News and Media Reports

98 arrests for prostitution made in Florida. One dude was dressed in a french maid outfit.

[URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/prostitution-sting-florida_5671c6b3e4b0688701dbf930[/URL]

[QUOTE=Zeuss;2758662]There's problems with many things. I think that any underage girl being trafficked is a problem. That said there, unfortunately, will always be the underage who are forced into it; sad but true. The same goes for foreigners, typically Asians, who become involuntary servants. The typical government solution is to throw money at a problem. When this is done the results MUST justify the costs. In virtually all of the newspaper reports that I have seen regarding the trafficking stings about 75% (at least) of the providers are not minors. So were their ads inferring that they were young or was the sting basically targeted at the hobby itself and their arrests boosts the arrest numbers so it looks like they're catching the bad guys. It really appears to be the same stings they've always run, just re-branded as going after trafficking since that's where the money and fame is. As far as the minors that they do catch how many are voluntarily providing and how many are actually being trafficked? Let's face it there are a lot of 16 & 17 year old girls who look older and discover this lucrative source of income. Getting a fake I'd isn't that hard to do.

Anyways, why on earth is the Department of Homeland Security involved in this?[/QUOTE]I have heard that there is federal money involved when they catch those that are trafficking or being trafficked. I wouldn't put it past LEO to hint / suggest / mention the trafficking angle to the girls as a way for them to get a lighter sentence, if any, and they give up their handler. That way they get the handler and the federal funding for a trafficking bust that is nowhere close to it. I wonder what their talk would be if here were no providers and they were doing other, robbery / shooting / etc, to get their money?

[QUOTE=Howard5354;2758960]98 arrests for prostitution made in Florida. One dude was dressed in a french maid outfit.

[URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/prostitution-sting-florida_5671c6b3e4b0688701dbf930[/URL][/QUOTE]Holy shit. They actually have a picture of the dude in the french maid outfit.

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2758979]I have heard that there is federal money involved when they catch those that are trafficking or being trafficked. I wouldn't put it past LEO to hint / suggest / mention the trafficking angle to the girls as a way for them to get a lighter sentence, if any, and they give up their handler. That way they get the handler and the federal funding for a trafficking bust that is nowhere close to it. I wonder what their talk would be if here were no providers and they were doing other, robbery / shooting / etc, to get their money?[/QUOTE]YES! It's big money for LE, just more wasted money added to the ever increasing national debt.

[URL]http://www.dhs.gov/topic/human-trafficking[/URL]

[URL]http://www.dhs.gov/blue-campaign[/URL]

[URL]http://www.dhs.gov/blue-campaign/awareness-training[/URL]

[QUOTE=MikeH123;2759004]Holy shit. They actually have a picture of the dude in the french maid outfit.[/QUOTE]That pic was funny as hell.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?1019455-Personal-info[/URL]

Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL]

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2836898]Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL][/QUOTE]

Nothing like keeping the evidence for the po-po. Wonder if he is a senior here.

Let this be a lesson my friends. If you have taken a video or have pictures of this hobby - Get rid of them. All your doing is building the case and storing evidence against yourself.

[QUOTE=Star67;2837996]Nothing like keeping the evidence for police. Wonder if he is a senior here.

Let this be a lesson my friends. If you have taken a video or have pictures of this hobby. Get rid of them. All your doing is building the case and storing evidence against yourself.[/QUOTE]I'll agree that having video or pictures could prove that you've been with a known provider, but unless you or they admit you paid for it, they can't really do anything. Sure it's not something you want them knowing, but if you're both consenting adults there's no evidence of a crime in pictures alone. What got this guy in so much trouble was that several of them were drugged when he recorded them. Once they were presented with the evidence, they said they didn't consent. He screwed up and drew attention to himself, which in turn led to LE looking at his phone and finding the incriminating evidence.

I too was curious if he was a member, but unless he logs in and says "hey guys, it's been nice knowing you" I doubt we'll find out for sure.

He got pussy whipped and went buck wild. Had some prostitutes working for him, supporting them financially, shared a few with his brother, and that nabbed his ass. While he was banging them, he was handing out hefty sentences to dudes who were busted. Now he is going to join them in the slammer.

[URL]http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/michigan/state-ag-ingham-county-prosecutor-arrested-charged_[/URL]

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2836898]Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL][/QUOTE]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.

