"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[QUOTE=TylerDurden07;6301297][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a58c1f81-ec62-4738-8052-3408012fc06a[/URL]

Seemed nice at first, very personable. After asking what she was looking for, she said she was new to this, but knew that she didn't want "anything sexual. " What a pity. She'll get nothing financial then, at least not from me.[/QUOTE]Why do these girls think money is free. They are so lazy and entitled. I have had several girls get mad and block me because I would not loan them any money. One wanted 5 k but was to lazy to write up a contract, another one wanted $2300 I told her no that's her bd job.

She offered me 2,500/ month on the site. I just simply replied that I couldn't meet her expectation and never heard back from her.

SD.

[QUOTE=DArrow404;6301611][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/53975180-ab02-49b8-bd94-8ef36c4e1587[/URL]

Saw a familiar face. Has anyone talked to her recently? I remember she had very good reviews awhile back but her profile went inactive.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HollowGuy;6301952]Why do these girls think money is free. They are so lazy and entitled. I have had several girls get mad and block me because I would not loan them any money. One wanted 5 k but was to lazy to write up a contract, another one wanted $2300 I told her no that's her bd job.[/QUOTE]The typical modern western woman thinks all she has to do is show up and bless you with her presence. They don'twant to do anything to earn their resources. They think having a v-jay-jay ENTITLES them to your time when they need you, and your resources when they want them!

[QUOTE=SugarDaddio;6302058]She offered me 2,500/ month on the site. I just simply replied that I couldn't meet her expectation and never heard back from her..[/QUOTE]I met with her about two years ago at a Mexican restaurant for drinks. At the time, she wanted $1500/ month. (Inflation is killing us! She's beautiful, but older than 43. The chemistry in person wasn't there; she didn't flirt or touch my arm or anything. She was very nice. However, I'm younger than her. I can pull older women like her just by going out to a bar and buying them a drink. I think her demographic is older rich, retired guys (based on an arrangement story she told me). Also, she might still be married if that matters. My take: She doesn't fit into what this board is looking for.

[QUOTE=BrassMan73;6302099]The typical modern western woman thinks all she has to do is show up and bless you with her presence. They don'twant to do anything to earn their resources. They think having a v-jay-jay ENTITLES them to your time when they need you, and your resources when they want them![/QUOTE]It's just pussy capitalism and also these young not terribly bright females translate loads of messages and likes on their profiles to potential cash offerings, which is not even remotely true. They end up pricing themselves out of an arrangement either wittingly or unwittingly ultimately wasting their time and everyone else's.

How do I know this? B / c I'll do 2 30 day memberships spread out of the course of a year and see the same hot chicks on SA online. If they had landed what they were looking for, why would they still be online all the time? They're stupid and their shelf life is limited to just a few years but they won't know it till it's too late.

The really hot ones keep chasing squirrels on SA. The mid tier ones will eventually give up. Both go back to banging guys their own age for free.

What would help SA is to stop allowing male users to send messages to girls before paying. Don't new users get to send up to 10 messages before paying? It's flooding girls inboxes and screwing everything up. Maybe they will fix that, b/c SA really has little value for me now. All the girls I'd consider allowances don't seem to respond. I only get legit responses from low-mid tier girls and pros, neither of which I'm interested in paying.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bea0a277-9189-4e5e-b16c-623e5843c32c[/URL]

Urfr3akflor

Here's one I moved off site and had some good conversations with. Sent confirmation pic so I know she's real. Settled on 200 ppm plus hotel. She's a little far out for me and I'm pretty happy with my regular SB so I'm throwing her to here. Was open to BBJ. She didn't want to send nudes without payment (another reason I didn't chase, if an SB wants $ to send nudes I normally eject) but I think she's easy to land if you're looking for a nice latina.

Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL]

[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;6301937]Yes too bad, although I doubt I could afford her anyway. That is top shelf SB or at least pretty far up there.[/QUOTE]Likely true. Which makes her refusal to provide sexual benefits all the more appalling.

