CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

I'm one who love your photo skills. I can't belive someone would even question you're skill. If they wanted more pics all they had to do is ask you. You are still the King.

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1315945]Let's get it on. Let's have an open discussion. Everyone has likes and dislikes. I am not all that fond of big flabby women. I do like cute, big shapely girls with big features. Sabrina comes to mind. I don't care for loose flat boobs. But, if everything else is intact and the service is acceptable, I can over look a couple of floppy tits. Black Nicole is an excellence example. I like a cute face, long legs, small waist, ample behind, smooth skin, nice hair, and etc, etc, and etc. In other words, I like the perfect women. What I like most is,"Clean." Good hygiene is a most. If the Hygiene is good, I can usually find something to like in every girl.

Take Michelle to example. Even though her facial expression isn't that pleasing, she's cute IMHO. And she does have a teeny bit of baby fat. But that's part of her charm. Her breast may not be the biggest. Who cares? At least they are not hanging to her knees and her inny nipples are a delight to suck on. All of that is just fine, however, her best feature? Check out her superfine, pimple less, smooth little ass.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1315945]. Let's get it on. Let's have an open discussion. Everyone has likes and dislikes. I am not all that fond of big flabby women. I do like cute, big shapely girls with big features. Sabrina comes to mind. I don't care for loose flat boobs. But, if everything else is intact and the service is acceptable, I can over look a couple of floppy tits. Black Nicole is an excellence example. I like a cute face, long legs, small waist, ample behind, smooth skin, nice hair, and etc, etc, and etc. In other words, I like the perfect women. What I like most is,"Clean." Good hygiene is a most. If the Hygiene is good, I can usually find something to like in every girl.

Take Michelle to example. Even though her facial expression isn't that pleasing, she's cute IMHO. And she does have a teeny bit of baby fat. But that's part of her charm. Her breast may not be the biggest. Who cares? At least they are not hanging to her knees and her inny nipples are a delight to suck on. All of that is just fine, however, her best feature? Check out her superfine, pimple less, smooth little ass.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]The only thing that I have ever seen about you photos that I have not liked are dirty feet or dirty socks. But I think your photos are the best on this site.

Another Michelle with black granny glasses. That makes three that I know of. CJ, nice pics as usual.

Perhaps you could help out the men who might want to find and "take Michelle" for sex.[/QUOTE]You would think that after over 3, 000 posts, over 9, 000 pictures posted and over 5 years as a senior member, I'd know how to give a proper review. Lucky for me, and the rest of the membership, that we have someone out there lurking in the wings to remind me.

One of Michelle pictures has over 600 views. I am guessing, but it is a good bet that a large percentage of those views are from out of towners who will not be seeking to find Michelle. It is also a safe bet that a number of these views involve lurkers who live near-by but who have no intentions of seeking out Michelle. That leaves the views of a few senior members, new members and lurkers who actually travel the avenues of Philadelphia, searching for women. This last group of viewers, the guys who actually go out and find women; if they are regular readers of the, "CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos," thread; already have all the information they need to find Michelle (if they want to find her). Regular followers, who actually monger, already know.

[indent][b]When:[/b] Recent (I stated awhile back that I post my pictures in a timely manner. However, I do not give exact dates and times because I do not want to establish a schedule, a profile or a method of operation to which LE or members of this forum may fellow. I will say, however, I mostly monger during daylight hours.

If you need to know the exact day and times that I monger, I am sorry, that is privilege information.

[b]Where:[/b] Kensington Ave. (Unless otherwise stated any girl reviewed in the, "CookyJar's StreetWalker Photo," can be found on Kensington Ave. That's always been the case.)

[b]What:[/b] I cannot answer that. Since we are talking about a Streetwalker and I don't pay for sex, or sexual acts, I cannot answer that. I imagine that you could assume that because she is a streetwalker she provides regular streetwalker services. (Some girls will do things with one guy but not with another. That's the assumption made by most senior mongers.)

[b]How[/b]: YMMV (She was fine with me. But, like most seniors, I have come to find that, that doesn't mean much. Guys who actually do what others claim to do know that the girl's personalities change with the wind – from day to day and guy to guy. For example: Alexus was good [b]most[/b] Of the time and as sweet as Aundrea was she wasn't always sweet. [/indent]

[QUOTE=Phillyewe;1196856]I write in support of Lost Philly, Nats Nats, and Jicarlo. The reason I do is that they understand the purpose for which Jackson created this forum, which is to facilitate the exchange of information among men looking for sex with women.[/quote]I am getting a little tired of the references to the, "Creators Purpose." If I am not helping men find women for sex, let Jackson tell me.

Helping Men Find Women for Sex, doesn't mean that I am obligated to take your hand and guide you to the pussy and stick your nose in it. The pictures are free, the information (implied or otherwise) is free. After 5 years of posting pictures and tons of details, I am sorry, but, I am a little offended by your post. You are a senior member. If you really wanted the information you could have just ask. It is not what you asked but how you asked it.

