Printable View
[QUOTE=MisterDotD;7092316]Yep, that is her. She just come back from OC. I saw her once it was a pretty interested session. Oh also she know what going here and read some, if not, all the review on this forum. That caught me off guard, LOL.[/QUOTE]Nice the jiggly booty Alice is back. Since she reads this I can voice my complaints about her upcharge LOL.
[QUOTE=MisterDotD;7092316]Yep, that is her. She just come back from OC. I saw her once it was a pretty interested session. Oh also she know what going here and read some, if not, all the review on this forum. That caught me off guard, LOL.[/QUOTE]For everyone's sake, you should assume that most of the girls / bookers / owners browse and interact within these forums and elsewhere. There's a practical and financial benefit for them to keep a finger on the pulse of this community. Girls asking for and in some cases not asking for reviews should already clue you in that they are aware. As such, keep details that could single you out to minimum to cover your ass. I've seen and heard of mongers getting reprimanded and questioned for things said here and elsewhere.
BookerM. Newly listed flavor in midwil, White.
[URL]https://www.rokm.ch/[/URL]
New girl Baliee photos look tempting, advertising as real pic.
Obviously, pictures without face are fake.
She's now fully booked for 2 days checking to see if anyone would like to chime in with the details.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/bailee[/URL]
Sin-I is a new face in ktown, just arrived from Korea few days ago. Body pics is accurate, all natural spinner with a compass tattoo on the back of her neck. Easy BB except she asked me to cream outside. Age maybe late 20's, early 30's.
Very pretty spinner. I don't think is real pics but still very good looking. Boobs are not as huge and unproportional as pics, IMO pics look kinda weird. She has a doggy tattoo her arm and some random English phrases on her back.
[QUOTE=ResilientJohn;7092433]For everyone's sake, you should assume that most of the girls / bookers / owners browse and interact within these forums and elsewhere. There's a practical and financial benefit for them to keep a finger on the pulse of this community. Girls asking for and in some cases not asking for reviews should already clue you in that they are aware. As such, keep details that could single you out to minimum to cover your ass. I've seen and heard of mongers getting reprimanded and questioned for things said here and elsewhere.[/QUOTE]I've heard that too. In SD we post reviews of girls we like. On girls we don't, dead silence. So when someone posts they didn't like a girl but won't even name her, I already know who she is! I guess the one benefit of being a tiny korg market.
More than anything, I've heard girls wanting fake reviews of them removed. Reviews promising anal, rimming, or other crazy stuff they don't do. It's a huge safety issue. These girls never ask me for a review, they don't even want bad reviews removed. They want very positive fake reviews removed, that put them in danger of saying no to a guy who thinks she's doing it for someone else. Hani asked me about one example and it cannot be removed, but thankfully is pretty hard to find. Others not so lucky. Please do not take seriously the fan fiction that spoils TER. Don't imagine a girl is doing something for every guy except you. It took me years to figure out how common this was.
The bookers don't dare post fake reviews in SD these days. The Admin banned an entire agency over it so no one can mention 1 of 4 korgs in SD anymore. Shills are too obvious in a smaller community, I recognize almost every single reviewer. And SD is so small many regulars can see most of the girls easily. They just want a hint who to skip and who not to miss. So if a shill comes along and makes things up about a girl, so many guys will call them out. It just embarrasses a girl who might have been worth seeing anyways, without exaggerating her age or what she does. "Yes she is good service but 40s not 20s". But I do sometimes see a shill pop up to say "nuh uh" when we say a girl wasn't worth seeing. But the shill can't even describe the girl one bit. It's one out of maybe 50 or 100 reviews these days. As I said, gatekeeping is the bigger problem.
OC has a gatekeeping problem. Now that Lizza is leaving I see a bunch of her regulars frantically posting about it, but they didn't review her. The only fix is to lead by example and be kind with intel first. Some people PM'd me saying they liked a girl I reviewed. My reply is if they want, please review her. All I ask.
