[QUOTE=OliverNP;6278138]I encounter it fairly regularly (like when an SB is getting the hint that the new and shiny factor is wearing off for me, and suddenly she has the idea maybe we could date without sugar in order to keep me around), but only within a certain age bracket (maybe 25+ on average).
But, what I'm seeing now is a little different. It's the girls who make clear they are in search of a long-term relationship and ask me explicitly to not ruin it by talking about ppm or allowance.
Is that really sugar-optional? I don't think so. I still think the majority of them still want their hands in my pockets, they would just like it to be under the successful boyfriend / young girlfriend way of doing things rather than anything like an official specified amount.
If that's what you're looking for (and I know some folks are), then yes probably a different approach in the profile to indicate that's what you want would attract more of what you want. I try to craft my profile in a way that it doesn't limit opportunities. That's not always easy, because if I say I want casual & NSA, the girls who want BFs won't react well to it, and if I say I want a LTR, it might land me more cheap or free pussy (at the expense of lots of texting) but turns away the casual encounters I actually prefer.[/QUOTE]Yes I prefer the casual encounters too, but come to think of it, given the entire goal is BBFS with a UTR, it's best to come across looking for "monogamous" and "emotional connection" even though we all know everything about seeking is short term.
