Good pooce.
Printable View
Good pooce.
[QUOTE=AmgPhilly63;7463513]They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.[/QUOTE][BLUE]It's all about CC processing. Banks prohibit sites that talk about prostitution from having merchant accounts. Since Fosta/Sesta passed its worse. Seeking/Cuddle Comfort do that so they can keep processing payments. They know exactly what is going on on their sites as do their banks but because they pull a Louis Renault (obscure film reference) whenever they catch somebody "Prostitution on our dating site, we are SHOCKED I tell you, SHOCKED."
It's as simple as that.
A2[/BLUE]
[QUOTE=AmgPhilly63;7463513]They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.[/QUOTE]Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:
Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.
Registered Address:
Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.
I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.
The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.
I just noted the motto that comes up when you log on now.
You know what you want, find it on seeking.
Of course, read literally this is mild, but this is the game they play, to tease what it is without being overt.
And the policing is so random and selective, it is admittedly very very frustrating. However, women seem to like it and know it best, so that is why we go there.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463165]Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.
Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.
Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:
References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."
Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.
Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.
They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.[/QUOTE]I have adjusted my intro letter. Now there is no mention of anything that could be construed as ppm or any other "arrangement". But I do allude to having fun in a way that no one can misconstrue as anything other than hitting the FC. If they respond I go straight to txt. No problems the last few months I been doing it this way.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463871]Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:
Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.
Registered Address:
Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.
I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.
The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.[/QUOTE]Thats nice. Well I got news for you. It is ABSOLUTELY the same people behind it. I created an account on there and within 10 minutes my cc account was banned. I immediately filed fraud chargebacks with my card and stuck it to them.
Did you get banned?
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463165]Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.
Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.
Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:
References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."
Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.
Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.
They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.[/QUOTE]
Yes, they have double standards in banning people. It is at their own discretion.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463894]I just noted the motto that comes up when you log on now.
You know what you want, find it on seeking.
Of course, read literally this is mild, but this is the game they play, to tease what it is without being overt.
And the policing is so random and selective, it is admittedly very very frustrating. However, women seem to like it and know it best, so that is why we go there.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7467695]Did you get banned?[/QUOTE]I did not, but I am sure my account has a demerit against it, and if there were to be another accident (truly, I am no whoremonger and I really try to be careful), I'm sure that profile would be history.
How are autistic men like me supposed to get laid now?
The demographic cliff is pretty much here. Birthrates started dropping off in 2007 when the housing market collapsed so expect there to be alot less younger girls and alot of the 30-45 crowd now.
The 2010 through 2017 period was FIRE.
[QUOTE=Ghost323;7458703]Hi Gents. Anyone met with this one on Sugardaddymeet? Goes under Cheekymiss. She comes off a bit pushy. Sent number within first few emails and a bit pushy to meet. Lives in Burbank and giving pro vibes.[/QUOTE]She will only allow you to pop once and will push you to finish quickly. Additionally, she always has something else to do after you pop and can never stay for long. Don't even think about a second round. She needs everything cover. Make sure you don't give her anything until everything is finished. If you do, she'll find an excuse to leave immediately and won't answer your calls or texts afterward. She only responds when she needs help. By the way, if you don't like the smell from 420, it's better to see someone else, as she is a heavy smoker.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7468934]I did not, but I am sure my account has a demerit against it, and if there were to be another accident (truly, I am no whoremonger and I really try to be careful), I'm sure that profile would be history.[/QUOTE]You got lucky there. It's getting very hard to get back on once you're banned.
Let me know if you guys need me to share some new methods to get back on Seeking once you're banned.
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7473447]Let me know if you guys need me to share some new methods to get back on Seeking once you're banned.[/QUOTE]How you are able to get passed selfie check, I believe they do retina scan and immediately bans new profile.
[QUOTE=AdamEve7;7474029]How you are able to get passed selfie check, I believe they do retina scan and immediately bans new profile.[/QUOTE]For new accounts, you'll have to do the selfie. The selfie is only to check if you are actually a real person or not. It doesn't compare your new selfie with banned user accounts so you don't have to worry about not passing the selfie.
So hard to find these days.
[QUOTE=StevenWalker;7474826]So hard to find these days.[/QUOTE] Best easy way is to get into one of the Kgirl agencies, I use those, amazing talent, bareback services, many girls, and reasonable. Go to that forum on this board. It changed my life for better instead of relying on flakey and fickle SBs.
[QUOTE=StudBucket;7475057]Best easy way is to get into one of the Kgirl agencies, I use those, amazing talent, bareback services, many girls, and reasonable. Go to that forum on this board. It changed my life for better instead of relying on flakey and fickle SBs.[/QUOTE]Not the easiest to get access to those agencies. Alot of us don't want to give up all that PII info that's asked for. Plus it's just Korean Asian flavor all the time. I like different flavors of Asian pussy. And there are some drawbacks too. Usually only an hour, extra to take pics / video, extra for bare and they're getting dicked down by multiple guys a day.
