[QUOTE=Skizzard;7465234]Forgot to add, she's left Pasadena already.[/QUOTE]That's a pity, she was fun. Would like to know where she is as well.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Skizzard;7465234]Forgot to add, she's left Pasadena already.[/QUOTE]That's a pity, she was fun. Would like to know where she is as well.
[QUOTE=MyFinalHeav3;7465384]That's a pity, she was fun. Would like to know where she is as well.[/QUOTE]I have no idea. She hasn't popped up anywhere as of yet.
Admittedly, I still haven't seen any of these Thai girls because I just can't find the time for the commute. However, I have noticed that the pics have been going down hill. What I mean by that is that they are slowly but surely moving from authentic, representative pics, to glammed up, touched up, or even flat out fake pics. Look at Pinky's new pics, for example. She was one of the girls I was most interested in meeting (and I still am). However, her new pics look so touched up it's hard to tell if it's even her. Anna's pics (Khaleesi) look flat out fake and that is what I will assume until confirmed otherwise.
I wish there was some way to make these agencies understand that having real and accurate pics is a major asset, and on top of the better pricing, it puts them at a huge advantage over the K agencies. I, for one, have completely abandoned the K agencies, first and foremost because the fake pics and rebranding make every session a crapshoot. When you add the crazy prices on top of that, it is just not worth the risk. The Thai agencies should stay where they started and build our trust through real and accurate pics. I hope they read this.
[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;7466854]Admittedly, I still haven't seen any of these Thai girls because I just can't find the time for the commute. However, I have noticed that the pics have been going down hill. What I mean by that is that they are slowly but surely moving from authentic, representative pics, to glammed up, touched up, or even flat out fake pics. Look at Pinky's new pics, for example. She was one of the girls I was most interested in meeting (and I still am). However, her new pics look so touched up it's hard to tell if it's even her. Anna's pics (Khaleesi) look flat out fake and that is what I will assume until confirmed otherwise.
I wish there was some way to make these agencies understand that having real and accurate pics is a major asset, and on top of the better pricing, it puts them at a huge advantage over the K agencies. I, for one, have completely abandoned the K agencies, first and foremost because the fake pics and rebranding make every session a crapshoot. When you add the crazy prices on top of that, it is just not worth the risk. The Thai agencies should stay where they started and build our trust through real and accurate pics. I hope they read this.[/QUOTE]I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.
[QUOTE=Skizzard;7467107]I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.[/QUOTE]
Yes, it's true. If you follow the agency ad photos, you'll see they cycle through various photos for some veteran girls. SC Maya for example has about 20 different photos. Usually, ass photos without face and in-apartment selfies tend to be the most accurate. No face photos are sometimes unfiltered (as far as I can tell). Even korgs occasionally do that, though it is rare.
When a girl has weird face PS, it does make her look worse. It's for privacy. More often, it is the usual PS to improve her age / looks.
FA Sammy for example has no face photos that are exactly her - but face photos are heavily PS'd. Her body actually looks better than her no face photos, you can't see how well toned and good her complexion is from a zoomed out full shot photo.
Some girls like KDC Jenny K vary their looks both over time and even day to day as far as make up. So my first visit to Jenny K, she looked 95% like her ad photo including the exact outfit in her ad and same make up style. It was extremely close. But my second visit, she had different make up. Her weight went up and down, not by a lot, but enough to not match the ad closely. So even with a realistic and accurate ad, it drifts over time and even day by day. I have seen some girls occasionally with no make up, obviously it makes a difference. So even an unfiltered ad cannot exactly match a girl consistently, but what we hope for is it gives an accurate idea of the girl to help you pick the right girl.
SC Maya and Guitar are examples of girls with realistic ads. It gives you the right idea even when there is some PS. So it gives a starting point for people to talk about the girl, especially if she has changed since the photos were taken. USAG has a photo attachment limit, so I will first include Maya's ad photos current and past.
