Printable View
[QUOTE=Vincer9991;7427943]I'm confused, just joined the site based off the recommendation and yes you can join without the selfie but it doesn't look like you can do anything else on the site without a verification selfie?[/QUOTE]I did upload several photos as well to my new profile there, but when wanting to like a profile, I still needed to do a verification step. I still need to choose one of the paid subscription levels so I can actually get more options.
[QUOTE=Grail47;7429231]I did upload several photos as well to my new profile there, but when wanting to like a profile, I still needed to do a verification step. I still need to choose one of the paid subscription levels so I can actually get more options.[/QUOTE]I paid for the month and you can't like profile, or respond to chat without selfie verification. We received some incorrect information unfortunately.
[QUOTE=Vincer9991;7427943]I'm confused, just joined the site based off the recommendation and yes you can join without the selfie but it doesn't look like you can do anything else on the site without a verification selfie?[/QUOTE]Hello yes you must upload a selfie verification in order to fully use the site. I never stated nor recommended this site for those who did not want to do a selfie verification.
They do this to prevent scammers, ensure you are not a catfish, which I think is a good idea and helps us as well being fake proifles have been prevalent on many sites like Tinder. The verification is not visible and they cannot share this without your consent ever or they risk being sued to kingdom come. So, when they say they only need it for them, they mean that.
For me, this site brings a great option with less GPS than Seeking, which I am still a member of but every month keep questioning it due to the high monthly fee.
Sugardaddymeet is only $90 for 3 months, and I have had several successful meetups and I have a list of others waiting.
[QUOTE=StudBucket;7432192]Hello yes you must upload a selfie verification in order to fully use the site. I never stated nor recommended this site for those who did not want to do a selfie verification.
They do this to prevent scammers, ensure you are not a catfish, which I think is a good idea and helps us as well being fake proifles have been prevalent on many sites like Tinder. The verification is not visible and they cannot share this without your consent ever or they risk being sued to kingdom come. So, when they say they only need it for them, they mean that.
For me, this site brings a great option with less GPS than Seeking, which I am still a member of but every month keep questioning it due to the high monthly fee.
Sugardaddymeet is only $90 for 3 months, and I have had several successful meetups and I have a list of others waiting.[/QUOTE]Forums can be funny, so certainly not trying to start an argument and I don't believe anything was done maliciously, but when the thread is around verification and your quote is "They do not require a video, selfie, etc" not sure how we are supposed to take that differently?
Is raising its price to 150 / mo.
Keep all you riff-raff out of there, I guess.
I just wish they'd put the $ into getting the site to work properly.
I have another week on this membership, then putting it away for a good while.
Think you might have (or want) a little kink in your game.
[URL]https://bdsmtest.org/[/URL]
Pretty accurate in my opinion.
The site is safe, no follow up bots or unexpected bs.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7433905]Is raising its price to 150 / mo.
Keep all you riff-raff out of there, I guess.
I just wish they'd put the $ into getting the site to work properly.
I have another week on this membership, then putting it away for a good while.[/QUOTE]Your Membership:
30 Days Premium Subscription.
Next renewal: Nov 06,2025 for $109.99 USD.
Just checked mine. This is todays notice.
Secret Benefits after a third try was a bust again. You get a single reply from a girl and then no further communication. Site is still a waste of money.
Switched to try sugardaddymeet two days ago and it's coming along better. Have two girls I've switched to texting off site. A cute Black 20 yr old who is ready to go. And a 19 yr old Latina I'm still negotiating with. Black girl is a freak and likes to play daddy / little girl fantasy. Open to anal and all. Have set to hookup next weekend. Definitely want to bury my face in that cute little ass.
The sugardaddymeet site has a good variety of girls and ages. Only thing I don't like is their search feature which doesn't let you specify a mile search radius. But other than that it's good so far. I'm trying it on the monthly sub which is reasonable at 50 a month.
[QUOTE=Vincer9991;7433778]Forums can be funny, so certainly not trying to start an argument and I don't believe anything was done maliciously, but when the thread is around verification and your quote is "They do not require a video, selfie, etc" not sure how we are supposed to take that differently?[/QUOTE]Hello Vincer,
My apologies, you are absolutely correct about me making a mistake when I typed " they do require a video, selfie, etc. ".