[QUOTE=DewPoint4157;2838482]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.[/QUOTE]I didn't recognize him from the picture, but after your post I ran the number I had in my phone. Damn! Deleted all the info I had in my phone, but it's still out there somewhere. I feel bad for him, he's actually a good guy.

"The new charges filed on Tuesday, March 15th include the following: . Prostitution -- Non-marital sexual intercourse".

What? Charges were filed for non-marital sexual intercourse? Where the fuck am I. In Saudi Arabia?

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2836898]Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CharlieKane200;2839262] Deleted all the info I had in my phone, but it's still out there somewhere.[/QUOTE]Hopefully that "somewhere" isn't still in his phone which is now in a police evidence bag LOL! Luckily they'd probably have no reason to want to talk to everyone in his phone, but I'd at least comit that number to memory so you know not to answer it just in case.

[QUOTE=DewPoint4157;2838482]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.[/QUOTE]Sure sounds like someone that may be a member here. Anyone MIA this week?

[QUOTE=DieselMike;2839500]Sure sounds like someone that may be a member here. Anyone MIA this week?[/QUOTE]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.

[QUOTE=Msteresc;2839684]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.[/QUOTE]But if you play with fire long enough you will get burned. As Winston discovered in 1984, everyone will flip under the right circumstances. As Victor Ortiz found out in his fight with Mayweather, protect yourself at all times.

[QUOTE=FlaFlaFlowhi;2839269]"The new charges filed on Tuesday, March 15th include the following: . Prostitution -- Non-marital sexual intercourse".

What? Charges were filed for non-marital sexual intercourse? Where the fuck am I. In Saudi Arabia?[/QUOTE]Even more harsh - 17 counts of capturing an image of nudity. These new charges span at least two years, and have a lot to do with lewd photos and videos allegedly found on Harrington's phone.

He should have used an iPhone and encrypted it.

[QUOTE=Oakly;2839800]Even more harsh - 17 counts of capturing an image of nudity. These new charges span at least two years, and have a lot to do with lewd photos and videos allegedly found on Harrington's phone.

He should have used an iPhone and encrypted it.[/QUOTE]May be with their consent and be harmless but also dangerous. In reality, if you're going to keep / store them you should cover your A $$. They may not like the idea but you should get a picture of their I'd to show that they are of age and get a signed release for them because she can change her story at any given time.

One thing that I'm curious about regarding the IPhone and encryption pertains to a living person. Apple is fighting the work around for the IPhone and those people are dead but what would happen if you are alive? Could they go to court and get a judge to rule that a person must reveal the security / unlock code? I could see a judge going both ways depending on the severity. For national security it may pass muster but if it is for pictures / videos would that fall under the 5th amendment and self incrimination?

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2839838]Could they go to court and get a judge to rule that a person must reveal the security / unlock code? [/QUOTE]If it's a terrorist I say why bother the judge when you can just waterboard the prick for the password? Even if he doesn't give it up, at least we got to waterboard a terrorist. It's a win / win!

[QUOTE=MikeH123;2839410]Hopefully that "somewhere" isn't still in his phone which is now in a police evidence bag LOL! Luckily they'd probably have no reason to want to talk to everyone in his phone, but I'd at least comit that number to memory so you know not to answer it just in case.[/QUOTE]I'm not worried about being in his directory; I'm just hoping he deleted the texts.

[QUOTE=Msteresc;2839684]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.[/QUOTE]Exactly what you said. This is the point I was originally trying to make. Don't keep the images or pictures because these girls can flip on a dime and claim they never authorized any of the images or video. Next thing you know it you find yourself in a world of shit.

Did he have images of just one provider or did he have multiple images / video of other girls? Are we talking SWs. BP girls. Girls off of Craigslist? They went back to November 2013.

If a guy takes nude pics of a woman, whether it be his girlfriend, wife, paid companion, whatever, and she later says that it was done against her will or while she was intoxicated / stoned, the guy is in deep shit? Or if the guy has sex with her, apparently consensual, and she later says she did not consent?

I realize there are many ways for this stuff to bite a guy in the ass, but it's pretty messed up. Would a waiver / consent form even help if the woman later claimed that she was impaired by drugs or alcohol?

[QUOTE=DieselMike;2840895]If a guy takes nude pics of a woman, whether it be his girlfriend, wife, paid companion, whatever, and she later says that it was done against her will or while she was intoxicated / stoned, the guy is in deep shit? Or if the guy has sex with her, apparently consensual, and she later says she did not consent?