Part 2. I will attach ad photos from SweetCandies two years ago. Be warned these are all HYA ads for actual HYA, I would not expect them often. But they represent the kind of ads my ATFs were using at SweetCandies. There was a brand new girl, SC Chichi. They posted placeholder ads showing a HYA - see the first 3 images for Chichi's original ads. The remarkable thing was when they had HYA ads, it was a HYA. Or rather, when it was a MILF they made sure to use MILF ads. I'm okay with the girl not looking the same as the ad as long as it is in the ballpark so to speak, and I had used SC enough to know that they sometimes hosted HYA. So I was hopeful after my SC Emily experiences, and each time I dove in on an HYA ad it was an actual HYA. It was quite a surprise, and maybe too good to be last. But, Thai orgs have a much better average than korgs on ads so there is that.
Once Chichi started, they added new ads more and more, and they were recognizably her with low filter. Some of her outdoors, some smartphone photos taken of her in the apartment. You could instantly recognize it was the apartment and that it was taken very recently, and having already seen Chichi I could see it was an unfiltered shot. If there was some filter or PS, I couldn't tell, so the important point is they were accurate. 4th photo is 1 cropped example. There were many others.
5th and 6th photos are 2 later ads they used when Chichi toured again. I think there is light PS making her look slimmer and smoothing out the face. It is very light. She had a great figure imo and didn't need it, so it took a long examination to identify the PS. Not bad, she actually looked about the same level as her ads just slightly different. In the 6th picture attached, she has full make up on. I repeated her many times and did see her look pretty much like that, but usually she didn't. It's another factor in ad photos and the same point I made about Jenny K.
I saw Chichi and Jenny K match their ad photos even down to the make up look, but most visits they did not have that make up. That is the big caveat even when the ad matches - it won't stay that way. It is simply too hard to maintain full make up and do appointments, the make up wears off and causes problems. But glamour shots will show it. It's a case where the ad is not representative, but not wrong either (it is not some filter). It's why in-apartment selfies are superior, because usually it's taken when she is "ready" and more representative. They are also way more recent. When I saw HX independents, girls would post hundreds of selfies, and they varied over time. The more recent photos were sometimes as close as you can get with natural day-by-day variation only. I used to write HX guides and this was one way to pick your girl.
Last two photos are SC Emily from 2 years ago. I repeated her many times over a long time and her weight did go up and down. Sometimes she was very skinny. I feel like there could be PS in the selfie but it is not far off if there is. Meaning the important point is it's representative. Note the big hands, that's not filtering but what happens when you stand close to a mirror and take a selfie (if you try it yourself, your hand easily gets bigger than your head). Those were her nails, her jewelry, her outfit, her hairstyle, the apartment. Chefs kiss. The last photo is another one, it has light PS but was representative. She had an unreal exotic look to her face, it is a one of a kind face. She was mixed Thai and Chinese. So to the extent there is PS, it's as close as you can hope for and the ad captures her well.
I think I got very lucky with these and other girls I saw at SweetCandies. I reported when ads were accurate and so did others, and I never got a dud. I consider that a combo of intel and luck, it is just a matter of time when my luck changes. I did see plenty of placeholder ads and ads with more PS, but it wasn't korg level. MILFs got MILF ads, which was what mattered to me. Many Thai women are thick and full bodied. It's not my thing, but glad that ads usually showed that too. Especially backside shots with no face, people generally reported them as accurate with low or no filter.
I would not expect true HYA at thai orgs often. S99 Lyla was borderline HYA in October in SD, she was a solid girl but like with korgs it's maybe 10% to 20% HYA depending on your standard. She was short tour so never rotated to LA.
There are some girls who use completely fake ads. If the girl is the same level as the ad then I call it a placeholder ad, I assume for privacy. Keep an eye out for new updated ads that are selfies or in-apartment, they tend to be decent. But lately, people are pointing out there are ads looking too much better than the girl, so the only solution is intel.
