what YOU would look like at 3 am after an arrest. Get real guys! Bill Ho
[QUOTE=Chase Star]That would be very useful information IF IT WERE TRUE, but how do we know if any of it really IS true? There is nothing in it that is really verifiable (no names or links to booking reports citing IV drug use or criminal transmission of HIV or even dates that the photos were taken) and it actually seems to me to have a very questionable tone to it. Why was it even posted? Was it really to warn us OR, as it seems to me, was it just written by someone who has some personal vendetta against these provider(s) and would resort to making things up. The 2nd photo is clearly a different person from all the rest (Tammy, I guess). The girl in the 3rd photo actually appears quite hot to me. I suppose she might or might not be the girl in the 1st mug shot (not nearly so hot), but how many ever really look that good right after they've been arrested? And the posting itself was very poorly written (e.g. addressed to us guys and then says "to earn your guy's money", as if written to our wives and girlfriends).
Then there is also this OTHER posting on BP: [url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/re-caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful/4271316[/url]. According to THIS posting, the posting you linked to was actually posted by another provider and her pimp, who are really the ones who are bad news, and the info they provided about Somer/Beautiful/Chloe was all made up because this provider had the audacity to try and break away from that pimp and keep all the money she earns. And THAT posting at least provides FULL names that you can actually look up.
When reading ANYTHING, whether on this board or elsewhere, but particularly if you have no idea of who is posting it and why (which is particularly a problem on BP), one should always read it with a healthy dose of skepticism and a very critical mind. Does it make sense? Is it believable? Could something else be going on here? What seems more plausible? One can keep those postings in mind due to their POSSIBLE veracity, but should also put less stock in those postings to the degree they don't seem entirely credible. And, in my view at least, the posting about Chloe doesn't, at least not entirely. But who knows? Maybe BOTH postings have elements of truth in them along with a few embellishments.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bill Ho]I don't understand that there are guys out there that post mug shots and then coment on how ugly the girl looks. I can just see the just arrested hooker to tell the police, hold on a minute. I need to comb my hair and freshen up my makeup before you take that photo. Are you guys nuts? or what? Visualize what YOU would look like at 3 am after an arrest. Get real guys! Bill Ho[/QUOTE]It's certainly true that you can't expect everyone to look their best in a mug shot, but its also true that there ARE actually some that are so fugly that, no matter how much hair combing or fresh make-up they'd throw on, its hard to imagine they wouldn't STILL be fugly even after all that. But I agree that the gals in those 2 particular mug shots, while those shots may not make them look like any raving beauty queens, at least they didn't look so horrible that they couldn't be passable looking under other circumstances.
Somer and Tammy are both very good and they are SELPs (Skiper Endorsed Local Providers)
I have not seen either one in a long time but I have posted pictires of them on the Streetwalker page. Feel free to PM me a working phone number for either of them and I'll be happy to go try them out again and report back to the board.
Clearly the person who made the post blasting them on backpage has an agenda. But so do I, I plan to fuck them both; one at a time or tag team.
Keep it up boys!
Skip out.
This provider is close to my office so I Popped over for a visit after work.
Had a very nice time.
[quote]I'm now SIX Months Pregnant and just starting to show & Lactating -so I'm ALWAYS Wet & Creamy. She NEVER seems to get enough!! U wanna come see me for a while?
My place is SAFE, COMFORTABLE & PRIVATE so we can relax & do whatever we want or I can come to you and Im PRIVATE and DISCREET-plus I am a Certified SuperFreak so when u pick me, I Guarantee u will be Damn Glad u did...
I am a Fetish Queen & a GFE Specialist-so Just Let Me know What u Like & I'll Treat u Right...
So do u like my Big, Juicy, Milk-Filled Titties & my Luscious Hips? And do u like Tight, Creamy, Young, White .....? And have u ever wanted to have your way with a Pretty Pregnant Woman? Do u think I'm Pretty? Well, here I am!!
So STOP Wasting Precious Time & Give Me a Call.
INCALL and OUTCALL will TRAVEL!!!Open Minded!!!24 Hours!!!G.F.E!!!Specials all DAY and NIGHT!!!Check out me on T.E.R id#131005!!!NEW REVIEWS,NEW REVIEWS!!!*****OFFERING MY FUN FILLED FANTASY SPECIALS*****just ask!!!!
INCALL 80 ROSES FOR H/H and 150 for HOUR
OUTCALL 140 ROSES FOR H/H and 180 ROSES for HOUR
XOXOX MISSY 813 802 4140 new number guys!!!! XOXOX[/quote]
[QUOTE=Skiper]Somer and Tammy are both very good and they are SELPs (Skiper Endorsed Local Providers)
I have not seen either one in a long time but I have posted pictires of them on the Streetwalker page. Feel free to PM me a working phone number for either of them and I'll be happy to go try them out again and report back to the board.
Clearly the person who made the post blasting them on backpage has an agenda. But so do I, I plan to fuck them both; one at a time or tag team.
