[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1661909]Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?[/QUOTE]Can't go wrong if you bet on Harbaugh!
LOL
Printable View
[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1661909]Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?[/QUOTE]Can't go wrong if you bet on Harbaugh!
LOL
This is the real super bowl-Nara vs. Channel.
What's similar-both are very popular, nice figure, fakies, curves, on the younger side, Korean. Both have nice meaty thick lips. Both really do not cum after the fist day or two back from vacation. So its all an act for both. Both only do covered FS. Both do not workout, so they don't have import, model skinny, hardbodies, but nice above average looks for both. Both will turn heads at the mall.
What's different-Channel is the girl next door cutie, bubbly, she will suck you hard if you like, all covered service, some DFK but not a lot. YMMV and maybe she is too wet, but her pussy is not as tight as Nara. Also, Channel has a smaller ass. Channel is a bit older, and has a 'sex is fun' attitude.
Nara has more "bad girl" looks. You know, the short black dress w no panties kind, hehe. A little more meat on Nara, but not even close to Joon like thickness. Nara has bigger fakies, and responsive nipples and she will let you suck them. Nice curves.
Both will suck and fuck you, even fuck you back hard. Channel seems to have more hip movement and will pork you with lots of energy.
You would be lucky to get "60 minutes" with either as both are busy. But its is well worth your time-quality time-with either one.
I haven't had a bad fuck with either one. If I had to make a choice, it would be Nara today. If Channel ever does BBBJ, I go see her everyday, LOL.
Kids, go fuck both and make your own comments and comparisons. I would pay to fuck both at the same time, LOL.
I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.
Nara wins the Superho Bowl with a field goal in the final seconds of the game when she's 2 points down. Her awesome BBBJ carries her to victory.
(However if Chanel did a comparable BBBJ to Nara, she would win by a touchdown).
[QUOTE=Jbravo; 1662534]Yo,
Dis is the real super bowl-Nara vs. Channel.
Whats similar-both are very popular, nice figure, fakies, curves, on the younger side, korean proes. Both have nice meaty thick lips. Both really do not cum after the fist day or two bak from bacation. So its all an act for both. Both covered FS. Both do not workout, so not import model skinny hardbodies, but nice above average looks for both. Both will turn heads at the mall.
Whats different-Channel is girl next door cutie, bubbly, she will suk you hard if you like, all covered service, some DFK but not a lot. YMMV and maybe she too wet, but her pussy is not as tight at Nara. Also, Channel has a smaller ass. Channel is a bit older, and has a 'sex if fun' attitude.
Nara is more "bad girl" looks you know, the short black dress w no panties kine, hehe. A little more meat on Nara, but not even close to Joon thickness. Nara has bigger fakies, and responsive nipples and she will let you suk them. Nice curves.
Both will suk and fuk you, fuk you bak hard. Channel seems to have more hip movement and will pork you with lots of energy.
You would be lucky to get "60 minutes" with either as both are busy. But its is well worth your time-quality time-with either one.
I haven't had a bad fuk with either one. If I had to make a choice, it would be Nara today. If Channel ever does BBBJ, I go see her everyday, LOL.
Kids, go fuk both and make your own comments and comparisons. I would pay to fuk both at the same time, LOL.[/QUOTE]
Is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on KHNL, Jennifer Robbins, I just think she's hot, kind of look like Tera Patrick.
I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.
[QUOTE=Van Deventer; 1663495]I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.[/QUOTE]Nice thought, but it'd be impossible to get each AMP to state which providers are working and when, each day, much less get the providers to update the "wait time" based upon customer experiences. And you never know what walk-ins will ask for.
[QUOTE=Van Deventer; 1663495]I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.[/QUOTE]This is one hell of an idea. I'm sure I'm not the only one who agrees with this.
[QUOTE=Millertime808; 1662557]I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.[/QUOTE]the public lose again as NFC and Over comes home. Superbowl is looking like 9ers and over since Public looks like on Ravens and Under
[QUOTE=Millertime808; 1662557]I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.[/QUOTE]If the #s are for real, I am quite suprised the public would go under on the pro bowl. Its the fricken pro bowl for gods sake, always no D. Anyway, personally I find the betting against the public philosophy a dud. I seen too many games work either way too much. Plus when the numbers are in the 60-65% range, that is almost like being 50. Trends too is another overrated / bogus philosophy. Although, I'm sure the % of the favorite covering in the SB isn't good at all, and the over usually hits. But I believe its a result of oddsmakers inflating a line for a televised game. Really have no feel on the total, but got to take the points. This will be one of the few times SF will play a decent D against the run.
[quote=miri kitani;1663400]is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on khnl, jennifer robbins, i just think she's hot, kind of look like tera patrick.[/quote]she's hot!
[QUOTE=Blade82;1663887]If the #s are for real, I am quite suprised the public would go under on the pro bowl. Its the fricken pro bowl for gods sake, always no D. Anyway, personally I find the betting against the public philosophy a dud. I seen too many games work either way too much. Plus when the numbers are in the 60-65% range, that is almost like being 50. Trends too is another overrated / bogus philosophy. Although, I'm sure the % of the favorite covering in the SB isn't good at all, and the over usually hits. But I believe its a result of oddsmakers inflating a line for a televised game. Really have no feel on the total, but got to take the points. This will be one of the few times SF will play a decent D against the run.[/QUOTE]Got lucky yesterday as our house wasn't taking action on ProBow or I would've lost both ways. I'm new at this posting; however, have been at too many KBs and AMPs over the past 20+ years. Just broke up with SO, and looking to find some fun and HE now. Finally "registered" after reading so many other postings throughout the years. Good stuff guys. After a round of golf on the Ewa Side, we went to KB "down under" Flamingos in PC for some grinds. Bar seats for Pro Bowl game was packed and even saw a H & W couple (tourist) walk in and sit in the forest after the game with red jerseys. WTF? Good Kalbi, Shrimp Tempura, and Mandoo with Miller Lites. Bought another block for SB. Also, have a block at Butterfly. BF daytime weekend bartender Yumi cooks good too. Casino got some good cooks too during happy hour. Deciding where to go to watch the SB at. Does anyone know a good place to go? Vegas III is big enough however their kitchen mama just okay. Most places are packed. Was at Islander last year and few H & W and couples; however, I won the half time block $1, 000 with a 20 buy in. There food was just okay.
Oh yeah, I been lookin for an AMP provider that look like Jenny baby. She reminds me of Emily at GB-busty nice curves, skinny arms, nice legs.
I would do Jenny and Tera.
[QUOTE=Miri Kitani;1663400]Is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on KHNL, Jennifer Robbins, I just think she's hot, kind of look like Tera Patrick.[/QUOTE]
I would say bet the farm on the Ravens and Over, public had Ravens for championship and look how that turned out. I am getting out of the bay and coming home for Super Bowl, before they burn anymore muni busses.
[QUOTE=DaViper;1663525]the public lose again as NFC and Over comes home. Superbowl is looking like 9ers and over since Public looks like on Ravens and Under[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PopoloGirl;1665042]I would say bet the farm on the Ravens and Over, public had Ravens for championship and look how that turned out. I am getting out of the bay and coming home for Super Bowl, before they burn anymore muni busses.[/QUOTE]True Ravens won that public bet but if I go w / them this week I would be going against my theory of betting against the public which has won me a lot of $$$. Not saying public never wins but I am saying long run this system wins