[QUOTE=TylerDurden07;6301297][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a58c1f81-ec62-4738-8052-3408012fc06a[/URL]

Seemed nice at first, very personable. After asking what she was looking for, she said she was new to this, but knew that she didn't want "anything sexual. " What a pity. She'll get nothing financial then, at least not from me.[/QUOTE]I don't fish in your sugar bowl (to mix metaphors) but she's been on less than a week. She likely will have few different course corrections in her time on the site. I wouldn't write her off based on what you've said she replied thus far.

I also wasn't too impressed w / her. Despite her 'slim' self-description, she looks a little thick for me. We have Latinas like her a lot on the site in southern California.

She can't host and she wants 400 ppm. I haven't tried to negotiate down yet but seems DTF.

SD.


[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302776]Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SugarDaddio;6302941]She can't host and she wants 400 ppm. I haven't tried to negotiate down yet but seems DTF.

SD.[/QUOTE]I'm surprised that she hasn't been reviewed or mentioned before. Her profile says she's been on the site since 2017.

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302776]Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL][/QUOTE]Chatted a bit on the site, tried to move off the site. Never reached out to me, and when I came back on the site a month later when I renewed, she reached out to me with small talk on the site. I lost interest.

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302976]I'm surprised that she hasn't been reviewed or mentioned before. Her profile says she's been on the site since 2017.[/QUOTE]I have seen her and that number quoted is accurate and she cannot host. But she is DTF.

Has anyone had experience with Petiteyoga? I know she is on both Seeking and SDM. We messaged a little off site and she is firm on 400 per meet.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2cad06a-7672-4e0d-adc4-8dd7acd12d72[/URL]

Thanks.

So it sounds like there is no need to try and negotiate her down then if you saw her at 400. I appreciate the input.

Thanks,

SD.

[QUOTE=PeterPan;6303290]I have seen her and that number quoted is accurate and she cannot host. But she is DTF.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SugarDaddio;6303593]So it sounds like there is no need to try and negotiate her down then if you saw her at 400. I appreciate the input.

Thanks,

SD.[/QUOTE]I would say try negotiating. She did not budge in my case. Please report if you have success.

Here's another I'm chatting with.

Any info on this one? Definitely seems DTF.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2ff68fa-a03f-4da1-9f39-18e00e125e4f[/URL]

[QUOTE=PeterPan;6303656]I would say try negotiating. She did not budge in my case. Please report if you have success.[/QUOTE]She quoted me the same so looks like that is set for her.

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302776]Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL][/QUOTE]I almost got together with her a couple of times, but just didn't feel like going out that particular night. But she seems real and DTF. I think she wanted 400, but I talked her down to 350 or so.

So I was talking with a girl on Seeking and I decided to cancel our meeting together after I asked for a pic and she didn't look as good in that photo. She raged at me over text and said that she would publish my number with a negative review for other girls to see. Since she said that, I noticed a bunch of girls not respond to my messages or block me after we exchange a couple of messages.

Does anyone know if this is a feature on Seeking that only the women can see? I've never heard of this before.

Short answer: Pretty sure she's only selling pics / vids on snapchat.

Longer answer: I used to flirt with this girl a little when she worked at a starbucks I stopped at on my way to work. This was about 6 years ago. So I was pretty excited to see her on Seeking. I reached out, told her I used to see her at the starbucks and we moved to snapchat. She seems pretty funny and nice to chat with. When I asked if she'd like to do a meet and greet she said she just needed to arrange a babysitter and would let me know when she got one. She never directly asked me for money to cover it. A day later I see in her story that she's having a $50 sale for content. So I did something I never do because I felt like I kinda knew this girl. I sent her a message saying I'd send her the 50 for the content. She sends me some pics of her ass in various poses and one with a dildo in it. Honestly it may not even have been her for all I know. I'm a little disappointed but whatever. I then ask when she can meet and she says that she'll need to get some money for a babysitter. WHAT? I just gave you 50. She says something like she didn't realize it was for the babysitter and she's already used it for gas.