Keep it up boys!
Skip out.[/QUOTE]
I remember MyVice posted some nice pictures of Tammy. I dont recall seeing any by you. Perhaps if I search.
[QUOTE=Bill Ho]I don't understand that there are guys out there that post mug shots and then coment on how ugly the girl looks. I can just see the just arrested hooker to tell the police, hold on a minute. I need to comb my hair and freshen up my makeup before you take that photo. Are you guys nuts? or what? Visualize what YOU would look like at 3 am after an arrest. Get real guys! Bill Ho[/QUOTE]
Yea I don't expect her to look like a super model but damn she does look strung out. Simply being arrested does not make your eyes look like that. I've seen her ads in the past and posted really cute pics. So pics 3 and 4 are her. Mugs shots to me are actually a better representation of who they are currently instead of dated glamour shots they normally post.
From a cute escort I'd pay 150 for to a drugged out SW I wouldn't pay 40 for. I'm not saying it's her fault just making that observation.
[QUOTE=Mr Horney]... Mugs shots to me are actually a better representation of who they are currently instead of dated glamour shots they normally post. ...[/QUOTE]I'd have to disagree with you somewhat there. To me neither are necessarily an accurate reflection of who they are currently.
Let's start with the fact that the person who posted that smear attack did not include any real full name or booking date in their post. Without any easy way to look up the arrest report ourselves, one doesn't have any more real idea when those mug shots were taken than they do for the glamor photos. For all we know those mug shots could be dated too.
As for many arrestees looking strung out in their photos, duh, of course they would. Many of them have JUST been arrested for driving drunk, getting caught with drugs, etc. (probably in the midst of high that caused them to do something stupid to make them get caught). Just as the glamor photos are taken when the subject is made up to look there best, the mug shots are usually taken when a person is bound to look their absolute worst. And lets not fool ourselves many if not most of these gals, whether the streetwalker or the "cute escort", are involved with drugs to one degree or another (which is usually at least part of why they do what they do) and most of them that are have probably looked pretty bad at times because of it whether they've ever been arrested for it or not.
Presumably when they're out selling their wares on the street or expecting a john to show up at their hotel room from BP, they're going to go to at least a little effort to clean themselves up (just as most of us do ourselves when we go for an incall), take a shower, brush their hair, slap on some make up (whether to cover up the rings under their eyes or the needle marks on their arms). Okay, they probably won't look as good as they did in their professionally done glamor shot particularly if the shot is really old (although most of them don't even use professionally done glamor shots), but most of the time they won't look as bad as they did in an undated mug shot either. IMHO, the truth is usually someplace in between.
Of course if its a glamor shot of somebody else entirely or the shot is really as old as you suggest, all bets are off, but that is usually going to be pretty obvious to most of us sometimes even before we go out to see them.
[QUOTE=Chase Star]I'd have to disagree with you somewhat there. To me neither are necessarily an accurate reflection of who they are currently.
Let's start with the fact that the person who posted that smear attack did not include any real full name or booking date in their post. Without any easy way to look up the arrest report ourselves, one doesn't have any more real idea when those mug shots were taken than they do for the glamor photos. For all we know those mug shots could be dated too.
As for many arrestees looking strung out in their photos, duh, of course they would. Many of them have JUST been arrested for driving drunk, getting caught with drugs, etc. (probably in the midst of high that caused them to do something stupid to make them get caught). Just as the glamor photos are taken when the subject is made up to look there best, the mug shots are usually taken when a person is bound to look their absolute worst. And lets not fool ourselves many if not most of these gals, whether the streetwalker or the "cute escort", are involved with drugs to one degree or another (which is usually at least part of why they do what they do) and most of them that are have probably looked pretty bad at times because of it whether they've ever been arrested for it or not.
Presumably when they're out selling their wares on the street or expecting a john to show up at their hotel room from BP, they're going to go to at least a little effort to clean themselves up (just as most of us do ourselves when we go for an incall), take a shower, brush their hair, slap on some make up (whether to cover up the rings under their eyes or the needle marks on their arms). Okay, they probably won't look as good as they did in their professionally done glamor shot particularly if the shot is really old (although most of them don't even use professionally done glamor shots), but most of the time they won't look as bad as they did in an undated mug shot either. IMHO, the truth is usually someplace in between.
Of course if its a glamor shot of somebody else entirely or the shot is really as old as you suggest, all bets are off, but that is usually going to be pretty obvious to most of us sometimes even before we go out to see them.[/QUOTE]
I agree that their real self is somewhere in-between. I'd just rather see the worst of a person instead of their best when judging them as a companion.
The "cute escorts" I see most likely do drugs I agree but at least they don't look strung out.
I'm not saying what this poster said was true. I'm just observing the big difference in how she looked in the good/advertised pics versus her mug shot. You really think she looks closer to her good pics on a normal day? Not me. Your face can't be fixed from that overnight. Drugs fuck you up especially the ones these girls do.