[QUOTE=Toungsten;4165556]Not putting me on the spot at all. You have to understand I don't make appointments unless I know what I'm getting into. No pun intended. Either from other hobbyists that I know and trust or from M herself. So I don't know how all the girls are and can't tell you who is the worst performer of them all. My only deviance from my normal way of booking is a couple of weeks ago when I showed up at the address of someone from another booker who I actually had seen before and was finally told, after waiting about a half hour for a text response, that she was not going to be available for another hour. I didn't want to waste any more time and TOFTT with Lia who just began that week. Knew hardly anything about her but hit a home run that day. As far as the ones that I have seen I have to say 1. Lucia (combination of looks and performance) 2. Lia (performance).
3. Lexi (performance) 4. BB who I haven't seen yet but was told by a very reliable source that she is very good and I will see her soon. And there's always Megan who I don't have to explain at all.
There is another factor to consider. Looks may be very subjective as performance can also be to the uninitiated. That being said we all get something different out of the girls we visit because of a variety of factors. Could be if they like you or feel a comfortable connection. Could be looks or age of the customer. Could be a lot of things and that's why when I read about mongers who say some providers that DEFINITELY do not offer BB when I know they do on a selective basis I know that you can't compare what each one of us gets from the girls we see.[/QUOTE]I very much appreciate the detailed feedback and thanks for taking the time to provide it to us. Are there any current providers in M's stable with whom you would NOT repeat? Or, of the list of M's current providers, have you only seen the four that you mentioned? Thanks again!