I realize there are many ways for this stuff to bite a guy in the ass, but it's pretty messed up. Would a waiver / consent form even help if the woman later claimed that she was impaired by drugs or alcohol?[/QUOTE]DieselMike -.

So many ways to be burned here. This applies to the act itself. With or Without photos. Bite you in the ass and then completely ruin your life. Yes its entirely messed up.

There was a member here that has since relocated to a nicer warmer climate. He posted his encounters and escapades on pornhub. I always told him be careful with what you are doing.

She may say yeah go ahead and take the picture (s) or video (s) at the time. She may say I have no problem with it. You may even give her extra money to take the pictures or video. But she can claim they were taken against her will, she was impared, forced, and then deny consent at any time.

Signed waivers are one way. It got so bad in Florida and in California that porn producers were recording the consent to prove there was no impairment and that the actor / actress was a willing participant.

Be careful my friends.

[QUOTE=Star67;2841679]DieselMike -.

So many ways to be burned here. This applies to the act itself. With or Without photos. Bite you in the ass and then completely ruin your life. Yes its entirely messed up.

There was a member here that has since relocated to a nicer warmer climate. He posted his encounters and escapades on pornhub. I always told him be careful with what you are doing.

She may say yeah go ahead and take the picture (s) or video (s) at the time. She may say I have no problem with it. You may even give her extra money to take the pictures or video. But she can claim they were taken against her will, she was impared, forced, and then deny consent at any time.

Signed waivers are one way. It got so bad in Florida and in California that porn producers were recording the consent to prove there was no impairment and that the actor / actress was a willing participant.

Be careful my friends.[/QUOTE]You can look for it there. Friend goes to Real Estate Convention. Friend meets two babes in the bar. Drinks later, on to their bedroom. He's eating pussy on Number 1, while Number 2 is calling desk (yep pre-cell phone days) and yells rape. Long and short, he gets convicted of 3rd degree sexual assualt, winds up on CCAP, and loses all future credibility with future clients (non-clients). It was a set-up from the beginning. Babes sue him civilly for damages after conviction. They lose, he loses, Lawyers win.

So if you think about it, you're further ahead to be caught with a known prostitute than to date a woman out of a bar. If the hooker claims rape, well, gee, not much credibility there. If two realtors from a small town in Wisconsin claim rape, well kiss your nuts goodbye.

Coochie (damn, dis sum heavy shit) Eater.

God Bless You All.

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2839838]May be with their consent and be harmless but also dangerous. In reality, if you're going to keep / store them you should cover your A $$. They may not like the idea but you should get a picture of their I'd to show that they are of age and get a signed release for them because she can change her story at any given time.

One thing that I'm curious about regarding the IPhone and encryption pertains to a living person. Apple is fighting the work around for the IPhone and those people are dead but what would happen if you are alive? Could they go to court and get a judge to rule that a person must reveal the security / unlock code? I could see a judge going both ways depending on the severity. For national security it may pass muster but if it is for pictures / videos would that fall under the 5th amendment and self incrimination?[/QUOTE]Here's an interesting article regarding the second part of your question. Some interesting comments as well.

[URL]http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/02/17/other-apple-case/80505314/[/URL]

I'm no attorney but I think the court cases are less about the 5th Amendment (forcing YOU to hand over your password) than about having a backdoor so they don't need your password. Today's smart phones are nothing more than handheld computers and the Government will absolutely search your laptop / desktop if they have probable cause and a warrant.

[QUOTE=HuntingStreets;2842849]Here's an interesting article regarding the second part of your question. Some interesting comments as well.

[URL]http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/02/17/other-apple-case/80505314/[/URL]

I'm no attorney but I think the court cases are less about the 5th Amendment (forcing YOU to hand over your password) than about having a backdoor so they don't need your password. Today's smart phones are nothing more than handheld computers and the Government will absolutely search your laptop / desktop if they have probable cause and a warrant.[/QUOTE]But. You have the right to remain silent. Demanding your password would be the equivalent of demanding a bank robber to tell them where you hid the money. That said, don't use your finger print to lock the phone as they can use your prints to unlock the phone.

[QUOTE=Oakly;2843060]But. You have the right to remain silent. Demanding your password would be the equivalent of demanding a bank robber to tell them where you hid the money. That said, don't use your finger print to lock the phone as they can use your prints to unlock the phone.[/QUOTE]To establish a [I]foregone conclusion[/I] that there are others, so then the Fifth does not apply; at least according to the US District Court, SE Wisconsin.

