Thank GOODNESS someone said it.
I met up w her and didn't follow through because of that exact same "ridden hard and put away wet" type of vibe. Wasn't doing to review her when I didn't partake, but had no desire to see it through the moment I saw the "live" version of the ad. Never ceases to amaze me what some of us deem an acceptable fantasy.
[QUOTE=Ocean101;2399101]I think what's happening with her is that she has too many "problems" that she thinks she can solve by becoming a high volume provider. It always gets worse not better for these types who go from one crisis to another. Just a matter of time till she burns out. No repeat here also.[/QUOTE]
Provider Reviews: Helpful but not definitive
This thread has been interesting to read and I agree with all that has been said. The glaring deficiency here is the ability to write a truthful and COMPLETE review. Obviously, the level of writing skills varies widely here. There is no checklist available for novice reviewers to follow and even if there were how easy would it be to find?
I've been in the hobby for about 2 years. I've studied reviews from many of the "big city boards" on USA. There are 2 basic styles employed: The List and the Narrative.
The List is just that. An item by item, one line per item, few word description that touches on many aspects of the visit and provider. For example:
Matches ad pictures: Yes.
Chest: 36 DDD enhanced.
Waist: Slim but many stretch marks & sagging skin.
Hips: Wide with many stretch marks & sagging skin.
She wore: Lingerie and short shorts.
Room Appearance: Hurricane Provider. Tripped over sex toys.
Smokes: Yes. Blows smoke in your face.
Attitude: Combative.
Management? Yes. 2 NFL Linebackers, armed with M-16's and grenades.
Notes: Track marks up both arms, both feet and around back.
Service included: Oral: BBBJCIM. Most positions.
Kissing: No. Reserved for husband.
Greek on menu: No.
You get the idea.
The Narrative can range from a few useless sentences to an exhaustively detailed analysis of every aspect of the visit. This is the most common form and is, by and large, only somewhat useful. I say this because most reviewers don't write well and don't provide all that much useful information. So the question is: How to teach novice reviewers (and those who have posted many reviews but many offer little value) how to improve what they supply? It's a problem for which there doesn't seem to be any good solution.
I like checklists. I use them all the time for my work, hobbies and my reviews here. I rely on my memory but try to cover all the essentials. I think the essentials are pretty easy yet they are often overlooked particularly in vague one or two paragraph, reviews that basically say "Had fun" and "will repeat. ".
Ask five mongers to describe their dream with the same provider and you will get 5 different reviews each touching on the details important that reviewer. I find that what I read in reviews usually has to be averaged out if there is more than one. As has already been mentioned, one monger's fantasy can be another monger's nightmare.
The bottom line for me is this: A review here is usually only one part of the decision-making process. The content of Review (s) must be weighed against what happens during the phone call and any other results of my research. Private messages (PMs) can be your friend here.
We can hope for a "standardized" review checklist but I don't ever see that happening. We can encourage all reviewers to be more thorough via polite feedback sent via PMs. Keep in mind that ALL reviews can be edited for a short time after they are "uploaded" so more detail can be provided if needed or requested.
Have fun. Stay safe. Write a complete and truthful review.
OAG.