I signed up 2 years ago, and then quit and rejoined about 6 months ago so at the time, I did not recall uploading a selfie but is now confirmed by you and others that you have to. Again, it was honest mistake as I signed up a while ago that is all. If you look at my other threads though, I did state I do not feel uploading a selfie or photo, on this site or Seeking (which now requires) is a big deal and it is only visible to the site admins. With that said, I am glad Lexx commented he already has 2 new ones off from this site ([URL]sugardaddymeet.com[/URL]). Hollywood, you love AA and cheap, please let us know what you find on this site. Its only $90 buck for 3 months. Sorry I am recommending it to all you guys, I am just fed up too with high prices from Seeking and it being the only option so I wanted to really put this out there. I never really heard about guys posting on this thread. I always hear about Seeking, Secret Benefits, and Whats your Price, LOL. Hope you enjoy if you join and report back. I have a date this week from there.
Texting now with this Italian goth baddie from sugardaddymeet. She's a stripper which is cool with me. Have fucked strippers in the past outside of the club and was dating one when I was in my late 20's. Wish me luck man. Want her grinding that ass on my face. LOL.
Same here. Can certainly afford it, but that's not the issue. I don't like paying more for ANY service that is declining in utility. I wish Brandon would charge a nominal fee for the ladies. That would do more to cut out the riff raff.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7433905]Is raising its price to 150 / mo.
Keep all you riff-raff out of there, I guess.
I just wish they'd put the $ into getting the site to work properly.
I have another week on this membership, then putting it away for a good while.[/QUOTE]
Just came back from a trip to L. A. Went on a few cheap dates that were less than thrilling so I decided to break down and treat myself to a girl that cost more (did an overnite) but at least I had a good time. She was a bit of germ phobe but so am I so no big deal. Mid wilshire area. Nice house. As always YMMV but she was open minded to a few things. Going to go back in a couple months to try my luck again and plan ahead next time.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/95620c3b-6dfb-4818-9fcf-d356dd575e44[/URL]
This girl has in her profile picture some sort of butane torch, which seems like it might be used for some illicit purpose, related to demons, yes?
Here's a white girl for you guys. She has dirty blonde hair, DD natural breast, and curvy ass in her late 20's. She's near DTLA. She's real but she's asking for high allowance and wants deposit in advance.
[URL]https://www.sugurr.com/Profile/Index/c3ed0765-7d93-4e6a-a6a6-99299a3ee85e[/URL]
I was on seeking for years until I met my girlfriend on there. Been going steady two years and we're interested in getting back in the P2 P game for threesomes. I basically never valued any site other than seeking, likely bc it was the glory years, and the talent was far superior. Perusing the last few pages of this sub, I'm seeing some contrasting experiences to what I had, which was honestly fantastic between 2016-2023.
Price and verification aren't really a factor, however the invested is. Just looking for the best value to get solid LA 9's and above without spending an eternity filtering through all the BS. Where are you all finding the most success, given the above?
[QUOTE=TheArchitect;7438733]I was on seeking for years until I met my girlfriend on there. Been going steady two years and we're interested in getting back in the P2 P game for threesomes. I basically never valued any site other than seeking, likely bc it was the glory years, and the talent was far superior. Perusing the last few pages of this sub, I'm seeing some contrasting experiences to what I had, which was honestly fantastic between 2016-2023.
Price and verification aren't really a factor, however the invested is. Just looking for the best value to get solid LA 9's and above without spending an eternity filtering through all the BS. Where are you all finding the most success, given the above?[/QUOTE]It's not as good as it was ten, five, or even two years ago. But it still has a better selection of non-scammer profiles in major markets like Los Angeles versus sites like SDM, SLN, SB, etc. Allowance requests are higher across all sites. Some are just outrageous, asking for $1 k+. But there are still deals to be made in the $300-$500 range. My current rotation of 4 SB's are getting between $250 and $500 for a full date. And I've scored a few threesomes along the way as well.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7437121]This girl has in her profile picture some sort of butane torch, which seems like it might be used for some illicit purpose, related to demons, yes?[/QUOTE]Perhaps life imitates art?
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOhDSTVibQt/?hl=en[/URL]
[QUOTE=TheArchitect;7438733]"I Just looking for the best value to get solid LA 9's and above without spending an eternity filtering through all the BS. Where are you all finding the most success, given the above?"[/QUOTE]Hello there, I have been in the sugar bowl steady for 8 years now. If you are looking for 9's and above, Seeking still has the best quality talent for looks hands down. But, be prepared for sticker shock. Prices have gone even crazier in the last 2-3 years which makes no sense as all of us has have less disposable income with inflation. The 8's, 9's and 10's will ask for 600- 1 k and few want even more than that for overnights. Prices have been crazy for top tier talent. I would try both sites like I do if you are on somewhat of a budget.