Over in the Las Vegas / OC / LA forums for Korean agency BBFS, there is a poster who always says he gets selfies of the girls after seeing them and posts them here. I've talked to a couple of providers who said that the photo the guy uses are the photos they gave to the booker and / or owner. I don't like the shilling aspect of that, but if it's a real selfie (the selfies always have the phone obscuring the face in a mirror), then at least the more accurate representation of their body is appreciated.
[QUOTE=Skizzard;7467107]I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.[/QUOTE]
Currently in OC Khaleesi is posting pictures of Nina who was recently up in Pasadena. Normally, the Thai orgs are great at posting real pictures. But lately, I am skeptical because these look too good to be true. Did anyone happen to see Nina when she was up here?
[QUOTE=KingsFoil;7483861]Currently in OC Khaleesi is posting pictures of Nina who was recently up in Pasadena. Normally, the Thai orgs are great at posting real pictures. But lately, I am skeptical because these look too good to be true. Did anyone happen to see Nina when she was up here?[/QUOTE]
Yes, this one looks like a generic ad photo.
Here is the other Nina ad you asked about and my reply:
[URL]https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=793427&d=1767001843[/URL] Nina ad selfie
[QUOTE=Download X;7484173]Note there is filter on the face. It's possible the body is real and the face gives you an idea of her face type but doesn't "tell you the level" (I. E. Tier / hot or not). I haven't seen her, so that is just a guess from past experience. It isn't enough consolation, but at least thai orgs are cheap at 200 hh and the girls tend to have good attitude and service. But my dilemma is as long as a korg or corg has an ATF in town, I don't have the time to toftt.[/QUOTE]
So it is a kind of standoff where either a) Someone toftt or b) They add new ads again. There are some thai girls like Maya aka Megan who worked long tour, so eventually guys gather good intel.
[QUOTE=JackHolly;7467829]Over in the Las Vegas / OC / LA forums for Korean agency BBFS, there is a poster who always says he gets selfies of the girls after seeing them and posts them here. I've talked to a couple of providers who said that the photo the guy uses are the photos they gave to the booker and / or owner. I don't like the shilling aspect of that, but if it's a real selfie (the selfies always have the phone obscuring the face in a mirror), then at least the more accurate representation of their body is appreciated.[/QUOTE]
Yes, it looks like Bighose does this for mainly LTLV, occasionally GNS or FKS. Since I know so little about it, I only have a general impression and not all the facts. If your distinction is correct (he claims to get selfies but is just passing booker selfies) that's sad. But, I don't actually know that and haven't examined it carefully. If I were him, I would be completely upfront what I was doing. I have nothing against supplying accurate selfies itself, just the transparency. That said, he may be saying that for legal reasons. The same way someone East Coast says his review was "just a dream". I wouldn't do it that way myself, but I get it. In this hobby, people have to do that so you read between the lines.
I've thought about it a while and have mixed feelings. One reason I review girls at all is it's the only way to fight against lying ads. I don't even look at ad photos or specs, the only thing I'll believe is the price and upcharge options. If bookers themselves supplied reasonably accurate selfies, I'd be all for it. It would solve the original problem. You could put this as a thought experiment - if bookers put photos and descriptions of girls that were as accurate as any normal reviewer could write about a girl, would you use that intel? I sure would! The reason I don't use booker info is because it's wrong, not because it's from the booker.
That's a separate issue of course from shilling. If someone is upfront about what they're doing and their biases, all good. If they say "I'm a booker and I'm going to be posting accurate selfies from now on", and I see that they're truthful - I'm all for it. It is distasteful if someone pretends to be a customer but is doing that (I do believe Bighose is a real customer, though). Although I'm pretty cynical and choose to look at the half glass full if they're giving honest info. It would still be way better than some actual reviewers who post poor quality or even wrong info. That sucks too, people underrate how important accuracy of intel is over who is supplying it. I'd stop reviewing if one day booker sites had more accurate photos and words than me. Right? Never gonna happen though.