[URL]http://www.dww.com/articles/us-court-orders-suspect-to-decrypt-files[/URL]

[QUOTE=WizardOfAahs;2844137]To establish a [I]foregone conclusion[/I] that there are others, so then the Fifth does not apply; at least according to the US District Court, SE Wisconsin.

[URL]http://www.dww.com/articles/us-court-orders-suspect-to-decrypt-files[/URL][/QUOTE]That just doesn't seem right on so many levels. What makes it a 'foregone conclusion'? I could see child porn if they monitor your web tracks but it still doesn't seem right. For photos it is your word against the provider's and if she was unaware or unable to say 'no' then how can she testify that you took photos and used that particular phone. Regardless, it should send a chill down one's spine.

[QUOTE=Oakly;2843060]But. You have the right to remain silent. Demanding your password would be the equivalent of demanding a bank robber to tell them where you hid the money. That said, don't use your finger print to lock the phone as they can use your prints to unlock the phone.[/QUOTE]To go directly to jail. Now shut up and empty your pockets. If you don't have big bucks then you are not going to get justice. Justice means just us!

I'm surprised no one has posted this yet. I saw this a few weeks ago on Ch 12 News. Guess that's a warning for us to stay away. No wonder the last time I was there it wasn't any good as my review stated. Oh well, onto the next one.

[URL]http://www.wisn.com/news/greenfield-massage-parlor-being-investigated/38639532[/URL]

[QUOTE=JeBiga469;2870773]I'm surprised no one has posted this yet. I saw this a few weeks ago on Ch 12 News. Guess that's a warning for us to stay away. No wonder the last time I was there it wasn't any good as my review stated. Oh well, onto the next one.

[URL]http://www.wisn.com/news/greenfield-massage-parlor-being-investigated/38639532[/URL][/QUOTE]All the more reason to just take your money, spend a little extra time and head south. Lots of good info on the various Chicago area boards. It's hard to look past convenience, but man it's not worth the trouble around here now.

[URL]http://host.madison.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/racine-man-gets-years-prison-in-escort-scam-armed-robbery/article_e4d8329c-6f55-598d-b150-199bedaf6201.html[/URL]

To bang any of these ladies.

[URL]http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/32219605/mpd-sting-nets-11-prostitution-arrests[/URL]

[QUOTE=Howard5354;2963901]To bang any of these ladies.

[URL]http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/32219605/mpd-sting-nets-11-prostitution-arrests[/URL][/QUOTE]It all. . 2-. 5 is all they wanted and the city says tons. They have a LOT of drug problems down there, not to mention all the other crimes.

[QUOTE=Howard5354;2963901]To bang any of these ladies.

[URL]http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/32219605/mpd-sting-nets-11-prostitution-arrests[/URL][/QUOTE]Good thing they're in Memphis.

Quite a few of you visited the jungle house in New Berlin a few years ago. Did a name search on youtube and there is a news story. Very good segment. Looks like our friend is now in Colorado running a cannabis business. Her pics, she looks healthy and happy. Definitely put on a little weight. The good way, healthy style. Also noticed that all references to her difficult past that used to be all over the web have been removed. Kind of glad to see its gone.

[URL]http://www.startribune.com/milwaukee-man-charged-with-running-multistate-sex-trafficking-ring/386091591/[/URL]

All the area pussy is headed to Philly now but there is a killer on the loose.

[URL]http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/22/philadelphia-prostitutes-band-together-to-fight-a-mystery-predator.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=ThoughtIdJoin;3034719]Was going to make the trip 2 Milwaukee because the Madison market sucks but not now. Let me get this right let me know if I'm wrong. A black Criminal ran from the cops with a stolen handgun in his hand then turned around still holding the gun when the cops had to drop the gun he refused so the cop shot the criminal black kid or young man. The cop that did the shooting was also black. So the Northside Community gets all worked up because they don't think young black guys with criminal records running around stolen weapons should be shot by the cops so their responses to loot pillage and destroy their own black community. Makes sense to me. So my trip to Milwaukee will be off I know well enough not to go on the North side anyway but I think I'll just be hands-off.[/QUOTE]There as a press conference today and they had said that the gatherings on Sunday were peaceful until later that night. There was a group that came up from Chicago that started all the uproar, hostile acts and damage. I don't remember the group name they sated but it was something with Russian. Like in the other serious problemed uproars they said that it is the outside groups that flood in to use a situation to advance their cause. Like mentioned, the law enforcement shootings get the attention but the gang or black on black shootings go untouched.