I have had good success on [URL]sugardaddymeet.com[/URL] as well as Seeking and I have tried most of the other major sites. If you want to spend under 600 I recommend this site (sugardaddymeet.com), but you will need to stick with 8's and below. There are just too many simps in Los Angeles that throw these girls 700-1000 so once they get those numbers, its hard for them to lower their price. Hell, even hot escorts (9's and up) in LA want $800-1. 5 k and that is for 1 hour so these gals figure you owe them at least that for several hours. We are really in a f. D up market. With that said, I always tell them my max is 500 and will push up to 600 if I absolutely have to but that is for an overnight date, not a quick date.
[QUOTE=StudBucket;7439286]Hello there, I have been in the sugar bowl steady for 8 years now. If you are looking for 9's and above, Seeking still has the best quality talent for looks hands down. But, be prepared for sticker shock. Prices have gone even crazier in the last 2-3 years which makes no sense as all of us has have less disposable income with inflation. The 8's, 9's and 10's will ask for 600- 1 k and few want even more than that for overnights. Prices have been crazy for top tier talent. I would try both sites like I do if you are on somewhat of a budget.
I have had good success on [URL]sugardaddymeet.com[/URL] as well as Seeking and I have tried most of the other major sites. If you want to spend under 600 I recommend this site (sugardaddymeet.com), but you will need to stick with 8's and below. There are just too many simps in Los Angeles that throw these girls 700-1000 so once they get those numbers, its hard for them to lower their price. Hell, even hot escorts (9's and up) in LA want $800-1. 5 k and that is for 1 hour so these gals figure you owe them at least that for several hours. We are really in a f. D up market. With that said, I always tell them my max is 500 and will push up to 600 if I absolutely have to but that is for an overnight date, not a quick date.[/QUOTE]Your experience on cost matches mine but the women there are generally comfortable spending 2-3 hours on a date. Considering even HX pricing has gone up and you're looking at 400/ hr there and maybe 700/2 hrs, its not so bad, and the women are much, much, much more attractive on average.
This assumes you value longer dates, of course, but if you do then its a solid option if you're willing to put in the legwork.
[QUOTE=Awergin1;7440540]Your experience on cost matches mine but the women there are generally comfortable spending 2-3 hours on a date. Considering even HX pricing has gone up and you're looking at 400/ hr there and maybe 700/2 hrs, its not so bad, and the women are much, much, much more attractive on average.
This assumes you value longer dates, of course, but if you do then its a solid option if you're willing to put in the legwork.[/QUOTE]I've never found the escort avenue all that rewarding as there's typically little to no chemistry, whereas SA was always, at least for me, a bit of a chase which brought far more excitement. I'd typically do 3, 4, 5 hour dates with multiples with a young, girl willing to do nearly if not everything for somewhere between 600 and 1 k, so in my opinion it was by far the best value.
Maybe I was fucking up the pricing for everyone, but in the hayday of 2018-2021, I'd say, it was LA 8's, 9's three, four times a week, with a heavy rotation.
In your opinion has the verification and cost component made it more or less competitive for dates? The stories I was always told from my SBs was that it was all old ugly dudes and then me (now 37), so it was a pretty simple easy game.
I'm curious of anyone else's experience in bringing the girl to the account profile and seeing measurable differences in success for dates. I figure it demands a higher price, and fewer SBs willing. In the past I was always coordinating that by the SB bringing her girlfriend.
Hey everyone Dave here, new SLN girl in Los Angeles, her name is Juddy and she is 44. Originally from Brazil, she can be submissive for the right SD, wants somebody who knows how to take control. Not into rough sex, especially choking or slapping, prefers passionate not painful. She doesn't like girls, but might eventually consider a 3 sum MFM to please her SD. Wants a condom for sex but not for head, but would consider BBFS depending on how things develop. Not really into anal, but she is willing to try. Mid-High PPM.
[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Juddy/[/URL]
I have used [URL]stdcheck.com[/URL] to get anonymous testing for a long time. I used a prepaid to get the 10-test panel. Drop into a place for a blood draw and pee, and you get the results emailed to you, w / anonymous name, birthdate, address of your choosing.
I tried to pay for my test yesterday w / an Amex gift card. The site would not take it because there was no zip code associated w / the card. There was no way to enter that when I activated the card.
I've googled around, and indications are that Vanilla Gift Card, which everyone used to use for seeking, has a zip code involved. I think they are hard to find these days, though. But googling suggested Walmart and Sam's might have them.
I am looking for other gift cards I can find easily that have a zip code involved.
