BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=SonicS;1714819]I had slightly better than average BP experience, but she rushed me every time.[/QUOTE]When I saw her I had to wait but she was taking pics (I saw her just after the pics in front of the fire) she disnt rush, and even wanted me to stay afterwards and help her try to sync her phone with her ipad. (she was quite intoxicated tho). If anyone knows how to make a "awesome" website for her she is looking. I wish I had that knowledge, I'd be willing to trade tech-4-twat, pages-4-pussy.

[QUOTE=StrokeOfLuck; 1694706]Been looking at this one for a while.

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/1-petite-little-doll-_-uperpinner-21/7898604[/url]

Google image search does not look promising, but just curious if any mongers have given this one a shot.[/QUOTE]Not sure if anyone's replied to ya yet but I responded to an ad with the very same pictures and name about 2 years ago I'm guessing and did a report on it in this thread. The girl that showed up was not the girl in the pictures, not even close. The girl that did show up was not bad looking however, a little rough on the face but really short and petite with dark hair. She had a really nice body, great tits for a small girl and nice ass, and even though I called her out on not being the girl in the picture (said she never uses her own pics) I decided to go trough with the appointment. Turned out to be a mistake, had a ton of rules and was pretty lame overall from what I remember. I think I also read back then that she stayed and operated out of the same hotel I saw her at with her bf / pimp in Warren. I also recall several negative reviews after and possibly ripoffs. I'd avoid this one.

[QUOTE=StrokeOfLuck; 1694706]Been looking at this one for a while.

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/1-petite-little-doll-_-uperpinner-21/7898604[/url]

Google image search does not look promising, but just curious if any mongers have given this one a shot.[/QUOTE]I only had phone conversation about 1 1/2 years ago with her. She said she was at the Playboy Mansion, that's when I decided she had to many stories for me.

Dreamt of meeting the "hard body" Kim. Maybe hard body years ago? She has an average body at best. Prices are a HE for a Ben. 1.2 for BBJ and 1. 4 for CFS. The CFS is "a 1/2 off special." A nice enough provider who gets into the service but definitely not worth a repeat from me. Standard 2 call system operating out of a motel which is really a residence for her. I saw some favorable reviews on here so figured I would sample but way overpriced and maybe a 5/10 on the SW scale for me.

[QUOTE=StrokeOfLuck; 1694706]Been looking at this one for a while.

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/1-petite-little-doll-_-uperpinner-21/7898604[/url]

Google image search does not look promising, but just curious if any mongers have given this one a shot.[/QUOTE]SOL,

Not only is it necessary to RTFF but you should also Search the F*cking Forum. I searched this thread for "Barbie" and it yielded several posts. All of these posts indicate that this is someone to be avoided. This girl was featured on a MSNBC episode of Sex Slaves. If you search this thread you will find a link to the video. There is a reason the senior members are always telling people to RTFF.

[QUOTE=Sevup;1715785]Not sure if anyone's replied to ya yet but I responded to an ad with the very same pictures and name about 2 years ago I'm guessing and did a report on it in this thread. The girl that showed up was not the girl in the pictures, not even close. The girl that did show up was not bad looking however, a little rough on the face but really short and petite with dark hair. She had a really nice body, great tits for a small girl and nice ass, and even though I called her out on not being the girl in the picture (said she never uses her own pics) I decided to go trough with the appointment. Turned out to be a mistake, had a ton of rules and was pretty lame overall from what I remember. I think I also read back then that she stayed and operated out of the same hotel I saw her at with her bf / pimp in Warren. I also recall several negative reviews after and possibly ripoffs. I'd avoid this one.[/QUOTE]This the girl? DD free my azz. [url]http://adultsearch.com/michigan/detroit/female-escorts/692813[/url]

[QUOTE=HeywoodJablomi; 1716230]This the girl? DD free my azz.

[url]http://adultsearch.com/michigan/detroit/female-escorts/692813[/url][/QUOTE]No that's not her, at least the girl in the pictures you linked is not the girl I saw. If you search around Jan 2012 for the little barbie posts there's a link to an msnbc article that features her.