I've had all flavors of Asian pussy as babies / non-pros. Usually two to three hours of bed time. On average ppm between 200 to 400. No extra to take pics / video. Swallowing and CIP as many times as you want in that timeframe. And usually only fucking you that day. Not multiple dudes possibly rawdogging her daily. And all for about the same money spent. My latest young Japanese honey is 400 for a few hours. Open to everything except anal which is understandable. Gave her four nuts this past meet up. Three of them creampies. And pics / video of all the fun.
For me other than going to another country as a sex tourist for cheap pussy. The sugar game still has the best bang for the buck when it comes to what you get back as a very real GFE experience. In the US for me nothing else touches it.
[QUOTE=StudBucket;7475057]Best easy way is to get into one of the Kgirl agencies, I use those, amazing talent, bareback services, many girls, and reasonable. Go to that forum on this board. It changed my life for better instead of relying on flakey and fickle SBs.[/QUOTE]Thanks but I don't like fobs man.
Two Latinas (tapping new one tomorrow), Two Black Girls, Two Asian girls and one White girl tapped and on new rotation. Life is good on SDM and in only one and a half months. And still talking to other girls working meets out. I wasn't this busy on Seeking after covid. So much booty and so little time. Still looking though for a worthy East Indian honey and that damn midget! LOL My Fucket List.
[QUOTE=StudBucket;7475057]Best easy way is to get into one of the Kgirl agencies, I use those, amazing talent, bareback services, many girls, and reasonable. Go to that forum on this board. It changed my life for better instead of relying on flakey and fickle SBs.[/QUOTE]The best days for that has already passed. During the CV era, almost new Korean girls every day and most of the girls are new, young, and only working for a short time. The girls now are pros and doing it as full time.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7476810]Two Latinas (tapping new one tomorrow), Two Black Girls, Two Asian girls and one White girl tapped and on new rotation. Life is good on SDM and in only one and a half months. And still talking to other girls working meets out. I wasn't this busy on Seeking after covid. So much booty and so little time. Still looking though for a worthy East Indian honey and that damn midget! LOL My Fucket List.[/QUOTE]Tried it. No luck for me. All fakes.
For the past year, I've been booking a lot more fashion models from my agent than usual. I'm surprised they never raise their prices. Before, their prices seem high but now seems cheap compare to what some of the 9's and 10's SBs are asking for now days. I booked a hot 24 yo blond fashion model, tall and skinny with nice model body. I'll be seeing her later today.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7476810]Two Latinas (tapping new one tomorrow), Two Black Girls, Two Asian girls and one White girl tapped and on new rotation. Life is good on SDM and in only one and a half months. And still talking to other girls working meets out. I wasn't this busy on Seeking after covid. So much booty and so little time. Still looking though for a worthy East Indian honey and that damn midget! LOL My Fucket List.[/QUOTE]I haven't tried SDM but it looks to be much more straightforward and transactional than Seeking. Women even mention specific numbers in some cases.
What's the going rate? Any issues setting up one-time PPMs?
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7477038]Tried it. No luck for me. All fakes.[/QUOTE]You probably were just looking at 9's and 10's which can be fake on any site. Seeking has fakes and pros just like any other sugar site. Been there, done that. Not new news. Those are usually the too good to be true girls.
[QUOTE=BringItHome;7477112]I haven't tried SDM but it looks to be much more straightforward and transactional than Seeking. Women even mention specific numbers in some cases.
What's the going rate? Any issues setting up one-time PPMs?[/QUOTE]You don't see that on Seeking anymore because it's changed to a "luxury dating" site. It's not considered a sugar site anymore technically. So any talk like that can get you banned or temporarily under further review.
No issues with ppms. That's all I do. I only stick to 400 and under PPMs. Average ppms I've been setting up are between 200 and 400. Can even find some girls that will mess around for 100 and work it from there. And yes there are GPS girls asking 500 and up. Just like Seeking. Silly average looking girls asking high ppms are on any sugar site. Certain terms are also not allowed on SDM once messaging like PPM, cashapp, etc. At least they don't ban you like Seeking does for saying them. Lmao. It just gives you a little red message, oops your message couldn't be sent. So you just reword it a little like pp m or cash app to let the message go through. Only little advantage Seeking has is searching within a very specific mileage radius. SDM starts the radius at 50 miles, 100 miles, etc. No biggie.
And if you don't think Seeking was transactional sometimes too. You haven't been on it as long as I have from back in the day. When it was still a true sugar site and still called Seeking Arrangement. All true sugar sites can be transactional at times. But not every girl.