[QUOTE=RanManCan;7415937]Yep, always a good idea to have two accounts, so the standby (blank profile) can take over when the 1st gets blasted.
It's also helpful to help determine if profiles that disappeared blocked you or their account is actually gone.
If you know how to use VMWare or any other Virtual Machine software (it's not that hard), you can run a separate VM for each profile.[/QUOTE]Why is that useful? What is the advantage of using a VM? If there is an advantage, wouldn't a VPN accomplish the same thing?
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7442700]I have used [URL]stdcheck.com[/URL] to get anonymous testing for a long time. I used a prepaid to get the 10-test panel. Drop into a place for a blood draw and pee, and you get the results emailed to you, w / anonymous name, birthdate, address of your choosing.
I tried to pay for my test yesterday w / an Amex gift card. The site would not take it because there was no zip code associated w / the card. There was no way to enter that when I activated the card.
I've googled around, and indications are that Vanilla Gift Card, which everyone used to use for seeking, has a zip code involved. I think they are hard to find these days, though. But googling suggested Walmart and Sam's might have them.
I am looking for other gift cards I can find easily that have a zip code involved.[/QUOTE]I looked at the rack at my local grocery. There are indeed Visa Vanilla cards, but I am skeptical they involve zip codes. There is also SecureSpend, which everyone used to discuss. It kinda replaced the OneVanilla product (looks the same, named differently). The packaging on these cards does say for online purchases. I have some old SS cards. I got on the site, the value I had recorded is still there, but there is no way to input a zip code.
The message I got from both Amex and the std check customer service is that the 'bank' declined to approve the charge based on it being unwilling to verify the zip code (that I entered). Maybe that is how it works. If an issuer will give the green light to any zip code we pick, then that card is good for online purchases.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d66f37d9-24c8-4a04-9e0f-ef1680fdcbc2[/URL]
250 for dinner date, 500 for FC.
She's everything she appears to be, nice person, skilled and passionate.
Hey everyone Dave here, new SLN girl in Temecula, her name is Barbra and she is 27. She lives in Temecula, but is willing to drive pretty much anywhere. She loves having her nipples sucked and her pussy eaten, but not into anal. Not even fingered. She likes giving head but insists on good hygiene. As she loves face riding, she likes the idea of riding her daddy, and then scooting up and sitting on his face. Also likes her hair pulled and spanked while being f*ed in doggy. Wants to be used as a sex toy and called names. Prefers a condom for sex, but not for head. She is not into girls, but will consider a 3 sum MFM. Mid-High PPM.
[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/SoCalGirl/[/URL]
I've seen plenty of Vanilla GCs at your local 7-11.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7442700]I have used [URL]stdcheck.com[/URL] to get anonymous testing for a long time. I used a prepaid to get the 10-test panel. Drop into a place for a blood draw and pee, and you get the results emailed to you, w / anonymous name, birthdate, address of your choosing.
I tried to pay for my test yesterday w / an Amex gift card. The site would not take it because there was no zip code associated w / the card. There was no way to enter that when I activated the card.
I've googled around, and indications are that Vanilla Gift Card, which everyone used to use for seeking, has a zip code involved. I think they are hard to find these days, though. But googling suggested Walmart and Sam's might have them.
I am looking for other gift cards I can find easily that have a zip code involved.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7444148][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d66f37d9-24c8-4a04-9e0f-ef1680fdcbc2[/URL]
250 for dinner date, 500 for FC.
She's everything she appears to be, nice person, skilled and passionate.[/QUOTE]Is BBFS an option? She's just my type!
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7443384]I looked at the rack at my local grocery. There are indeed Visa Vanilla cards, but I am skeptical they involve zip codes. There is also SecureSpend, which everyone used to discuss. It kinda replaced the OneVanilla product (looks the same, named differently). The packaging on these cards does say for online purchases. I have some old SS cards. I got on the site, the value I had recorded is still there, but there is no way to input a zip code.
The message I got from both Amex and the std check customer service is that the 'bank' declined to approve the charge based on it being unwilling to verify the zip code (that I entered). Maybe that is how it works. If an issuer will give the green light to any zip code we pick, then that card is good for online purchases.[/QUOTE]Continuation of the saga.
I got a SecureSpend card. It also failed, for the same reason. I spent time on the phone w / CS, first with SS, and then w / Analyte Health. The former told me that they note at this time, Analyte Health does not accept prepaid gift cards. The latter told me that they would accept them provided the prepaid card was registered w / a valid address. Obviously, I could put in a valid address for someone else, so the latter would not compromise me. I do need to find a prepaid card, though, that permits you to add the full address to it (but it is possible that only the zip code is actually verified between merchant and issuer).