Saw his one last week and she gives a good BBBJ. Really nice breast to hold onto as she performs fellatio. She is cleanly shaved and a few tats with great hygiene. She performs close to gf in that she does actively participate. Nothing fake in that she tries to get her orgasm as well. Her looks a 6/10 and breast make her body 5. 5/10. The best thing is that she has an enormous clit. Would repeat.

Had been thinking of this one for a while, and her price came down for her "Specail" (sic).

Problem is, before TOFTT. A location in the ad is one thing but broadcasting which hotel your in? I wonder if she's inviting TOO much attention.

Use the big head, guys. Some of the ladies seem to be a little too reckless lately.

(I will say though that Samantha has been on my Radar for a while. Long legs and an ass to die for!)

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-an-thick-samanthacall-50-specail-new-pics-text-19894147235-or-call-1_313_728_1353-25/11171488[/url]

I'm very curious about this entry.

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/upscale-playmate-petite-white-female-livonia-incall-30/10506463[/url]

Tin eye pulls up a Phoenix escort NR profile from one pic, and a site called jailbaits. Be for another (which was worth the visit :) So probably those are not the girl in Livonia, if there is one.

Phone # search pulls up other escort adds for the same girl, making her look legitimate-ish, if not for the pics.

Anyone know any more?

Carrington listed here.

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/carrington-is-back-hotter-than-before-tall-long-leg-beautiful-brunette-57-129lbs-36c-26-36-23/11531030[/url]

No hits on tin eye, but the phone numbers match group of ladies that have worked out of southfield and near the airport. (Melody, Tina, etc) I heard mixed reviews from this lot, but they seem to be legit. Anyone try Carrington?

[QUOTE=Warpig2000; 1716488]Had been thinking of this one for a while, and her price came down for her "Specail" (sic).

Problem is, before TOFTT. A location in the ad is one thing but broadcasting which hotel your in? I wonder if she's inviting TOO much attention.

Use the big head, guys. Some of the ladies seem to be a little too reckless lately.

(I will say though that Samantha has been on my Radar for a while. Long legs and an ass to die for!)

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-an-thick-samanthacall-50-specail-new-pics-text-19894147235-or-call-1_313_728_1353-25/11171488[/url][/QUOTE]There's already a bad review about her here. Looks way older, really isn't into the date & rushes through the whole date, not GFE.

[QUOTE=Warpig2000; 1716488]Had been thinking of this one for a while, and her price came down for her "Specail" (sic).

Problem is, before TOFTT. A location in the ad is one thing but broadcasting which hotel your in? I wonder if she's inviting TOO much attention.

Use the big head, guys. Some of the ladies seem to be a little too reckless lately.

(I will say though that Samantha has been on my Radar for a while. Long legs and an ass to die for!)

[url]http://detroit.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-an-thick-samanthacall-50-specail-new-pics-text-19894147235-or-call-1_313_728_1353-25/11171488[/url][/QUOTE]Paranoid? Not one bit in my opinion! It makes no sense to post the hotel you're at. Might as well hang out a red light. Cross streets are even giving more info than necessary. 50$ hh "special", good looking lady (if pics are accurate). Shouldn't be too difficult to follow that traffic flow. Ignorance? Desperation? Both spell trouble. Now, if she posted that as a decoy, I'll take it back.

[QUOTE=Bb Lover;1716526]There's already a bad review about her here. Looks way older, really isn't into the date & rushes through the whole date, not GFE.[/QUOTE]You should also notice that her age went from 33 to 25 in her postings. LOL.

Okay, I caught the bad review in this forum that Bb Lover was referring to.

Dlmred quoted it in an earlier post of his. NOT GFE is right.

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?8148-BackPage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=1631585#post1631585[/url]

And I was only concerned because I thought her ad would draw too much attention and get the Dearborn Red Roof watched by the Dearborn PD.

Another one off the radar and on the DO NOT FLY column. Thanks guys for saving me from an in-and-out ball buster!