[QUOTE=BringItHome;7477112]I haven't tried SDM but it looks to be much more straightforward and transactional than Seeking. Women even mention specific numbers in some cases.
What's the going rate? Any issues setting up one-time PPMs?[/QUOTE]Didn't notice that you specifically said "one" time PPMs. That depends on the girl. And if you're looking for one and done girls. Better to look at escorts / pros for that. These girls as babies have different situations of why they've considered sugaring. Some want long term, some short term and some maybe one time for a very specific financial emergency. I don't look for one times specifically. If it happens, it happens. Usually when dealing on the non-pro side of girls. They usually leaned more to short term and sometimes one or two meets to get the money they needed. But I've also had long term non-pros. And have a few at this moment. But non-pros are very hard to find nowadays.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7477571]Didn't notice that you specifically said "one" time PPMs. That depends on the girl. And if you're looking for one and done girls. Better to look at escorts / pros for that. These girls as babies have different situations of why they've considered sugaring. [/QUOTE]Thanks for all the advice. Yeah I'm not looking specifically for one-time girls. I'd actually prefer if they want to be ongoing, but I'm not willing to offer that until we've had a successful meetup. So I suppose I was really asking if you set any expectation about it being ongoing when you're talking to them, or if that's even discussed before the first meet.
[QUOTE=BringItHome;7477801]Thanks for all the advice. Yeah I'm not looking specifically for one-time girls. I'd actually prefer if they want to be ongoing, but I'm not willing to offer that until we've had a successful meetup. So I suppose I was really asking if you set any expectation about it being ongoing when you're talking to them, or if that's even discussed before the first meet.[/QUOTE]I talk everything w / them as soon as I can get them engaged, except sex specifics and allowance. I demand that be at a M&G. I bring my most recent STD test as a screen shot on my phone and show it. There's a difference between sending someone something (pic) and showing it to them.
I oddly got a recent very positive response from a girl when I sent her a composite pic of some past SBs (who were at least not ones and dones). She could see they were young, normal, pretty girls, so must have figured I couldn't be a creep.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7477492]You probably were just looking at 9's and 10's which can be fake on any site. Seeking has fakes and pros just like any other sugar site. Been there, done that. Not new news. Those are usually the too good to be true girls.[/QUOTE]True. I try to lower my standard when I'm on sugar dating sites but still no luck. Sites like SugarDaddyMeet, SugarDaddy, SugarDaters, SugarBook are on top of the lists for search engine results for sugar dating related keywords. However, most of the profiles on these sites are fake. If they are already on top of search engine results and getting free organic traffic from Google, why do they still need to create so many fake profiles. I came to the conclusion that most SBs that are signing up on Seeking are not coming from search engine traffic anymore but mostly coming from social media like TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube.
[QUOTE=BringItHome;7477801]Thanks for all the advice. Yeah I'm not looking specifically for one-time girls. I'd actually prefer if they want to be ongoing, but I'm not willing to offer that until we've had a successful meetup. So I suppose I was really asking if you set any expectation about it being ongoing when you're talking to them, or if that's even discussed before the first meet.[/QUOTE]The expectation that it be ongoing is there by default usually. What can be discussed is short term or long term. So you're clarifying for how long it's ongoing. However don't ever say if the first fuck meet doesn't go well. I won't see you again. No girl wants to hear that. If you say that she probably won't even do a first meet. What I like to clarify is what we're doing in bed beforehand. Those are the only expectations I try and set before the meet. I expect to get my dick sucked and hopefully well. A good BJ is at the top of the list for me. But there are pillow princesses out there that only want you to eat and fuck them. And don't suck dick. I'm not paying for that. So I clarify all that and further details.
Being that these are NSA and usually open arrangements though. If the first fuck meet is terrible. Then you can just not see her again. Just be nice in ending it or up to you if you just want to ghost them.
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7477814]True. I try to lower my standard when I'm on sugar dating sites but still no luck. Sites like SugarDaddyMeet, SugarDaddy, SugarDaters, SugarBook are on top of the lists for search engine results for sugar dating related keywords. However, most of the profiles on these sites are fake. If they are already on top of search engine results and getting free organic traffic from Google, why do they still need to create so many fake profiles. I came to the conclusion that most SBs that are signing up on Seeking are not coming from search engine traffic anymore but mostly coming from social media like TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube.[/QUOTE]The only site and it's related sites that I've tried that has a very high number of fakes. Probably all fakes is Secret Benefits and its related sister sites that use "credits" to communicate. I gave Secret Benefits a second shot and it was the same results as the first time. Messaged alot of girls and got one reply back and that's all. No more messages. The one girl that hit me up was proish.