A reverse example of this is when someone said Nadia was probably a MILF just because they don't trust CGLA's ages. I don't even need to correct him, someone else will and did. There are realistic differences in opinion, that's fine. But we all have two eyes and know who is a MILF or HYA.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=7091955&viewfull=1#post7091955[/URL]
I know who actually saw a girl by what they write, it's usually very obvious. Like if I describe an OC kgirl as "This kgirl doesn't turn on the shower but gestures with her hand for you step inside first". That one detail alone singles out 1 kgirl in 1000, a princess in fact. Anyone who saw her knows who I'm talking about, she did it for you too. A good review has maybe 5 details like that which show you saw the girl. The complete opposite of shills.
Non-posters who visit girls outnumber the posters 30 to 1 by my estimate (not counting people who read but don't even visit). It's odd but really easy to tell that lurkers are showing girls USAG sometimes. Like how long it took before someone showed Lizza USAG after my posts. In that case it was a harmless compliment:
[I]BTW guys, Lizza has already seen the Lin Hui pics enough no need to show her again lol. Better to keep USAG out of visits whenever possible, it can spoil the fun and free sharing of intel. Your call though.[/I]
You should feel free to share useful intel on girls. When in doubt, if you just want to share a story you can remove names. Or you might end up quitting and starting over just to be able to post reviews anonymously again.
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7093301]I've heard that too. In SD we post reviews of girls we like. On girls we don't, dead silence. So when someone posts they didn't like a girl but won't even name her, I already know who she is! I guess the one benefit of being a tiny korg market.
[/QUOTE]Isn't that the same over here. Usually dead silence on a girl means no bueno.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I]
I'm going to ban you the next time you post anything except a thank you for a nice review.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Stonkz;7093479]Isn't that the same over here. Usually dead silence on a girl means no bueno.[/QUOTE]Or gatekeeping.
[QUOTE=Stonkz;7093479]Isn't that the same over here. Usually dead silence on a girl means no bueno.[/QUOTE]That would be the logical takeaway. But I think it's counterintuitive and not all the case. As DX said, the SD market is relatively small compared to OC / LA. As such, they have an almost 100% intel coverage of kgirls that come through. Spotting inconsistencies and weeding out bad info is remarkably hassle free and effective. They have a robust network of active user that do so and post useful intel.
However, in the case of LA and OC, we have anywhere between 10-20+ times more girls at any one time. Yet, the "resources" that SD currently enjoys is abysmally small. We don't have anywhere near 20 times more active users that post useful intel or alert of misinformation. By my back of the envelope estimate we may hover around 10-20% of accurate and useful intel for any given roster. So my take on it is that if there's no intel on a girl and she's been around more than a couple weeks, I just categorize her as neutral. It could be: she's bad and they don't want to publicly admit that she is or that they saw a dud, she's awesome and they want her for themselves for easy booking (gatekeeping), or she's being seen by people that are oblivious to these boards or they don't care / want to write reviews. Not knowing what bucket the girl falls into, I just reserve my judgement. It's sad but the lack of active participation to review and provide intel does lead to gems falling through the cracks.
Haven't seen Seti in a while. She tightened up nicely, still the best boobs on the west side. Had a great session, not sure why doesn't get more love here. Weird.
There's a white girl that's on ta bunch of the korg sites named Ashley that's been around before and says that she's returning. I've tried looking for reviews of her's on here but can't find any. Anyone here have any experience with her that recommend her or not?
Adela, 340 all in, spinner stats with C cup, anyone?
Vivian, 350 all in, ultra spinner stats sup 5' with c cup, anyone? This one I'm very interested, been banging middle age ajumah def not spinners, LOL.
Prada, not sure if anyone reviewed her but her double D got my attention but again, I have a feeling that she is an ajumah with 116 lbs at 5'6, that's consider heavy weight in K-pussy world.
Rona, spinner D cup ajumah? She got that sultry looking that fuck me face, anyone?
It's weired, last week I text sesang asking for Nali but not even a single reply asking for reference or I'd etc. Just ghost. No idea what's the deal.
[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;7093600]Haven't seen Seti in a while. She tightened up nicely, still the best boobs on the west side. Had a great session, not sure why doesn't get more love here. Weird.[/QUOTE]Seti is Kira per other mongers, been reviewed, no hype.