[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 573625]

...I don't want to put CJ on ignore, because I like his stuff about Hunting Park and the K.

...Click on the Report to Moderator button, as I have just done. There's no sense bugging CJ if it bothers you. He's a nice guy and respects the management here.[/QUOTE]If you don't think I am not following the letter of the forum, please follow your own advice.

CookyJar.

PS: Are you sure you were one of the good ones?

CJ, I am one of the out of town mongers you referenced in your last post. I find it very hard to believe that some dumbasses want to question how you do business on here. In casse they have not noticed, this forum is called CookyJar's Streetwalker photos. Maybe they should have there own, named something like Dumbasses guide to lurking and P! Ssing People Off. Ignore these folks. I for one bemoan the fact that my own hometown cannot not come anywhere near the quality of SW's that CJ alone finds. You sir are one of my idols and I hope to make it to Philly some day and will offer to buy you a beer and a cheesesteak just as my way of saying "Thanks" for the entertainment you provide. Of course if you can provide me with references to one of these find ladies at that time it would be appreciated, but will no be necessary. Keep up the good work and remember, a safe monger is a long lived monger.

CJ, I am a long time member but I don't post much at all. I am from Baltimore and ALWAYS stop by to see your posts. Who knows someday I might make the trip with all of the talent in your city. What I wanted to say was THANKS and keep up the good work! Don't worry about anything, anyone else has to say.

[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 1316381]Thanks, as always, for sharing your photographs of streetwalkers.

Perhaps you could help out the men who might want to find and "take Michelle" for sex:[indent]WHEN did you find Michelle (what year, or month) ,

WHERE did you find her (what neighborhood of Philadelphia, perhaps even a street) ,

WHAT streetwalker services did she offer (BJ, FS, etc.) , and

HOW would you evaluate her streetwalker services and personality. [/indent][/QUOTE]I can tell that Phillyewe don't understand, if you don't have digits but have a way of seeing you can spot them as you are hunting for them (driving around). CJ keep them coming the pic only it do help.

[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 1317053]...A photo or two certainly helps do that.

...It still holds true that you can't just view 30 photos of someone's body and know which section of the city to look for her, or how many months / years ago she worked there or whether she was friendly or showed particular sexual skills.[/QUOTE]You could if you read the thread and used a little common sense.

Here is a question for you, friend Phillyewe. Which of the thirty pictures of Michelle did it for you? Was it Michelle 39 or perhaps it was Michelle 51 (where she is showing off her tongue piecing). Hopefully, out of 30 pictures you were able to find two that you liked enough to encourage your going out and seeking a woman. If just one of my 30 pictures helped you then I've satisfied the forum's premise.

Like always, that's not good enough for you. You want it all. You want me to take it out and put it in for you. Sorry buddy, it's ain't going to happen. I do the best I can and if you cannot accept that – I don't know what else to say.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 1317108]Actually, none of the photos helped me until you replied to my post. I was damned if I would drive to Kensington Avenue looking for someone who may have been encountered at Broad & Shunk. I was not going to look for someone whose picture may have been taken 2 years ago. I was not going to pick up someone who may have ripped off a guy's wallet. I would have thought twice before making a deal with someone who was reported to have an STD. Based on your reply post, these apparently were not the case with Michelle. Again, I thank you for providing some further information.

No one here can assume a photo is recent, or of a Kensington Avenue girl, or of a provider who was "fine", unless it is stated. (Remember the guy who used to post photos of New Jersey girls here? The guy who loves those gals from Old York Road? The guy who loves to reprise favorite poses from the past? He's the same photographer being discussed here.) Few people read every post here and remember every posting promise or mongering habit of others.

As for which picture was best? Any one or two that showed her face. With that and with the basic info I've mentioned, men who are seeking women for sex can "take it out and put it in" all by themselves. There's no need to exaggerate what is being asked for.[/QUOTE]First let me apologize, because in my last post I resorted to name calling directed at Phillyewe and I normally do not fall to that level. I will however point out that this thread is named CJ's Streetwalker Photos. I don't think any other explanation is required on his part. As an out of towner, I have figured out on my own from RTFF that the K is where the action in in your city and I will be cruising when I do visit.

[QUOTE=Phillyewe;1317108]Actually, none of the photos helped me until you replied to my post.[/QUOTE]But, eventually I was able to help you. So where is your information that's going to help, Men find women for sex. Where is your review?

Once again I cannot help but be offended. For you to suggest that I would not report a STD is an insult. A pox on you.

I hate people who presume to tell others what, they can or cannot do. I can assume anything I care to assume. That's my right. I always assume that every girl out there has an STD. I assume that every girl out there will steal / take a wallet if the right opportunity presents itself. I always assume that unless otherwise stated the girls [b]reviewed [/b] In this thread are from Philadelphia (Kensington Ave.) and not NJ.