So moral of the story and advice that's always given out in this thread. Never send money ahead of time. I live by it most of the time. Thought I could trust her but still got burned.

Also, note that she says she's 25 on seeking. I'm pretty sure she wasn't 19 when I knew her at the starbucks. I'd guess she's closer to 30. Also, if this is actually the girl I knew from starbucks she looks more like her main profile pic than the last one. She told me she uses a filter for all of her snapchat stuff.

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6305017]Here's another I'm chatting with.

Any info on this one? Definitely seems DTF.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2ff68fa-a03f-4da1-9f39-18e00e125e4f[/URL][/QUOTE]

Moved her to snap earlier in the month. I was a bit skeptical when she asked for only 500 a month for weekly meetups. Scheduled a meet, texted the day of to confirm but she had "forgot" and couldn't, but wouldn't you know she has some content for sell. Typical content selling time waster.

[QUOTE=DudeNextDoor;6305248]Short answer: Pretty sure she's only selling pics / vids on snapchat.

Longer answer: I used to flirt with this girl a little when she worked at a starbucks I stopped at on my way to work. This was about 6 years ago. So I was pretty excited to see her on Seeking. I reached out, told her I used to see her at the starbucks and we moved to snapchat. She seems pretty funny and nice to chat with. When I asked if she'd like to do a meet and greet she said she just needed to arrange a babysitter and would let me know when she got one. She never directly asked me for money to cover it. A day later I see in her story that she's having a $50 sale for content. So I did something I never do because I felt like I kinda knew this girl. I sent her a message saying I'd send her the 50 for the content. She sends me some pics of her ass in various poses and one with a dildo in it. Honestly it may not even have been her for all I know. I'm a little disappointed but whatever. I then ask when she can meet and she says that she'll need to get some money for a babysitter. WHAT? I just gave you 50. She says something like she didn't realize it was for the babysitter and she's already used it for gas.

So moral of the story and advice that's always given out in this thread. Never send money ahead of time. I live by it most of the time. Thought I could trust her but still got burned.

Also, note that she says she's 25 on seeking. I'm pretty sure she wasn't 19 when I knew her at the starbucks. I'd guess she's closer to 30. Also, if this is actually the girl I knew from starbucks she looks more like her main profile pic than the last one. She told me she uses a filter for all of her snapchat stuff.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;6305260]Moved her to snap earlier in the month. I was a bit skeptical when she asked for only 500 a month for weekly meetups. Scheduled a meet, texted the day of to confirm but she had "forgot" and couldn't, but wouldn't you know she has some content for sell. Typical content selling time waster.[/QUOTE]Just a general question regarding "snapchat", do you find girls wanting to use that platform to communicate instead of regular phone number texting to always be content scammers?

[QUOTE=DudeNextDoor;6305248]Short answer: Pretty sure she's only selling pics / vids on snapchat.

Longer answer: I used to flirt with this girl a little when she worked at a starbucks I stopped at on my way to work. This was about 6 years ago. So I was pretty excited to see her on Seeking. I reached out, told her I used to see her at the starbucks and we moved to snapchat. She seems pretty funny and nice to chat with. When I asked if she'd like to do a meet and greet she said she just needed to arrange a babysitter and would let me know when she got one. She never directly asked me for money to cover it. A day later I see in her story that she's having a $50 sale for content. So I did something I never do because I felt like I kinda knew this girl. I sent her a message saying I'd send her the 50 for the content. She sends me some pics of her ass in various poses and one with a dildo in it. Honestly it may not even have been her for all I know. I'm a little disappointed but whatever. I then ask when she can meet and she says that she'll need to get some money for a babysitter. WHAT? I just gave you 50. She says something like she didn't realize it was for the babysitter and she's already used it for gas.

So moral of the story and advice that's always given out in this thread. Never send money ahead of time. I live by it most of the time. Thought I could trust her but still got burned.