The seldom fake results I've gotten on SDM versus when I was on Seeking are about the same. There's nothing special filtering wise that makes girls on Seeking more "real". The only thing that's probably making them seem more real. Is that they're a luxury dating site now and supposedly these ladies are looking for more of a traditional dating relationship but with rich dudes. The money incentive is supposed to not be there anymore. So that will reduce some scammers by default a bit. But not all of them. There's still fakes and pros on Seeking. It's not some magical site that's 100% immune to that.
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7477814]True. I try to lower my standard when I'm on sugar dating sites but still no luck. Sites like SugarDaddyMeet, SugarDaddy, SugarDaters, SugarBook are on top of the lists for search engine results for sugar dating related keywords. However, most of the profiles on these sites are fake. If they are already on top of search engine results and getting free organic traffic from Google, why do they still need to create so many fake profiles. I came to the conclusion that most SBs that are signing up on Seeking are not coming from search engine traffic anymore but mostly coming from social media like TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube.[/QUOTE]I would have to agree with this comment that there are still many fake profiles on these sites. I have been in the bowl for many years and was a member on Seeking and Sugar Daddy Meet as of 2017.
I still to this day say it is about a 1 in 4 chance the profiles you like will be real, available, or not a fake profile. So, I treat it like I am going fishing and just expect to have to weed through some fake profiles. I always ask to video call or chat within a day of getting their number and many hesitate or will not respond so you know they are fake. Another trick I use is to use a free number lookup and see who the number belongs to. Free services like Num Lookup or Spy Dialer sometimes give you the name and many times I have seen dudes listed as owner which I immediately cut off then. I suppose there are many scammers here in US and in other countries who try to get guys to send them gifts. Some actually just get off on being a catfish. Even with Seekings verification badges you still see some fake profiles and shake your head. After all, a true Sugar Baby would want our money and not have excuses and hide. So you need to really get their number right away and ask to set up a quick call and if they are never available, flakey, have excuses not to make the call write them off immediately.
With that said, the 1 in 4 or 5 that are real and do work out are worth the work for me. I agree with Lexxs point high turn escorts like the ones on Private Delights or K Escort agencies are higher mileage and put you on the clock. So, if you are Ultra Patient and weed through the landmines, some battle victories can occur and be worth it.
Has anyone ever met up with BlackSwanGeisha from SDM? She was on Seeking but seems to have left the site and is just on SDM now. Got her number, started chatting but seems real picky with offers.
Any info on this one?
Also if anyone wants to trade vids from girls on SA pm me.
[QUOTE=Backslide;7478313]Has anyone ever met up with BlackSwanGeisha from SDM? She was on Seeking but seems to have left the site and is just on SDM now. Got her number, started chatting but seems real picky with offers.[/QUOTE]I reviewed her a long time ago. She's an SA elder. Been on SA for too long. She has very bad teeth. Turn off.
[QUOTE=Backslide;7478313]Has anyone ever met up with BlackSwanGeisha from SDM? She was on Seeking but seems to have left the site and is just on SDM now. Got her number, started chatting but seems real picky with offers.[/QUOTE]She's pricy. She's sexy though and love that ass on her. But she's in the above 500 range. I have other sexy Asian chics that I'm more than happy with right now. Especially a Japanese chic giving me a shot. Every once in a while a White or Asian chic won't consider me because I'm Hispanic. I love all races of the ladies. But it's not always mutual.
I may one day consider going above my range for her. Because I definitely love that ass.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7478648]She's pricy. She's sexy though and love that ass on her. But she's in the above 500 range. I have other sexy Asian chics that I'm more than happy with right now. Especially a Japanese chic giving me a shot. Every once in a while a White or Asian chic won't consider me because I'm Hispanic. I love all races of the ladies. But it's not always mutual.
I may one day consider going above my range for her. Because I definitely love that ass.[/QUOTE]I'm Asian, sometimes I get a comment saying I look mixed, but most asian chicks won't consider me also. White chicks are more miss than hit but Black chicks love me. And same, love all races.
[QUOTE=Backslide;7478752]I'm Asian, sometimes I get a comment saying I look mixed, but most asian chicks won't consider me also. White chicks are more miss than hit but Black chicks love me. And same, love all races.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't say most Asian chics don't consider me from my experiences. It's very very seldom when it happens. Because I've had alot of Asian pussy. Pretty much every nationality of Asian. And not just as non-pros / sugarbabies. I've civie dated them as well. But I believe Asian chics "prefer" white dudes. But a preference doesn't mean ONLY them. White chics are even more rare when it's happened to me.
Black chics usually love everybody. LOL And I love them too. On average they usually have the best sexual performance. And can usually be had the cheapest.
Cool man. Ladies and all their colors/races are beautiful. Have to appreciate them all.