Streetwalker Reports

I spent a little time in Las Vegas last week and I was amazed at how many cops were patrolling Boulder Hwy from early evening until late night. Early in the morning there was nothing. No girls, no cops. Plenty of girls at night, but nobody worth getting excited over.

There were a couple of hotties, but one completely ignored me, and the ones that are just too over-the-top are a turn-off to me.

I wonder why the hot ones I try to pick up ignore me while the obese fugly ones in the vicinity come running right over.

Trish is not on BP. Not sure how she's handling former regulars as far as a price increase.

Ashley's and Diamond's phones are still dead. Thank you to whoever tipped me off to Diamond, but I was never able to hook up with her because all she ever did was text me back and would never actually answer her phone or settle on a date.

Better luck next time.

I looked at a few of his posts and did not see anything unusual. But Vegas LE has a reputation for being very aggressive. I was watching a episode of COP's and they were conducting a sting operation in LV. This one guy stopped and talked to one of the decoys, but did not solicit her. They arrested him for "loitering for prostitution". So this is why I tend to believe Buckwood's story. It is fairly important to find out if there are other reports to confirm this.

[QUOTE=Cameltopian;2425000]You are innocent until proven guilty and the less you say to uncle LEO the better.

With a little research here and online you will be better prepared in case you find yourself in such a scenario in real life and not just a dream.

Agreed it is "a bit odd" and the positive lesson in his post is a reminder to all of us it's always good to play it safe and know your rights. Not trying to be argumentative but if you research James Buckwood and his alias Smokey1981 posts on USASG you learn to take what's typed with a grain of salt.

It takes all types to make a village and with some research skills combined with the bones fellow honest mongers toss out will dramatically increase your odds at finding what you seek.

Also did a Trop and BH run yesterday and the pickins were slim unless you like them plus sized and hope with the springtime weather it continues to bring us more nice flowers.

Have fun and stay safe.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PopCorn77;2424131]Met her on Trop by wild wild West. She dresses classier than most. Talks more intelligently than most. Wants everything covered so I tried a $50 HJ. Not as good as expected. Tried to rush me. Will not repeat.[/QUOTE]Picked her up this morning, went to her room ended up leaving. To many rules, she did look good spinner type.

[QUOTE=Hargow20;2425422]I looked at a few of his posts and did not see anything unusual. But Vegas LE has a reputation for being very aggressive. I was watching a episode of COP's and they were conducting a sting operation in LV. This one guy stopped and talked to one of the decoys, but did not solicit her. They arrested him for "loitering for prostitution". So this is why I tend to believe Buckwood's story. It is fairly important to find out if there are other reports to confirm this.[/QUOTE]"Loitering for prostitution" requires more than a single incident. The pertinent law states "repeatedly" engaging in defined conduct. That being said, it can be your word against LEO but don't be afraid to hire a good lawyer and contest charge.

It is unlawful for anyone, other than a Peace Officer acting within the scope of his or her employment, to:

(A) Remain or wander about in a public place and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020; or.

(B) Remain or wander about in or upon private property after having been warned against trespassing on such property and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020.

It appears that the cops had a weak case against Buckwood. It is quite possible that vice arresting people simply to harass them. Awhile back I was pulled over by this one cop and he openly stated that could arrest and see if the charge would stick in court or not. Although it's unethical it probably does rise to the level of police misconduct. A night in jail would certainly deter a lot of people.

[QUOTE=JimRob;2426035]"Loitering for prostitution" requires more than a single incident. The pertinent law states "repeatedly" engaging in defined conduct. That being said, it can be your word against LEO but don't be afraid to hire a good lawyer and contest charge.

It is unlawful for anyone, other than a Peace Officer acting within the scope of his or her employment, to:

(A) Remain or wander about in a public place and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020; or.

(B) Remain or wander about in or upon private property after having been warned against trespassing on such property and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SuckerBill;2425182]I spent a little time in Las Vegas last week and I was amazed at how many cops were patrolling Boulder Hwy from early evening until late night. Early in the morning there was nothing. No girls, no cops. Plenty of girls at night, but nobody worth getting excited over.

There were a couple of hotties, but one completely ignored me, and the ones that are just too over-the-top are a turn-off to me.

I wonder why the hot ones I try to pick up ignore me while the obese fugly ones in the vicinity come running right over.

Trish is not on BP. Not sure how she's handling former regulars as far as a price increase.

Ashley's and Diamond's phones are still dead. Thank you to whoever tipped me off to Diamond, but I was never able to hook up with her because all she ever did was text me back and would never actually answer her phone or settle on a date.

Better luck next time.[/QUOTE]Are you talking about Trish on Freemont at her motel room?

I'd love to get in touch with her, her old number's dead.

I ran into Sabrina a few days ago on DM south of Trop. We finally managed to work out an appointment last night at her incall (motel room).

Location isn't the greatest but not the worst by far. Her room is generally clean and neat.

We had already established neither of us to be LEO so we got right down to brass tacks and got naked.

Sabrina has a nice body, not too thin but curves where they belong. She has a child and therefore the signs of such (not a bad thing in my book).

