Arrangement Reports

Notmyrealname is an escort who was on STG. She's had other profiles on SA. Biggest concern on her is a stalker "ex" who is out of jail from what I understand.

[QUOTE=MkePlayer;4979105]Fungal2020 has had several profiles on here before. From the Fox River Valley area. At one point supposedly visiting once a week. Then later supposedly in Wauwatosa. CCAP shows her mostly in FRV area until very recently. She has been reviewed before, dk the old username though. Was reported as a scammer. I had a M&G set up with her a couple years ago but it got so weird leading up to it I bailed. Currently asking 300/ meet?

Moanings has had several profiles too. She has always moved around (or the listing in her profile moves around). Is a pro escort, I guess. She had (has?) and account on P411. Used to ask 1 k / hour on P411. Former cam girl. At one point lots of pics from her cam life were floating around. Never heard of anyone actually meeting her. You could check the other site to see if she ever got reviews. I'm sure she's been discussed here before too, but don't recall her old profile names. I messaged her several times on P411 but she never came down from 1k/hr and I never saw her.

Notmyrealname pics look very very familiar. Not sure where from, but probably had previous profiles. Dk any more except I'm sure she's been around.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Miltown;4979437]Notmyrealname is an escort who was on STG. She's had other profiles on SA. Biggest concern on her is a stalker "ex" who is out of jail from what I understand.[/QUOTE]I believe that stalker ex of hers actually has died. Not too long ago on her snap she had posted her being at his grave site. Although she does frequently post snaps with another fella, talking about being "in love". So much for her being "single". Also in regards to her pics not being recent, you can clearly see how old the pics are from her actual live snaps. Nonetheless she has the imagination of the typical stereotype that she's "all about money", yet lives with mommy and daddy. I just don't get what the hype is with the younger generation of always taking snaps in cars driving around late at night bragging how they are "making runs", all just for a little dope cash.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d26b3067-9a10-45db-a96d-f3fb579b3922[/URL]

Communication was irregular but settled on time for coffee and going from there for 200. Her photos sent me she was not pregnant. Seemed as if everything was headed for a meeting and playtime but then ghosted. Any luck with this one?

[QUOTE=HornyTfs;4979427]Will keep on updating for my fellow brethren. Hope you guys are reeling it in with back to school discount.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the rundown.

As for the discount, 33% off, it saves you $30 off a monthly ($90 to $60). I waste more money than that with all the time I spend hunting. So the discount doesn't really move the needle for me.

I'm ambivalent about subscribing to SA again. I've subscribed 2 or 3 times in the past. Always worth it eventually. I've always managed to find one cute thing willing to spend a few hours for $300 - $400 plus a hotel and do anything I want.

But for one, there's friction in having to go get a prepaid anonymous card to pay for it. No way I'd pay with any card associated with my real identity. Remember the Ashley Madison data breach? That file is still probably out on the net somewhere. And, once I subscribe, the time I spend hunting goes way up. Because all of a sudden instead of scrounging around in the junk yard of STG looking at the same old tired girls I've already seen and found wanting, there's a bevvy of hot young things (especially in Madison) to filter through.

LOL.

Next time I subscribe the goal will be to harvest as many numbers as possible. With the idea that I will cultivate more of a reliable list I can turn to instead of hunting through the garbage of SA.

[QUOTE=HornyTfs;4979423]I don't know what is going on SA not been really active until now. Was content with couple of UTR off tinder. Seems like it's either straight up 500 per meet gps or unresponsive profiles or conversation not going anywhere. I remember last year same time it was like shooting fish in the barrel.[/QUOTE]You heard about this covid thing right?

It probably has competing effects. Girls are more desperate / broke out of a job, etc. But also more leery of breaking social distancing. So, more chaotic.

[QUOTE=DonMartin57;4978715]Ok, so I might be an old, fat, married man[/QUOTE]Welcome to the club.

[QUOTE=DonMartin57;4978715]Had a pleasant conversation, wants to be paid for a M&G. I won't pay for a M&G. Buy lunch or drinks, yes.[/QUOTE]Amen. No way I'm paying for M&G. It's not as bad as prepay, but fuck that shit.

[QUOTE=Flagrant;4979832]
I'm ambivalent about subscribing to SA again. I've subscribed 2 or 3 times in the past. Always worth it eventually. I've always managed to find one cute thing willing to spend a few hours for $300 - $400 plus a hotel and do anything I want.
[/QUOTE]I've been surprised by my success on SA. Have found quite a few that turned into weekly regulars (some more often, some a little less). Meet for 3-6 hours, 300-500.500 makes it easy, but I only go there in special cases. But its a LOT of work to sort through, message, set up a M&G, filter out the scammers and those I don't vibe with. I don't have a hotel cost since I bring them to my place (too risky for some I know). And I'm a legit medicare eligible senior citizen with a bit a grandad bod, which is what surprises me about the cute gals who will get naked in my bed with me and act like they are having a good time.

IMHO the quality, at least among the very few that make it into my bed, is VASTLY BETTER than anything I've seen on stg. And the cost, though somewhat steep compared to stg prices, is WAY LESS that what I could get a "high end escort" for 3-6 hours. Most of those are 500/ hr or more. So, apart from the time it takes, I'm happy with SA. And conversation and other activities outside the bedroom (at 3-6 hours we do other things too) is mostly much more enjoyable than any stg gal would be, and probably more enjoyable than a high end escort would be.

