100 % agree w / ElGato6969
[QUOTE=ElGato6969;7674791]I think one of the big problems here is the watering down of the abbreviations. I have only been on here for a short time compared to most of you, but it seems to me that there are no standards, everyone makes the abbreviation fit their review. Here are a few examples that I have read on here. One member on here wrote a review where he received a HJ that was very GFE, a GFE handy, really?? I have been in this hobby for a long time and GFE to me means whatever you would do with your GF (kissing, licking, fucking, sucking, BB everything etc.) How is a HJ GFE, makes 0 sense. Another example is the L's or levels of service. I was always under the impression that L1 = HJ, L2 = BJ and L3 = FS, but now you have guy's who report getting L2, but to them L2 is a nude or partially nude HJ, again the standard is all over the place. This is a problem because it misleads members into thinking that there is more or in some cases less service available. The other issue is the vague reviews, ok if you don't want to post details then why bother posting a review at all or writing at a review that hints at something but it is never said. The other abbreviation here that is abused is YMMV. The only reason these providers do this line of work is for money, sure maybe if they like you, you will get a little extra, but not enough to put you in some special category and if she is doing it for you then she is doing it for others which kind of blows the YMMV thing out of the water. I would be curious if other members here think we should tighten up on this slippery slope of abbreviations or anything else I mentioned here.[/QUOTE]The standard IS and should be "L1 = HJ, L2 = BJ and L3 = FS" period no deviation thanks ELGato.
Eva blue energy, newbury beantown
Got Eva at Blue Energy. Nice person, Younger and rockin bod. Great massage and tease. Xtra massage after hand finish. Kinda pricey but would repeat.