Best Shows: customer feedback
[QUOTE=Bestshows; 1559075]Hi, this is Gary from Bestshows Entertainment, (you can verify that by calling the company phone line and talking to me). I would like to say that I enjoy the conversations on this board very much, we can't be all things, to all people, that's why choice is good. Also Wingman Todd isn't me.
We try to work with all of our customers to make sure they are happy, we explain what we offer on the phone and on our website. As a company, we deal with customer complaints in a responsible way, I think it is a lot better than having no recourse at all which is what happens when you deal with an independent girl. The good thing with us is that that you know who you are getting, the pictures are real. This contrast to the other companies in town, that as almost everyone on here knows, plasters tons of fake pictures on backpage everyday, and for the most part sends out ripoff artists. You can tell their pictures because they are professional model pics, and of course searching with google images, reveals they are posted on multiple sites.
Anyway.
Thanks,
Gary[/QUOTE]Gary:
I appreciate your willingness to openly engage your customer base. I would like to offer a bit of (hopefully) constructive feedback.
I used your service with mixed results back in the late 1990s / early 2000s. About half of the time, the lady sent to me would (per D-Nut's description) read me the RICO act and pretend to be offended. On the other occasions, I did have a decent time, but it was *very* expensive for what I got. I always felt like I was rolling the dice, which I was.
This was circa 1999, before the Internet-based indy scene got going. I will admit that your service was probably the best option available in the Cincinnati area at the time. I also used to use Cincy Seductions and 247 Dancers, who offered more or less the same service as Best Shows: You had to pay a fee for the girl to show up, and then try to bargain for expensive "extras." Once again, the customer had to roll the dice. The customer was completely disappointed about half of the time.
The market (and the economy) have changed since then. It is now possible to find attractive FS independent providers for about what you charge as an agency fee. In 2012 customers expect flat-rate pricing, and they want a sure thing.
Also, your ladies used to be a lot more attractive. I have looked at your current lineup, and you don't have anyone who I would describe as a real stunner. About half of them are overweight.
My point being this: If you are going to thrive in the current market as a middleman, then you need to offer flat-rate pricing and women who are a cut above the ones that customers can find on the indy scene. For example, check out Fantasy escorts: [url]http://www.kentuckyescorts.net/escorts/tasha/tashabio.htm[/url] Then check out Brooke from Discreet [url]Desires:http://www.discreetdesires.org/Brooke.htm.[/url]
These women are "sure things" and they are as stunning in person as they are in their pictures. (I have used the services of both agencies.)
Now check out BestShows' current lineup. Surely you can see the difference. Best Shows isn't offering anything better in the way of quality, and customers are concerned that for $130, they'll be sold a very expensive strip tease (from an overweight stripper, at that).
Personally, I would love to see you improve your lineup and provide flat-rate pricing, because I would be eager to see another viable option in Cincinnati for young, slender, and attractive escorts. But what you now provide isn't going to get my business.
I will continue to watch your website. Please take this feedback in the positive spirit in which it was intended.
Best shows feedback continued
Todd Cincy says it perfectly.
Gary: you've got a niche, no question. However, I (like many) hope you'll take Todd's critiques constructively. Price your services based on what the market will bare (pun intended). Otherwise, your business model likely only preys on unknowing and unvouched newbies. Do you even get repeat clients? Members of a board like this (especially seniors) won't likely pay attention to your offerings (as I have not) for the very reasons pointed out by Todd. When you have a hot little firecracker / sure thing like Dawn, Molly, Lexi, Fan-four etc. Why would anyone futz around with a service such as yours? I'm sure many board members are already missing Buddah until he returns from his hiatus. He wrote the book when it comes to your kind of business model. You may consider emulating it.
I like Todd am hopeful you'll recognize that it's no longer the good-ol-days of the 90's and 2000's. Haven't dreamt more than $1. 5 to $2 for HQ FS in a very long time.
Thanks for opening up to the board.
Cam.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy; 1559411]Gary:
I appreciate your willingness to openly engage your customer base. I would like to offer a bit of (hopefully) constructive feedback.
I used your service with mixed results back in the late 1990s / early 2000s. About half of the time, the lady sent to me would (per D-Nut's description) read me the RICO act and pretend to be offended. On the other occasions, I did have a decent time, but it was *very* expensive for what I got. I always felt like I was rolling the dice, which I was.
This was circa 1999, before the Internet-based indy scene got going. I will admit that your service was probably the best option available in the Cincinnati area at the time. I also used to use Cincy Seductions and 247 Dancers, who offered more or less the same service as Best Shows: You had to pay a fee for the girl to show up, and then try to bargain for expensive "extras." Once again, the customer had to roll the dice. The customer was completely disappointed about half of the time.