I have tried grading the selfies that Bighose posts, but it's just not often he posts one of a girl I know well. None of them so far were inaccurate, but I don't have enough examples. He does make rosters, same problem. Everything he posted was accurate, and it looks like he does see the girls. So, he is at least more helpful and good than the gatekeepers.
There is divine punishment for gatekeeping. OC routinely cucks LA when they gatekeep HYA leading to the HYA working OC only. And OC is overrun with HYA because MILF hunters don't review enough. And so on..
SC has a promotion for 1 more week at 180 hh, 260 hr. The girl is Ida, no idea about her. I'm only pointing out the price. Hopefully others can chime in on what she's like.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/network/SweetCandies/[/URL]
SweetCandies hosts mostly Thai girls in SGV. I've seen some Laos, Viet, and half-Chinese girls through them too. Looks and service vary just like with korgs. They fill in a niche in-between AMPs and korgs where the price is cheaper like AMPs but you get a private incall in the korg fashion. Most Thai girls are freestyle service. More like a real girlfriend than typical service queen worship, though a few Thai girls did it too. The service style is different, not necessarily better or worse, so it was good for variety. I used to go all the time.
I'm not sure if every girl is priced the same, but it was typically 200 hh, 240 45, 300 hr.
They have very occasionally had HYA and MILFs, but it's not often. In my experience, HYAs used HYA ads and MILFs used MILF ads. There is PS and fake placeholder ads, but sometimes they will post real selfies mixed in which were more accurate. Occasionally it was no filter or low filter and recent, but I don't expect it often. On HX what I would do is just notice when they updated their ads. No face selfies tended to be the most accurate, especially backside shots.
Lastly, HX is the best way to screen imo. They will network rate you back, but with some Thai orgs I have had to remind them 2-3 times but they eventually did. For example, they are not always available to log in and do it but told me to remind them later and they did. Within korgs, some bookers will do this too but there are bookers who do not rate back anymore. Just FYI.
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7519000]SC has a promotion for 1 more week at 180 hh, 260 hr. The girl is Ida, no idea about her. I'm only pointing out the price. Hopefully others can chime in on what she's like.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/network/SweetCandies/[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Great work as usual! They have a second HX account in Pasadena as well, lucky_88.
[QUOTE=TnaStylez;7520387]Great work as usual! They have a second HX account in Pasadena as well, lucky_88.[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen Lydia from Lucky_88? Pics look good from humaniplex, but may be P.S. Or fake.
[QUOTE=AppleBottomFdr;7523879]Has anyone seen Lydia from Lucky_88? Pics look good from humaniplex, but may be P.S. Or fake.[/QUOTE]I've seen Lydia many times and she's probably one of my ATF from all of my Thai agency experiences.
[QUOTE=BabyLetsPlay12;7524503]I've seen Lydia many times and she's probably one of my ATF from all of my Thai agency experiences.[/QUOTE]Nice! Does she look like the pics? Face and body well represented?
[QUOTE=AppleBottomFdr;7524527]Nice! Does she look like the pics? Face and body well represented?[/QUOTE]Yea, she's damn near perfect. What you see is what you get. Excellent service, cute laugh, killer body.
[QUOTE=AppleBottomFdr;7524527]Nice! Does she look like the pics? Face and body well represented?[/QUOTE]Yup, looks just like her pic. I don't think there's ANY photoshop at all.