[QUOTE=Pmanhere;7444985]Is BBFS an option? She's just my type![/QUOTE]Not going to get into breaches of ToS for this site.
[QUOTE=Pmanhere;7444985]Is BBFS an option? She's just my type![/QUOTE]No offense, but you guys are paying 500 to FC a 46 yo. . . That looks like that? How rough has it gotten on SA these days? Good grief.
[QUOTE=Chupacabra;7446377]No offense, but you guys are paying 500 to FC a 46 yo. . . That looks like that? How rough has it gotten on SA these days? Good grief.[/QUOTE]Exactly why I said fuck SA! Lmao It's the supreme site for old GPS milfs now. I'm having alot more fun on sugardaddymeet. There's some GPS ho's on the site too. But many more that are realistic with money expectations and under 30. And the site's membership fee is alot more reasonable. Dudes around here make it seem like seeking is the end all site.
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7446389]Exactly why I said fuck SA! Lmao It's the supreme site for old GPS milfs now. I'm having alot more fun on sugardaddymeet. There's some GPS ho's on the site too. But many more that are realistic with money expectations and under 30. And the site's membership fee is alot more reasonable. Dudes around here make it seem like seeking is the end all site.[/QUOTE]Sugardaddymeet not allowing you to use any search filters before signing up for a membership is a non-starter for me. I'm not paying money just to figure out how many SBs are within a 20 mile radius of me.
[QUOTE=Stolper;7447366]Sugardaddymeet not allowing you to use any search filters before signing up for a membership is a non-starter for me. I'm not paying money just to figure out how many SBs are within a 20 mile radius of me.[/QUOTE]With the basic discover search I was still able to see nearby girls. I'm doing fine on the site. To each their own.
I was just suspended a few weeks ago, and again now for the 3rd time. I super-cleaned my messaging. . . No idea what the issue is.
Warning.
You have committed another violation of our Terms of Service. Your account was flagged for the following reason:
Soliciting Companionship for Compensation.
Your account has been suspended for a suspected violation of our Anti-Solicitation Policy. Seeking never allows dating that involves financial transactions of any kind. These rules are in place to help ensure Seeking is a great place for everyone to explore and enjoy.
Please watch the following video that helps to explain the Terms of Use violation. At the end, you will be prompted to respond to a short questionnaire. We hope you find this information helpful and you can continue to enjoy all of the amazing connections you've made on Seeking.
Because this is your third violation for the same reason, your account has been suspended for 48 hours. Further violations could result in a permanent ban of your account.
This 48-hour suspension will begin after you read, electronically sign, and agree to our Terms of Service again. (Your account will be frozen indefinitely until you do so.).
VIDEO LINK: https://contents.seeking.com/videos/sws-soliciting-sex-for-compensation.mp4
Now it wants ID after 3rd suspension. No thanks, I'll go to a new profile!
Warning.
Your Seeking account has been temporarily put on hold.
To encourage and maintain trust between users on Seeking, you will need to confirm your identity to have your account re-activated. If approved, your account will also receive the blue verified badge. On Seeking, the badge lets people know that your account is authentic.
Seeking has partnered with [URL]Au10tix.com[/URL] to securely and privately process verification of identity. To receive the verified badge start the verification with Au10 tix where you will provide a photo of an official government issued identification document, such as your Driver's License or Passport to be verified.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7445868]Not going to get into breaches of ToS for this site.[/QUOTE]Am I missing something? When does this site prevent discussions of service?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b2584dcf-4fe2-4823-846a-d45fe952339e[/URL]
This Asian girl looks very hot but I can’t tell if it's photoshop or not. She wants 1. 5 k per visit for basic covered fun. Crazy but I am sure someone will do it because the photo looks very good.
She is a working girl. Be careful. Few people I know from Vegas used to bone her for $100 or $50 for BBBJ.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7444148][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d66f37d9-24c8-4a04-9e0f-ef1680fdcbc2[/URL]
250 for dinner date, 500 for FC.
She's everything she appears to be, nice person, skilled and passionate.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ID481;7450802]She is a working girl. Be careful. Few people I know from Vegas used to bone her for $100 or $50 for BBBJ.[/QUOTE]Oh, really. "People".
I met her. She has an advanced degree. She worked at Zappos. She drives a BMW 3-series. I found her to be quite normal, nice, very pretty. Has class. For a 40's woman, just what you'd expect. My bullshit detectors are pretty good. I see no way she could be what you imply.