Also, note that she says she's 25 on seeking. I'm pretty sure she wasn't 19 when I knew her at the starbucks. I'd guess she's closer to 30. Also, if this is actually the girl I knew from starbucks she looks more like her main profile pic than the last one. She told me she uses a filter for all of her snapchat stuff.[/QUOTE]Yeah, she hit me with the "need babysitting money" before meeting.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6305350]Just a general question regarding "snapchat", do you find girls wanting to use that platform to communicate instead of regular phone number texting to always be content scammers?[/QUOTE]Yes, Snap is always scammers. I respond: "I don't have Snapchat. How about Telegram, Signal, Discord, Instagram, Whatsapp, or Text?

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302776]Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL][/QUOTE]I've seen her twice.

Talked her down to $300 but gave her a tip because she drove an hour to my motel twice. Didn't watch the clock. Hung out a while after the session just looking at memes. BBJ doggy mish, she doesn't like DATY so I opted out. She gets off on thrusting with some speed. Only cons is she smokes and covers it with perfume.

[QUOTE=MilfHunter818;6305717]I've seen her twice.

Talked her down to $300 but gave her a tip because she drove an hour to my motel twice. Didn't watch the clock. Hung out a while after the session just looking at memes. BBJ doggy mish, she doesn't like DATY so I opted out. She gets off on thrusting with some speed. Only cons is she smokes and covers it with perfume.[/QUOTE]I'm not 100% sure, but I think SucculentSweetheart is a woman I saw several times about three years ago. Her body was smoking hot. She had curvy hips and nice tits but wasn't fat at all. She was really tight for both vaginal and anal. She didn't really like to kiss, which is the main reason why I stopped seeing her. She seemed disinterested when I was DATY, so I only did it once and didn't keep at it for very long. I really can't be certain it's the same woman because I don't have any old pictures of her to compare. But your comment about her not liking DATY makes me think it's her. She didn't host. She always drove to my hotel room.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6305350]Just a general question regarding "snapchat", do you find girls wanting to use that platform to communicate instead of regular phone number texting to always be content scammers?[/QUOTE]I run into the same amount of pic sellers / scammers on normal text and snap. No difference. The SB I've been enjoying this month I moved from the site to text, the one I banged out the previous 4 months I took from the site to Snap. I've had a lot of one time meet ups off both. Generally after a little bit of site chat and I know I'm interested in moving forward I just say something like "I'd love to talk arrangement details. Do you prefer text or snap?"

I actually find it easier to weed out scammers on snap since you can see someone's "snap score" once you've added each other. If a girl's snap score is too low then it's usually a dead giveaway they are scamming, since they constantly have to make new accounts after the previous account gets banned.

[QUOTE=NewAnonymousName;6305760]I'm not 100% sure, but I think SucculentSweetheart is a woman I saw several times about three years ago. Her body was smoking hot. She had curvy hips and nice tits but wasn't fat at all. She was really tight for both vaginal and anal. She didn't really like to kiss, which is the main reason why I stopped seeing her. She seemed disinterested when I was DATY, so I only did it once and didn't keep at it for very long. I really can't be certain it's the same woman because I don't have any old pictures of her to compare. But your comment about her not liking DATY makes me think it's her. She didn't host. She always drove to my hotel room.[/QUOTE]Do you remember if she had any identifiable tattoos.

Probably her. She didn't like to kiss either. Said too many had bad breathe. I was able to kiss her once. Haven't seen her since.

[QUOTE=NewAnonymousName;6305760]I'm not 100% sure, but I think SucculentSweetheart is a woman I saw several times about three years ago. Her body was smoking hot. She had curvy hips and nice tits but wasn't fat at all. She was really tight for both vaginal and anal. She didn't really like to kiss, which is the main reason why I stopped seeing her. She seemed disinterested when I was DATY, so I only did it once and didn't keep at it for very long. I really can't be certain it's the same woman because I don't have any old pictures of her to compare. But your comment about her not liking DATY makes me think it's her. She didn't host. She always drove to my hotel room.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6302776]Anyone have any history on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e0bac1a6-502b-4661-b16a-23a4e32295b6[/URL][/QUOTE]I've seen her once. Good body, cute face. Like her personality too. Smoked with her; 420 is her true passion. Prices quoted thus far are in line. No DATY, but I usually don't look for that anyway. When we got down to it, she was a little rushed and distracted. So, the quality wasn't there. Definitely DTF. She's contacted several times since, but the connection was too flaky for me. Would really like her if she actually liked me more.