[QUOTE=Download X;7519000]SC has a promotion for 1 more week at 180 hh, 260 hr. The girl is Ida, no idea about her. I'm only pointing out the price. Hopefully others can chime in on what she's like.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/network/SweetCandies/[/URL]
SweetCandies hosts mostly Thai girls in SGV. I've seen some Laos, Viet, and half-Chinese girls through them too. Looks and service vary just like with korgs. They fill in a niche in-between AMPs and korgs where the price is cheaper like AMPs but you get a private incall in the korg fashion. Most Thai girls are freestyle service. More like a real girlfriend than typical service queen worship, though a few Thai girls did it too. The service style is different, not necessarily better or worse, so it was good for variety. I used to go all the time.[/QUOTE]
Looks like Lucky_88 has the promotion now. 180 hh, 260 hr. I'm only pointing out the price, no idea about the girl. I used to go SweetCandies all the time and even in late 2023 it was 200 hh, 300 hr. But just before that, it was 180 hh, 260 hr. Hope it sticks:
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Lucky_88[/URL]
Even though I don't go anymore, alternatives like this put pressure on pricing at other shops. Thai orgs are kind of a transition between the AMP level to the korg level by sharing some aspects of both.
Thanks fellas for chiming in, but it looks like I may have missed out. Take my attention off the hobby for a couple days to focus in work, and Lucky_88 took the ad for Lydia down. Now it's Nina. I think I have my sights set on Lydia. Does she just rotate in and out of their roster periodically? Anyone know?
[QUOTE=AppleBottomFdr;7528541]Thanks fellas for chiming in, but it looks like I may have missed out. Take my attention off the hobby for a couple days to focus in work, and Lucky_88 took the ad for Lydia down. Now it's Nina. I think I have my sights set on Lydia. Does she just rotate in and out of their roster periodically? Anyone know?[/QUOTE]They could rotate through again, it's also possible you can catch her at their sister locations in OC or SD as well. May have to just keep an eye out on the ads.
Hello folks.
I saw they are having a deal of $260 per hour is this 2 pops?
I wants sure whether to do the half hour instead of it's a one pop.
[QUOTE=Heizenberg;7528743]Hello folks.
I saw they are having a deal of $260 per hour is this 2 pops?
I wants sure whether to do the half hour instead of it's a one pop.[/QUOTE]I doubt you'll get 2 pops out of Nina, she can barely handle one. She has a newbie vibe and just wasn't a very good time. Wincing and waiting for it to end.
[QUOTE=Skizzard;7528751]I doubt you'll get 2 pops out of Nina, she can barely handle one. She has a newbie vibe and just wasn't a very good time. Wincing and waiting for it to end.[/QUOTE]Wow thanks for this info!!
I'll stick to my Korean BB girls.
[QUOTE=Skizzard;7528751]I doubt you'll get 2 pops out of Nina, she can barely handle one. She has a newbie vibe and just wasn't a very good time. Wincing and waiting for it to end.[/QUOTE]Today's options at Lucky_88 / SweetCandies appear to be Ellie and Hanna. Anyone have any intel?
[QUOTE=AppleBottomFdr;7531237]Today's options at Lucky_88 / SweetCandies appear to be Ellie and Hanna. Anyone have any intel?[/QUOTE]If I were you I'd roll the dice on Ellie. I saw Hanna (formerly Nina) and she was very inexperienced. Decent body but she kept cutting services short, no DFK, wincing, minimal eye contact. I could just tell she wanted me gone. But if you like her look, take chance on her. I personally wouldn't see her again.
[B]Guitar[/B] is at HX Lucky88. Here are some reviews of her, mostly from OC:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7165212&viewfull=1#post7165212[/URL] Guitar
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7083241&highlight=guitar#post7083241[/URL] Guitar
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7054202&highlight=guitar#post7054202[/URL] Guitar
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7057874&highlight=guitar#post7057874[/URL] Guitar
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7136967&highlight=guitar#post7136967[/URL] Guitar
[URL]https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?37663-Thai-orgs-girl-reviews-and-information&p=7310328&viewfull=1#post7310328[/URL] GUITAR PLEASER
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33105-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls-in-OC&p=7165229&highlight=evian#post7165229[/URL] Guitar meta with ad photos
About ad photos. Sometimes the thai org has realistic ad photos, sometimes it doesn't. For a while girls like Guitar / Maya were good examples. But sooner or later, the thai org uses place holders that are not of the girl. For that reason, we try to find a variety of opinions through reviews.