The market (and the economy) have changed since then. It is now possible to find attractive FS independent providers for about what you charge as an agency fee. In 2012 customers expect flat-rate pricing, and they want a sure thing.
Also, your ladies used to be a lot more attractive. I have looked at your current lineup, and you don't have anyone who I would describe as a real stunner. About half of them are overweight.
My point being this: If you are going to thrive in the current market as a middleman, then you need to offer flat-rate pricing and women who are a cut above the ones that customers can find on the indy scene. For example, check out Fantasy escorts:
[url]http://www.kentuckyescorts.net/escorts/tasha/tashabio.htm[/url]
Then check out Brooke from Discreet.
[url]Desires:http://www.discreetdesires.org/Brooke.htm.[/url]
These women are "sure things" and they are as stunning in person as they are in their pictures. (I have used the services of both agencies.)
Now check out BestShows' current lineup. Surely you can see the difference. Best Shows isn't offering anything better in the way of quality, and customers are concerned that for $130, they'll be sold a very expensive strip tease (from an overweight stripper, at that).
Personally, I would love to see you improve your lineup and provide flat-rate pricing, because I would be eager to see another viable option in Cincinnati for young, slender, and attractive escorts. But what you now provide isn't going to get my business.
I will continue to watch your website. Please take this feedback in the positive spirit in which it was intended.[/QUOTE]
Best Shows: more feedback
Gary:
With all due respect, you also need to ditch the old pics of "Tia," whom I did see in 1997. You have her age on the Cincinnati site as 26. (Was she 11 in '97?) You also have her listed on your Dallas sub-site, where you have her age as 30. (Are you really going to send Tia to Dallas?)
Looking at the marketing blurb on the BestShows site, your pitch seems to be,"You guys can't trust independent providers, so you should come to me for overpriced inner city women with large booties." Anyone who does a bit of research knows that this is not the case. To be sure, there are rip-offs on BP, but there are also many trustworthy local independent ladies, like those found on this site.
To put this in outline form, I would make the following suggestion to BestShows (or anyone who wanted to start an agency) :
(1.) Don't insult your customers' intelligence: You will score no points with old pics, marketing-through-fear tactics, and similar ploys. In 1999, research was difficult to come by. Now anyone can find vetted reviews on any number of sites.
(2.) Offer something better / different: I realize that not every guy on here shares my exclusive preference for providers who are young, attractive, and slender. Some guys don't mind providers who are older / heavier. However, there are already *plenty* of older / heavier women on the indy market. We don't need an agency like Best Shows to give the hobbyists of Cincinnati one more overweight or middle-aged provider.
If I were running an agency, I would focus on bringing to market what is more rare on the indy scene: the young, the attractive, the stunning. As a middleman, you won't make money on overweight and older providers. There is simply too much competition in those niches among the indies.
(3.) Keep it simple and straightforward: The whole "stripper agency" guise used by Best Shows / Cincy Seductions, etc. Is obsolete. Too many of us have been burned by these arrangements in the past, by women who use the stripper label as a pretext to cash-and-dash. No one (except an extreme newbie) is willing to run that risk anymore.
Once again, Gary, I don't mean to be harsh. I was a frequent flyer with you ten years ago and would like to do business with you again.
Lexi "Sexy Red" from InKent
First *hugs to Lexi.
Had a dream (first dream) about Lexi today. Imagined I was directed to her in-call at what I considered a nice, clean hotel. Lexi's pics are 100% accurate, although I was happy to find she was a little shorter and more "stacked" than I'd imagined. YMMV, but I found Lexi (after a short convo) to be very affectionate; made eye contact with me, touched me, put her arms around me, and generally made it feel like I'd just re-connected with an old g / f. After some messing around, Lexi decided to proceed to warm me up. Very nice BBBJ (NCIM-fine by me) and I agree with another poster. There was some effective suction happening.
Now, Lexi has said herself she is 33 and had a child. You can tell in some ways, and that is understandable. However, I very much enjoyed her breasts (great nipples) and all the other things that makes a lady great; her delicate neck, nice arms and hands, pretty eyes, smelled great, the works. And of course, that mane of hair. After all that, I was ready to really enjoy her in a CFS type of way. I'm an ass and legs man, and Lexi is very well-equipped there. I enjoyed her in MISH and DOGGIE (great view) and she was enthusiastic in a realistic way. Not over the top at all.
IMO, Lexi is a little firecracker. I had a great time.