[QUOTE=HollowGuy;6306051]Do you remember if she had any identifiable tattoos.[/QUOTE]I don't remember. Sorry. It was a long time ago.

[QUOTE=NewAnonymousName;6306470]I don't remember. Sorry. It was a long time ago.[/QUOTE]She does have tattoos several but can't remember what they were. I did end up meeting her. She was pretty cool, put on more weight than her photos show but still good looking. She was down for everything except for anal. Paid less than originally agreed upon so that was a plus!

[QUOTE=Rican2323;6306535]She does have tattoos several but can't remember what they were. I did end up meeting her. She was pretty cool, put on more weight than her photos show but still good looking. She was down for everything except for anal. Paid less than originally agreed upon so that was a plus![/QUOTE]I wonder why she stopped doing anal. I did it with her all three times I saw her a few years ago.

Hey guys,

I noted some good dialogue on succulent sweetheart. Here is another one who has been around and.

Makes a new profile sometimes.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/899e8bca-2729-49f1-b3c8-2d00645286e9[/URL]

Does anyone have history with her?

She wants 600! But DTF.

[QUOTE=NewAnonymousName;6306544]I wonder why she stopped doing anal. I did it with her all three times I saw her a few years ago.[/QUOTE]Well, let just say that the square peg has never been able to fit ANY round hole!

[QUOTE=PeterPan;6306615]Hey guys,

I noted some good dialogue on succulent sweetheart. Here is another one who has been around and.

Makes a new profile sometimes.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/899e8bca-2729-49f1-b3c8-2d00645286e9[/URL]

Does anyone have history with her?

She wants 600! But DTF.[/QUOTE]600 for that is insane. Her face is a 6, maybe a 7. Way too much ink. and body isn't that nice. And pushing 30. She is a 250 girl if she is lucky, or maybe 300 if someone has tattoo fetish.

[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;6306812]600 for that is insane. Her face is a 6, maybe a 7. Way too much ink. and body isn't that nice. And pushing 30. She is a 250 girl if she is lucky, or maybe 300 if someone has tattoo fetish.[/QUOTE]Thank for talking some sense into. I appreciate this forum and your post! Helps stopping me from making stupid ass mistakes as I think with my sick sometimes! But yeah she does not go down below 600 apparently. And last SD was 60 M net worth and was going to buy her a car etc. But obviously didn't! Anyways thanks.

[QUOTE=PeterPan;6306832]Thank for talking some sense into. I appreciate this forum and your post! Helps stopping me from making stupid ass mistakes as I think with my sick sometimes! But yeah she does not go down below 600 apparently. And last SD was 60 M net worth and was going to buy her a car etc. But obviously didn't! Anyways thanks.[/QUOTE]It's a standard exaggeration for a SB to talk about how generous her "last" sugar daddy was. I usually stop pursuing them when I hear that line. To me, it screams overentitled [female dog]. (Edited because I didn't know USASG blocks the actual word; sorry.)

In the same vein, I never respond to a profile that says you can get her attention by buying her something from her wishlist. To me, it means she's either overentitled or a scammer.

As soon as I see the line about getting her attention by getting something form the wish list it is an automatic skip. I know most on this forum get this but I have gotten some of the best pussy I have ever had from sweet submissive women on SA that are not necessarily models (although there have been a few LOL) but are beautiful to me. And you know that's all that counts. I hit two this past week for 200 and 300 and they both hosted. I had a good week to say the least. Sorry for the rant here I simply got excited LOL.

As always may the pussy be with you.

SD.