One or two facial pictures satisfy you and that's fine. I am okay with that. Why cannot you be okay with the fact that others need more? Are you assuming that your needs trumps the needs of the entire forum? Do you presume to speak for the rest of the membership? What about those members who may need a picture of her face, butt and legs. There are guys who want to know if she is shaved, has full lips or a large clit. Does it really hurt you that much that I post thirty pictures? There you go again, imposing you righteousness over the rights of others.

Tell you what I'm going to do. I am going to start a separate thread just for you. In that thread I will post two facial pictures and information just for you. Hopefully this will satisfy you. And! From now on, I will only post two facial pictures and just the information you require. How's that? Wait for it. Whatever you want, you got it.

I would suggest that if you need more than I am currently giving, get it yourself, friend.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar;1317313]Tell you what I'm going to do. I am going to start a separate thread just for you. In that thread I will post two facial pictures and information just for you. Hopefully this will satisfy you. And! From now on, I will only post two facial pictures and just the information you require. How's that? Wait for it. Whatever you want, you got it.[/QUOTE]Oh, PLEASE don't give in to what you think he wants. Anyway, you'd be missing the point. What HE wants is to criticize you. It makes him feel bigger.

Read his criticism and you'd think that, unless a post contains detailed who, what, where, how, why and when (plus a link to google maps in real time to show what corner) then he thinks you were posting annoying, useless information. In truth, and I'll bet everyone else gets this, CJ's postings (and 1000 other postings on this forum) give us all very useful information that the K stroll is active and what kind of SWs are to be found. More info than that is not needed in every case and is usually not more helpful.

. Forth Ryte

[QUOTE=Forth Ryte; 1317400]Oh, PLEASE don't give in to what you think he wants. Anyway, you'd be missing the point. What HE wants is to criticize you. It makes him feel bigger.

Read his criticism and you'd think that, unless a post contains detailed who, what, where, how, why and when (plus a link to google maps in real time to show what corner) then he thinks you were posting annoying, useless information. In truth, and I'll bet everyone else gets this, CJ's postings (and 1000 other postings on this forum) give us all very useful information that the K stroll is active and what kind of SWs are to be found. More info than that is not needed in every case and is usually not more helpful.

Forth Ryte[/QUOTE]Thanks ForthRyte,

I really appreciate it when a senior member from, "Back in the day," speaks out. I am not looking for an, "Atta Boy," but I do like to know when I am on the right track.

When guys like you and Phillyewe say something, I listen. I don't always follow the suggestions but I do listen. Phillyewe is a senior member and he has been around for awhile. I remember these same arguments from 2006. I didn't agree with these arguments then and I don't agree with them now – but, I listen.

[QUOTE=Phillyewe]For God's sake, calm down. If the review caused the problem and it bothers you so much, then stop reviewing. It's not like you're winning acclaim for your spelling, your grammar, your descriptive prose, or your ability to remember provider names. So stop giving details and just post what you're good at: photographs!

You've always said your mission is just to show what's under the wrapper. So do it. And relax. [/QUOTE]

Click here to read the original: [post=478744][b]The above quote is from 11/13/06[/b][/post]

Phillyewe, I wish you would make up your mind. You cannot have it both ways.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Phillyewe;1317459]...I DON'T want detailed information.[/QUOTE]That's what you said. Click here to read the original: [post=478744][b]The above quote is from 11/13/06[/b][/post]

I wish you would make up your mind. You cannot have it both ways.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Phillyewe;1317664]… Detail is "the corner of Ontario & the K" or "5:15pm yesterday". Detail gives away information which you rightfully want to keep to yourself…[/QUOTE]
There you go again trying to tell others what’s what. According to Merrian-Websters, details are particulars. In this particular case details are the particulars I feel like giving.


What you said was:
[QUOTE=Phillyewe]… If the review caused the problem and it bothers you so much, then stop reviewing.
…stop giving details and just post what you're good at: photographs![/QUOTE]
If memory serves, the discussion was about my giving to many details.

What you said was; stop reviewing, stop giving details and just post pictures. Now you are asking for details: A report with particulars. Stop splitting hairs and make up your mind.

I need to know details. What exactly is it that you want. I want to start-up your personalized thread, ASAP.

BTW; you’re welcome. (The orininal welcome was implied. I assumed you were grateful.)

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1317768]There you go again trying to tell others what's what. According to Merrian-Websters, details are particulars. In this particular case details are the particulars I feel like giving.

What you said was:

If memory serves, the discussion was about my giving to many details.

What you said was; stop reviewing, stop giving details and just post pictures. Now you are asking for details: A report with particulars. Stop splitting hairs and make up your mind.

I need to know details. What exactly is it that you want. I want to start-up your personalized thread, ASAP.

BTW; you're welcome. (The orininal welcome was implied. I assumed you were grateful.)

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Cookie,

I appreciate the reviews and the faces. The least I can do is find the girl! Your work is well appreciated.

Milo