Fraudster trying to sell pictures and those on her profile are fake / downloads. I reported her but I forgot to post here first. Link is from after she was blocked but hopefully the link still works. Including a link to the person she downloaded from.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4a917a6e-dc1b-4a37-9339-4c40cf1330d4[/URL]

[URL]https://www.picuki.com/profile/dixielynnx[/URL] (The Sexiest Southern Belle Adult Actress & Model).

[QUOTE=HornyTfs;4979427][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/5c28e76a-320c-4093-b903-909806542727[/URL]

DTF for 300, but my not my type to be honest.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d2600b89-4734-4b8a-b2b2-0fb9b59c34d3[/URL]

Asking 500 for few hours. DTF, Too high for me.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e064ffd4-25da-452f-be80-dcb563943238[/URL]

DTF real deal, Flaky, Lucky if you get to see her, 250.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3b46b27b-6a49-4e14-852b-e524b9b12923[/URL]

DTF, Has been around. Few seniors might have seen her. Not my type.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/messages/inbox/3f79e417-0c78-4315-bf7a-9904d99165b4[/URL]

Definitely something wrong with her. Do not waste your time.

Will keep on updating for my fellow brethren. Hope you guys are reeling it in with back to school discount.[/QUOTE]Your last link is to your messages, so can't see who you're talking about.

I've heard good reports about your first one, amina, from others. Doesn't much appeal to me either, so haven't tried to see her. If she appealed to me I'd try based on positive reports.

Fourth one, katielove, has had positive reports too from others, with the caveat she's very transactional. Nice time, but only comes, does the deed and leaves. The pics she sent via text didn't excite me much, but notwithstanding I did schedule with her once based on good reviews, even though I'm not really into the transactional types either. She canceled the morning of, due to getting her period. She did followup nicely when she was ready again a couple times, but I was the one who didn't follow up then. If she was more my type appearance wise and attitude wise, I'd see her baed on good reviews.

[QUOTE=MkePlayer;4981076]Your last link is to your messages, so can't see who you're talking about.

I've heard good reports about your first one, amina, from others. Doesn't much appeal to me either, so haven't tried to see her. If she appealed to me I'd try based on positive reports.

Fourth one, katielove, has had positive reports too from others, with the caveat she's very transactional. Nice time, but only comes, does the deed and leaves. The pics she sent via text didn't excite me much, but notwithstanding I did schedule with her once based on good reviews, even though I'm not really into the transactional types either. She canceled the morning of, due to getting her period. She did followup nicely when she was ready again a couple times, but I was the one who didn't follow up then. If she was more my type appearance wise and attitude wise, I'd see her baed on good reviews.[/QUOTE]Last one is moaning on seeking. Now it shows up as she is New York.

I agree about Katie Love, maybe before she had a kid last year I would have seen her. Not now. I am more into petite women.

Most of the ladies I am talking to have left me on read after couple of smalltalk messages exchanged. And I have been not impolite or rude. Have been gentleman in my approach. Is this happening to you guys as well? Did not happen earlier.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8f41b891-bd11-457d-b480-63032cf002f3[/URL]

Anyone seen this one? She responds at snails pace.

[QUOTE=HornyTfs;4981165]Most of the ladies I am talking to have left me on read after couple of smalltalk messages exchanged. And I have been not impolite or rude. Have been gentleman in my approach. Is this happening to you guys as well? Did not happen earlier.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8f41b891-bd11-457d-b480-63032cf002f3[/URL]

Anyone seen this one? She responds at snails pace.[/QUOTE]I messaged her and she replied but after a few she stopped reading them. No indication that anything was wrong and seemed interested before going silent.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8f41b891-bd11-457d-b480-63032cf002f3[/URL]

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0283d5a1-691c-48a8-8bc8-0bcbe487764d[/URL]

I had a brief fling with this one last fall. Good: Easy on the wallet. Nice girl, very talkative, but very ghetto. Very 420 friendly. Decent head game (BBBJ, spit). OK body, small breasts, tight pussy. Helped her find a job, bought her new clothes, was having a good time with her for a bit. Bad: She got greedy. I had a bit of a crunch right around the holidays, plus got busy with other life issues. She thought I was avoiding her (I wasn't), then got nasty with me, accusing me of talking shit about her to her friends (I didn't, and I wouldn't, even if I knew any of her friends). Threatened to out me, had to call the cops on her. Would I recommend? Only if you like clingy semi-psychotic redheads. Avoid if you have a significant other in your life or value your privacy.

[QUOTE=DonMartin57;4987765][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0283d5a1-691c-48a8-8bc8-0bcbe487764d[/URL]

I had a brief fling with this one last fall. Good: Easy on the wallet. Nice girl, very talkative, but very ghetto. Very 420 friendly. Decent head game (BBBJ, spit). OK body, small breasts, tight pussy. Helped her find a job, bought her new clothes, was having a good time with her for a bit. Bad: She got greedy. I had a bit of a crunch right around the holidays, plus got busy with other life issues. She thought I was avoiding her (I wasn't), then got nasty with me, accusing me of talking shit about her to her friends (I didn't, and I wouldn't, even if I knew any of her friends). Threatened to out me, had to call the cops on her. Would I recommend? Only if you like clingy semi-psychotic redheads. Avoid if you have a significant other in your life or value your privacy.[/QUOTE]Had the same issues, have seen her on and off for about 3 years (not for the last 5-6 months though). She gets confused about the roles here. Thinks she's more of a GF than a bang buddy. Fun to fuck, BBFS once you get to know her (at least used to be). Tight pussy for sure though.

Carl.