We started off cuddled on her bed, she was cold, so I warmed her up a bit, light make out session till junior began to respond. She started with a very thorough BBBJ that quickly turned to 69. After a bit on went the cover. We tried to start mish, but she's so damn tight I suggested she get on top and work things from that angle. Worked beautifully. She road me for a good bit while stroking her clit. As her legs were about to give out I flipped her onto her back and continued in a modified mish. She began to shudder and I swear I felt the tell tale spasms of a vaginal orgasm that sent me over the edge.

I rolled off of her and we laid there catching our breath then chatting casually for a bit before we got dressed.

Total damage $ and a half. Will DEFINITELY repeat.

Digits available to seniors, treat her well guys.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]373136[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]373137[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]373138[/ATTACH].

[QUOTE=JimRob;2426035]"Loitering for prostitution" requires more than a single incident. The pertinent law states "repeatedly" engaging in defined conduct. That being said, it can be your word against LEO but don't be afraid to hire a good lawyer and contest charge.

It is unlawful for anyone, other than a Peace Officer acting within the scope of his or her employment, to:

(A) Remain or wander about in a public place and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020; or.

(B) Remain or wander about in or upon private property after having been warned against trespassing on such property and repeatedly beckon to, or repeatedly stop, or repeatedly attempt to stop, or repeatedly attempt to engage passers-by in conversation, or repeatedly stop or attempt to stop motor vehicles, or repeatedly interfere with the free passage of other persons, for the purpose of committing a violation of Section 10.36. 020.[/QUOTE]In this country when the Citizens know more about the law then Uncle LEO does do you realize other then the obvious laws that get broken that Uncle LEO has to go to his / her little law black book to look up law. It tickles my fancy knowing that most citizens / criminals kmow more about the law then Uncle LEO does!!

I am disgusted that LE is using this law to bust guys. In California the law is even worse: " The list of circumstances set forth in subdivision (b) is not.

Exclusive. The circumstances set forth in subdivision (b) should be.

Considered particularly salient if they occur in an area that is.

Known for prostitution activity. Any other relevant circumstances may.

Be considered in determining whether a person has the requisite.

Intent. Moreover, no one circumstance or combination of circumstances.

Is in itself determinative of intent. Intent must be determined.

Based on an evaluation of the particular circumstances of each case. ".

Essentially the California's law is catch all law that allows LE to essentially make a determination on their own if you are loitering. This type of law makes more important than ever to pay attention to the 22 rules and be observant what is happening. These days I am more careful than ever when I pick a SW.

[QUOTE=Joesun1;2427314]In this country when the Citizens know more about the law then Uncle LEO does do you realize other then the obvious laws that get broken that Uncle LEO has to go to his / her little law black book to look up law. It tickles my fancy knowing that most citizens / criminals kmow more about the law then Uncle LEO does!![/QUOTE]

Total damage $ and a half. Will DEFINITELY repeat.

Digits available to seniors, treat her well guys.

Or you could just search craigslist for Sabrina. I have reviewed her here before.

[URL]http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/cas/4963182565.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Hargow20;2427709]I am disgusted that LE is using this law to bust guys. In California the law is even worse: " The list of circumstances set forth in subdivision (b) is not.

Exclusive. The circumstances set forth in subdivision (b) should be.

Considered particularly salient if they occur in an area that is.

Known for prostitution activity. Any other relevant circumstances may.

Be considered in determining whether a person has the requisite.

Intent. Moreover, no one circumstance or combination of circumstances.

Is in itself determinative of intent. Intent must be determined.

Based on an evaluation of the particular circumstances of each case. ".

Essentially the California's law is catch all law that allows LE to essentially make a determination on their own if you are loitering. This type of law makes more important than ever to pay attention to the 22 rules and be observant what is happening. These days I am more careful than ever when I pick a SW.[/QUOTE]I generally will walk up to them and ask for their number I am at a 50 percent clip of getting their number that way I didn't solicit them plus I can research their number etc etc and If they don't give me their number then oh well no skin off of my back onto the next girl if anything this approach protects me more then not I mean if you have common sense then most of us can figure out a sting with out even going to a girls room it's how they act question etc etc to figure them out!!

I don't partake of "roadkill" but I have taken note of a few ladies who stroll the Cameron / Trop. Parking lots around noon! Appear to be young, in shape, black, white! Worth checking out for those who "partake".

[QUOTE=Night234;2427751]Total damage $ and a half. Will DEFINITELY repeat.

Digits available to seniors, treat her well guys.

Or you could just search craigslist for Sabrina. I have reviewed her here before.

[URL]http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/cas/4963182565.html[/URL][/QUOTE]So I seen her post on CL and BP but your saying she is a streetwalker. Where did you meet her at? I already know of her but haven't partaked, seemed sketchy to me. But, if your giving ther the wood of approval I'll reconsider.

[QUOTE=Night234;2427751]Total damage $ and a half. Will DEFINITELY repeat.

Digits available to seniors, treat her well guys.

Or you could just search craigslist for Sabrina. I have reviewed her here before.

[URL]http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/cas/4963182565.html[/URL][/QUOTE]She is thin. I had her the another day, Everything is cover.

[QUOTE=IAm1000;2426596]Are you talking about Trish on Freemont at her motel room?

I'd love to get in touch with her, her old number's dead.[/QUOTE]Yes, that's her.

And, that should read "Trish is NOW on BP".